England - EFL League OneData current as of 12 September 2026

Wycombe Wanderers vs AFC Wimbledon: match statistics

155%(1.51)
X25%(3.47)
220%(5.90)

Wycombe Wanderers presents solid home form with 50% wins and an impressive +9 goal difference at their home stadium, scoring an average of 1.83 goals per match. The hosts hold an advantage in possession (51% vs 43%) and significantly better offensive efficiency in home games (xG 1.63 vs visitors' away xG 1.13). AFC Wimbledon records poor away results with 50% losses and just 8% clean sheets, conceding an average of 1.92 goals per away match. The form of both teams in the last five matches is similar (1.2 and 1.0 points per match respectively), yet the significant gap between Wycombe's home efficiency and Wimbledon's away performance favors the hosts. xG statistics also favor Wycombe, creating more scoring chances at home than Wimbledon can generate away, making a home win the most probable scenario.

Wycombe Wanderers vs AFC Wimbledon: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Wycombe Wanderers played AFC Wimbledon in EFL League One (England). The match was played on 4 January 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Wycombe Wanderers: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. AFC Wimbledon: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Wycombe Wanderers scores 1.25 and concedes 1.17 goals per match. AFC Wimbledon scores 1.17 and concedes 1.35. League average: 2.54 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Wycombe Wanderers 58%, AFC Wimbledon 48%. Over 2.5: Wycombe Wanderers 46%, AFC Wimbledon 52%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 48%.

xG, shots and style

Wycombe Wanderers has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.12. Wycombe Wanderers: 12.4 shots per match, AFC Wimbledon: 10.0.

Match halves

Wycombe Wanderers: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.63. AFC Wimbledon: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.70.

Goals by minute

Wycombe Wanderers: 61-75 (6 goals). AFC Wimbledon: 61-75 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

League One: 2.54 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 48%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Wycombe Wanderers presents solid home form with 50% wins and an impressive +9 goal difference at their home stadium, scoring an average of 1.83 goals per match. The hosts hold an advantage in possession (51% vs 43%) and significantly better offensive efficiency in home games (xG 1.63 vs visitors' away xG 1.13). AFC Wimbledon records poor away results with 50% losses and just 8% clean sheets, conceding an average of 1.92 goals per away match. The form of both teams in the last five matches is similar (1.2 and 1.0 points per match respectively), yet the significant gap between Wycombe's home efficiency and Wimbledon's away performance favors the hosts. xG statistics also favor Wycombe, creating more scoring chances at home than Wimbledon can generate away, making a home win the most probable scenario.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
13Shots6
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
7Shots on target0
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
1.69xG0.75
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
4Corners2
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
51Dangerous attacks50
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
5Fouls12
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
2Cards2
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
1.25Goals scored / match1.17
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
1.17Goals conceded / match1.35
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
54%Average possession46%
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
4.17Shots on target / match3
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.38Shots per match9.96
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
4.17Shots on target3
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
10.1%Shot conversion11.8%
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
54%Possession46%
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
1.43xG for1.12
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
1.28xG against1.29
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon

Shooting quality

Wycombe Wanderers: BalancedAFC Wimbledon: Balanced
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
Accuracy (shots on target)34%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Wycombe Wanderers is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Wycombe Wanderers · 1 pts / match - AFC Wimbledon

Wycombe Wanderers
DWLDD
Season result split
29% W38% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-9-8
1.25 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-3-3
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.01Opponent xG: 1.66BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
AFC Wimbledon
DLDLW
Season result split
39% W17% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-4-10
1.35 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-1-6
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LDLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 1.02BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Wycombe Wanderers is 7% better for: goals scored per match.

1.25 goals / match - Wycombe Wanderers · 1.17 goals / match - AFC Wimbledon

Wycombe Wanderers is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.17 goals / match - Wycombe Wanderers · 1.35 goals / match - AFC Wimbledon

Wycombe Wanderers scoring profile: very strong

Wycombe Wanderers scores in 75% of matches (18 of 24 matches), while AFC Wimbledon keeps a clean sheet in 22% (5 of 23 matches).

AFC Wimbledon scoring profile: strong

AFC Wimbledon scores in 61% of matches (14 of 23 matches), while Wycombe Wanderers keeps a clean sheet in 25% (6 of 24 matches).

30Goals scored (season)27
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
28Goals conceded (season)31
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
2.42Average goals in match2.52
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
4Goals scored (last 5)4
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
7Goals conceded (last 5)5
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal61%
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
33%2 goals48%
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
13%3 goals9%
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
4%4 goals0%
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal78%
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
33%2 goals26%
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
4%3 goals22%
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
4%4 goals4%
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

58%
Wycombe Wanderers - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.14 of 24 matches
50%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time17%
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
0%BTTS in both halves4%
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
25%Scored in both halves35%
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
60%BTTS - last 540%
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time61%
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time87%
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time48%
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Wycombe Wanderers - half-time state
38% leading25% draw38% trailing
AFC Wimbledon - half-time state
26% leading57% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per match (1st half)1.35
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
0.63Goals scored (1st half)0.48
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
0.71Goals conceded (1st half)0.43
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
1.33Average goals (1st half)0.91
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
50%Clean sheet before half-time65%
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
54%No goal before half-time57%
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon

After half-time (2nd half)

1.58Points per match (2nd half)1.13
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
0.63Goals scored (2nd half)0.7
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
0.46Goals conceded (2nd half)0.91
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
1.08Average goals (2nd half)1.61
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
63%Clean sheet after half-time39%
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon
46%No goal after half-time48%
Wycombe WanderersAFC Wimbledon

Wycombe Wanderers - second-half results

42% W33% D25% L
33
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding76%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 29%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

AFC Wimbledon - second-half results

30% W22% D48% L
31
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.35
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Wycombe Wanderers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.60
Goals scored / match0.80.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.60.6
1 goal80%40%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%100%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
AFC Wimbledon - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.00.8
1 goal60%40%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Wycombe Wanderers
ScoredConceded
5
7
0-15
5
3
16-30
5
7
31-45
3
3
46-60
6
4
61-75
6
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

AFC Wimbledon
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
4
2
16-30
6
4
31-45
4
7
46-60
9
3
61-75
3
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.47
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+21%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
46%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Wycombe Wanderers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

AFC Wimbledon

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
92%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).

Teams vs league

Wycombe WanderersLigaAFC Wimbledon
Average goals in match 2.422.54 2.52
Both teams scored 58%50% 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 46%48% 52%
Clean sheets 25%28% 22%
Goal before half-time 79%68% 61%
Goal after half-time 75%81% 87%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.54
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
1.08
Away goals / match
+35%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Wycombe WanderersGoalArmando Quitirna
  2. AFC WimbledonYellow cardMyles Hippolyte
  3. Wycombe WanderersYellow cardDaniel William Harvie
  4. Wycombe WanderersSubstitutionOn: Niall HugginsOff: Armando Quitirna
  5. Wycombe WanderersSubstitutionOn: Conner TaylorOff: Luke Leahy
  6. Wycombe WanderersGoalNiall HugginsAssist: Jamie Mullins
  7. AFC WimbledonYellow cardMarcus Browne
  8. AFC WimbledonSubstitutionOn: Danilo Orsi-DadamoOff: Marcus Browne
  9. Wycombe WanderersYellow cardNiall Huggins

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Thomas ParsonsMatches officiated: 16
3.25Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 244%Home wins25%Draws31%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Wycombe Wanderers 0 - 0 - 1 AFC Wimbledon. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

AFC Wimbledon
2 : 1
Wycombe Wanderers FC

FAQ

What was the result of Wycombe Wanderers vs AFC Wimbledon?

The EFL League One match finished Wycombe Wanderers 2:0 AFC Wimbledon. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Wycombe Wanderers vs AFC Wimbledon?

Wycombe Wanderers score 1.25 goals per game on average and AFC Wimbledon 1.17. The EFL League One average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Wycombe Wanderers's matches and 48% of AFC Wimbledon's.

What form are Wycombe Wanderers and AFC Wimbledon in?

Over the last 5 games Wycombe Wanderers have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and AFC Wimbledon 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wycombe Wanderers vs AFC Wimbledon?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Wycombe Wanderers vs AFC Wimbledon: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.