Morocco - Botola ProStade Mohamed VData current as of 07 September 2026

Wydad Casablanca vs Olympic Safi: match statistics

Wydad Casablanca vs Olympic Safi: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Wydad Casablanca played Olympic Safi in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match was played on 8 June 2026. Venue: Stade Mohamed V. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Wydad Casablanca: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Olympic Safi: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Wydad Casablanca scores 1.55 and concedes 0.91 goals per match. Olympic Safi scores 0.86 and concedes 1.55. League average: 2.15 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Wydad Casablanca 50%, Olympic Safi 73%. Over 2.5: Wydad Casablanca 45%, Olympic Safi 45%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 38%.

xG, shots and style

Wydad Casablanca has higher xG: 1.45 vs 1.28. Wydad Casablanca: 11.6 shots per match, Olympic Safi: 10.1.

Match halves

Wydad Casablanca: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.59. Olympic Safi: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Wydad Casablanca: 31-45+ (12 goals). Olympic Safi: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Botola Pro: 2.15 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 38%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Wydad Casablanca is the data-driven favorite — they sit 4th while Olympic Safi are 16th, and the edge is clear in the numbers: Wydad average 1.5 goals at home and concede 0.8 per match, whereas Safi on the road score only 0.91 and concede 1.55. The hosts create more high-quality chances: Wydad’s average xG is 1.52 versus the visitors’ 1.2, 5.2 shots on target per game vs 3.09 and 12.2 vs 9.73 total shots, with a conversion rate of 12% compared to 9%. Form also favors Wydad — over the last 5 matches they have 3 wins and 2 losses, averaging 1.8 points per game, while Safi have failed to win in that span (0 wins, 3 draws, 2 losses) and average 0.6 points per game. Defensively the hosts are more stable: Wydad keep clean sheets in 50% of home games and are without scoring in only 10% of matches, whereas Safi have 0% clean sheets away and fail to score in 27% of away fixtures, which increases the probability of a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have a season BTTS rate of 73% (Wydad 73%, Olympic Safi 73%), significantly above the league average of 51%. In the short term Wydad has BTTS in 40% of their last 5 matches, while Olympic Safi have BTTS in 100% (5/5), and the visitors have recorded no clean sheets this season (0%) versus 18% for the hosts. Both sides concede an average of 1.55 goals per game, and xG indicates Wydad generates 1.36 xG compared to the visitors' 1.20 xG, while Safi’s opponents produce 1.50 xG against them, implying numerous chances for both teams. Additionally Wydad have scored 34 goals this season and conceded 20, while Safi have scored 19 and conceded 34, so the goal stats and the visitors’ lack of clean sheets support BTTS. Based on this I recommend BTTS = Yes with a probability of 78% versus 22% for No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG- and opponent-average-based model indicates expected goals: Home 1.43 (calculated as (1.36 + 1.50)/2), Away 1.19 (calculated as (1.20 + 1.17)/2), total 2.62 goals. Season stats show Over 1.5 occurred for Wydad in 82% of matches and for Olympic Safi in 91% of matches, and both teams record BTTS in 73% of games, which strongly supports a scenario of at least two goals. A distribution simulation (Poisson) gives about a 74% chance for Over 1.5, 49% for Over 2.5 and 27% for Over 3.5, so the strongest signal is Over 1.5. Additional indicators confirm this picture: Wydad averages 10.45 shots and 3.55 on target with xG 1.36 versus actual 0.82 goals per match, while Olympic Safi has 9.73 shots, 3.09 on target and xG 1.20, suggesting offensive potential for both sides. Considering the expected 2.62 goals, the high frequency of Over 1.5 (82%/91%) and the 74% simulation probability for Over 1.5, I recommend betting Over 1.5 as the best line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

First-half statistics indicate a draw at the break — the half-time draw rate is 36% for both teams, and in the last 5 matches the hosts recorded a half-time draw in 60% of cases, so the first goal often comes after the break. The second half is the main source of goals: in 91% of matches involving both teams at least one goal is scored after the break, and the average second-half goals are 1.64 for Wydad versus 1.45 for Safi. Form favors Wydad — 60% wins in the last 5 matches (3 of 5) versus 0% wins for Olympic Safi in that period, which increases the likelihood of a home turnaround after the break. Additionally, Wydad generates more chances (xG 1.36 vs 1.20) and records more shots on target on average (3.55 vs 3.09), and with BTTS at 73% for both teams the most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
11Shots11
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
5Shots on target2
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
1.42xG1.19
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
3Corners3
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
51Dangerous attacks49
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
14Fouls6
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
3Cards3
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
1.55Goals scored / match0.86
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
0.91Goals conceded / match1.55
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
51%Average possession51%
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
4.73Shots on target / match3.32
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.55Shots per match10.09
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
4.73Shots on target3.32
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
13.4%Shot conversion8.6%
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
51%Possession51%
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
1.45xG for1.28
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
1.34xG against1.34
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi

Shooting quality

Wydad Casablanca: Efficient finishingOlympic Safi: Balanced
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
Accuracy (shots on target)41%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Wydad Casablanca is 200% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Wydad Casablanca · 0.6 pts / match - Olympic Safi

Wydad Casablanca
LWWWL
Season result split
55% W18% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-4-6
1.82 pts / match · goal difference +14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-2-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LDLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 1.51BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Olympic Safi
LDDDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
9% W41% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-9-11
0.68 pts / match · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-5-5
Last 5 away
1-3-1
WDLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Wydad Casablanca is 80% better for: goals scored per match.

1.55 goals / match - Wydad Casablanca · 0.86 goals / match - Olympic Safi

Wydad Casablanca is 70% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.91 goals / match - Wydad Casablanca · 1.55 goals / match - Olympic Safi

Wydad Casablanca scoring profile: very strong

Wydad Casablanca scores in 77% of matches (17 of 22 matches), while Olympic Safi keeps a clean sheet in 9% (2 of 22 matches).

Olympic Safi scoring profile: strong

Olympic Safi scores in 77% of matches (17 of 22 matches), while Wydad Casablanca keeps a clean sheet in 36% (8 of 22 matches).

34Goals scored (season)19
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
20Goals conceded (season)34
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
2.45Average goals in match2.41
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
7Goals scored (last 5)5
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
5Goals conceded (last 5)7
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal77%
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
41%2 goals5%
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
23%3 goals5%
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
9%4 goals0%
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal91%
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
23%2 goals45%
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
5%3 goals14%
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
0%4 goals5%
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
Wydad Casablanca - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 22 matches
51%
League average

Goal patterns

23%BTTS at half-time5%
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
9%BTTS in both halves0%
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
23%Scored in both halves0%
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
40%BTTS - last 5100%
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
41%Min. 2 goals before half-time14%
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi

2nd half

68%Min. 1 goal after half-time91%
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
27%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Wydad Casablanca is 82% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.91 pts / match - Wydad Casablanca · 1.05 pts / match - Olympic Safi

Wydad Casablanca - half-time state
50% leading41% draw9% trailing
Olympic Safi - half-time state
23% leading36% draw41% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.91Points per match (1st half)1.05
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
0.95Goals scored (1st half)0.36
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
0.32Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
1.27Average goals (1st half)0.86
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
73%Clean sheet before half-time55%
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
36%No goal before half-time73%
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi

After half-time (2nd half)

1.27Points per match (2nd half)0.86
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
0.59Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
0.59Goals conceded (2nd half)1.05
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
1.18Average goals (2nd half)1.55
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
50%Clean sheet after half-time27%
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi
64%No goal after half-time50%
Wydad CasablancaOlympic Safi

Wydad Casablanca - second-half results

32% W32% R36% P
42
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+14
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.91
PPG before half-time
Lead holding110%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Olympic Safi - second-half results

18% W32% R50% P
23
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding39%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 9%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Wydad Casablanca - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.00
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Olympic Safi - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Wydad Casablanca
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
4
3
16-30
12
3
31-45
3
2
46-60
3
6
61-75
7
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Olympic Safi
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
2
4
16-30
5
6
31-45
2
9
46-60
3
5
61-75
6
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.44
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
113%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
62%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+23%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
59%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Wydad Casablanca

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.53
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
137%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Olympic Safi

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.63
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
137%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

Wydad CasablancaLigaOlympic Safi
Average goals in match 2.452.15 2.41
Both teams scored 50%51% 73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 45%38% 45%
Clean sheets 36%31% 9%
Goal before half-time 68%61% 68%
Goal after half-time 68%73% 91%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.15
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.13
Home goals / match
1.02
Away goals / match
+11%
Home attack advantage
+10%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Wydad CasablancaYellow cardWissam Ben Yedder
  2. Olympic SafiYellow cardSoulaimane El Bouchqali
  3. Wydad CasablancaYellow cardSallah Moussaddaq Kerboub
  4. Wydad CasablancaGoalHamza Hannouri
  5. Olympic SafiSubstitutionOn: Marwane ElazOff: Saad Morsli
  6. Olympic SafiSubstitutionOn: Sofian El MoudaneOff: Achref Habbassi
  7. Olympic SafiSubstitutionOn: Anass EddaouOff: Soulaimane El Bouchqali
  8. Wydad CasablancaSubstitutionOn: Hamza ElowastiOff: Hakim Ziyech
  9. Wydad CasablancaYellow cardHamza Hannouri
  10. Olympic SafiYellow cardFred Duval Ngoma
  11. Olympic SafiYellow cardAnas Mkhair

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Wydad Casablanca 1 - 0 - 0 Olympic Safi. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Olympic Safi
1 : 2
Wydad Casablanca

FAQ

What was the result of Wydad Casablanca vs Olympic Safi?

The Botola Pro match finished Wydad Casablanca 1:0 Olympic Safi. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Wydad Casablanca vs Olympic Safi?

Wydad Casablanca score 1.55 goals per game on average and Olympic Safi 0.86. The Botola Pro average is 2.15 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Wydad Casablanca's matches and 73% of Olympic Safi's.

What form are Wydad Casablanca and Olympic Safi in?

Over the last 5 games Wydad Casablanca have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Olympic Safi 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wydad Casablanca vs Olympic Safi?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.