Morocco - Botola ProStade Mohamed VData current as of 07 September 2026

Wydad Casablanca vs UTS Rabat: match statistics

Wydad Casablanca crest
Wydad Casablanca
1 : 2half-time 0:1
UTS Rabat crest
UTS Rabat

Wydad Casablanca vs UTS Rabat: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Wydad Casablanca played UTS Rabat in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match was played on 5 July 2026. Venue: Stade Mohamed V. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Wydad Casablanca: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. UTS Rabat: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Wydad Casablanca scores 1.31 and concedes 1.07 goals per match. UTS Rabat scores 1.03 and concedes 1.34. League average: 2.17 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Wydad Casablanca 48%, UTS Rabat 62%. Over 2.5: Wydad Casablanca 45%, UTS Rabat 31%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.

xG, shots and style

Wydad Casablanca has higher xG: 1.42 vs 1.30. Wydad Casablanca: 11.2 shots per match, UTS Rabat: 9.4.

Match halves

Wydad Casablanca: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.55. UTS Rabat: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.55.

Goals by minute

Wydad Casablanca: 31-45+ (12 goals). UTS Rabat: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Botola Pro: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 7.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

On a seasonal basis Wydad holds a clear advantage: 13 wins versus 5 for UTS, 38 goals scored compared to 30, and a higher league position (5th vs 14th). At home Wydad averages 1.29 goals scored and 1.00 conceded, produces 12.14 shots per match with 5.29 on target, posts an average xG of 1.51 and wins 50% of home games, while UTS away averages 1.07 goals per match, 9.29 shots and only 4.29 on target, with just 21% away wins. Defensive metrics also favor the hosts: Wydad concedes 1.00 goal at home with 43% clean sheets, whereas UTS concedes 1.36 away and has only 7% clean sheets. However, form is with the visitors — Wydad has lost 5 of their last 5 matches, scoring only 2 goals and collecting 0 points over the last 5, while UTS scored 7 goals in that period and averages 1.4 points per game. Considering Wydad’s seasonal advantages (higher xG, more shots and better efficiency at home) combined with their sudden losing streak, I back a home win, although the scoreline should be narrow and there is a real risk of a draw or upset.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have high BTTS rates this season: Wydad 60% and UTS Rabat 64%, both above the league average of 52%, which fundamentally favors a Goal/Goal scenario. Season-long they both concede a lot — Wydad 1.33 goals per match and UTS 1.36 — and xG against of 1.34 and 1.40, so the opponent has realistic chances to score. Offensively xG is 1.30 (Wydad) and 1.29 (UTS), shots on target 3.8 vs 4.29 and conversion 10% vs 12%; UTS scored 7 goals in the last 5 matches (1.4 per match), while Wydad has only 2 (0.4) and conceded 9. Additionally Wydad keep a clean sheet in 20% of matches and UTS in 7%, which in a simplified estimate (100−20−7≈73%) suggests that in the majority of matches at least one side concedes and this supports BTTS - Yes, therefore I recommend a Yes bet.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

A model combining seasonal attacking xG and opponents’ defensive xG projects 1.35 expected goals for Wydad (attacking xG 1.30 vs opponents’ xG 1.40) and 1.32 for UTS Rabat (attacking xG 1.29 vs opponents’ xG 1.34), totaling 2.67 goals. Season-long metrics show Over 1.5 occurs frequently: 80% of Wydad’s matches and 71% of UTS’s matches finish over 1.5 goals, and both teams register BTTS in 60% and 64% of games respectively, increasing the likelihood of at least 2 goals. Although season Over 2.5 rates are lower (Wydad 27%, UTS 36%), the last 5 matches indicate more goals (recent Over 2.5 at 40% for both), and recent xG is 1.12 for Wydad and 1.43 for UTS, shifting the probability of Over 2.5 toward above 50%. Over 3.5 is unlikely (seasonal 13%–14%), and Wydad have scored only 2 and conceded 9 in their last 5 matches, which reduces the chance of a very high-scoring affair. Therefore the strongest and best signal is a bet on Over 1.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is a strong signal: the home side were level at the break in 73% of their matches, and the visitors in 43%, giving on average about a 58% chance of a draw after 45 minutes. After the break, however, the visitors have a higher probability of winning — the away team won 21% of matches versus 13% for the hosts, and in the last five meetings the home team has a 0% win rate and 100% losses, while the visitors won 40% of their last five. Offensively the visitors are more efficient: on average 4.29 shots on target versus 3.8 for the hosts and a conversion rate of 12% compared to 10% for the home side. Minute-by-minute stats show the visitors scored 5 goals in the 76–90' window while the hosts conceded 7 in the same phase, indicating a greater risk of post-break turnarounds in favor of the visitors. xG is even (1.30 for the hosts vs 1.29 for the visitors), so with equal expected goals form and finishing decide the outcome — therefore I assigned 36% to X/2 as the primary pick and 28% to X/X as a realistic alternative.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
4Shots11
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
3Shots on target4
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
0.83xG1.39
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
3Corners5
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
50Dangerous attacks58
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
9Fouls14
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
3Cards4
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
1.31Goals scored / match1.03
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
1.07Goals conceded / match1.34
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
51%Average possession48%
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
4.62Shots on target / match4.03
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.21Shots per match9.45
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
4.62Shots on target4.03
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
11.7%Shot conversion10.9%
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
51%Possession48%
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
1.42xG for1.3
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
1.34xG against1.37
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat

Shooting quality

Wydad Casablanca: BalancedUTS Rabat: Balanced
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
Accuracy (shots on target)41%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Wydad Casablanca
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
45% W14% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-4-12
1.48 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-2-5
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
WWLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
UTS Rabat
WLLDW
Season result split
17% W45% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-13-11
0.97 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-6-5
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WWDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 0.95BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Wydad Casablanca is 27% better for: goals scored per match.

1.31 goals / match - Wydad Casablanca · 1.03 goals / match - UTS Rabat

Wydad Casablanca is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.07 goals / match - Wydad Casablanca · 1.34 goals / match - UTS Rabat

Wydad Casablanca scoring profile: very strong

Wydad Casablanca scores in 72% of matches (21 of 29 matches), while UTS Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 14% (4 of 29 matches).

UTS Rabat scoring profile: strong

UTS Rabat scores in 72% of matches (21 of 29 matches), while Wydad Casablanca keeps a clean sheet in 31% (9 of 29 matches).

38Goals scored (season)30
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
31Goals conceded (season)39
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
2.38Average goals in match2.38
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
2Goals scored (last 5)6
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
9Goals conceded (last 5)5
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat

How often they score at least...

72%1 goal72%
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
31%2 goals24%
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
17%3 goals7%
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
7%4 goals0%
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal86%
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
31%2 goals31%
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
7%3 goals10%
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
0%4 goals7%
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

48%
Wydad Casablanca - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.14 of 29 matches
52%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time28%
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
7%BTTS in both halves7%
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
17%Scored in both halves10%
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS28%
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
40%BTTS - last 540%
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time52%
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
34%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
31%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Wydad Casablanca is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.52 pts / match - Wydad Casablanca · 1.1 pts / match - UTS Rabat

Wydad Casablanca - half-time state
38% leading38% draw24% trailing
UTS Rabat - half-time state
17% leading59% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.52Points per match (1st half)1.1
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
0.76Goals scored (1st half)0.48
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
0.45Goals conceded (1st half)0.59
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
1.21Average goals (1st half)1.07
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
62%Clean sheet before half-time55%
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
48%No goal before half-time66%
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat

After half-time (2nd half)

1.21Points per match (2nd half)1.03
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
0.55Goals scored (2nd half)0.55
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
0.62Goals conceded (2nd half)0.76
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
1.17Average goals (2nd half)1.31
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
48%Clean sheet after half-time38%
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat
62%No goal after half-time52%
Wydad CasablancaUTS Rabat

Wydad Casablanca - second-half results

28% W38% R34% P
44
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.52
PPG before half-time
Lead holding118%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

UTS Rabat - second-half results

21% W41% R38% P
32
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Wydad Casablanca - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.200.60
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-4-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
UTS Rabat - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.20
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match0.61.6
1 goal20%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Wydad Casablanca
ScoredConceded
6
3
0-15
4
4
16-30
12
6
31-45
4
4
46-60
5
8
61-75
7
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

UTS Rabat
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
5
5
16-30
5
11
31-45
5
3
46-60
3
6
61-75
8
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.38
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+194%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
52%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Wydad Casablanca

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
113%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.48
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

UTS Rabat

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.43
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

Wydad CasablancaLigaUTS Rabat
Average goals in match 2.382.17 2.38
Both teams scored 48%52% 62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 45%38% 31%
Clean sheets 31%30% 14%
Goal before half-time 69%62% 52%
Goal after half-time 69%73% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.17
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.16
Home goals / match
1.01
Away goals / match
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. UTS RabatSubstitutionOn: Yacine BammouOff: Samuel Tebily
  2. Wydad CasablancaYellow cardAyoub Boucheta
  3. Wydad CasablancaSubstitutionOn: Hamza HannouriOff: Ayman El Wafi
  4. UTS RabatYellow cardHamza Regragui
  5. Wydad CasablancaYellow cardHamza Hannouri
  6. Wydad CasablancaYellow cardJoseph Bakasu
  7. UTS RabatSubstitutionOn: Omar ArjouneOff: Hossam Essadak
  8. UTS RabatYellow cardSaad Lotfi
  9. Wydad CasablancaGoalWissam Ben YedderAssist: Zouheir El-Moutaraji
  10. UTS RabatGoalHamza Regragui
  11. Wydad CasablancaSubstitutionOn: Rayane MahtouOff: Naim Byar
  12. UTS RabatYellow cardHamza Regragui
  13. Wydad CasablancaSubstitutionOn: Moises PaniaguaOff: Wissam Ben Yedder
  14. UTS RabatYellow cardMohammed Amine Essahel

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Wydad Casablanca 1 - 0 - 0 UTS Rabat. Average goals 7.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Wydad Casablanca vs UTS Rabat?

The Botola Pro match finished Wydad Casablanca 1:2 UTS Rabat. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Wydad Casablanca vs UTS Rabat?

Wydad Casablanca score 1.31 goals per game on average and UTS Rabat 1.03. The Botola Pro average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Wydad Casablanca's matches and 62% of UTS Rabat's.

What form are Wydad Casablanca and UTS Rabat in?

Over the last 5 games Wydad Casablanca have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and UTS Rabat 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wydad Casablanca vs UTS Rabat?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Wydad Casablanca vs UTS Rabat: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.