Yelimay Semey vs FC Caspiy: match statistics
Yelimay Semey vs FC Caspiy: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Yelimay Semey played FC Caspiy in Kazakhstan Premier League (Kazakhstan). The match was played on 9 May 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Yelimay Semey: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. FC Caspiy: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Yelimay Semey scores 1.50 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. FC Caspiy scores 0.50 and concedes 1.38. League average: 2.09 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Yelimay Semey 63%, FC Caspiy 38%. Over 2.5: Yelimay Semey 38%, FC Caspiy 38%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 34%.
xG, shots and style
Yelimay Semey has higher xG: 1.55 vs 1.02. Yelimay Semey: 13.6 shots per match, FC Caspiy: 9.0.
Match halves
Yelimay Semey: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.88. FC Caspiy: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.25.
Goals by minute
Yelimay Semey: 76-90+ (5 goals). FC Caspiy: 0-15 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Kazakhstan Premier League: 2.09 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 34%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Yelimay Semey holds superior chance quality: home average xG is 1.57 versus FC Caspiy’s 0.89 xG on the road, and the hosts average 14 shots and 4.67 on target per match compared to the visitors’ 7.4 and 2.4. This translates to goals: Yelimay have scored 12 goals this season (6 in the last 5) and average 1.33 goals per home match, while Caspiy have 4 goals in total (2 in the last 5) and only 0.4 goals per away match. The visitors also display defensive issues on the road — conceding 1.4 goals per away game with an xG Against of 1.97, whereas the hosts concede 1.0 at home and keep a 33% clean sheet rate. Form trends and the table further favor the hosts: Yelimay average 1.0 point per match in the last 5 and sit 5th, while Caspiy average 0.6 points in the last 5, are 16th and suffer 80% defeat rate away. Considering the edge in xG, shot volume and the fact Caspiy fail to score in 60% of away games, I predict a home win as the most likely outcome, although Yelimay’s high draw rate (67% of home matches) maintains a significant draw risk.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS rates are low: home 33% and away 40% vs league average BTTS 49%, indicating a reduced probability of Goal/Goal. In the last 5 matches the home side has BTTS 60% and averages 1.2 goals (6 goals in 5), while the away side has BTTS 20% and has scored only 2 goals in 5 matches (0.4 avg), so the stronger signal is the away side’s lack of finishing. xG data shows Yelimay creates more quality chances (xG_for 1.23 vs 0.89, last 5: 1.41 vs 0.74), but the away conversion is only 5% with an average of 2.4 shots, so their real probability of scoring is low despite both teams conceding a fair number of chances (xG_against 1.5 vs 1.97). Additionally the league has a high clean sheet rate (62% of matches feature a clean sheet for one side), and seasonal CS are 33% for home and 20% for away, which reinforces the case against BTTS; therefore I project No Goal (BTTS - No) as the more likely outcome.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Combining xG and actual scoring averages, I estimate 1.32 goals for Yelimay Semey (home xG 1.23 and xG against opponents 1.97 -> simple xG estimate 1.60, but season actual goals scored 0.67) and 1.03 goals for FC Caspiy (away xG 0.89 and xG against opponents 1.50 -> 1.20 xG estimate, but season actual goals scored 0.40), totaling 2.35 goals. The hosts average 11.67 shots and 3.0 on target per match versus the visitors' 7.4 and 2.4, but low conversion (6% vs 5%) limits expected goals. Seasonal rates show Over 2.5 occurs in 33% of Yelimay matches, 40% of Caspiy matches and 34% in the league, therefore the model prices Over 2.5 at ~42% and Over 1.5 at ~68%. Over 3.5 is unlikely (Yelimay 33%, Caspiy 0%, our calculations ~21%), so the strongest signal from the data is Under 3.5. Recommendation: play Under at line 3.5, because the expected 2.35 goals, low finishing efficiency and seasonal over-3.5 stats favor a result with at most three goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I back the 2/1 scenario (guests leading at half-time, home team wins full-time) because the data indicate a mix of a weak start from the home side and strong second-half performance. The home team were trailing after 45 minutes in 67% of their season matches and had 0% leads at the break, whereas the visitors led at the break in 20% of games and have scored 5 goals before half-time compared to 2 for the hosts; average first-half goals are 0.67 for the home team and 1.0 for the visitors. Despite this, the home team perform better over full matches at home — averaging 1.0 points per home game versus 0.2 points for the visitors, a higher xG of 1.23 versus 0.89 and more shots on target 3.0 versus 2.4 — which increases the chance of a comeback. Additionally, the hosts have a higher second-half goals average, 1.33 versus 0.8 for the visitors, and have scored in the 61–75 and 76–90 minute windows, confirming the potential for a turnaround and a post-break victory.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Yelimay Semey | FC Caspiy | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.19 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Yelimay Semey is 167% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Yelimay Semey · 0.6 pts / match - FC Caspiy
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Yelimay Semey is 200% better for: goals scored per match.
1.5 goals / match - Yelimay Semey · 0.5 goals / match - FC Caspiy
Yelimay Semey is 38% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - Yelimay Semey · 1.38 goals / match - FC Caspiy
Yelimay Semey scores in 88% of matches (7 of 8 matches), while FC Caspiy keeps a clean sheet in 25% (2 of 8 matches).
FC Caspiy scores in 50% of matches (4 of 8 matches), while Yelimay Semey keeps a clean sheet in 25% (2 of 8 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Yelimay Semey
Over / Under - FC Caspiy
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Yelimay Semey is 133% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.75 pts / match - Yelimay Semey · 0.75 pts / match - FC Caspiy
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Yelimay Semey - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 38%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
FC Caspiy - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 13%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Yelimay Semey
FC Caspiy
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kazakhstan Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Yelimay Semey | Liga | FC Caspiy | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.50 | 2.09 | ▼ 1.88 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 49% | ▼ 38% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 38% | 34% | ▲ 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 25% | 31% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 61% | ▲ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 67% | ▼ 50% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Yelimay Semey vs FC Caspiy?
The Kazakhstan Premier League match finished Yelimay Semey 0:1 FC Caspiy. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Yelimay Semey vs FC Caspiy?
Yelimay Semey score 1.50 goals per game on average and FC Caspiy 0.50. The Kazakhstan Premier League average is 2.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Yelimay Semey's matches and 38% of FC Caspiy's.
What form are Yelimay Semey and FC Caspiy in?
Over the last 5 games Yelimay Semey have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and FC Caspiy 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Yelimay Semey vs FC Caspiy?
The statistical background for Yelimay Semey vs FC Caspiy — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


