Wydad Casablanca vs UTS Rabat: match statistics
Wydad Casablanca vs UTS Rabat: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Wydad Casablanca played UTS Rabat in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match was played on 5 July 2026. Venue: Stade Mohamed V. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Wydad Casablanca: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. UTS Rabat: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Wydad Casablanca scores 1.31 and concedes 1.07 goals per match. UTS Rabat scores 1.03 and concedes 1.34. League average: 2.17 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Wydad Casablanca 48%, UTS Rabat 62%. Over 2.5: Wydad Casablanca 45%, UTS Rabat 31%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.
xG, shots and style
Wydad Casablanca has higher xG: 1.42 vs 1.30. Wydad Casablanca: 11.2 shots per match, UTS Rabat: 9.4.
Match halves
Wydad Casablanca: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.55. UTS Rabat: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.55.
Goals by minute
Wydad Casablanca: 31-45+ (12 goals). UTS Rabat: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Botola Pro: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 7.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
On a seasonal basis Wydad holds a clear advantage: 13 wins versus 5 for UTS, 38 goals scored compared to 30, and a higher league position (5th vs 14th). At home Wydad averages 1.29 goals scored and 1.00 conceded, produces 12.14 shots per match with 5.29 on target, posts an average xG of 1.51 and wins 50% of home games, while UTS away averages 1.07 goals per match, 9.29 shots and only 4.29 on target, with just 21% away wins. Defensive metrics also favor the hosts: Wydad concedes 1.00 goal at home with 43% clean sheets, whereas UTS concedes 1.36 away and has only 7% clean sheets. However, form is with the visitors — Wydad has lost 5 of their last 5 matches, scoring only 2 goals and collecting 0 points over the last 5, while UTS scored 7 goals in that period and averages 1.4 points per game. Considering Wydad’s seasonal advantages (higher xG, more shots and better efficiency at home) combined with their sudden losing streak, I back a home win, although the scoreline should be narrow and there is a real risk of a draw or upset.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have high BTTS rates this season: Wydad 60% and UTS Rabat 64%, both above the league average of 52%, which fundamentally favors a Goal/Goal scenario. Season-long they both concede a lot — Wydad 1.33 goals per match and UTS 1.36 — and xG against of 1.34 and 1.40, so the opponent has realistic chances to score. Offensively xG is 1.30 (Wydad) and 1.29 (UTS), shots on target 3.8 vs 4.29 and conversion 10% vs 12%; UTS scored 7 goals in the last 5 matches (1.4 per match), while Wydad has only 2 (0.4) and conceded 9. Additionally Wydad keep a clean sheet in 20% of matches and UTS in 7%, which in a simplified estimate (100−20−7≈73%) suggests that in the majority of matches at least one side concedes and this supports BTTS - Yes, therefore I recommend a Yes bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
A model combining seasonal attacking xG and opponents’ defensive xG projects 1.35 expected goals for Wydad (attacking xG 1.30 vs opponents’ xG 1.40) and 1.32 for UTS Rabat (attacking xG 1.29 vs opponents’ xG 1.34), totaling 2.67 goals. Season-long metrics show Over 1.5 occurs frequently: 80% of Wydad’s matches and 71% of UTS’s matches finish over 1.5 goals, and both teams register BTTS in 60% and 64% of games respectively, increasing the likelihood of at least 2 goals. Although season Over 2.5 rates are lower (Wydad 27%, UTS 36%), the last 5 matches indicate more goals (recent Over 2.5 at 40% for both), and recent xG is 1.12 for Wydad and 1.43 for UTS, shifting the probability of Over 2.5 toward above 50%. Over 3.5 is unlikely (seasonal 13%–14%), and Wydad have scored only 2 and conceded 9 in their last 5 matches, which reduces the chance of a very high-scoring affair. Therefore the strongest and best signal is a bet on Over 1.5 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time is a strong signal: the home side were level at the break in 73% of their matches, and the visitors in 43%, giving on average about a 58% chance of a draw after 45 minutes. After the break, however, the visitors have a higher probability of winning — the away team won 21% of matches versus 13% for the hosts, and in the last five meetings the home team has a 0% win rate and 100% losses, while the visitors won 40% of their last five. Offensively the visitors are more efficient: on average 4.29 shots on target versus 3.8 for the hosts and a conversion rate of 12% compared to 10% for the home side. Minute-by-minute stats show the visitors scored 5 goals in the 76–90' window while the hosts conceded 7 in the same phase, indicating a greater risk of post-break turnarounds in favor of the visitors. xG is even (1.30 for the hosts vs 1.29 for the visitors), so with equal expected goals form and finishing decide the outcome — therefore I assigned 36% to X/2 as the primary pick and 28% to X/X as a realistic alternative.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Wydad Casablanca | UTS Rabat | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Wydad Casablanca is 27% better for: goals scored per match.
1.31 goals / match - Wydad Casablanca · 1.03 goals / match - UTS Rabat
Wydad Casablanca is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.07 goals / match - Wydad Casablanca · 1.34 goals / match - UTS Rabat
Wydad Casablanca scores in 72% of matches (21 of 29 matches), while UTS Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 14% (4 of 29 matches).
UTS Rabat scores in 72% of matches (21 of 29 matches), while Wydad Casablanca keeps a clean sheet in 31% (9 of 29 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Wydad Casablanca
Over / Under - UTS Rabat
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Wydad Casablanca is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.52 pts / match - Wydad Casablanca · 1.1 pts / match - UTS Rabat
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Wydad Casablanca - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
UTS Rabat - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Wydad Casablanca
UTS Rabat
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| Wydad Casablanca | Liga | UTS Rabat | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.38 | 2.17 | ▲ 2.38 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 48% | 52% | ▲ 62% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 45% | 38% | ▼ 31% |
| Clean sheets | • 31% | 30% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 69% | 62% | ▼ 52% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 69% | 73% | ▲ 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Wydad Casablanca 1 - 0 - 0 UTS Rabat. Average goals 7.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Wydad Casablanca vs UTS Rabat?
The Botola Pro match finished Wydad Casablanca 1:2 UTS Rabat. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Wydad Casablanca vs UTS Rabat?
Wydad Casablanca score 1.31 goals per game on average and UTS Rabat 1.03. The Botola Pro average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Wydad Casablanca's matches and 62% of UTS Rabat's.
What form are Wydad Casablanca and UTS Rabat in?
Over the last 5 games Wydad Casablanca have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and UTS Rabat 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wydad Casablanca vs UTS Rabat?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Wydad Casablanca vs UTS Rabat: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


