Nigeria - NPFLData current as of 23 July 2026

Wikki Tourist vs Remo Stars: match statistics

Wikki Tourist crest
Wikki Tourist
1 : 0half-time 2:0
Remo Stars crest
Remo Stars
165%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
210%(0.00)

Wikki Tourist presents significantly better home form with a 42% win rate and an impressive 58% clean sheet record at their own stadium. The hosts boast a positive goal difference (+6) in home matches and significantly higher xG figures (1.81 vs 0.76), demonstrating their offensive superiority. Remo Stars find themselves in disastrous away form with 92% losses, only 8% wins, and zero clean sheets on the road. The visitors have recorded a staggering 12 defeats in their last 13 away matches, highlighting their immense struggles away from home. An average of just 0.46 goals per away game and failing to score in 62% of matches further diminishes Remo Stars' chances. Considering all statistics, Wikki Tourist holds a clear advantage and should capitalize on their home solidity to secure a victory.

Wikki Tourist vs Remo Stars: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Wikki Tourist play Remo Stars in NPFL (Nigeria). The match date is 21 February 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Wikki Tourist: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Remo Stars: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Wikki Tourist scores 0.86 and concedes 1.19 goals per match. Remo Stars scores 1.11 and concedes 1.24. League average: 2.02 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Wikki Tourist 43%, Remo Stars 55%. Over 2.5: Wikki Tourist 32%, Remo Stars 45%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Remo Stars has higher xG: 1.37 vs 1.34. Wikki Tourist: 5.1 shots per match, Remo Stars: 7.5.

Match halves

Wikki Tourist: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.35. Remo Stars: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.63.

Goals by minute

Wikki Tourist: 31-45+ (11 goals). Remo Stars: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NPFL: 2.02 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Wikki Tourist presents significantly better home form with a 42% win rate and an impressive 58% clean sheet record at their own stadium. The hosts boast a positive goal difference (+6) in home matches and significantly higher xG figures (1.81 vs 0.76), demonstrating their offensive superiority. Remo Stars find themselves in disastrous away form with 92% losses, only 8% wins, and zero clean sheets on the road. The visitors have recorded a staggering 12 defeats in their last 13 away matches, highlighting their immense struggles away from home. An average of just 0.46 goals per away game and failing to score in 62% of matches further diminishes Remo Stars' chances. Considering all statistics, Wikki Tourist holds a clear advantage and should capitalize on their home solidity to secure a victory.

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
10Shots11
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
3Shots on target3
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
1.41xG1.44
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
5Corners4
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
76Dangerous attacks73
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
-1Fouls-1
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
0Cards1
Wikki TouristRemo Stars

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Wikki TouristRemo Stars
0.86Goals scored / match1.11
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
1.19Goals conceded / match1.24
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
27%Average possession39%
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
1.59Shots on target / match3.24
Wikki TouristRemo Stars

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

5.14Shots per match7.55
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
1.59Shots on target3.24
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
16.8%Shot conversion14.6%
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
27%Possession39%
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
1.34xG for1.37
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
1.17xG against1.17
Wikki TouristRemo Stars

Shooting quality

Wikki Tourist: Counter-attackingRemo Stars: Counter-attacking
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
Accuracy (shots on target)31%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.260.18
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.540.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Remo Stars is 133% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Wikki Tourist · 1.4 pts / match - Remo Stars

Wikki Tourist
WLLLL
Season result split
24% W32% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-12-16
1.05 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-8-3
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
WDDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Remo Stars
LWLWD
Season result split
37% W13% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-5-19
1.24 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-16
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LDLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Remo Stars is 29% better for: goals scored per match.

0.86 goals / match - Wikki Tourist · 1.11 goals / match - Remo Stars

Wikki Tourist scoring profile: strong

Wikki Tourist scores in 62% of matches (23 of 37 matches), while Remo Stars keeps a clean sheet in 21% (8 of 38 matches).

Remo Stars scoring profile: very strong

Remo Stars scores in 76% of matches (29 of 38 matches), while Wikki Tourist keeps a clean sheet in 30% (11 of 37 matches).

32Goals scored (season)42
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
44Goals conceded (season)47
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
2.05Average goals in match2.34
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
6Goals scored (last 5)8
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
11Goals conceded (last 5)6
Wikki TouristRemo Stars

How often they score at least...

62%1 goal76%
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
24%2 goals29%
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
0%3 goals5%
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
0%4 goals0%
Wikki TouristRemo Stars

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal79%
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
35%2 goals32%
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
14%3 goals11%
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
0%4 goals3%
Wikki TouristRemo Stars

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

38%
League average

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time26%
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
8%BTTS in both halves0%
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
19%Scored in both halves11%
Wikki TouristRemo Stars

BTTS and goal count

30%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
80%BTTS - last 580%
Wikki TouristRemo Stars

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time66%
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time34%
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Wikki TouristRemo Stars

2nd half

57%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
27%Min. 2 goals after half-time37%
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
Wikki TouristRemo Stars

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Wikki Tourist is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.11 pts / match - Wikki Tourist · 1 pts / match - Remo Stars

Wikki Tourist - half-time state
19% leading54% draw27% trailing
Remo Stars - half-time state
16% leading53% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.11Points per match (1st half)1
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
0.51Goals scored (1st half)0.47
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
0.62Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
1.14Average goals (1st half)1.11
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
51%Clean sheet before half-time47%
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
54%No goal before half-time61%
Wikki TouristRemo Stars

After half-time (2nd half)

1.08Points per match (2nd half)1.39
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
0.35Goals scored (2nd half)0.63
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
0.57Goals conceded (2nd half)0.61
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
0.92Average goals (2nd half)1.24
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
62%Clean sheet after half-time55%
Wikki TouristRemo Stars
65%No goal after half-time53%
Wikki TouristRemo Stars

Wikki Tourist - second-half results

19% W51% R30% P
41
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding126%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Remo Stars - second-half results

37% W29% R34% P
38
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
53
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding231%

Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Wikki Tourist - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match1.21.0
Average goals in match1.81.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-3-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 3
Remo Stars - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.20
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Wikki Tourist
ScoredConceded
4
6
0-15
4
8
16-30
11
9
31-45
5
10
46-60
4
1
61-75
4
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Remo Stars
ScoredConceded
6
9
0-15
1
7
16-30
11
8
31-45
3
6
46-60
9
5
61-75
12
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.20
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
49%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-9%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Wikki Tourist

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.50
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
60%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
205%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.45
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Remo Stars

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
191%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).

Teams vs league

Wikki TouristLigaRemo Stars
Average goals in match 2.052.02 2.34
Both teams scored 43%38% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 32%34% 45%
Clean sheets 30%37% 21%
Goal before half-time 68%61% 66%
Goal after half-time 57%64% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.02
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
37%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
0.58
Away goals / match
+148%
Home attack advantage
+60%
Home defence advantage
+52%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Wikki Tourist 0 - 0 - 1 Remo Stars. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Remo Stars
2 : 0
Wikki Tourist

FAQ

What was the result of Wikki Tourist vs Remo Stars?

The NPFL match finished Wikki Tourist 1:0 Remo Stars. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Wikki Tourist vs Remo Stars?

Wikki Tourist score 0.86 goals per game on average and Remo Stars 1.11. The NPFL average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Wikki Tourist's matches and 55% of Remo Stars's.

What form are Wikki Tourist and Remo Stars in?

Over the last 5 games Wikki Tourist have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Remo Stars 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wikki Tourist vs Remo Stars?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Wikki Tourist vs Remo Stars: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.