England - National LeagueThe A2B StadiumData current as of 31 August 2026

Worthing vs Wealdstone: match statistics

Worthing crest
Worthing
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Wealdstone crest
Wealdstone

Worthing vs Wealdstone: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Worthing played Wealdstone in National League (England). The match was played on 22 August 2026. Venue: The A2B Stadium. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Worthing: 1-0-1, 1.50 points/match. Wealdstone: 0-1-1, 0.50 points/match.

Goal statistics

Worthing scores 2.00 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. Wealdstone scores 1.50 and concedes 2.50. League average: 3.00 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Worthing 100%, Wealdstone 100%. Over 2.5: Worthing 100%, Wealdstone 100%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 58%.

xG, shots and style

Wealdstone has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.15. Worthing: 8.5 shots per match, Wealdstone: 10.5.

Match halves

Worthing: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.50. Wealdstone: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Worthing: 76-90+ (2 goals). Wealdstone: 76-90+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

National League: 3.00 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 58%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Worthing have a clearly better recent record: they have won 3 of their last 5 matches and scored 14 goals in the process, while Wealdstone have failed to win any of their five games, scoring just 5 goals. However, the hosts are vulnerable defensively, conceding an average of 2 goals at home with an xG against of 2.20 and failing to keep a clean sheet. Wealdstone also concede an average of 2 goals away from home, while their defence allows opponents chances worth 1.89 xG, which should benefit Worthing’s attack. The visitors are effective on the road, averaging 2 goals per game with a 22% shot conversion rate, making it highly likely that they will score. Worthing’s advantage in recent form and significantly greater attacking output nevertheless point to a marginally higher probability of a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have recorded BTTS in 100% of their matches so far, and neither side has kept a clean sheet, which is a very strong signal for goals at both ends. Worthing concede an average of 3.0 goals per match, while Wealdstone concede 2.0, with the hosts creating an average of 1.55 xG and the visitors 1.30 xG. In their last five matches, both teams recorded BTTS in 80% of games, and each conceded 1.6 goals per match. Worthing scored 2.8 goals per game during this period, while Wealdstone, despite their lower average of 1.0 goal, should benefit from the hosts' defensive vulnerabilities. In addition, all previous matches involving both teams have ended with over 2.5 goals and goals scored by both sides, making BTTS - Yes the most likely outcome.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Worthing have averaged 2.8 goals scored in their last five matches, while Wealdstone have conceded 1.6 goals per game over the same period, clearly supporting the hosts’ attacking output. The xG model also points to an open game: Worthing average 1.55 xG, while the visitors’ defence allows opponents 1.89 xG. Wealdstone have scored in every match so far, and both teams have recorded 100% of matches with goals from both sides and at least 2 total goals. In their last five appearances, both teams saw goals scored by both sides in 80% of matches, making Over 1.5 goals the strongest pick with a projected total of 3.05 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Worthing have won 3 of their last 5 matches, scoring an average of 2.8 goals, while Wealdstone have failed to win any of their five games and scored just 1.0 goal per match. The hosts held a lead at the break in 60% of this run, whereas the visitors did so on none of those occasions; Wealdstone were level at half-time in 80% of their matches and managed only 0.4 goals before the break. Worthing’s advantage is also evident after half-time: they averaged 1.8 goals in the second half, compared with 0.6 for Wealdstone. Although Wealdstone have a high shot-conversion rate of 22%, compared with 8% for the hosts, their average xG stands at 1.30, while Worthing create chances worth 1.55 xG. The HT/FT scenario of Worthing leading at half-time and winning the match is therefore the one most strongly supported by current form and the hosts’ clearly superior goal production.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
WorthingWealdstone
20Shots4
WorthingWealdstone
8Shots on target2
WorthingWealdstone
2.2xG0.71
WorthingWealdstone
7Corners5
WorthingWealdstone
54Dangerous attacks42
WorthingWealdstone
11Fouls21
WorthingWealdstone
0Cards5
WorthingWealdstone

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2Goals scored / match1.5
WorthingWealdstone
2Goals conceded / match2.5
WorthingWealdstone
48%Average possession54%
WorthingWealdstone
4.5Shots on target / match3.5
WorthingWealdstone

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.5Shots per match10.5
WorthingWealdstone
4.5Shots on target3.5
WorthingWealdstone
23.5%Shot conversion14.3%
WorthingWealdstone
48%Possession54%
WorthingWealdstone
1.15xG for1.43
WorthingWealdstone
2.49xG against1.65
WorthingWealdstone

Shooting quality

Worthing: Efficient finishingWealdstone: Efficient finishing
WorthingWealdstone
Accuracy (shots on target)53%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.440.43

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Worthing is 200% better for: last-5 form.

1.5 pts / match - Worthing · 0.5 pts / match - Wealdstone

Worthing
WL
Season result split
50% W0% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 at home
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.15Opponent xG: 2.49BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Wealdstone
DL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W50% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-1
0.50 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-1
0.50 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 away
0-1-0
D
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 2.5xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.65BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Worthing is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

2 goals / match - Worthing · 1.5 goals / match - Wealdstone

Worthing is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.

2 goals / match - Worthing · 2.5 goals / match - Wealdstone

Worthing scoring profile: very strong

Worthing scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Wealdstone keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).

Wealdstone scoring profile: very strong

Wealdstone scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Worthing keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).

4Goals scored (season)3
WorthingWealdstone
4Goals conceded (season)5
WorthingWealdstone
4Average goals in match4
WorthingWealdstone
4Goals scored (last 5)3
WorthingWealdstone
4Goals conceded (last 5)5
WorthingWealdstone

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
WorthingWealdstone
50%2 goals50%
WorthingWealdstone
50%3 goals0%
WorthingWealdstone
0%4 goals0%
WorthingWealdstone

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
WorthingWealdstone
100%2 goals100%
WorthingWealdstone
0%3 goals50%
WorthingWealdstone
0%4 goals0%
WorthingWealdstone

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

58%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time50%
WorthingWealdstone
0%BTTS in both halves0%
WorthingWealdstone
0%Scored in both halves0%
WorthingWealdstone

BTTS and goal count

100%Min. 3 goals and BTTS100%
WorthingWealdstone
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
WorthingWealdstone
100%BTTS - last 5100%
WorthingWealdstone

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
WorthingWealdstone
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
WorthingWealdstone
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
WorthingWealdstone

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
WorthingWealdstone
100%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
WorthingWealdstone
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
WorthingWealdstone

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Worthing is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - Worthing · 1 pts / match - Wealdstone

Worthing - half-time state
50% leading0% draw50% trailing
Wealdstone - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)1
WorthingWealdstone
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.5
WorthingWealdstone
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
WorthingWealdstone
1Average goals (1st half)1
WorthingWealdstone
50%Clean sheet before half-time50%
WorthingWealdstone
50%No goal before half-time50%
WorthingWealdstone

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per match (2nd half)0.5
WorthingWealdstone
1.5Goals scored (2nd half)1
WorthingWealdstone
1.5Goals conceded (2nd half)2
WorthingWealdstone
3Average goals (2nd half)3
WorthingWealdstone
0%Clean sheet after half-time0%
WorthingWealdstone
50%No goal after half-time50%
WorthingWealdstone

Worthing - second-half results

50% W0% R50% P
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Wealdstone - second-half results

0% W50% R50% P
2
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+1.5

Concedes 1.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Worthing - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.501.50
Goals scored / match0.51.5
Goals conceded / match0.51.5
Average goals in match1.03.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%50%
Clean sheet50%0%
No goal50%50%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 50% leading - 0% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 0% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Wealdstone - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.50
Goals scored / match0.51.0
Goals conceded / match0.52.0
Average goals in match1.03.0
1 goal50%100%
2 goals50%100%
3 goals0%50%
Clean sheet50%0%
No goal50%50%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 50% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Worthing
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
1
46-60
1
0
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Wealdstone
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
1
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

4.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.3 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
133%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
100%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Worthing

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.85
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.49
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
137%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
130%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

Wealdstone

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.78
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.85
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
171%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
67% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
67%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (National League).

Teams vs league

WorthingLigaWealdstone
Average goals in match 4.003.00 4.00
Both teams scored 100%58% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 100%58% 100%
Clean sheets 0%21% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%71% 50%
Goal after half-time 100%83% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.00
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
1.54
Away goals / match
+-5%
Home attack advantage
+-5%
Home defence advantage
+-8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
58%
2 goals
29%
3 goals
21%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. WealdstoneYellow cardDylan Kadji
  2. WealdstoneYellow cardKyle Ray Smith
  3. WorthingGoalRamell CarterAssist: Joel Colbran
  4. WealdstoneYellow cardDylan Kadji
  5. WealdstoneYellow cardDion Conroy
  6. WealdstoneYellow cardJack Wells-Morrison
  7. WealdstoneSubstitutionOn: Mason Earle BarrettOff: Jaydn Josiah Mundle-Smith
  8. WealdstoneSubstitutionOn: Olufela Oladele OlomolaOff: Aaron Lewis Henry
  9. WorthingSubstitutionOn: Harry William Dominique RansomOff: Dominic Hutchinson

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Worthing vs Wealdstone?

The National League match finished Worthing 1:0 Wealdstone. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Worthing vs Wealdstone?

Worthing score 2.00 goals per game on average and Wealdstone 1.50. The National League average is 3.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Worthing's matches and 100% of Wealdstone's.

What form are Worthing and Wealdstone in?

Over the last 5 games Worthing have a 1-0-1 record (1.50 points per game) and Wealdstone 0-1-1 (0.50 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Worthing vs Wealdstone?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Worthing vs Wealdstone: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.