United States - MLS Next ProData current as of 06 September 2026

Whitecaps II vs Austin II: match statistics

Whitecaps II crest
Whitecaps II
0 : 4half-time 0:3
Austin II crest
Austin II

Whitecaps II vs Austin II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Whitecaps II played Austin II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 23 July 2026. Final score: 0:4.

Current form

Whitecaps II: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Austin II: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Whitecaps II scores 1.37 and concedes 2.05 goals per match. Austin II scores 2.12 and concedes 0.94. League average: 3.23 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Whitecaps II 74%, Austin II 53%. Over 2.5: Whitecaps II 68%, Austin II 53%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.

xG, shots and style

Austin II has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.64. Whitecaps II: 12.5 shots per match, Austin II: 13.7.

Match halves

Whitecaps II: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.84. Austin II: half-time lead 59%, second-half goals 1.06.

Goals by minute

Whitecaps II: 61-75 (6 goals). Austin II: 61-75 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.23 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

The away side are the favorites — Austin II: sit 1st and win 86% of away matches, averaging 2.0 goals scored and only 0.29 conceded per game, with 71% clean sheets. Whitecaps II are 25th in the table, with 5 wins and 12 losses this season and 26 goals scored; at home they average 1.6 goals scored and 1.6 conceded per match. In the last five fixtures Austin have scored 12 goals (4 wins, 1 loss) and collect 2.4 points per game on average, while Whitecaps have scored 7 goals (2-1-2) and average 1.4 points per game, which confirms the visitors’ superiority in form and efficiency. Although the home xG is 1.82 versus the visitors’ 1.75 xG on the road, Austin register 7 shots on target on average vs 5 and have a higher conversion rate 14% vs 12%, while Austin’s defense overperforms — conceding 0.29 goals against an expected goals against of 1.54. Based on this I tip an away win; estimated probabilities: 65% Austin II, 20% draw, 15% Whitecaps II win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Whitecaps II score an average of 2.2 goals per match (xG 1.58) and concede 1.4, while Austin II score 2.0 (xG 1.75) and seasonally concede only 0.29 — both sides therefore possess genuine attacking potential, although Austin theoretically defends very tightly. Season-long BTTS metrics are mixed: Whitecaps have BTTS 70% and Austin 29%, while the league overall sits at BTTS 61%, indicating matches in this league often finish Goal/Goal. Recent form, however, partly reverses the season narrative — in the last 5 matches Austin have BTTS 80%, scored 12 goals (2.4 per match) and conceded 7, and Whitecaps in their last 5 have BTTS 60% and scored 7 while conceding 9; this suggests that in the short term both teams are more frequently exchanging goals. Although Austin’s season clean sheet rate is 71% (a strong signal against BTTS), the dominant combination of Whitecaps’ high 70% BTTS, Austin’s 80% form in the last 5, and the league 61% leads me to predict BTTS - Yes with a probability of 62% versus 38% for No Goal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG-based model yields a combined expected goals total of about 3.03: Whitecaps II ~1.56 xG (attacking xG 1.58 vs conceded xG 1.54) and Austin II ~1.47 xG (attacking xG 1.75 vs conceded xG 1.18). Seasonal averages confirm an offensive profile — Whitecaps score 2.2 and concede 1.4 on average, Austin score 2.0 and concede only 0.29 according to data, with the visitors keeping a clean sheet in 71% of matches. Both teams show very high Over 1.5 rates: Whitecaps 90% and Austin 86%, and the league averages 3.22 goals per game, so I rate Over 1.5 at 89%. Over 2.5 is less clear — Whitecaps have 70% of matches >2.5, Austin only 29%, but the combined xG 3.03 and a league-level 65% Over 2.5 provide a moderately strong signal (64% for Over 2.5). I rate Over 3.5 at 32% because the summed xG 3.03 is below 3.5 and only Whitecaps have 50% of the season >3.5 while Austin have 14%; shot tempo (13.1 vs 14.43) and on-target shots share (5.0 vs 7.0) also support a rather moderate goal count.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I favor the '2/2' scenario (away team leading at half-time and winning at full-time) due to Austin II's advantage: 86% win rate this season and an average of 2.71 points per match versus Whitecaps II's 60% win rate and 2.0 points per match, as well as higher xG of 1.75 versus 1.58 and more on-target shots on average 7 compared to 5. In first-half statistics the away side's edge is pronounced — in the last 5 matches Austin II led at the break in 5 of 5 games, scoring 11 first-half goals (1.8 on average), while Whitecaps II scored 4 first-half goals in that period (0.2 on average). Austin II concedes only 0.29 goals per match on average and has 71% clean sheets this season, whereas the hosts concede 1.4 goals on average and 70% of their matches see goals at both ends, which increases the likelihood of an away victory given the low number of goals conceded by Austin II. Therefore I assign the highest probability to '2/2', but I also consider 'X/2' a realistic alternative (draw at half-time, away win) given that halves end with over 0.5 goals in approximately 70–71% of cases and half-time draws occur in about 30% for hosts and 29% for away teams.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 3
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
Whitecaps IIAustin II
14Shots12
Whitecaps IIAustin II
2Shots on target7
Whitecaps IIAustin II
1.56xG1.93
Whitecaps IIAustin II
3Corners2
Whitecaps IIAustin II
73Dangerous attacks92
Whitecaps IIAustin II
14Fouls7
Whitecaps IIAustin II
2Cards0
Whitecaps IIAustin II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Whitecaps IIAustin II
1.37Goals scored / match2.12
Whitecaps IIAustin II
2.05Goals conceded / match0.94
Whitecaps IIAustin II
48%Average possession49%
Whitecaps IIAustin II
4.53Shots on target / match5.82
Whitecaps IIAustin II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.53Shots per match13.65
Whitecaps IIAustin II
4.53Shots on target5.82
Whitecaps IIAustin II
10.9%Shot conversion15.5%
Whitecaps IIAustin II
48%Possession49%
Whitecaps IIAustin II
1.64xG for1.65
Whitecaps IIAustin II
1.75xG against1.33
Whitecaps IIAustin II

Shooting quality

Whitecaps II: BalancedAustin II: Efficient finishing
Whitecaps IIAustin II
Accuracy (shots on target)36%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Austin II is 71% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Whitecaps II · 2.4 pts / match - Austin II

Whitecaps II
DWLWL
Season result split
26% W11% R63% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-12
0.89 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-1-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LLDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Austin II
WWWWL
Season result split
71% W18% R12% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-3-2
2.29 pts / match · goal difference +20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-1-0
Last 5 away
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Austin II is 55% better for: goals scored per match.

1.37 goals / match - Whitecaps II · 2.12 goals / match - Austin II

Austin II is 118% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.05 goals / match - Whitecaps II · 0.94 goals / match - Austin II

Whitecaps II scoring profile: strong

Whitecaps II scores in 79% of matches (15 of 19 matches), while Austin II keeps a clean sheet in 47% (8 of 17 matches).

Austin II scoring profile: very strong

Austin II scores in 100% of matches (17 of 17 matches), while Whitecaps II keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 19 matches).

26Goals scored (season)36
Whitecaps IIAustin II
39Goals conceded (season)16
Whitecaps IIAustin II
3.42Average goals in match3.06
Whitecaps IIAustin II
8Goals scored (last 5)12
Whitecaps IIAustin II
8Goals conceded (last 5)7
Whitecaps IIAustin II

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal100%
Whitecaps IIAustin II
47%2 goals76%
Whitecaps IIAustin II
11%3 goals29%
Whitecaps IIAustin II
0%4 goals6%
Whitecaps IIAustin II

How often they concede at least...

89%1 goal53%
Whitecaps IIAustin II
63%2 goals24%
Whitecaps IIAustin II
32%3 goals12%
Whitecaps IIAustin II
11%4 goals6%
Whitecaps IIAustin II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

26%BTTS at half-time12%
Whitecaps IIAustin II
11%BTTS in both halves0%
Whitecaps IIAustin II
11%Scored in both halves24%
Whitecaps IIAustin II

BTTS and goal count

68%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
Whitecaps IIAustin II
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS12%
Whitecaps IIAustin II
80%BTTS - last 580%
Whitecaps IIAustin II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
Whitecaps IIAustin II
47%Min. 2 goals before half-time47%
Whitecaps IIAustin II
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time18%
Whitecaps IIAustin II

2nd half

84%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
Whitecaps IIAustin II
63%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
Whitecaps IIAustin II
37%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
Whitecaps IIAustin II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Austin II is 117% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.95 pts / match - Whitecaps II · 2.06 pts / match - Austin II

Whitecaps II - half-time state
16% leading47% draw37% trailing
Austin II - half-time state
59% leading29% draw12% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.95Points per match (1st half)2.06
Whitecaps IIAustin II
0.53Goals scored (1st half)1.06
Whitecaps IIAustin II
0.84Goals conceded (1st half)0.35
Whitecaps IIAustin II
1.37Average goals (1st half)1.41
Whitecaps IIAustin II
47%Clean sheet before half-time76%
Whitecaps IIAustin II
63%No goal before half-time41%
Whitecaps IIAustin II

After half-time (2nd half)

0.95Points per match (2nd half)1.88
Whitecaps IIAustin II
0.84Goals scored (2nd half)1.06
Whitecaps IIAustin II
1.21Goals conceded (2nd half)0.59
Whitecaps IIAustin II
2.05Average goals (2nd half)1.65
Whitecaps IIAustin II
16%Clean sheet after half-time59%
Whitecaps IIAustin II
47%No goal after half-time35%
Whitecaps IIAustin II

Whitecaps II - second-half results

21% W32% R47% P
18
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.95
PPG before half-time
Lead holding163%

Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Austin II - second-half results

53% W29% R18% P
35
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+12
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.06
PPG before half-time
Lead holding120%

Leads at half-time in 59% of matches and wins 71%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Whitecaps II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.40
Goals scored / match0.41.2
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.02.2
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Austin II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.001.00
Goals scored / match1.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match2.21.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal0%60%
Goal difference+7-2
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 9

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Whitecaps II
ScoredConceded
5
5
0-15
4
5
16-30
1
6
31-45
5
11
46-60
6
5
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Austin II
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
4
2
16-30
8
2
31-45
4
1
46-60
10
5
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.24
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 2.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+23%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
79%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Whitecaps II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.57
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
146%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.51
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Austin II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.86
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.47
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.39
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
151%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
52%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Whitecaps IILigaAustin II
Average goals in match 3.423.23 3.06
Both teams scored 74%61% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 68%65% 53%
Clean sheets 11%22% 47%
Goal before half-time 63%75% 71%
Goal after half-time 84%84% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.23
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / match
1.40
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
59%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Austin IIGoalMicah BurtonAssist: Riley Thomas
  2. Austin IIGoalDiego Abarca
  3. Whitecaps IIYellow cardYuma Tsuji
  4. Austin IIAssistMarcel Ruszel
  5. Austin IISubstitutionOn: Dren DobrunaOff: Riley Thomas
  6. Whitecaps IISubstitutionOn: Johnny SelemaniOff: Yuma Tsuji
  7. Austin IIAssistMohammad Badawiya
  8. Whitecaps IIYellow cardJohnny Selemani

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Whitecaps II 1 - 0 - 0 Austin II. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Vancouver Whitecaps FC II
4 : 0
Austin FC II

FAQ

What was the result of Whitecaps II vs Austin II?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Whitecaps II 0:4 Austin II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Whitecaps II vs Austin II?

Whitecaps II score 1.37 goals per game on average and Austin II 2.12. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 74% of Whitecaps II's matches and 53% of Austin II's.

What form are Whitecaps II and Austin II in?

Over the last 5 games Whitecaps II have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Austin II 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Whitecaps II vs Austin II?

The statistical background for Whitecaps II vs Austin II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.