Widzew Łódź vs Motor Lublin: match statistics
Widzew Łódź vs Motor Lublin: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Widzew Łódź played Motor Lublin in Ekstraklasa (Poland). The match was played on 26 April 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Widzew Łódź: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Motor Lublin: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Widzew Łódź scores 1.17 and concedes 1.28 goals per match. Motor Lublin scores 1.34 and concedes 1.48. League average: 2.72 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Widzew Łódź 52%, Motor Lublin 66%. Over 2.5: Widzew Łódź 48%, Motor Lublin 48%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
Widzew Łódź has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.41. Widzew Łódź: 13.3 shots per match, Motor Lublin: 11.8.
Match halves
Widzew Łódź: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.69. Motor Lublin: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.55.
Goals by minute
Widzew Łódź: 46-60 (10 goals). Motor Lublin: 46-60 (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ekstraklasa: 2.72 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The favorite is Widzew Łódź due to superior home defense and a favorable goal differential. Widzew concedes an average of 1.00 goals per home match and has clean sheets in 43% of games, whereas Motor concedes 1.93 goals on the road and keeps a clean sheet in only 7% of away matches. In attack Widzew scores 1.21 goals per home match with an average xG of 1.59, while Motor scores 1.36 away with xG 1.49, indicating a slight advantage in quality of chances for the hosts (1.59 vs 1.49). In the last 5 matches Motor has scored 7 goals and averages 1.6 points per game, while Widzew has scored 3 goals and averages 1.2 points per game; however, the visitors have conceded 6 goals in that period versus 3 for Widzew and display poor away goal difference (-8 compared to the hosts’ +3). Considering Widzew’s higher shot volume at home (14.43 vs 12.0), higher rate of clean sheets for the hosts and overall better home form, I project a home win: 58% Widzew, 22% draw, 20% Motor.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams show seasonal BTTS rates of 60% (Widzew) and 71% (Motor), versus a league average of 59%, indicating a propensity for matches with goals at both ends. Widzew scores in 87% of games (fails to score in only 13%), while Motor scores in 79% (FTS 21%); the product of these frequencies yields roughly a 69% probability that both teams will score. Additionally, Motor concedes an average of 1.93 goals per game with xG against of 2.05, whereas Widzew’s offensive xG is 1.34 — this highlights Motor’s tendency to leak goals and Widzew’s ability to generate chances. In the last 5 matches Widzew scored 3 goals (0.6 per game) and Motor 7 goals (1.4 per game), with Motor registering 80% BTTS in those 5, further strengthening the signal for BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate total xG around 3.25 (1.70 for Widzew and 1.55 for Motor), calculated as the average of Widzew’s attacking xG 1.34 and Motor’s conceded xG 2.05, and Motor’s attacking xG 1.49 and Widzew’s conceded xG 1.62. Season goal averages are 1.33 (Widzew) and 1.36 (Motor), with Widzew conceding 1.07 goals per game and Motor conceding as many as 1.93, which increases the likelihood of goals from both sides. Seasonal Over 1.5 rates are 73% for Widzew and 86% for Motor, while Over 2.5 is 33% for the home side and 64% for the visitors; based on this I forecast about an 84% chance for Over 1.5 and 63% for Over 2.5. Additionally, BTTS is 60% (Widzew) and 71% (Motor), and average shots 11.53/12.0 with shots on target 3.13/4.29 confirm both teams generate scoring opportunities; in the last 5 matches Motor scored 7 goals and Widzew 3. On that basis the strongest and safest signal is Over 1.5 as the recommended side.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I forecast a draw at half-time — Widzew had 0 goals scored and 0 conceded at half-time in 5 of their last 5 home matches (average 0.0, 100% HT draws), and seasonally hosts are level at the break in 53% of matches. Seasonal averages corroborate an even first half: Widzew scores 0.8 goals on average by half-time versus Motor’s 0.79, while the first-half goal average is 1.33 for the home team compared to 1.71 in away fixtures, suggesting few goals before the break. After the break I favor Widzew — the hosts collect 1.53 points per home game and have 40% clean sheets on the season, whereas Motor concedes 1.93 goals per game on average and has only 7% clean sheets, which increases the hosts’ chances of a win. Additionally, Motor generates 1.49 away xG and 4.29 shots on target per away match, and their away games feature an 86% incidence of at least 0.5 goals in the second half with an average of 1.0 goals conceded after the break, so the outcome is likely to be decided only in the second half. Therefore the strongest signal is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time: I assign X/1 30%, X/X 15% and 1/1 20% as the main scenarios, with other options having lower probability.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Widzew Łódź | Motor Lublin | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Motor Lublin is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Widzew Łódź · 1.6 pts / match - Motor Lublin
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Motor Lublin is 15% better for: goals scored per match.
1.17 goals / match - Widzew Łódź · 1.34 goals / match - Motor Lublin
Widzew Łódź is 16% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.28 goals / match - Widzew Łódź · 1.48 goals / match - Motor Lublin
Widzew Łódź scores in 72% of matches (21 of 29 matches), while Motor Lublin keeps a clean sheet in 24% (7 of 29 matches).
Motor Lublin scores in 83% of matches (24 of 29 matches), while Widzew Łódź keeps a clean sheet in 31% (9 of 29 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Widzew Łódź
Over / Under - Motor Lublin
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Motor Lublin is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.28 pts / match - Widzew Łódź · 1.34 pts / match - Motor Lublin
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Widzew Łódź - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Motor Lublin - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Widzew Łódź
Motor Lublin
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ekstraklasa).
Teams vs league
| Widzew Łódź | Liga | Motor Lublin | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.45 | 2.72 | ▲ 2.83 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 52% | 59% | ▲ 66% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 48% | 52% | ▼ 48% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 31% | 24% | • 24% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 62% | 73% | ▼ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | • 79% | 78% | ▼ 72% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Widzew Łódź 0 - 0 - 1 Motor Lublin. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Widzew Łódź vs Motor Lublin?
The Ekstraklasa match finished Widzew Łódź 2:0 Motor Lublin. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Widzew Łódź vs Motor Lublin?
Widzew Łódź score 1.17 goals per game on average and Motor Lublin 1.34. The Ekstraklasa average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Widzew Łódź's matches and 66% of Motor Lublin's.
What form are Widzew Łódź and Motor Lublin in?
Over the last 5 games Widzew Łódź have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Motor Lublin 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Widzew Łódź vs Motor Lublin?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


