United States - MLS Next ProData current as of 06 September 2026

Whitecaps II vs North Texas: match statistics

Whitecaps II crest
Whitecaps II
1 : 1half-time 0:0
North Texas crest
North Texas

Whitecaps II vs North Texas: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Whitecaps II played North Texas in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 11 June 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Whitecaps II: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. North Texas: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Whitecaps II scores 1.29 and concedes 2.21 goals per match. North Texas scores 1.69 and concedes 1.46. League average: 3.22 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Whitecaps II 71%, North Texas 54%. Over 2.5: Whitecaps II 71%, North Texas 54%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.

xG, shots and style

Whitecaps II has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.38. Whitecaps II: 12.7 shots per match, North Texas: 11.2.

Match halves

Whitecaps II: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.71. North Texas: half-time lead 46%, second-half goals 0.77.

Goals by minute

Whitecaps II: 0-15 (4 goals). North Texas: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.22 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 6.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Visitors North Texas are the favorites based on superior form: they have scored 9 goals in the last 5 matches and average 1.4 points per game, whereas Whitecaps II have managed only 3 goals and collected 0 points in their last five fixtures. This season Whitecaps II have 18 goals for and 31 against; at home they concede an average of 1.57 goals per match and have shipped 14 goals in the last 5 games, while North Texas have 22 scored and 19 conceded on the season and have conceded 7 goals in their last five. The hosts generate home xG of 1.85, average 13.29 shots per game with 4.71 on target, indicating chance-creation potential, but this only translates to 1.29 goals at home with a conversion rate of 10%. North Texas are more efficient away — 13% conversion and 1.25 goals per game — although their away average xG against is 2.03, highlighting defensive vulnerability; in practice the visitors have recently been more clinical with their opportunities. Considering Whitecaps’ 0 points in the last five versus North Texas’s 1.4 and the visitors’ superior season goal differential, I predict a North Texas win; estimated probabilities: 55% for the visitors, 25% draw, 20% hosts.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I pick the "Yes" scenario — hosts Whitecaps II have a season BTTS rate of 80% with 0% clean sheets, season averages 2.4 goals scored and 1.6 conceded. North Texas has a season BTTS 38% and season averages 1.25 goals scored and 1.38 conceded, but in the last 5 matches they scored 9 goals (1.8 avg) while Whitecaps II in the same period scored only 3 goals (0.6) and conceded 14 (2.8). xG shows the hosts generate 1.66 xG versus 1.20 xG for the visitors, while both teams also have high opponent xG (hosts 1.78, visitors 2.03), indicating chance creation and chance concession. Hosts average 6.0 shots on target versus 3.75 for the visitors and lead in total shots 13.8 vs 9.63, and BTTS occurs in 61% of league matches — this further supports both teams finding the net. Considering the hosts' season 80% BTTS, North Texas's 9 goals in the last 5 matches and Whitecaps II's lack of clean sheets, I assess the probability of BTTS at about 70% versus 30% for No Goal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG-based model (Whitecaps II attack xG 1.66 vs North Texas xG conceded 2.03) yields expected 1.85 goals for Whitecaps II and 1.49 for North Texas, totaling ~3.34 goals. With a mean of 3.34 from a Poisson distribution, the probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) is ~85%, ≥3 goals (Over 2.5) ~65%, and ≥4 goals (Over 3.5) ~43%. Seasonal stats support this view: Whitecaps at home have 100% of matches Over 1.5 and 80% Over 2.5, while North Texas have 75% Over 1.5 and 38% Over 2.5, with the league average Over 2.5 at 65%. Additionally, Whitecaps generate 13.8 shots and 6.0 on target at home with a 17% conversion rate, compared to North Texas’s 9.63 shots, 3.75 on target and 13% conversion, which increases goal likelihood. Considering the projected 3.34 goals and the strongest signal for Over 1.5 (~85%), I recommend backing Over 1.5, while accounting for Whitecaps’ recent poor form (last 5 matches: average 0.6 scored and 2.8 conceded), which raises outcome volatility.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Whitecaps II possess a markedly stronger attack: on average 2.4 goals per game versus North Texas’s 1.25, higher xG 1.66 vs 1.20 and more shots (13.8 and 6.0 on target vs 9.63 and 3.75). However, North Texas dominates at half-time — they led in 50% of matches, concede only 0.13 goals on average before the break and keep a clean sheet at half-time in 88% of games; their average points at half-time are 1.88 compared to the visitors’ 1.4. After the interval Whitecaps II score 1.4 goals on average and register 2.2 points in second halves, whereas North Texas score just 0.38 goals after the break, concede 1.25 on average and collect 0.38 points in second halves. These figures indicate the most likely scenario is North Texas leading at the break with a subsequent turnaround by Whitecaps II, hence the HT/FT recommendation 2/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
14Shots8
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
5Shots on target3
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
1.73xG1.06
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
5Corners5
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
68Dangerous attacks46
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
18Fouls15
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
3Cards2
Whitecaps IINorth Texas

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Whitecaps IINorth Texas
1.29Goals scored / match1.69
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
2.21Goals conceded / match1.46
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
49%Average possession47%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
4.57Shots on target / match4.62
Whitecaps IINorth Texas

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.71Shots per match11.23
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
4.57Shots on target4.62
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
10.1%Shot conversion15.1%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
49%Possession47%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
1.67xG for1.38
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
1.79xG against1.93
Whitecaps IINorth Texas

Shooting quality

Whitecaps II: BalancedNorth Texas: Counter-attacking
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
Accuracy (shots on target)36%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Whitecaps II
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
21% W7% R71% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-10
0.71 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-4
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
WWLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
North Texas
LWWDL
Season result split
31% W31% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-5
1.23 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-4
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WDLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.95BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

North Texas is 31% better for: goals scored per match.

1.29 goals / match - Whitecaps II · 1.69 goals / match - North Texas

North Texas is 51% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.21 goals / match - Whitecaps II · 1.46 goals / match - North Texas

Whitecaps II scoring profile: very strong

Whitecaps II scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while North Texas keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 13 matches).

North Texas scoring profile: very strong

North Texas scores in 62% of matches (8 of 13 matches), while Whitecaps II keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 matches).

18Goals scored (season)22
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
31Goals conceded (season)19
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
3.5Average goals in match3.15
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
3Goals scored (last 5)9
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
14Goals conceded (last 5)7
Whitecaps IINorth Texas

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal62%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
50%2 goals62%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
0%3 goals23%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
0%4 goals15%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal92%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
64%2 goals54%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
43%3 goals0%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
14%4 goals0%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time23%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
7%BTTS in both halves8%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
7%Scored in both halves46%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas

BTTS and goal count

71%Min. 3 goals and BTTS54%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
60%BTTS - last 540%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time46%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
29%Min. 3 goals before half-time23%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
64%Min. 2 goals after half-time62%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
36%Min. 3 goals after half-time31%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

North Texas is 69% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Whitecaps II · 1.69 pts / match - North Texas

Whitecaps II - half-time state
21% leading36% draw43% trailing
North Texas - half-time state
46% leading31% draw23% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.69
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
0.57Goals scored (1st half)0.92
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
0.93Goals conceded (1st half)0.54
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
1.5Average goals (1st half)1.46
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
50%Clean sheet before half-time54%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
64%No goal before half-time46%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas

After half-time (2nd half)

0.79Points per match (2nd half)1.08
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)0.77
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
1.29Goals conceded (2nd half)0.92
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
2Average goals (2nd half)1.69
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
21%Clean sheet after half-time38%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
50%No goal after half-time46%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas

Whitecaps II - second-half results

14% W36% R50% P
14
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

North Texas - second-half results

23% W38% R38% P
22
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.69
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 46% of matches and wins 31%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Whitecaps II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.20
Goals scored / match0.00.6
Goals conceded / match1.01.8
Average goals in match1.02.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-5-6
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
North Texas - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.60
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.61.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Whitecaps II
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
3
4
16-30
1
5
31-45
3
9
46-60
4
4
61-75
3
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

North Texas
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
3
2
16-30
7
4
31-45
1
5
46-60
3
4
61-75
6
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.33
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+80%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Whitecaps II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.80
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.38
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
153%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.71
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

North Texas

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.55
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.78
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.47
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
117%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Whitecaps IILigaNorth Texas
Average goals in match 3.503.22 3.15
Both teams scored 71%61% 54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 71%65% 54%
Clean sheets 14%22% 8%
Goal before half-time 64%75% 77%
Goal after half-time 79%83% 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.22
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.78
Home goals / match
1.44
Away goals / match
+24%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
60%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Whitecaps IIYellow cardImmanuel Mathe
  2. North TexasSubstitutionOn: Jose ContrerasOff: Ricardo Nick Louis
  3. North TexasGoalJose ContrerasAssist: Daniel Baran
  4. North TexasYellow cardJose Contreras
  5. Whitecaps IIYellow cardCristiano Bruletti
  6. North TexasSubstitutionOn: Christopher SalazarOff: Nathaniel James
  7. Whitecaps IISubstitutionOn: Marko PopovićOff: Tyler Brown
  8. North TexasYellow cardIan Howard Joshep Charles
  9. North TexasSubstitutionOn: Samuel SedehOff: Daniel Baran
  10. Whitecaps IIYellow cardMicaah Dominique Garnette

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Whitecaps II 1 - 0 - 1 North Texas. Average goals 6.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Vancouver Whitecaps FC II
4 : 3
North Texas SC
North Texas SC
3 : 2
Vancouver Whitecaps FC II

FAQ

What was the result of Whitecaps II vs North Texas?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Whitecaps II 1:1 North Texas. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Whitecaps II and North Texas?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Whitecaps II won 1, North Texas won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 6.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Whitecaps II vs North Texas?

Whitecaps II score 1.29 goals per game on average and North Texas 1.69. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.22 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 71% of Whitecaps II's matches and 54% of North Texas's.

What form are Whitecaps II and North Texas in?

Over the last 5 games Whitecaps II have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and North Texas 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Whitecaps II vs North Texas?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.