Widad Témara vs UTS Rabat: match statistics
Widad Témara vs UTS Rabat: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Widad Témara played UTS Rabat in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match was played on 2 October 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Widad Témara: 1-0-0, 3.00 points/match. UTS Rabat: 1-0-0, 3.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Widad Témara scores 3.00 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. UTS Rabat scores 2.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 3.50 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Widad Témara 100%, UTS Rabat 100%. Over 2.5: Widad Témara 100%, UTS Rabat 100%. League level: BTTS 75%, Over 2.5 75%.
xG, shots and style
Widad Témara has higher xG: 1.35 vs 0.76. Widad Témara: 11.0 shots per match, UTS Rabat: 6.0.
Match halves
Widad Témara: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 2.00. UTS Rabat: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 0.00.
Goals by minute
Widad Témara: 16-30 (1 goals). UTS Rabat: 0-15 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Botola Pro: 3.50 goals per match, BTTS 75%, Over 2.5 75%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
UTS Rabat are slight favourites after a run of 4 wins and 1 draw in their last 5 matches, while Widad Témara have won 3, drawn 1 and lost 1. The visitors scored 9 goals in that period compared with the hosts’ 7, and conceded 3 compared with 4, giving them a narrow edge in both attack and defence. However, Widad sit 3rd in the table, with UTS in 5th, so league position favours the hosts. Both teams won their only listed match this season and conceded one goal apiece, so the visitors’ advantage is not decisive. The data do not allow a reliable comparison of the quality of chances or of each team’s home and away form, increasing the likelihood of a draw.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
In their last 5 matches, both teams scored in 60% of games, providing a solid basis for selecting BTTS - Yes. Over this period, Widad Témara averaged 1.4 goals and UTS Rabat 1.8 goals per match; their average xG was 1.06 and 1.45 respectively, showing that the visitors also created scoring chances. Both defences look vulnerable: the hosts conceded an average of 0.8 goals and the visitors 0.6 goals across their last 5 matches. Although UTS Rabat's away statistics show 0.0 goals scored, their recent attacking form and the fact that both teams scored in 86% of their league matches point towards a BTTS - Yes scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
In their last 5 matches, Widad Témara averaged 1.4 goals scored and 0.8 conceded, while UTS Rabat averaged 1.8 scored and 0.6 conceded. The teams’ average xG over this period was 1.06 and 1.45, respectively, which points toward goals but does not provide a strong basis for predicting at least 4 goals. The Over 2.5 goals line landed in 40% of the hosts’ last 5 matches and 60% of the visitors’, so I consider it a less reliable option. Although the league average is 3.86 goals, the teams’ recent results and xG point to around 2.30 goals in this match, making Under 3.5 goals the strongest pick.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
UTS Rabat have won 4 of their last 5 matches, while Widad Témara have won 3 of 5; the visitors have also averaged 1.8 goals compared with 1.4 for the hosts. In the available first-half data, UTS were leading at the break in 67% of matches, while Widad led in 40% and were level in 60% of their last 5 games. This gives the visitors a slight edge in the contest to lead at the break, although a draw remains almost equally likely. After half-time, UTS have a case for holding on to their advantage: they have conceded an average of 0.6 goals per match across their last 5 games, compared with 0.8 for Widad. Therefore, 2/2 is the strongest individual pick, but its edge over X/2 is marginal, particularly as the data on UTS’s away performances is incomplete.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Widad Témara | UTS Rabat | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 55% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.50 | 1.00 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Widad Témara is 50% better for: goals scored per match.
3 goals / match - Widad Témara · 2 goals / match - UTS Rabat
Widad Témara scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while UTS Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).
UTS Rabat scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while Widad Témara keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Widad Témara
Over / Under - UTS Rabat
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Widad Témara - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
UTS Rabat - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 3.00 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 100% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 0% |
| No goal | 0% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 3.00 | 0.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 2.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 0% |
| No goal | 0% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 61-75 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Widad Témara
UTS Rabat
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| Widad Témara | Liga | UTS Rabat | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.00 | 3.50 | ▼ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 75% | ▲ 100% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 100% | 75% | ▲ 100% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 19% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 63% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 88% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
FAQ
What was the result of Widad Témara vs UTS Rabat?
The Botola Pro match finished Widad Témara 0:1 UTS Rabat. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Widad Témara vs UTS Rabat?
Widad Témara score 3.00 goals per game on average and UTS Rabat 2.00. The Botola Pro average is 3.50 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 75% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Widad Témara's matches and 100% of UTS Rabat's.
What form are Widad Témara and UTS Rabat in?
Over the last 5 games Widad Témara have a 1-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and UTS Rabat 1-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Widad Témara vs UTS Rabat?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


