Austria - BundesligaData current as of 12 September 2026

Wolfsberger AC vs Grazer AK: match statistics

Wolfsberger AC crest
Wolfsberger AC
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Grazer AK crest
Grazer AK

Wolfsberger AC vs Grazer AK: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Wolfsberger AC played Grazer AK in Bundesliga (Austria). The match was played on 25 April 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Wolfsberger AC: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Grazer AK: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Wolfsberger AC scores 1.18 and concedes 1.46 goals per match. Grazer AK scores 1.18 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.69 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Wolfsberger AC 61%, Grazer AK 64%. Over 2.5: Wolfsberger AC 61%, Grazer AK 57%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

Wolfsberger AC has higher xG: 1.27 vs 1.08. Wolfsberger AC: 11.3 shots per match, Grazer AK: 9.7.

Match halves

Wolfsberger AC: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.39. Grazer AK: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.68.

Goals by minute

Wolfsberger AC: 0-15 (8 goals). Grazer AK: 16-30 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Bundesliga: 2.69 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-1. Average goals 3.33, BTTS 67%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Wolfsberger AC holds a clear home advantage in underlying metrics: at home they average 1.21 goals per game with xG 1.28, 11.64 shots and 52% possession, while Grazer AK on the road records 0.93 goals per game, xG 1.00 and only 8.14 shots. Defensively the hosts also perform better — Wolfsberger concedes 1.07 goals on their own ground and has a 36% clean sheet rate, whereas Grazer concedes 1.71 away and has just a 7% clean sheet rate. Nevertheless, recent form favors the visitors: Grazer scored 9 goals in their last 5 matches (1.8 per game) and averages 1.4 points per game, while Wolfsberger in their last 5 have 0 wins, 3 draws, 2 losses with only 2 goals and 0.6 points per game. Grazer have a slightly higher average on-target shots (3.5 vs 3.29) and an 11% conversion versus the hosts’ 10%, giving them counter-attacking opportunities, but a high away loss rate (64%) and 50% of away matches without scoring weaken their prospects. Considering the hosts’ xG advantage (1.28 vs 1.00), better home defense (1.07 vs 1.71) and greater shot volume, I assess Wolfsberger as more likely to win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal indicators favor the "both teams to score" outcome: Wolfsberger has a seasonal BTTS of 79%, Grazer AK 50%, giving an average of ~65% which exceeds the league BTTS level of 56%. However, the last 5 matches show a contrast — Wolfsberger has only 40% BTTS and scores on average 0.4 goals, while Grazer AK has 80% BTTS and scores 1.8 goals per game, so the visitors are in better scoring form. From a chance-creation perspective seasonal xG are 1.17 (Wolfsberger) and 1.00 (Grazer AK); combined xG 2.17 is below the league average 2.69, suggesting a moderate number of goals. Although Grazer AK failed to score in 50% of season matches and the home side have only 2 goals in the last 5, the low clean sheet percentages 14% (Wolfsberger) and 7% (Grazer AK) and an even seasonal goals tally 33–33 support the probability that both teams will score. Considering the strong seasonal BTTS signal from the hosts (79%), the visitors’ good scoring form (1.8 in the last 5) and weak clean sheets, I tip BTTS "Yes" as the more likely outcome.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal comes from the 1.5 line: Wolfsberger have 93% of their matches this season with over 1.5 goals, and Grazer 71%, so I rate Over 1.5 at a high 85%. xG analysis shows 1.17 xG for Wolfsberger and 1.00 xG for Grazer, while their opponents concede on average 1.41 (Grazer) and 1.37 (Wolfsberger) xG, which yields a projection of about 1.29 goals for the home side and 1.19 for the away side, i.e. a total of 2.48 expected goals. Both teams historically have Over 2.5 in 57% of their matches (seasonal), versus a league average of 51%, so Over 2.5 has a slight edge — therefore I assign it a 56% probability. Over 3.5 looks unlikely: Wolfsberger have 29% of such games, Grazer 21%, so I assess Over 3.5 at around 25% and prefer Under 3.5. Additional support for Over 1.5 comes from penalty-area activity: Wolfsberger average 11.29 shots with 3.0 on target and a 13% conversion, Grazer 8.14 shots with 3.5 on target and an 11% conversion, which increases the chance of at least two goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time appears most likely: Wolfsberger were level at the break in 43% of home games, while Grazer were level at half-time in 50% of their away matches. After the break the home side have the advantage — Wolfsberger average 1.5 points per home match and win 36% of home games, whereas Grazer collect only 0.64 points on average away and win 14% of away fixtures, which increases the likelihood of a home victory following a draw at the interval. Additionally, Wolfsberger score 1.43 goals per game on average with an xG of 1.17 versus Grazer’s 0.93 goals and xG 1.00, and before the break Wolfsberger average 0.71 goals compared to the visitors’ 0.29; home matches end with both teams scoring in 79% of cases, so I expect goal activity and a Wolfsberger advantage after half-time. On this basis the strongest signal is X/1 — a draw at half-time followed by a Wolfsberger win by full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
8Shots12
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
4Shots on target2
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
1.08xG1.18
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
5Corners8
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
42Dangerous attacks40
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
13Fouls10
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
0Cards2
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
1.18Goals scored / match1.18
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
1.46Goals conceded / match1.5
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
52%Average possession47%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
3.54Shots on target / match3.25
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.25Shots per match9.71
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
3.54Shots on target3.25
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
10.5%Shot conversion12.1%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
52%Possession47%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
1.27xG for1.08
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
1.45xG against1.39
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

Shooting quality

Wolfsberger AC: BalancedGrazer AK: Counter-attacking
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
Accuracy (shots on target)31%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Grazer AK is 133% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Wolfsberger AC · 1.4 pts / match - Grazer AK

Wolfsberger AC
DLDDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
25% W29% D46% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-8-13
1.04 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-6-4
Last 5 at home
0-5-0
DDDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 1.43BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Grazer AK
WWLDL
Season result split
25% W32% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-9-12
1.07 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-9
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LLWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 1.22BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Wolfsberger AC scoring profile: very strong

Wolfsberger AC scores in 71% of matches (20 of 28 matches), while Grazer AK keeps a clean sheet in 11% (3 of 28 matches).

Grazer AK scoring profile: very strong

Grazer AK scores in 68% of matches (19 of 28 matches), while Wolfsberger AC keeps a clean sheet in 21% (6 of 28 matches).

33Goals scored (season)33
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
41Goals conceded (season)42
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
2.64Average goals in match2.68
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
2Goals scored (last 5)9
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
7Goals conceded (last 5)6
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal68%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
32%2 goals32%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
14%3 goals11%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
0%4 goals4%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal89%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
54%2 goals39%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
14%3 goals14%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
0%4 goals4%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

57%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time29%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
4%BTTS in both halves7%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
18%Scored in both halves25%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

BTTS and goal count

54%Min. 3 goals and BTTS46%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
40%BTTS - last 580%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
46%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
46%Min. 2 goals after half-time46%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Wolfsberger AC is 43% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.43 pts / match - Wolfsberger AC · 1 pts / match - Grazer AK

Wolfsberger AC - half-time state
32% leading46% draw21% trailing
Grazer AK - half-time state
18% leading46% draw36% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.43Points per match (1st half)1
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
0.79Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.75
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
1.29Average goals (1st half)1.25
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
54%Clean sheet before half-time39%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
46%No goal before half-time57%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

After half-time (2nd half)

0.79Points per match (2nd half)1.29
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
0.39Goals scored (2nd half)0.68
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
0.96Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
1.36Average goals (2nd half)1.43
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
36%Clean sheet after half-time43%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK
64%No goal after half-time50%
Wolfsberger ACGrazer AK

Wolfsberger AC - second-half results

14% W36% D50% L
40
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-16
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding78%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 25%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Grazer AK - second-half results

29% W43% D29% L
28
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding139%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Wolfsberger AC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.60
Goals scored / match0.40.0
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%40%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference0-5
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Grazer AK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference0+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Wolfsberger AC
ScoredConceded
8
3
0-15
7
6
16-30
7
5
31-45
3
3
46-60
2
11
61-75
6
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

Grazer AK
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
8
7
16-30
4
10
31-45
6
3
46-60
5
7
61-75
8
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.66
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+25%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Wolfsberger AC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Grazer AK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Bundesliga).

Teams vs league

Wolfsberger ACLigaGrazer AK
Average goals in match 2.642.69 2.68
Both teams scored 61%57% 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 61%51% 57%
Clean sheets 21%25% 11%
Goal before half-time 75%74% 75%
Goal after half-time 79%75% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.69
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.43
Home goals / match
1.26
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Grazer AKYellow cardBeres Owusu
  2. Grazer AKYellow cardAlexander Hofleitner
  3. Grazer AKSubstitutionOn: Tobias KochOff: Thorsten Schriebl
  4. Wolfsberger ACSubstitutionOn: Donis Xhemë AvdijajOff: Alessandro Schöpf
  5. Grazer AKSubstitutionOn: Dominik FrieserOff: Ramiz Harakaté
  6. Wolfsberger ACGoalMarkus PinkAssist: Fabian Wohlmuth
  7. Wolfsberger ACSubstitutionOn: Tobias GruberOff: Fabian Wohlmuth

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Alain SadikovskiMatches officiated: 8
5.25Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 263%Home wins25%Draws13%Away wins

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Wolfsberger AC 1 - 1 - 1 Grazer AK. Average goals 3.33, both teams scored in 67% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Wolfsberger AC vs Grazer AK?

The Bundesliga match finished Wolfsberger AC 1:0 Grazer AK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Wolfsberger AC and Grazer AK?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Wolfsberger AC won 1, Grazer AK won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Wolfsberger AC vs Grazer AK?

Wolfsberger AC score 1.18 goals per game on average and Grazer AK 1.18. The Bundesliga average is 2.69 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Wolfsberger AC's matches and 64% of Grazer AK's.

What form are Wolfsberger AC and Grazer AK in?

Over the last 5 games Wolfsberger AC have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Grazer AK 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wolfsberger AC vs Grazer AK?

The statistical background for Wolfsberger AC vs Grazer AK — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.