Wikielec vs Warta Sieradz: match statistics
Wikielec vs Warta Sieradz: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Wikielec played Warta Sieradz in 3 Liga Group 1 (Poland). The match was played on 17 May 2026. Venue: Stadion Wikielec. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Wikielec: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Warta Sieradz: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Wikielec scores 1.13 and concedes 1.61 goals per match. Warta Sieradz scores 1.94 and concedes 1.03. League average: 3.34 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Wikielec 68%, Warta Sieradz 68%. Over 2.5: Wikielec 55%, Warta Sieradz 65%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.
xG, shots and style
Wikielec has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.46. Wikielec: 10.0 shots per match, Warta Sieradz: 9.8.
Match halves
Wikielec: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.71. Warta Sieradz: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.26.
Goals by minute
Wikielec: 76-90+ (12 goals). Warta Sieradz: 61-75 (16 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
3 Liga Group 1: 3.34 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Wikielec sits 16th and has only a 13% win rate at home; at home they average 0.87 goals scored and concede 1.53 per match. Warta Sieradz are second in the table, with a 53% win rate away, averaging 1.67 goals scored and 0.93 conceded per away match, and 60 goals scored this season versus Wikielec’s 35. Warta also has superior chance efficiency: 15% shot conversion and 4.5 shots on target per match versus 7% and 3.91 for the hosts, and a much lower share of matches without a goal (7% vs 33%). xG is similar (Warta 1.5 vs Wikielec 1.41), but Warta converts chances better and keeps more clean sheets (40% away clean sheets vs 0% for the hosts), while the home side loses 67% of matches at home compared to Warta’s 13% away defeats. Given Warta’s better efficiency, defensive stability and form (Wikielec 1 win in last 5 and 0.6 points per match; Warta unbeaten in last 5 and 1.8 points per match), I tip an away victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS scenario is more likely: Wikielec has a seasonal BTTS rate of 75%, Warta Sieradz 60%, and the league average is 62%. Wikielec averages 2.19 goals scored and concedes 1.13 (35 for, 50 against this season), while Warta averages 1.67 scored and concedes 0.93 (60 for, 32 against), indicating the visitors can score against the hosts' weaker defense. In the last 5 matches both teams have BTTS at 60%: Wikielec scored 6 and conceded 10 (1.2 and 2.0 per game), Warta 11 and 7 (2.2 and 1.4), so recently both regularly exchange goals. xG comparison shows a similar picture: Wikielec xG 1.44 vs Warta defensive xG 1.40, Warta xG 1.50 vs Wikielec defensive xG 1.25, and additionally the hosts have 5.2 shots on target vs 4.5 for the visitors and a higher conversion rate 19% vs 15%, which favors goals from both sides. Therefore I assign a 72% probability to BTTS - Yes and 28% to No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The combined xG for both teams is 2.94 (home xG 1.44 vs away xG 1.50), while seasonal goal averages are 2.19 for Wikielec and 1.67 for Warta Sieradz, indicating a match with at least two goals. The home side have scored over 1.5 goals in 94% of their matches, the visitors in 80% — a strong signal for Over 1.5, which I estimate at roughly 90% probability. A Poisson model based on total xG=2.94 yields ~56% probability of 3+ goals (Over 2.5), and additionally the home team records Over 2.5 in 81% of fixtures, so I lean toward Over 2.5 at about a 60% level. Over 3.5 is less likely: Wikielec has Over 3.5 in 31% of matches, Warta in 20%, and the Poisson for 2.94 suggests ~34% — therefore Under 3.5 appears the safer option. Based on this, the best play is Over 1.5; expected goals are 1.44 (Wikielec) and 1.50 (Warta), total 2.94.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Season-long statistics favor the home side: Wikielec led at the break in 38% of home matches and scores on average 0.88 goals by Half-Time versus Warta’s 0.43, while the average goals per match are 2.19 versus 1.67, which increases the likelihood of a home lead and a full-time victory for the hosts. Wikielec also has higher shot efficiency (19% conversion with 5.2 shots on target versus 15% and 4.5 for Warta) and 69% season win rate versus the visitors’ 53%, so I rated the 1/1 scenario highest (23%). The counterargument is recent form over the last five: the hosts had 0% leads at Half-Time and were trailing at the break in 75% of their last five, while Warta led at Half-Time in 50% of their last five, so I assign a significant probability to X/1 (18%) and 2/2 (17%). Additionally, both teams score heavily after the break (Wikielec has 94% of matches with a goal in the Second Half and averages 1.31 goals in the Second Half, Warta 1.29), which increases the chance of a turnaround after Half-Time and justifies allocation to X/X (12%) and X/2 (10%). In summary, the strongest single signal is 1/1 due to 38% seasonal HT leads, 69% seasonal home wins and better shot efficiency, but high Second-Half activity and the hosts’ poor last-five form distribute the remaining probability.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Wikielec | Warta Sieradz | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.47 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Warta Sieradz is 200% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Wikielec · 1.8 pts / match - Warta Sieradz
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Warta Sieradz is 72% better for: goals scored per match.
1.13 goals / match - Wikielec · 1.94 goals / match - Warta Sieradz
Warta Sieradz is 56% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.61 goals / match - Wikielec · 1.03 goals / match - Warta Sieradz
Wikielec scores in 74% of matches (23 of 31 matches), while Warta Sieradz keeps a clean sheet in 32% (10 of 31 matches).
Warta Sieradz scores in 97% of matches (30 of 31 matches), while Wikielec keeps a clean sheet in 10% (3 of 31 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Wikielec
Over / Under - Warta Sieradz
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Warta Sieradz is 43% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.97 pts / match - Wikielec · 1.39 pts / match - Warta Sieradz
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Wikielec - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Warta Sieradz - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 61%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (16 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Wikielec
Warta Sieradz
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 1).
Teams vs league
| Wikielec | Liga | Warta Sieradz | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.74 | 3.34 | ▼ 2.97 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 68% | 61% | ▲ 68% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 55% | 65% | • 65% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 10% | 21% | ▲ 32% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 65% | 74% | ▼ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 94% | 84% | ▲ 87% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- WikielecGoalAdrian Rajski
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Wikielec 0 - 0 - 1 Warta Sieradz. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Wikielec vs Warta Sieradz?
The 3 Liga Group 1 match finished Wikielec 1:1 Warta Sieradz. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Wikielec vs Warta Sieradz?
Wikielec score 1.13 goals per game on average and Warta Sieradz 1.94. The 3 Liga Group 1 average is 3.34 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 68% of Wikielec's matches and 68% of Warta Sieradz's.
What form are Wikielec and Warta Sieradz in?
Over the last 5 games Wikielec have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Warta Sieradz 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wikielec vs Warta Sieradz?
The statistical background for Wikielec vs Warta Sieradz — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


