Yacoub El Mansour vs FAR Rabat: match statistics
Yacoub El Mansour vs FAR Rabat: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Yacoub El Mansour played FAR Rabat in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match was played on 26 April 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
Yacoub El Mansour: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. FAR Rabat: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Yacoub El Mansour scores 0.87 and concedes 1.67 goals per match. FAR Rabat scores 1.53 and concedes 0.33. League average: 2.10 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Yacoub El Mansour 60%, FAR Rabat 27%. Over 2.5: Yacoub El Mansour 47%, FAR Rabat 40%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 35%.
xG, shots and style
FAR Rabat has higher xG: 1.71 vs 1.44. Yacoub El Mansour: 11.8 shots per match, FAR Rabat: 12.2.
Match halves
Yacoub El Mansour: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.47. FAR Rabat: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Yacoub El Mansour: 31-45+ (4 goals). FAR Rabat: 46-60 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Botola Pro: 2.10 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 35%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
FAR Rabat are the favorites: they sit 1st with a season record of 8 wins, 7 draws and 0 losses, 23 goals scored and 5 conceded, while Yacoub El Mansour are 16th with 1 win, 4 draws, 10 losses and a 13-25 goal record. The key difference is defence: FAR away concede on average 0.29 goals and keep 71% clean sheets, whereas the home side concede 1.71 goals at home and have only 14% clean sheets. Last five form confirms the visitors' edge: hosts have 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses (0.2 pts per game) while FAR have 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss (1.6 pts per game). In attack FAR record higher xG and better conversion: visitors’ average xG away is 1.82 vs hosts’ 1.66 xG at home, and shot-to-goal conversion is 12% vs hosts’ 7%; additionally hosts concede more goals than their xG suggests (1.71 goals conceded vs xG against 1.07), while FAR concede far less (0.29 conceded vs xG against 1.01), indicating greater defensive efficiency from the visitors. Considering defensive superiority, better conversion and form, I predict a away win, although FAR’s high draw rate away (57% draws) and the fact they fail to score in 43% of away matches justify a significant chance of a draw.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I select the 'No' scenario (No BTTS) because long-term clean sheet rates are very high: 75% for the home side and 71% for the away side, versus a league average of 67%. Season-to-date percentages of matches with both teams scoring are only 25% (home) and 29% (away), averaging about 27%, which strongly argues against BTTS. Although xG are 1.6 for the home team and 1.82 for the away team, and shots on target average 4.75 and 4.71, the last 5 matches show a discrepancy: the home team has 80% BTTS in the last 5 and concedes an average of 2.0 goals, while the away team has 20% BTTS and concedes 0.6 goals. Additionally, the league average goals is 2.12, over 2.5 frequencies are 38% and 43%, and combined over2.5+BTTS values are only 13–14%, indicating matches more often finish with a one-sided goal balance than with both teams scoring. Considering the stability of seasonal clean sheets (75%/71%) and low seasonal BTTS (25%/29%), I assess the probability of BTTS 'No' at 70% and 'Yes' at 30%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate expected goals at 1.31 for Yacoub El Mansour and 1.39 for FAR Rabat, totalling 2.70 goals; the calculation is based on xG: 1.60 for the home side versus 1.01 xG conceded by the visitors, and 1.82 for the visitors versus 0.95 xG conceded by the home side. The aggregate value of 2.70 is clearly above the league average of 2.12, and the seasonal over 1.5 rates are 63% for the home team and 57% for the visitors, which further supports the over 1.5 goals option. From a Poisson distribution with λ=2.70 we get roughly a 75% probability for over 1.5, about 51% for Over 2.5 goals and about 29% for Over 3.5. Despite high clean sheet rates (75% home, 71% away) and low BTTS (25%/29%), the last 5 matches show the home side conceded 10 goals versus 3 conceded by the visitors, which increases the likelihood of a higher goal count. Therefore I recommend playing Over 1.5 as the strongest signal from the analysis.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Hosts perform better this season: 63% wins versus 43% for the visitors and an average of 1.63 goals per match compared to 1.43 for FAR Rabat. At half-time draws dominate — the hosts were level at the break in 50% of matches (4 games), the visitors in 71% (5 games), with HT goal averages of 0.63 for the hosts and 0.43 for the visitors and a low share of matches with both teams scoring in the first half (13% and 14%). In the second half the hosts markedly accelerate: they score on average 1.0 goal, concede 0.0 goals in the second half, win the second half in 75% of cases and have accumulated 20 points in second halves, which increases the likelihood of turning an HT draw into an FT win. xG is similar (1.6 vs 1.82), but the hosts’ better conversion rate (13% vs 12%) and marginally higher number of shots on target (4.75 vs 4.71) support the scenario X/1 as the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Yacoub El Mansour | FAR Rabat | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.23 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
FAR Rabat is 800% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - Yacoub El Mansour · 1.8 pts / match - FAR Rabat
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FAR Rabat is 76% better for: goals scored per match.
0.87 goals / match - Yacoub El Mansour · 1.53 goals / match - FAR Rabat
FAR Rabat is 406% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.67 goals / match - Yacoub El Mansour · 0.33 goals / match - FAR Rabat
Yacoub El Mansour scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while FAR Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 73% (11 of 15 matches).
FAR Rabat scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while Yacoub El Mansour keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Yacoub El Mansour
Over / Under - FAR Rabat
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
FAR Rabat is 61% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.87 pts / match - Yacoub El Mansour · 1.4 pts / match - FAR Rabat
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Yacoub El Mansour - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 7%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
FAR Rabat - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Yacoub El Mansour
FAR Rabat
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| Yacoub El Mansour | Liga | FAR Rabat | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.53 | 2.10 | ▼ 1.87 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 60% | 47% | ▼ 27% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 47% | 35% | ▲ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 33% | ▲ 73% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 58% | ▼ 47% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 87% | 74% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Yacoub El Mansour 0 - 0 - 1 FAR Rabat. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Yacoub El Mansour vs FAR Rabat?
The Botola Pro match finished Yacoub El Mansour 2:2 FAR Rabat. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Yacoub El Mansour vs FAR Rabat?
Yacoub El Mansour score 0.87 goals per game on average and FAR Rabat 1.53. The Botola Pro average is 2.10 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Yacoub El Mansour's matches and 27% of FAR Rabat's.
What form are Yacoub El Mansour and FAR Rabat in?
Over the last 5 games Yacoub El Mansour have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and FAR Rabat 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Yacoub El Mansour vs FAR Rabat?
The statistical background for Yacoub El Mansour vs FAR Rabat — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


