Morocco - Botola ProData current as of 15 October 2026

Widad Témara vs UTS Rabat: match statistics

Widad Témara crest
Widad Témara
0 : 1half-time 0:1
UTS Rabat crest
UTS Rabat

Widad Témara vs UTS Rabat: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Widad Témara played UTS Rabat in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match was played on 2 October 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Widad Témara: 1-0-0, 3.00 points/match. UTS Rabat: 1-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Widad Témara scores 3.00 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. UTS Rabat scores 2.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 3.50 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Widad Témara 100%, UTS Rabat 100%. Over 2.5: Widad Témara 100%, UTS Rabat 100%. League level: BTTS 75%, Over 2.5 75%.

xG, shots and style

Widad Témara has higher xG: 1.35 vs 0.76. Widad Témara: 11.0 shots per match, UTS Rabat: 6.0.

Match halves

Widad Témara: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 2.00. UTS Rabat: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 0.00.

Goals by minute

Widad Témara: 16-30 (1 goals). UTS Rabat: 0-15 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Botola Pro: 3.50 goals per match, BTTS 75%, Over 2.5 75%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

UTS Rabat are slight favourites after a run of 4 wins and 1 draw in their last 5 matches, while Widad Témara have won 3, drawn 1 and lost 1. The visitors scored 9 goals in that period compared with the hosts’ 7, and conceded 3 compared with 4, giving them a narrow edge in both attack and defence. However, Widad sit 3rd in the table, with UTS in 5th, so league position favours the hosts. Both teams won their only listed match this season and conceded one goal apiece, so the visitors’ advantage is not decisive. The data do not allow a reliable comparison of the quality of chances or of each team’s home and away form, increasing the likelihood of a draw.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

In their last 5 matches, both teams scored in 60% of games, providing a solid basis for selecting BTTS - Yes. Over this period, Widad Témara averaged 1.4 goals and UTS Rabat 1.8 goals per match; their average xG was 1.06 and 1.45 respectively, showing that the visitors also created scoring chances. Both defences look vulnerable: the hosts conceded an average of 0.8 goals and the visitors 0.6 goals across their last 5 matches. Although UTS Rabat's away statistics show 0.0 goals scored, their recent attacking form and the fact that both teams scored in 86% of their league matches point towards a BTTS - Yes scenario.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

In their last 5 matches, Widad Témara averaged 1.4 goals scored and 0.8 conceded, while UTS Rabat averaged 1.8 scored and 0.6 conceded. The teams’ average xG over this period was 1.06 and 1.45, respectively, which points toward goals but does not provide a strong basis for predicting at least 4 goals. The Over 2.5 goals line landed in 40% of the hosts’ last 5 matches and 60% of the visitors’, so I consider it a less reliable option. Although the league average is 3.86 goals, the teams’ recent results and xG point to around 2.30 goals in this match, making Under 3.5 goals the strongest pick.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

UTS Rabat have won 4 of their last 5 matches, while Widad Témara have won 3 of 5; the visitors have also averaged 1.8 goals compared with 1.4 for the hosts. In the available first-half data, UTS were leading at the break in 67% of matches, while Widad led in 40% and were level in 60% of their last 5 games. This gives the visitors a slight edge in the contest to lead at the break, although a draw remains almost equally likely. After half-time, UTS have a case for holding on to their advantage: they have conceded an average of 0.6 goals per match across their last 5 games, compared with 0.8 for Widad. Therefore, 2/2 is the strongest individual pick, but its edge over X/2 is marginal, particularly as the data on UTS’s away performances is incomplete.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

74Possession (%)26
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
10Shots4
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
4Shots on target1
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
1.54xG0.64
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
7Corners0
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
85Dangerous attacks42
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
12Fouls21
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
1Cards2
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

3Goals scored / match2
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
1Goals conceded / match1
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
48%Average possession42%
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
6Shots on target / match2
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11Shots per match6
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
6Shots on target2
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
27.3%Shot conversion33.3%
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
48%Possession42%
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
1.35xG for0.76
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
1.16xG against1.37
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat

Shooting quality

Widad Témara: Efficient finishingUTS Rabat: Counter-attacking
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
Accuracy (shots on target)55%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.501.00

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Widad Témara
W
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 at home
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
UTS Rabat
W
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 away
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.76Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Widad Témara is 50% better for: goals scored per match.

3 goals / match - Widad Témara · 2 goals / match - UTS Rabat

Widad Témara scoring profile: very strong

Widad Témara scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while UTS Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).

UTS Rabat scoring profile: very strong

UTS Rabat scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while Widad Témara keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).

3Goals scored (season)2
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
1Goals conceded (season)1
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
4Average goals in match3
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
3Goals scored (last 5)2
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
1Goals conceded (last 5)1
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
100%2 goals100%
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
100%3 goals0%
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
0%4 goals0%
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
0%2 goals0%
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
0%3 goals0%
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
0%4 goals0%
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

75%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
100%Scored in both halves0%
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat

BTTS and goal count

100%Min. 3 goals and BTTS100%
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
100%BTTS - last 5100%
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time100%
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
100%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
100%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Widad Témara - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing
UTS Rabat - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

3Points per match (1st half)3
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
1Goals scored (1st half)2
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
0Goals conceded (1st half)0
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
1Average goals (1st half)2
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
100%Clean sheet before half-time100%
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
0%No goal before half-time0%
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat

After half-time (2nd half)

3Points per match (2nd half)0
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
2Goals scored (2nd half)0
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
1Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
3Average goals (2nd half)1
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
0%Clean sheet after half-time0%
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat
0%No goal after half-time100%
Widad TémaraUTS Rabat

Widad Témara - second-half results

100% W0% D0% L
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

UTS Rabat - second-half results

0% W0% D100% L
3
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
0
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Widad Témara - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.003.00
Goals scored / match1.02.0
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match1.03.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%100%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal0%0%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
UTS Rabat - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.000.00
Goals scored / match2.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match2.01.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals100%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal0%100%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Widad Témara
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

UTS Rabat
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 61-75 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.0 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
100%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Widad Témara

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.81
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.65
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
240%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
44%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

UTS Rabat

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.61
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.61
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-2.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 50% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

Widad TémaraLigaUTS Rabat
Average goals in match▲ 4.003.50▼ 3.00
Both teams scored▲ 100%75%▲ 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 100%75%▲ 100%
Clean sheets▼ 0%19%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▲ 100%63%▲ 100%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%88%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.50
Average goals per match
75%
Both teams scored
75%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
1.25
Home goals / match
2.25
Away goals / match
+-44%
Home attack advantage
+-80%
Home defence advantage
+-38%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
13%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
63%
2 goals
50%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. UTS RabatYellow cardHamza Regragui
  2. Widad TémaraYellow cardMohamed Belkaida
  3. UTS RabatGoalHamza RegraguiAssist: Mehdi Assahabi
  4. UTS RabatSubstitutionOn: Abdeljalil ChaynaneOff: Hamza Regragui
  5. UTS RabatYellow cardRedouane Ait Lemkadem
  6. UTS RabatSubstitutionOn: Omar ArjouneOff: Saad Lotfi

FAQ

What was the result of Widad Témara vs UTS Rabat?

The Botola Pro match finished Widad Témara 0:1 UTS Rabat. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Widad Témara vs UTS Rabat?

Widad Témara score 3.00 goals per game on average and UTS Rabat 2.00. The Botola Pro average is 3.50 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 75% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Widad Témara's matches and 100% of UTS Rabat's.

What form are Widad Témara and UTS Rabat in?

Over the last 5 games Widad Témara have a 1-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and UTS Rabat 1-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Widad Témara vs UTS Rabat?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.