Wolverhampton Wanderers vs West Ham United: match statistics
West Ham United holds a distinct advantage in this clash. Wolverhampton sits rock bottom of the table with a catastrophic record of 0 wins, 3 draws, and 16 losses, netting just 11 goals while conceding 40. The hosts remain winless in their last 5 fixtures and suffer from an 89% home loss rate, having failed to keep a single clean sheet. West Ham, despite their own relegation battle (18th place), demonstrate superior form with 3 wins this season and 21 goals scored. The visitors possess a better shot conversion rate (10% vs 8%) and an xG of 1.14 (vs 1.15 for the hosts) alongside a significantly stronger defense. The gap in goal difference (-6 for West Ham vs -16 for Wolves) and the fact that Wolverhampton has not won a home game this season point towards a victory for the visitors.
Wolverhampton Wanderers vs West Ham United: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Wolverhampton Wanderers played West Ham United in Premier League (England). The match was played on 3 January 2026. Final score: 3:0.
Current form
Wolverhampton Wanderers: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. West Ham United: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Wolverhampton Wanderers scores 0.58 and concedes 2.11 goals per match. West Ham United scores 1.11 and concedes 2.00. League average: 2.77 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Wolverhampton Wanderers 47%, West Ham United 58%. Over 2.5: Wolverhampton Wanderers 47%, West Ham United 63%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots and style
West Ham United has higher xG: 1.18 vs 1.06. Wolverhampton Wanderers: 8.8 shots per match, West Ham United: 10.0.
Match halves
Wolverhampton Wanderers: half-time lead 5%, second-half goals 0.21. West Ham United: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.58.
Goals by minute
Wolverhampton Wanderers: 31-45+ (4 goals). West Ham United: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Premier League: 2.77 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
West Ham United holds a distinct advantage in this clash. Wolverhampton sits rock bottom of the table with a catastrophic record of 0 wins, 3 draws, and 16 losses, netting just 11 goals while conceding 40. The hosts remain winless in their last 5 fixtures and suffer from an 89% home loss rate, having failed to keep a single clean sheet. West Ham, despite their own relegation battle (18th place), demonstrate superior form with 3 wins this season and 21 goals scored. The visitors possess a better shot conversion rate (10% vs 8%) and an xG of 1.14 (vs 1.15 for the hosts) alongside a significantly stronger defense. The gap in goal difference (-6 for West Ham vs -16 for Wolves) and the fact that Wolverhampton has not won a home game this season point towards a victory for the visitors.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Wolverhampton Wanderers | West Ham United | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.20 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
West Ham United is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - Wolverhampton Wanderers · 0.4 pts / match - West Ham United
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
West Ham United is 91% better for: goals scored per match.
0.58 goals / match - Wolverhampton Wanderers · 1.11 goals / match - West Ham United
West Ham United is 5% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.11 goals / match - Wolverhampton Wanderers · 2 goals / match - West Ham United
Wolverhampton Wanderers scores in 47% of matches (9 of 19 matches), while West Ham United keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 19 matches).
West Ham United scores in 63% of matches (12 of 19 matches), while Wolverhampton Wanderers keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 19 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Wolverhampton Wanderers
Over / Under - West Ham United
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
West Ham United is 54% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.68 pts / match - Wolverhampton Wanderers · 1.05 pts / match - West Ham United
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Wolverhampton Wanderers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 5% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
West Ham United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 16%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Wolverhampton Wanderers
West Ham United
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Wolverhampton Wanderers | Liga | West Ham United | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.68 | 2.77 | ▲ 3.11 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 47% | 54% | ▲ 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 47% | 55% | ▲ 63% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 26% | ▼ 5% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 63% | 71% | ▼ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | • 79% | 80% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Wolverhampton Wanderers vs West Ham United?
The Premier League match finished Wolverhampton Wanderers 3:0 West Ham United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Wolverhampton Wanderers vs West Ham United?
Wolverhampton Wanderers score 0.58 goals per game on average and West Ham United 1.11. The Premier League average is 2.77 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Wolverhampton Wanderers's matches and 58% of West Ham United's.
What form are Wolverhampton Wanderers and West Ham United in?
Over the last 5 games Wolverhampton Wanderers have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and West Ham United 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wolverhampton Wanderers vs West Ham United?
The statistical background for Wolverhampton Wanderers vs West Ham United — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.