Switzerland - Super LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Winterthur vs Grasshopper: match statistics

Winterthur crest
Winterthur
0 : 2half-time 0:1
Grasshopper crest
Grasshopper

Winterthur vs Grasshopper: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Winterthur play Grasshopper in Super League (Switzerland). The match date is 11 April 2026 at 18:00. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Winterthur: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Grasshopper: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Winterthur scores 1.16 and concedes 2.63 goals per match. Grasshopper scores 1.26 and concedes 1.95. League average: 3.29 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Winterthur 68%, Grasshopper 61%. Over 2.5: Winterthur 79%, Grasshopper 58%. League level: BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 67%.

xG, shots and style

Grasshopper has higher xG: 1.41 vs 1.32. Winterthur: 11.8 shots per match, Grasshopper: 12.5.

Match halves

Winterthur: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.63. Grasshopper: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.66.

Goals by minute

Winterthur: 61-75 (10 goals). Grasshopper: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Super League: 3.29 goals per match, BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 67%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 0-1-2. Average goals 3.33, BTTS 67%.

Match description

Winterthur shows better short-term form: in the last 5 matches the home side scored 5 goals and conceded 7, with a record of 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses (avg. 1 point per game), while Grasshopper lost all 5 fixtures, scoring only 3 and conceding as many as 18 (0 points per game). In home matches Winterthur averages 1.27 goals scored and concedes 2.33 per game, with xG 1.40 and xG against 2.06, whereas Grasshopper away records 1.00 goals scored and 2.31 conceded with xG 1.46 and xG against 1.71. Winterthur’s main advantage is finishing efficiency — conversion 10% versus 8% for Grasshopper — and a lower share of matches without scoring (20% vs 44%), with similar average shots on target (4.47 vs 4.75). Both teams allow many situations (combined average goals 3.6 for the home side and 3.31 for the visitors), but the visitors’ defense has been failing much more in recent games (18 conceded in 5 matches vs 7 for Winterthur), and the goal differential at home is -16 for Winterthur versus -21 for Grasshopper away. Considering better form, higher efficiency and Grasshopper’s clear defensive problems in the last 5 fixtures, I tip the home win.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

67Possession (%)33
WinterthurGrasshopper
8Shots11
WinterthurGrasshopper
1Shots on target4
WinterthurGrasshopper
0.98xG1.29
WinterthurGrasshopper
3Corners3
WinterthurGrasshopper
53Dangerous attacks44
WinterthurGrasshopper
9Fouls22
WinterthurGrasshopper
5Cards4
WinterthurGrasshopper

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

WinterthurGrasshopper
1.16Goals scored / match1.26
WinterthurGrasshopper
2.63Goals conceded / match1.95
WinterthurGrasshopper
44%Average possession45%
WinterthurGrasshopper
4.08Shots on target / match4.34
WinterthurGrasshopper

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.76Shots per match12.5
WinterthurGrasshopper
4.08Shots on target4.34
WinterthurGrasshopper
9.8%Shot conversion10.1%
WinterthurGrasshopper
44%Possession45%
WinterthurGrasshopper
1.32xG for1.41
WinterthurGrasshopper
2.13xG against1.62
WinterthurGrasshopper

Shooting quality

Winterthur: BalancedGrasshopper: Balanced
WinterthurGrasshopper
Accuracy (shots on target)35%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Grasshopper is 50% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Winterthur · 1.2 pts / match - Grasshopper

Winterthur
LDWLL
Season result split
13% W21% R66% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-8-25
0.61 pts / match · goal difference -56
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-5-11
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LLDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 2.21BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
Grasshopper
LLLWW
Season result split
21% W24% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-9-21
0.87 pts / match · goal difference -26
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-11
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LLWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.09Opponent xG: 1.86BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Grasshopper is 9% better for: goals scored per match.

1.16 goals / match - Winterthur · 1.26 goals / match - Grasshopper

Grasshopper is 35% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.63 goals / match - Winterthur · 1.95 goals / match - Grasshopper

Winterthur scoring profile: very strong

Winterthur scores in 68% of matches (26 of 38 matches), while Grasshopper keeps a clean sheet in 13% (5 of 38 matches).

Grasshopper scoring profile: very strong

Grasshopper scores in 71% of matches (27 of 38 matches), while Winterthur keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 38 matches).

44Goals scored (season)48
WinterthurGrasshopper
100Goals conceded (season)74
WinterthurGrasshopper
3.79Average goals in match3.21
WinterthurGrasshopper
9Goals scored (last 5)8
WinterthurGrasshopper
14Goals conceded (last 5)9
WinterthurGrasshopper

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal71%
WinterthurGrasshopper
37%2 goals29%
WinterthurGrasshopper
8%3 goals18%
WinterthurGrasshopper
3%4 goals3%
WinterthurGrasshopper

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal87%
WinterthurGrasshopper
76%2 goals53%
WinterthurGrasshopper
47%3 goals26%
WinterthurGrasshopper
24%4 goals16%
WinterthurGrasshopper

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

66%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time21%
WinterthurGrasshopper
5%BTTS in both halves11%
WinterthurGrasshopper
24%Scored in both halves24%
WinterthurGrasshopper

BTTS and goal count

58%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
WinterthurGrasshopper
21%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
WinterthurGrasshopper
80%BTTS - last 580%
WinterthurGrasshopper

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

84%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
WinterthurGrasshopper
42%Min. 2 goals before half-time37%
WinterthurGrasshopper
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time21%
WinterthurGrasshopper

2nd half

95%Min. 1 goal after half-time84%
WinterthurGrasshopper
66%Min. 2 goals after half-time58%
WinterthurGrasshopper
32%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
WinterthurGrasshopper

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Grasshopper is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.03 pts / match - Winterthur · 1.21 pts / match - Grasshopper

Winterthur - half-time state
26% leading24% draw50% trailing
Grasshopper - half-time state
29% leading34% draw37% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.03Points per match (1st half)1.21
WinterthurGrasshopper
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.61
WinterthurGrasshopper
1.08Goals conceded (1st half)0.87
WinterthurGrasshopper
1.61Average goals (1st half)1.47
WinterthurGrasshopper
39%Clean sheet before half-time45%
WinterthurGrasshopper
58%No goal before half-time55%
WinterthurGrasshopper

After half-time (2nd half)

0.63Points per match (2nd half)0.89
WinterthurGrasshopper
0.63Goals scored (2nd half)0.66
WinterthurGrasshopper
1.55Goals conceded (2nd half)1.08
WinterthurGrasshopper
2.18Average goals (2nd half)1.74
WinterthurGrasshopper
13%Clean sheet after half-time29%
WinterthurGrasshopper
50%No goal after half-time50%
WinterthurGrasshopper

Winterthur - second-half results

13% W24% R63% P
39
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
-21
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-35
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.03
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 13%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Grasshopper - second-half results

18% W34% R47% P
46
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
-16
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding72%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 21%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Winterthur - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.40
Goals scored / match1.20.6
Goals conceded / match1.01.8
Average goals in match2.22.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%100%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+1-6
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6
Grasshopper - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.80
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Winterthur
ScoredConceded
6
11
0-15
5
17
16-30
9
13
31-45
7
14
46-60
10
22
61-75
7
23
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (23). Late-goal balance (76-90): -16 - late phases are a weakness.

Grasshopper
ScoredConceded
9
11
0-15
4
11
16-30
10
11
31-45
5
13
46-60
9
19
61-75
11
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (19). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-5%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Winterthur

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.81
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.66
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
65%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
174%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Grasshopper

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).

Teams vs league

WinterthurLigaGrasshopper
Average goals in match 3.793.29 3.21
Both teams scored 68%66% 61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 79%67% 58%
Clean sheets 0%19% 13%
Goal before half-time 84%76% 79%
Goal after half-time 95%85% 84%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.29
Average goals per match
66%
Both teams scored
67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
1.78
Home goals / match
1.51
Away goals / match
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
57%
2 goals
31%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Winterthur 0 - 1 - 2 Grasshopper. Average goals 3.33, both teams scored in 67% matches.

Grasshopper Club Zürich
3 : 2
FC Winterthur
FC Winterthur
0 : 1
Grasshopper Club Zürich
Grasshopper Club Zürich
2 : 2
FC Winterthur

FAQ

What was the result of Winterthur vs Grasshopper?

The Super League match finished Winterthur 0:2 Grasshopper. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Winterthur and Grasshopper?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Winterthur won 0, Grasshopper won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Winterthur vs Grasshopper?

Winterthur score 1.16 goals per game on average and Grasshopper 1.26. The Super League average is 3.29 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 68% of Winterthur's matches and 61% of Grasshopper's.

What form are Winterthur and Grasshopper in?

Over the last 5 games Winterthur have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Grasshopper 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Winterthur vs Grasshopper?

The statistical background for Winterthur vs Grasshopper — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.