Yanbian Longding vs Shaanxi Union: match statistics
Yanbian Longding vs Shaanxi Union: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Yanbian Longding played Shaanxi Union in China League One (China). The match was played on 25 April 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Yanbian Longding: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Shaanxi Union: 1-1-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Yanbian Longding scores 1.00 and concedes 0.40 goals per match. Shaanxi Union scores 0.50 and concedes 0.75. League average: 2.26 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Yanbian Longding 20%, Shaanxi Union 25%. Over 2.5: Yanbian Longding 40%, Shaanxi Union 25%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 49%.
xG, shots and style
Shaanxi Union has higher xG: 1.39 vs 0.96. Yanbian Longding: 6.6 shots per match, Shaanxi Union: 11.5.
Match halves
Yanbian Longding: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.40. Shaanxi Union: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.25.
Goals by minute
Yanbian Longding: 16-30 (2 goals). Shaanxi Union: 0-15 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
China League One: 2.26 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 49%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Yanbian Longding (7th) have a 2-2-1 record with 5 scored and 2 conceded this season (avg. 1.0 scored and 0.4 conceded per match). At home they register 60% possession, an average of 4 shots on target and xG 1.1, but home metrics show 0 scored and 0 conceded goals with 100% clean sheets and 100% draws, indicating a run of goalless home fixtures. Shaanxi Union (13th) sit on a 1-1-2 record with 2 goals for and 3 against; away they concede 1.5 goals and score 0.5 per match despite a higher xG 1.59 and an average of 13 shots, which points to chance creation combined with poor finishing (they failed to score in 50% of away matches). In the last 5 matches the hosts have scored 5 goals and average 1.6 points, the visitors 7 goals with a 1.4 points average, so given both teams' limited efficiency a low-scoring draw looks the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The forecast favors No BTTS — the primary reason is the hosts' defensive data: Yanbian Longding have 100% clean sheets this season and concede 0.0 goals per match on average, which significantly reduces the likelihood of Goal/Goal. Visitors Shaanxi Union have a season BTTS rate of 50% and BTTS in the last 5 matches of 40%, but across the season they score only 0.5 goals per game (total 2 goals), limiting their real scoring threat. In chance terms both teams produce xG of 1.2 (home) vs 1.59 (away) and record 2.0 and 3.5 shots on target respectively, however conversion rates are low: 5.0% and 4.0%, so created chances rarely translate into goals. Additionally, in the last 5 matches the hosts conceded on average 0.4 goals and the visitors 0.8, while the league average BTTS is 46% with 62% clean sheets; therefore I assign a higher probability to No (70%) than Yes (30%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG model and comparative defensive analysis yield a combined expected goals total of approximately 2.64: home side (1.20 + 1.37)/2 = 1.29, away side (1.59 + 1.11)/2 = 1.35, total 2.64. This is 0.38 above the league average of 2.26, increasing the likelihood of a match with at least 2 goals. In the last 5 matches Yanbian averaged 1.0 goal, Shaanxi 1.4, and average shots on target were 2.0 for hosts and 3.5 for visitors; corresponding xG over the last 5 matches are 0.94 and 1.37, further indicating created chances. However, note that hosts have a seasonal 0% of matches over 1.5 goals and 100% clean sheets (small sample), while shot conversion is low (conversion 5% for hosts and 4% for guests), which may limit actual finishes. As a result the strongest signal is backing Over 1.5 (assessed at 84%), Over 2.5 has moderate chances (~58%), and Over 3.5 is unlikely (~22%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I predict a draw at half-time: the home side were level at the break in 100% of their home matches (2 of 2), and the home team’s average goals at half-time is 0.0 versus 0.5 for the visitors. For full-time I back a home win — they average 2.0 points per home match and have a 50% home win rate, while the visitors average 0.0 points per match and have a 0% win rate. Additionally, the hosts concede no goals this season (0.0 conceded on average), whereas the visitors concede 1.5 goals per match, giving a clear defensive advantage to the home side. Although the visitors have higher xG (1.59 vs 1.20) and more shots (13.0 vs 10.0, with 3.5 vs 2.0 on target), second-half statistics favor the hosts: they earned 4 points after half-time, average 0.5 goals in the second half and have 100% clean sheets after the break, while the visitors have a negative second-half goal difference (-1.0). Consequently, the most likely scenario is X/1 (Half-Time/Full-Time: draw at the break, home win) with an estimated probability of 39%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Yanbian Longding | Shaanxi Union | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 55% | 24% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.18 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Yanbian Longding is 60% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Yanbian Longding · 1 pts / match - Shaanxi Union
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Yanbian Longding is 100% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Yanbian Longding · 0.5 goals / match - Shaanxi Union
Yanbian Longding is 88% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.4 goals / match - Yanbian Longding · 0.75 goals / match - Shaanxi Union
Yanbian Longding scores in 40% of matches (2 of 5 matches), while Shaanxi Union keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 matches).
Shaanxi Union scores in 50% of matches (2 of 4 matches), while Yanbian Longding keeps a clean sheet in 60% (3 of 5 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Yanbian Longding
Over / Under - Shaanxi Union
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Yanbian Longding is 87% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.4 pts / match - Yanbian Longding · 0.75 pts / match - Shaanxi Union
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Yanbian Longding - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Shaanxi Union - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.75 | 1.25 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.5 | 0.3 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.5 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 50% |
| 2 goals | 25% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 75% |
| No goal | 75% | 75% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Yanbian Longding
Shaanxi Union
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (China League One).
Teams vs league
| Yanbian Longding | Liga | Shaanxi Union | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.40 | 2.26 | ▼ 1.25 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 20% | 46% | ▼ 25% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 49% | ▼ 25% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 60% | 31% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 40% | 67% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 60% | 74% | ▼ 50% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Yanbian Longding 2 - 0 - 0 Shaanxi Union. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Yanbian Longding vs Shaanxi Union?
The China League One match finished Yanbian Longding 0:0 Shaanxi Union. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Yanbian Longding and Shaanxi Union?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Yanbian Longding won 2, Shaanxi Union won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Yanbian Longding vs Shaanxi Union?
Yanbian Longding score 1.00 goals per game on average and Shaanxi Union 0.50. The China League One average is 2.26 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 20% of Yanbian Longding's matches and 25% of Shaanxi Union's.
What form are Yanbian Longding and Shaanxi Union in?
Over the last 5 games Yanbian Longding have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Shaanxi Union 1-1-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Yanbian Longding vs Shaanxi Union?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Yanbian Longding vs Shaanxi Union: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.