China - China League OneYanji Nationwide Fitness Centre StadiumData current as of 07 September 2026

Yanbian Longding vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring: match statistics

Yanbian Longding vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Yanbian Longding played Heilongjiang Lava Spring in China League One (China). The match was played on 4 July 2026. Venue: Yanji Nationwide Fitness Centre Stadium. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

Yanbian Longding: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Yanbian Longding scores 1.25 and concedes 0.92 goals per match. Heilongjiang Lava Spring scores 1.50 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.53 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Yanbian Longding 42%, Heilongjiang Lava Spring 92%. Over 2.5: Yanbian Longding 33%, Heilongjiang Lava Spring 50%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 48%.

xG, shots and style

Heilongjiang Lava Spring has higher xG: 1.41 vs 1.02. Yanbian Longding: 8.2 shots per match, Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 11.4.

Match halves

Yanbian Longding: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.50. Heilongjiang Lava Spring: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.83.

Goals by minute

Yanbian Longding: 16-30 (5 goals). Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

China League One: 2.53 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 48%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a draw. Home team has 0% wins and 100% draws at home (five-match home draw streak), while visitors have 60% draws on the road. Home average goals at home: 0.8 scored and 0.8 conceded per match; visitors away: 1.4 scored and 1.0 conceded, indicating visitors’ offensive edge but home defensive stability. In last 5 matches homes scored 8 goals and average 1.4 points per match; visitors scored 9 but conceded 13 and average 0.6 points per match, suggesting defensive instability for the visitors. Quality-of-chance analysis shows homes generate 1.23 xG at home vs 1.09 xG against, while visitors away have 1.2 xG vs 1.4 xG against; visitors register more on-target shots (4.4 vs 3.6) and higher conversion (15% vs 8%), so they convert chances better. Considering 100% home draws, 60% away draws for visitors, higher home possession (56% vs 51%) and higher visitor efficiency, a draw is the most likely outcome with low probability of either side winning.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal indicators strongly favor BTTS: Yanbian has BTTS 100% this season, while Heilongjiang 80%, providing a strong baseline signal that both teams typically score. The hosts have no clean sheets (0% this season), and the visitors kept a clean sheet in only 20% of matches, so the likelihood of either team failing to score is low. Offensive metrics and xG confirm this — Yanbian posts average xG 1.57 and 5.0 shots on target, while Heilongjiang has xG 1.2 and 4.4 shots on target, with the visitors showing higher conversion (15% vs hosts’ 12%). The last 5 matches are mixed: Yanbian had BTTS in 40% of their last 5 and conceded an average 1.6 goals, whereas Heilongjiang has BTTS 100% in their last 5 and concedes 2.6 goals on average, increasing the probability of goals at both ends. Considering the seasonal 100% vs 80%, the hosts’ lack of clean sheets, and the visitors’ weaker defense in the last 5 (2.6 conceded), I favor BTTS - Yes at approximately 80% vs 20% No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The combined xG for both teams is approximately 2.77 (1.57 for Yanbian and 1.20 for Heilongjiang), and the seasonal goals averages are 1.57 and 1.40, yielding roughly ~2.97 goals per game. Yanbian have 100% of home matches with over 1.5 goals, while Heilongjiang have 80% on the road, so the 1.5 line looks exceptionally safe (I estimate ~95%). For the 2.5 line, seasonal Over rates are 57% for Yanbian and 40% for Heilongjiang; combined xG of 2.77 and the visitors’ last 5 matches with xG 1.74 and 1.8 goals scored suggest a moderate chance of Over 2.5 (about 60%). Over 3.5 is less likely — seasonal values of 43% and 20% indicate roughly a 30% probability of more than 3.5 goals. Therefore I recommend backing Over 1.5 as the strongest signal, with expected goals 1.57 vs 1.20 = 2.77.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is 2/2 (away team leading at half and winning). Away teams led at the break in 40% of matches versus 14% for home teams, and they average 1.6 points by half-time compared to 0.86 for hosts, giving them the edge in the first half. Seasonally, away teams average 1.4 goals and 1.8 points per match, while hosts score 1.57 goals and average 1.0 point, so statistically the away side is stronger in the final result. Hosts concede 1.14 goals on average before the break, whereas away teams concede only 0.4; additionally, hosts had 100% of home matches with both teams scoring, and away teams in 80% of their games, indicating open matches but better away defensive performance before the break. Therefore I assign the highest probability to 2/2 (26%), followed by X/2 (21%) and X/X (17%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

40Possession (%)60
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
14Shots13
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
6Shots on target0
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
1.56xG1.12
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
5Corners6
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
37Dangerous attacks42
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
14Fouls16
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
2Cards3
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
1.25Goals scored / match1.5
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
0.92Goals conceded / match1.5
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
53%Average possession52%
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
3.33Shots on target / match4.75
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.17Shots per match11.42
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
3.33Shots on target4.75
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
15.3%Shot conversion13.1%
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
53%Possession52%
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
1.02xG for1.41
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
1.24xG against1.43
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring

Shooting quality

Yanbian Longding: Efficient finishingHeilongjiang Lava Spring: Efficient finishing
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
Accuracy (shots on target)41%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Yanbian Longding is 167% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Yanbian Longding · 0.6 pts / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring

Yanbian Longding
DWDLW
Season result split
33% W50% R17% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-6-2
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-5-0
Last 5 at home
0-5-0
DDDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 0.85Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
LDDLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
25% W58% R17% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-7-2
1.33 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-0
Last 5 away
2-3-0
DWWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.59Opponent xG: 1.61BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Heilongjiang Lava Spring is 20% better for: goals scored per match.

1.25 goals / match - Yanbian Longding · 1.5 goals / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring

Yanbian Longding is 63% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.92 goals / match - Yanbian Longding · 1.5 goals / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring

Yanbian Longding scoring profile: very strong

Yanbian Longding scores in 58% of matches (7 of 12 matches), while Heilongjiang Lava Spring keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 12 matches).

Heilongjiang Lava Spring scoring profile: very strong

Heilongjiang Lava Spring scores in 100% of matches (12 of 12 matches), while Yanbian Longding keeps a clean sheet in 42% (5 of 12 matches).

15Goals scored (season)18
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
11Goals conceded (season)18
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
2.17Average goals in match3
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
9Goals scored (last 5)9
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
8Goals conceded (last 5)12
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring

How often they score at least...

58%1 goal100%
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
42%2 goals42%
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
17%3 goals8%
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
8%4 goals0%
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring

How often they concede at least...

58%1 goal92%
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
25%2 goals33%
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
8%3 goals25%
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
0%4 goals0%
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

92%
Heilongjiang Lava Spring - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 12 matches
54%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time33%
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
8%BTTS in both halves17%
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
33%Scored in both halves25%
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
60%BTTS - last 5100%
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
42%Min. 2 goals before half-time42%
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
17%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Yanbian Longding is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - Yanbian Longding · 1.17 pts / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring

Yanbian Longding - half-time state
33% leading50% draw17% trailing
Heilongjiang Lava Spring - half-time state
25% leading42% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)1.17
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
0.75Goals scored (1st half)0.67
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.83
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
1.08Average goals (1st half)1.5
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
67%Clean sheet before half-time33%
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
50%No goal before half-time50%
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring

After half-time (2nd half)

1.17Points per match (2nd half)1.5
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.83
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
0.58Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
1.08Average goals (2nd half)1.5
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
58%Clean sheet after half-time42%
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring
58%No goal after half-time25%
Yanbian LongdingHeilongjiang Lava Spring

Yanbian Longding - second-half results

25% W42% R33% P
18
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Heilongjiang Lava Spring - second-half results

33% W50% R17% P
14
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Yanbian Longding - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.000.40
Goals scored / match1.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.41.2
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+4-3
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6
Heilongjiang Lava Spring - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match1.41.0
Average goals in match2.41.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet0%20%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Yanbian Longding
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
5
1
16-30
0
1
31-45
2
2
46-60
1
2
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Heilongjiang Lava Spring
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
3
4
16-30
4
3
31-45
3
5
46-60
3
2
61-75
4
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.58
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+16%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Yanbian Longding

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
69%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 27% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Heilongjiang Lava Spring

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
126%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.73
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (China League One).

Teams vs league

Yanbian LongdingLigaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
Average goals in match 2.172.53 3.00
Both teams scored 42%54% 92%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%48% 50%
Clean sheets 42%27% 8%
Goal before half-time 67%74% 83%
Goal after half-time 67%72% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.53
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.19
Home goals / match
1.34
Away goals / match
+-11%
Home attack advantage
+-13%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Yanbian LongdingGoalShihao PiaoAssist: Giovanny Bariani Marques
  2. Heilongjiang Lava SpringYellow cardJiaxuan Zhu
  3. Yanbian LongdingYellow cardZihao Wang
  4. Heilongjiang Lava SpringSubstitutionOn: Zimin ZhangOff: Jiaxuan Zhu
  5. Heilongjiang Lava SpringYellow cardChenghao Ma
  6. Yanbian LongdingYellow cardZhenfei Huang
  7. Yanbian LongdingGoalFelicio Anando Brown ForbesAssist: Zhenfei Huang
  8. Heilongjiang Lava SpringSubstitutionOn: Mingxin ZhuOff: Bojian Fan
  9. Yanbian LongdingSubstitutionOn: Ximin LiOff: Zhenfei Huang
  10. Yanbian LongdingSubstitutionOn: Erhai YangOff: Zihao Wang
  11. Heilongjiang Lava SpringSubstitutionOn: Yuchen HanOff: Chenghao Ma
  12. Yanbian LongdingGoalGiovanny Bariani Marques

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Yanbian Longding 1 - 0 - 1 Heilongjiang Lava Spring. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC
2 : 1
Yanbian Longding FC
Yanbian Longding FC
3 : 0
Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC

FAQ

What was the result of Yanbian Longding vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring?

The China League One match finished Yanbian Longding 3:0 Heilongjiang Lava Spring. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Yanbian Longding and Heilongjiang Lava Spring?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Yanbian Longding won 1, Heilongjiang Lava Spring won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Yanbian Longding vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring?

Yanbian Longding score 1.25 goals per game on average and Heilongjiang Lava Spring 1.50. The China League One average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Yanbian Longding's matches and 92% of Heilongjiang Lava Spring's.

What form are Yanbian Longding and Heilongjiang Lava Spring in?

Over the last 5 games Yanbian Longding have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Heilongjiang Lava Spring 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Yanbian Longding vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Yanbian Longding vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.