United States - MLS Next ProData current as of 15 October 2026

Whitecaps II vs Sporting KC II: match statistics

Whitecaps II crest
Whitecaps II
5 : 1half-time 2:0
Sporting KC II crest
Sporting KC II

Whitecaps II vs Sporting KC II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Whitecaps II played Sporting KC II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 30 August 2026. Final score: 5:1.

Current form

Whitecaps II: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Sporting KC II: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Whitecaps II scores 1.42 and concedes 2.21 goals per match. Sporting KC II scores 1.25 and concedes 2.54. League average: 3.31 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Whitecaps II 75%, Sporting KC II 63%. Over 2.5: Whitecaps II 71%, Sporting KC II 79%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.

xG, shots and style

Whitecaps II has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.53. Whitecaps II: 12.5 shots per match, Sporting KC II: 13.4.

Match halves

Whitecaps II: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.83. Sporting KC II: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.71.

Goals by minute

Whitecaps II: 61-75 (7 goals). Sporting KC II: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.31 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-2. Average goals 4.67, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Both teams are near the bottom of the table, but Whitecaps II have a clearly stronger home profile: they win 45% of their home matches, while Sporting KC II win just 17% of their away fixtures and lose as many as 67%. The hosts create chances worth an average of 1.80 xG, higher than the visitors’ 1.51 xG away from home, while their average of 1.45 goals per home game is marginally better than Sporting KC II’s 1.42. The visitors’ defensive record could be decisive, as they concede an average of 2.83 goals away from home and have kept no clean sheets, compared with 1.82 goals conceded by Whitecaps II at home. However, Whitecaps II’s form is extremely poor, having collected just 1 point and conceded 15 goals in their last five matches, so the home advantage is far from decisive. An open game with goals at both ends is expected, but home advantage and Sporting KC II’s particularly fragile defence point towards a Whitecaps II victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS - Yes pick is primarily supported by the very poor defensive records of both teams: Whitecaps II concede an average of 2.25 goals per match, while Sporting KC II concede as many as 2.83. Over their last five matches, these figures increased to 3.0 and 2.2 goals conceded, respectively, while both teams allowed their opponents a high xG: 2.19 and 1.93. Sporting KC II have kept a clean sheet in 0% of their matches this season, compared with just 8% for Whitecaps II, clearly increasing the chances of at least one goal for each side. BTTS has landed in 75% of the visitors' matches and in 80% of the hosts' last five matches, compared with a league average of 62%. Although Whitecaps II are currently scoring just 1.0 goal per match, their xG over the last five games stands at 1.42, while Sporting KC II allow opponents an average of 1.81 xG per season, meaning the hosts should have opportunities to find the net.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The profile of both teams clearly favors goals: Whitecaps II concede an average of 2.25 goals per match, while Sporting KC II concede as many as 2.83. In their last five matches, the hosts conceded 15 goals and the visitors 11, which equates to 3.0 and 2.2 goals conceded per match, respectively. The 1.5 line was covered in 83% of Whitecaps II matches and 92% of Sporting KC II matches, compared with a league-wide average of 3.29 goals. The xG data also points to numerous chances, with both teams averaging 1.56 and 1.51 xG while allowing opponents 1.78 and 1.81 xG, respectively. Over 1.5 is the safest choice, as weak defenses and the very high historical frequency of at least two goals give it a clear advantage.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Sporting KC II have a slight edge in current form, averaging 0.8 points over their last five matches compared with just 0.2 for Whitecaps II, who have lost 4 of their 5 games. The hosts have looked particularly vulnerable before half-time, conceding an average of 1.8 goals in their last five outings and going into the break behind in 60% of those matches. The visitors also have defensive issues, but Whitecaps II average only 1.08 goals per game across the season and just 0.67 in second halves, limiting their potential for a turnaround. Sporting KC II score an average of 1.42 goals per match, while the hosts allow opponents 2.25 goals, making a scenario in which the visitors lead at the break and maintain their advantage until full-time the most likely outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
3 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
23Shots2
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
12Shots on target1
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
2.91xG0.63
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
6Corners0
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
86Dangerous attacks57
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
20Fouls8
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
1Cards2
Whitecaps IISporting KC II

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Whitecaps IISporting KC II
1.42Goals scored / match1.25
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
2.21Goals conceded / match2.54
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
48%Average possession48%
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
4.33Shots on target / match4.96
Whitecaps IISporting KC II

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.5Shots per match13.38
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
4.33Shots on target4.96
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
11.3%Shot conversion9.3%
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
48%Possession48%
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
1.62xG for1.53
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
1.85xG against1.79
Whitecaps IISporting KC II

Shooting quality

Whitecaps II: BalancedSporting KC II: Balanced
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
Accuracy (shots on target)35%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Whitecaps II
LDLLW
Season result split
25% W13% D63% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-15
0.88 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-1-5
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
DWWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 2.25BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Sporting KC II
WLDLL
Season result split
21% W17% D63% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-4-15
0.79 pts / match · goal difference -31
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-8
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.79Opponent xG: 1.93BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Whitecaps II is 14% better for: goals scored per match.

1.42 goals / match - Whitecaps II · 1.25 goals / match - Sporting KC II

Whitecaps II is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.21 goals / match - Whitecaps II · 2.54 goals / match - Sporting KC II

Whitecaps II scoring profile: very strong

Whitecaps II scores in 79% of matches (19 of 24 matches), while Sporting KC II keeps a clean sheet in 4% (1 of 24 matches).

Sporting KC II scoring profile: very strong

Sporting KC II scores in 67% of matches (16 of 24 matches), while Whitecaps II keeps a clean sheet in 8% (2 of 24 matches).

34Goals scored (season)30
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
53Goals conceded (season)61
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
3.63Average goals in match3.79
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
8Goals scored (last 5)6
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
14Goals conceded (last 5)11
Whitecaps IISporting KC II

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal67%
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
46%2 goals38%
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
13%3 goals21%
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
4%4 goals0%
Whitecaps IISporting KC II

How often they concede at least...

92%1 goal96%
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
63%2 goals79%
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
38%3 goals33%
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
21%4 goals29%
Whitecaps IISporting KC II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time29%
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
13%BTTS in both halves17%
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
17%Scored in both halves21%
Whitecaps IISporting KC II

BTTS and goal count

67%Min. 3 goals and BTTS63%
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
80%BTTS - last 560%
Whitecaps IISporting KC II

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time88%
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
58%Min. 2 goals before half-time67%
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
29%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
Whitecaps IISporting KC II

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
63%Min. 2 goals after half-time58%
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
38%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
Whitecaps IISporting KC II

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Whitecaps II is 23% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.92 pts / match - Whitecaps II · 0.75 pts / match - Sporting KC II

Whitecaps II - half-time state
17% leading42% draw42% trailing
Sporting KC II - half-time state
17% leading25% draw58% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.92Points per match (1st half)0.75
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
0.58Goals scored (1st half)0.54
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
1.04Goals conceded (1st half)1.33
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
1.63Average goals (1st half)1.88
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
38%Clean sheet before half-time25%
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
58%No goal before half-time58%
Whitecaps IISporting KC II

After half-time (2nd half)

0.92Points per match (2nd half)1.17
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
0.83Goals scored (2nd half)0.71
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
1.17Goals conceded (2nd half)1.21
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
2Average goals (2nd half)1.92
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
21%Clean sheet after half-time25%
Whitecaps IISporting KC II
46%No goal after half-time54%
Whitecaps IISporting KC II

Whitecaps II - second-half results

21% W29% D50% L
22
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.92
PPG before half-time
Lead holding147%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Sporting KC II - second-half results

29% W29% D42% L
18
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-19
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding124%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Whitecaps II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match1.81.0
Average goals in match2.61.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals100%60%
3 goals60%40%
Clean sheet0%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-5-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 4
Sporting KC II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match1.21.0
Average goals in match1.81.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-3-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Whitecaps II
ScoredConceded
6
9
0-15
5
6
16-30
3
10
31-45
6
13
46-60
7
7
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Sporting KC II
ScoredConceded
0
10
0-15
3
12
16-30
10
10
31-45
1
10
46-60
5
8
61-75
11
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.71
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.0 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
112%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
69%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+26%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Whitecaps II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.56
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
156%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Sporting KC II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.75
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
134%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.01
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
37% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
37%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Whitecaps IILigaSporting KC II
Average goals in match▲ 3.633.31▲ 3.79
Both teams scored▲ 75%62%• 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 71%66%▲ 79%
Clean sheets▼ 8%21%▼ 4%
Goal before half-time▼ 71%77%▲ 88%
Goal after half-time• 83%84%▲ 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.31
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.89
Home goals / match
1.42
Away goals / match
+33%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
57%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Whitecaps IIGoalCristiano Bruletti
  2. Sporting KC IIYellow cardJack Kortkamp
  3. Whitecaps IIGoalCarson Rassak
  4. Sporting KC IISubstitutionOn: Missael RodriguezOff: Kashan Hines
  5. Whitecaps IISubstitutionOn: Manav BadwalOff: Sebastián Ramírez Maya
  6. Whitecaps IIGoalJohnny SelemaniAssist: Manav Badwal
  7. Sporting KC IIYellow cardGael Quintero
  8. Sporting KC IISubstitutionOn: Jack FranckaOff: Ty Haas
  9. Whitecaps IISubstitutionOn: Tyler BrownOff: Yuma Tsuji
  10. Whitecaps IIGoalTrevor Wright
  11. Sporting KC IISubstitutionOn: Trevor BurnsOff: Johann Ortiz
  12. Whitecaps IIYellow cardJohnny Selemani
  13. Sporting KC IIGoalMissael RodriguezAssist: Trevor Burns
  14. Whitecaps IIGoalJohnny Selemani
  15. Whitecaps IISubstitutionOn: Luigi CampagnaOff: Yeider Zuluaga

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Whitecaps II 0 - 1 - 2 Sporting KC II. Average goals 4.67, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Sporting KC II
3 : 2
Whitecaps II
Sporting Kansas City II
2 : 2
Vancouver Whitecaps FC II
Vancouver Whitecaps FC II
2 : 3
Sporting Kansas City II

FAQ

What was the result of Whitecaps II vs Sporting KC II?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Whitecaps II 5:1 Sporting KC II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Whitecaps II and Sporting KC II?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Whitecaps II won 0, Sporting KC II won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Whitecaps II vs Sporting KC II?

Whitecaps II score 1.42 goals per game on average and Sporting KC II 1.25. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Whitecaps II's matches and 63% of Sporting KC II's.

What form are Whitecaps II and Sporting KC II in?

Over the last 5 games Whitecaps II have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Sporting KC II 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Whitecaps II vs Sporting KC II?

The statistical background for Whitecaps II vs Sporting KC II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.