Yanbian Longding vs Suzhou Dongwu: match statistics
Yanbian Longding vs Suzhou Dongwu: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Yanbian Longding played Suzhou Dongwu in China League One (China). The match was played on 11 July 2026. Venue: Yanji Nationwide Fitness Centre Stadium. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
Yanbian Longding: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Suzhou Dongwu: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Yanbian Longding scores 1.38 and concedes 0.85 goals per match. Suzhou Dongwu scores 0.77 and concedes 1.46. League average: 2.57 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Yanbian Longding 38%, Suzhou Dongwu 54%. Over 2.5: Yanbian Longding 38%, Suzhou Dongwu 46%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 51%.
xG, shots and style
Suzhou Dongwu has higher xG: 1.24 vs 1.06. Yanbian Longding: 8.6 shots per match, Suzhou Dongwu: 9.2.
Match halves
Yanbian Longding: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.62. Suzhou Dongwu: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.54.
Goals by minute
Yanbian Longding: 0-15 (5 goals). Suzhou Dongwu: 46-60 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
China League One: 2.57 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 51%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Yanbian Longding sit 5th in the table while Suzhou Dongwu are 16th; the hosts record this season is 5 wins, 6 draws, 2 losses with 18 goals scored and 11 conceded, whereas the visitors are 2-3-8 with 10 scored and 19 conceded. In their last 5 matches Yanbian have scored 11 goals and collected 10 points (avg 2.0 points/match; 3-1-1), while Suzhou have 7 goals and 2 points (avg 0.4 points/match; 0-2-3). At home Yanbian average 1.17 goals scored and concede 0.67 with average xG 1.28 for and 1.10 against, while Suzhou away average 0.67 scored and 1.00 conceded with xG 0.98 for and 1.28 against, indicating a home advantage in quality of chances and defense. Yanbian average 10.67 shots per game with 4 on target and 54% possession, versus the visitors' 7.33 shots with 3 on target and 45% possession; shot conversion is 11% vs 9%, and clean-sheet failure rate is 33% vs 50%, with 50% clean sheets for the hosts at home versus 0% clean sheets for the visitors on the road. Considering superior finishing (18 vs 10 goals), xG advantage and form (avg 2.0 vs 0.4 points per match), I tip the hosts to win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The analysis favors the 'BTTS - Yes' scenario: home side seasonal BTTS rate is 57% vs visitors 50%, with the league average at 55%. A strong signal comes from the last 5 matches form: Suzhou has 100% BTTS in the last 5, Yanbian 40%, yielding a short-term average of 70% in favor of both teams scoring. Clean sheets are very rare: hosts have a 14% clean sheet rate, visitors 0%. In the last 5 matches Yanbian conceded an average of 1.4 goals and Suzhou 2.4 goals, so both sides regularly concede. xG supports this projection: Yanbian has xG 1.46 versus Suzhou 0.98, and on-target shots average 2.57 vs 3.0, which increases the probability of at least one goal from each side.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG, I project approximately 1.37 goals for Yanbian Longding (xG_for 1.46 vs opponents’ xG_against 1.28) and about 1.31 goals for Suzhou Dongwu (xG_for 0.98 vs hosts’ xG_against 1.64), totaling ~2.68 goals. In the last 5 matches the hosts averaged 2.2 goals, the visitors 1.4 (sum 3.6), and recent xG 1.03 vs 1.52 indicates increased attacking activity, especially from the away side. Seasonal readings are mixed: hosts have 71% of games Over 2.5 and 71% Over 1.5, while visitors only 17% Over 2.5 and 50% Over 1.5; BTTS is 57% for hosts and 50% for visitors. Hosts concede 1.86 goals per game on average, visitors 1.00, and clean sheets are only 14% for hosts and 0% for visitors, which raises the likelihood of goals. Considering the expected 2.68 goals, the high recent 5-game average (3.6) and the hosts’ dominant Over 1.5 profile, the strongest signal is a bet on Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal points to 1/1 (home team leads at the break and wins), which I assign a 32% probability. In the last 5 matches Yanbian Longding led at the break in 3 of 5 fixtures (60%) and won 60% of those performances, with an average first-half goals of 1.2 versus 0.6 for Suzhou Dongwu, strongly favoring the home side in the opening 45 minutes. Additionally, the hosts have a higher xG of 1.46 versus 0.98 and average 10.86 shots per match compared to the visitors’ 7.33, supporting the likelihood of maintaining the lead until full-time. Despite a seasonal warning that Yanbian trailed at half-time in 71% of matches, the home side’s last-5 form (60% wins versus 0% wins for the visitors in their last 5) justifies a larger share for the 1/1 and X/1 scenarios in the distribution.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Yanbian Longding | Suzhou Dongwu | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.39 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Yanbian Longding is 400% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Yanbian Longding · 0.4 pts / match - Suzhou Dongwu
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Yanbian Longding is 79% better for: goals scored per match.
1.38 goals / match - Yanbian Longding · 0.77 goals / match - Suzhou Dongwu
Yanbian Longding is 72% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.85 goals / match - Yanbian Longding · 1.46 goals / match - Suzhou Dongwu
Yanbian Longding scores in 62% of matches (8 of 13 matches), while Suzhou Dongwu keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 13 matches).
Suzhou Dongwu scores in 62% of matches (8 of 13 matches), while Yanbian Longding keeps a clean sheet in 46% (6 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Yanbian Longding
Over / Under - Suzhou Dongwu
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Yanbian Longding is 110% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.62 pts / match - Yanbian Longding · 0.77 pts / match - Suzhou Dongwu
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Yanbian Longding - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Suzhou Dongwu - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 15%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Yanbian Longding
Suzhou Dongwu
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (China League One).
Teams vs league
| Yanbian Longding | Liga | Suzhou Dongwu | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.23 | 2.57 | ▼ 2.23 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 38% | 55% | • 54% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 38% | 51% | ▼ 46% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 46% | 27% | ▼ 8% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 69% | 73% | ▼ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 69% | 73% | ▲ 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Yanbian Longding 1 - 1 - 0 Suzhou Dongwu. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Yanbian Longding vs Suzhou Dongwu?
The China League One match finished Yanbian Longding 3:1 Suzhou Dongwu. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Yanbian Longding and Suzhou Dongwu?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Yanbian Longding won 1, Suzhou Dongwu won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Yanbian Longding vs Suzhou Dongwu?
Yanbian Longding score 1.38 goals per game on average and Suzhou Dongwu 0.77. The China League One average is 2.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Yanbian Longding's matches and 54% of Suzhou Dongwu's.
What form are Yanbian Longding and Suzhou Dongwu in?
Over the last 5 games Yanbian Longding have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Suzhou Dongwu 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Yanbian Longding vs Suzhou Dongwu?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Yanbian Longding vs Suzhou Dongwu: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


