United States - MLS Next ProData current as of 23 July 2026

Whitecaps II vs North Texas: match statistics

Whitecaps II crest
Whitecaps II
1 : 1half-time 0:0
North Texas crest
North Texas

Whitecaps II vs North Texas: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Whitecaps II play North Texas in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match date is 11 June 2026 at 03:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Whitecaps II: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. North Texas: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Whitecaps II scores 1.37 and concedes 2.05 goals per match. North Texas scores 1.59 and concedes 1.24. League average: 3.22 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Whitecaps II 74%, North Texas 47%. Over 2.5: Whitecaps II 68%, North Texas 47%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.

xG, shots and style

Whitecaps II has higher xG: 1.64 vs 1.37. Whitecaps II: 12.5 shots per match, North Texas: 11.1.

Match halves

Whitecaps II: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.84. North Texas: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.88.

Goals by minute

Whitecaps II: 61-75 (6 goals). North Texas: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.22 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 1-0-1. Average goals 6.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Visitors North Texas are the favorites based on superior form: they have scored 9 goals in the last 5 matches and average 1.4 points per game, whereas Whitecaps II have managed only 3 goals and collected 0 points in their last five fixtures. This season Whitecaps II have 18 goals for and 31 against; at home they concede an average of 1.57 goals per match and have shipped 14 goals in the last 5 games, while North Texas have 22 scored and 19 conceded on the season and have conceded 7 goals in their last five. The hosts generate home xG of 1.85, average 13.29 shots per game with 4.71 on target, indicating chance-creation potential, but this only translates to 1.29 goals at home with a conversion rate of 10%. North Texas are more efficient away — 13% conversion and 1.25 goals per game — although their away average xG against is 2.03, highlighting defensive vulnerability; in practice the visitors have recently been more clinical with their opportunities. Considering Whitecaps’ 0 points in the last five versus North Texas’s 1.4 and the visitors’ superior season goal differential, I predict a North Texas win; estimated probabilities: 55% for the visitors, 25% draw, 20% hosts.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
14Shots8
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
5Shots on target3
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
1.73xG1.06
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
5Corners5
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
68Dangerous attacks46
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
18Fouls15
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
3Cards2
Whitecaps IINorth Texas

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Whitecaps IINorth Texas
1.37Goals scored / match1.59
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
2.05Goals conceded / match1.24
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
48%Average possession47%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
4.53Shots on target / match4.47
Whitecaps IINorth Texas

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.53Shots per match11.06
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
4.53Shots on target4.47
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
10.9%Shot conversion14.4%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
48%Possession47%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
1.64xG for1.37
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
1.75xG against1.87
Whitecaps IINorth Texas

Shooting quality

Whitecaps II: BalancedNorth Texas: Counter-attacking
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
Accuracy (shots on target)36%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Whitecaps II
DWLWL
Season result split
26% W11% R63% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-12
0.89 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-1-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LLDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
North Texas
LDWLW
Season result split
35% W29% R35% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-5-6
1.35 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-5
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.79BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

North Texas is 16% better for: goals scored per match.

1.37 goals / match - Whitecaps II · 1.59 goals / match - North Texas

North Texas is 65% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.05 goals / match - Whitecaps II · 1.24 goals / match - North Texas

Whitecaps II scoring profile: very strong

Whitecaps II scores in 79% of matches (15 of 19 matches), while North Texas keeps a clean sheet in 18% (3 of 17 matches).

North Texas scoring profile: very strong

North Texas scores in 65% of matches (11 of 17 matches), while Whitecaps II keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 19 matches).

26Goals scored (season)27
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
39Goals conceded (season)21
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
3.42Average goals in match2.82
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
8Goals scored (last 5)5
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
8Goals conceded (last 5)4
Whitecaps IINorth Texas

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal65%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
47%2 goals53%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
11%3 goals24%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
0%4 goals12%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas

How often they concede at least...

89%1 goal82%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
63%2 goals41%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
32%3 goals0%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
11%4 goals0%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

26%BTTS at half-time18%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
11%BTTS in both halves6%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
11%Scored in both halves35%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas

BTTS and goal count

68%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
80%BTTS - last 520%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
47%Min. 2 goals before half-time35%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time18%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas

2nd half

84%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
63%Min. 2 goals after half-time59%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
37%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

North Texas is 61% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.95 pts / match - Whitecaps II · 1.53 pts / match - North Texas

Whitecaps II - half-time state
16% leading47% draw37% trailing
North Texas - half-time state
35% leading47% draw18% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.95Points per match (1st half)1.53
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.71
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
0.84Goals conceded (1st half)0.41
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
1.37Average goals (1st half)1.12
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
47%Clean sheet before half-time65%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
63%No goal before half-time59%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas

After half-time (2nd half)

0.95Points per match (2nd half)1.24
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
0.84Goals scored (2nd half)0.88
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
1.21Goals conceded (2nd half)0.82
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
2.05Average goals (2nd half)1.71
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
16%Clean sheet after half-time41%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas
47%No goal after half-time41%
Whitecaps IINorth Texas

Whitecaps II - second-half results

21% W32% R47% P
18
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.95
PPG before half-time
Lead holding163%

Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

North Texas - second-half results

29% W35% R35% P
26
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.53
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Whitecaps II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.40
Goals scored / match0.41.2
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.02.2
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
North Texas - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.8
Average goals in match0.01.8
1 goal0%100%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Whitecaps II
ScoredConceded
5
5
0-15
4
5
16-30
1
6
31-45
5
11
46-60
6
5
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

North Texas
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
3
2
16-30
7
4
31-45
3
5
46-60
5
4
61-75
7
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.13
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+92%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
51%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Whitecaps II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.57
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
145%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.51
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

North Texas

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.50
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.85
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.63
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
113%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
69%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Whitecaps IILigaNorth Texas
Average goals in match 3.423.22 2.82
Both teams scored 74%61% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 68%65% 47%
Clean sheets 11%22% 18%
Goal before half-time 63%75% 59%
Goal after half-time 84%84% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.22
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.81
Home goals / match
1.41
Away goals / match
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
59%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Whitecaps II 1 - 0 - 1 North Texas. Average goals 6.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Vancouver Whitecaps FC II
4 : 3
North Texas SC
North Texas SC
3 : 2
Vancouver Whitecaps FC II

FAQ

What was the result of Whitecaps II vs North Texas?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Whitecaps II 1:1 North Texas. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Whitecaps II and North Texas?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Whitecaps II won 1, North Texas won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 6.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Whitecaps II vs North Texas?

Whitecaps II score 1.37 goals per game on average and North Texas 1.59. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.22 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 74% of Whitecaps II's matches and 47% of North Texas's.

What form are Whitecaps II and North Texas in?

Over the last 5 games Whitecaps II have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and North Texas 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Whitecaps II vs North Texas?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.