Yanbian Longding vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring: match statistics
Yanbian Longding vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Yanbian Longding play Heilongjiang Lava Spring in China League One (China). The match date is 4 July 2026 at 12:00. Venue: Yanji Nationwide Fitness Centre Stadium. Final score: 3:0.
Current form
Yanbian Longding: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Yanbian Longding scores 1.40 and concedes 0.80 goals per match. Heilongjiang Lava Spring scores 1.40 and concedes 1.67. League average: 2.56 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Yanbian Longding 40%, Heilongjiang Lava Spring 80%. Over 2.5: Yanbian Longding 40%, Heilongjiang Lava Spring 53%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
Heilongjiang Lava Spring has higher xG: 1.34 vs 1.10. Yanbian Longding: 9.1 shots per match, Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 10.9.
Match halves
Yanbian Longding: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.73. Heilongjiang Lava Spring: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.73.
Goals by minute
Yanbian Longding: 76-90+ (6 goals). Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 16-30 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
China League One: 2.56 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
2 H2H matches: 1-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.
Match description
I predict a draw. Home team has 0% wins and 100% draws at home (five-match home draw streak), while visitors have 60% draws on the road. Home average goals at home: 0.8 scored and 0.8 conceded per match; visitors away: 1.4 scored and 1.0 conceded, indicating visitors’ offensive edge but home defensive stability. In last 5 matches homes scored 8 goals and average 1.4 points per match; visitors scored 9 but conceded 13 and average 0.6 points per match, suggesting defensive instability for the visitors. Quality-of-chance analysis shows homes generate 1.23 xG at home vs 1.09 xG against, while visitors away have 1.2 xG vs 1.4 xG against; visitors register more on-target shots (4.4 vs 3.6) and higher conversion (15% vs 8%), so they convert chances better. Considering 100% home draws, 60% away draws for visitors, higher home possession (56% vs 51%) and higher visitor efficiency, a draw is the most likely outcome with low probability of either side winning.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Yanbian Longding | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Yanbian Longding is 400% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Yanbian Longding · 0.4 pts / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Yanbian Longding is 109% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.8 goals / match - Yanbian Longding · 1.67 goals / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring
Yanbian Longding scores in 60% of matches (9 of 15 matches), while Heilongjiang Lava Spring keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 15 matches).
Heilongjiang Lava Spring scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while Yanbian Longding keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Yanbian Longding
Over / Under — Heilongjiang Lava Spring
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Yanbian Longding is 23% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.47 pts / match - Yanbian Longding · 1.2 pts / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Yanbian Longding - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Heilongjiang Lava Spring - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Yanbian Longding
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (China League One).
Teams vs league
| Yanbian Longding | Liga | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.20 | 2.56 | ▲ 3.07 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 52% | ▲ 80% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 50% | ▲ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 47% | 29% | ▼ 7% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 71% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 72% | ▲ 87% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Yanbian Longding 1 - 0 - 1 Heilongjiang Lava Spring. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Yanbian Longding vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring?
The China League One match finished Yanbian Longding 3:0 Heilongjiang Lava Spring. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Yanbian Longding and Heilongjiang Lava Spring?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Yanbian Longding won 1, Heilongjiang Lava Spring won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Yanbian Longding vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring?
Yanbian Longding score 1.40 goals per game on average and Heilongjiang Lava Spring 1.40. The China League One average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Yanbian Longding's matches and 80% of Heilongjiang Lava Spring's.
What form are Yanbian Longding and Heilongjiang Lava Spring in?
Over the last 5 games Yanbian Longding have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Heilongjiang Lava Spring 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Yanbian Longding vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Yanbian Longding vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.