United States - MLS Next ProData current as of 08 September 2026

Whitecaps II vs Portland Timbers II: match statistics

Whitecaps II vs Portland Timbers II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Whitecaps II played Portland Timbers II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 6 June 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Whitecaps II: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. Portland Timbers II: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Whitecaps II scores 1.38 and concedes 2.31 goals per match. Portland Timbers II scores 1.25 and concedes 1.25. League average: 3.22 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Whitecaps II 77%, Portland Timbers II 33%. Over 2.5: Whitecaps II 77%, Portland Timbers II 58%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 65%.

xG, shots and style

Portland Timbers II has higher xG: 1.86 vs 1.71. Whitecaps II: 13.1 shots per match, Portland Timbers II: 15.9.

Match halves

Whitecaps II: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.77. Portland Timbers II: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.92.

Goals by minute

Whitecaps II: 0-15 (4 goals). Portland Timbers II: 46-60 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.22 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 65%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 1-2-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict an away win (2). Whitecaps II sit 26th with a season record of 3-1-9, 18 goals for and 30 against; in their last 5 matches they scored only 4 goals and failed to win any, conceding 15 goals (3.0 per game). Portland Timbers II are 6th with a 6-4-2 record, 15 scored and 15 conceded on the season, and in their last 5 matches they have 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, scoring 7 goals (1.4 per game). Stats show the hosts create more chances at home (avg xG 1.95 and 14.17 shots per match vs guests' 1.38 xG and 11.25 shots), but defend worse — conceding 1.67 goals per home match and only 17% clean sheets, while the visitors concede 1.25 on the road and boast 75% clean sheets. Given Whitecaps' 0 points and 15 goals conceded in the last five fixtures and Portland's defensive stability, I give the away side the higher probability.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal against BTTS is Portland Timbers II: season BTTS 0% and clean sheets in 75% of matches, strongly indicating games without goals from both sides. Whitecaps II have season BTTS 50% and in the last 5 matches BTTS 80%, but in the same period they lost 5 times and conceded 15 goals in the last 5 matches (avg 3.0) while scoring only 4 (0.8), so their ability to score regularly is limited. xG and shots stats show a contrast: Whitecaps have xG_for 2.10, 18.25 shots and 6.88 on target, but a low conversion rate of 7.0%, whereas Portland have xG_for 1.38, 11.25 shots and a higher conversion rate of 11.0%; defensively Portland conceded 15 goals this season versus 30 conceded by Whitecaps. The league has a high BTTS level at 62%, which favors the “BTTS - Yes” scenario, but Portland’s historical defensive consistency (75% CS, season BTTS 0%) and Whitecaps’ poor form outweigh that, so I assign a higher probability to the “No Goal” option.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I estimate total xG at approximately 3.17 goals: the home side about 1.78 xG (attacking xG 2.10 vs away defensive xG 1.46 → (2.10+1.46)/2=1.78), and the visitors about 1.39 xG (1.38 and 1.40 → 1.39). Projected total 3.17 is close to the league average of 3.23 goals, and the hosts average 18.25 shots and 6.88 on target versus the visitors' 11.25 and 4.25, which increases scoring probability. Whitecaps II have conceded 15 goals in their last 5 matches and lost all five, while Portland scored 7 and conceded 7 in their last 5, suggesting vulnerability in the home defense. Season stats support Over 2.5: Over 2.5 occurred in 63% of the hosts’ matches and 50% of the visitors’, with 80% and 60% in the last 5 matches respectively; the league average for Over 2.5 is 66%. Although Portland has 75% clean sheets and 0% BTTS (which limits the likelihood of both teams scoring), the hosts’ dominance in shot volume and higher xG favor taking Over 2.5 as the best line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Statistics strongly favor Portland: the visitors have won 75% of matches this season and held a lead at the break in 50% of games, while Whitecaps II led at the break in only 13% of matches, and in their last 5 home games the hosts did not lead at the break even once (0%). The average points scored by half-time are 1.75 for the visitors versus 0.75 for the hosts, and the average half-time goals are 1.25 for the visitors vs 0.88 for the hosts, which supports a scenario of Portland leading after 45 minutes. Whitecaps have higher xG (2.10 vs 1.38) and more shots (18.25 vs 11.25) and shots on target (6.88 vs 4.25), but their conversion rate is lower (7% vs 11%), so their superiority in chance creation does not translate into final results. The hosts score more frequently after the break (3 goals in minutes 46–60 and 4 goals in minutes 61–75), therefore I assign moderate weight to the X/2 variant; however the strongest signal from the data is visitors leading at half-time and visitors winning at full-time (2/2).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
8Shots15
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
5Shots on target5
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
1.25xG1.6
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
7Corners3
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
54Dangerous attacks43
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
17Fouls13
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
0Cards1
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
1.38Goals scored / match1.25
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
2.31Goals conceded / match1.25
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
48%Average possession46%
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
4.54Shots on target / match6
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.08Shots per match15.92
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
4.54Shots on target6
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
10.6%Shot conversion7.9%
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
48%Possession46%
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
1.71xG for1.86
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
1.81xG against1.42
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II

Shooting quality

Whitecaps II: BalancedPortland Timbers II: Attacking
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
Accuracy (shots on target)35%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.21

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Whitecaps II
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
23% W8% R69% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-9
0.77 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-3
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.60Opponent xG: 1.53BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Portland Timbers II
DWWLW
Season result split
50% W33% R17% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-4-2
1.83 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-0-1
Last 5 away
3-0-1
LWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 2.09Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Whitecaps II is 10% better for: goals scored per match.

1.38 goals / match - Whitecaps II · 1.25 goals / match - Portland Timbers II

Portland Timbers II is 85% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.31 goals / match - Whitecaps II · 1.25 goals / match - Portland Timbers II

Whitecaps II scoring profile: strong

Whitecaps II scores in 85% of matches (11 of 13 matches), while Portland Timbers II keeps a clean sheet in 50% (6 of 12 matches).

Portland Timbers II scoring profile: very strong

Portland Timbers II scores in 67% of matches (8 of 12 matches), while Whitecaps II keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).

18Goals scored (season)15
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
30Goals conceded (season)15
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
3.69Average goals in match2.5
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
4Goals scored (last 5)7
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
15Goals conceded (last 5)7
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal67%
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
54%2 goals42%
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
0%3 goals17%
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
0%4 goals0%
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II

How often they concede at least...

85%1 goal50%
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
69%2 goals33%
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
46%3 goals25%
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
15%4 goals8%
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

33%
Portland Timbers II - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.4 of 12 matches
62%
League average

Goal patterns

23%BTTS at half-time8%
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
8%BTTS in both halves8%
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
8%Scored in both halves17%
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II

BTTS and goal count

77%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS25%
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
80%BTTS - last 540%
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
54%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
31%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II

2nd half

77%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
69%Min. 2 goals after half-time58%
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
38%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Portland Timbers II is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Whitecaps II · 1.08 pts / match - Portland Timbers II

Whitecaps II - half-time state
23% leading31% draw46% trailing
Portland Timbers II - half-time state
25% leading33% draw42% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.08
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
0.62Goals scored (1st half)0.33
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
1.62Average goals (1st half)1
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
46%Clean sheet before half-time58%
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
62%No goal before half-time67%
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II

After half-time (2nd half)

0.85Points per match (2nd half)1.83
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
0.77Goals scored (2nd half)0.92
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
1.31Goals conceded (2nd half)0.58
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
2.08Average goals (2nd half)1.5
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
23%Clean sheet after half-time58%
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II
46%No goal after half-time50%
Whitecaps IIPortland Timbers II

Whitecaps II - second-half results

15% W38% R46% P
13
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Portland Timbers II - second-half results

50% W33% R17% P
13
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.08
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Whitecaps II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.200.40
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match1.41.6
Average goals in match1.62.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-6-5
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Portland Timbers II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.00
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Whitecaps II
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
3
4
16-30
1
5
31-45
3
9
46-60
4
3
61-75
3
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Portland Timbers II
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
1
5
16-30
0
2
31-45
4
2
46-60
4
1
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.09
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-35%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
57%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Whitecaps II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.83
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
157%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.77
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Portland Timbers II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.44
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.61
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
71%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Whitecaps IILigaPortland Timbers II
Average goals in match 3.693.22 2.50
Both teams scored 77%62% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 77%65% 58%
Clean sheets 15%21% 50%
Goal before half-time 69%77% 67%
Goal after half-time 77%83% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.22
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.75
Home goals / match
1.47
Away goals / match
+19%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
60%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Portland Timbers IIYellow cardDaniel Nunez
  2. Portland Timbers IISubstitutionOn: Connor FergusonOff: Bryce Vanvoorhis
  3. Whitecaps IISubstitutionOn: Marko PopovićOff: Yeider Zuluaga
  4. Portland Timbers IIGoalDaniel CervantesAssist: Connor Ferguson
  5. Whitecaps IISubstitutionOn: Tyler BrownOff: Kevin Podgorni

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Whitecaps II 1 - 2 - 1 Portland Timbers II. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Portland Timbers II
0 : 0
Whitecaps II
Vancouver Whitecaps FC II
4 : 1
Portland Timbers II
Portland Timbers II
1 : 0
Vancouver Whitecaps FC II
Vancouver Whitecaps FC II
1 : 1
Portland Timbers II

FAQ

What was the result of Whitecaps II vs Portland Timbers II?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Whitecaps II 0:1 Portland Timbers II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Whitecaps II and Portland Timbers II?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Whitecaps II won 1, Portland Timbers II won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Whitecaps II vs Portland Timbers II?

Whitecaps II score 1.38 goals per game on average and Portland Timbers II 1.25. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.22 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 77% of Whitecaps II's matches and 33% of Portland Timbers II's.

What form are Whitecaps II and Portland Timbers II in?

Over the last 5 games Whitecaps II have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Portland Timbers II 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Whitecaps II vs Portland Timbers II?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Whitecaps II vs Portland Timbers II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.