Yeovil Town vs Forest Green Rovers: match statistics
Yeovil Town vs Forest Green Rovers: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Yeovil Town played Forest Green Rovers in National League (England). The match was played on 20 December 2025. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Yeovil Town: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Forest Green Rovers: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Yeovil Town scores 1.00 and concedes 1.32 goals per match. Forest Green Rovers scores 1.77 and concedes 0.95. League average: 2.82 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Yeovil Town 36%, Forest Green Rovers 64%. Over 2.5: Yeovil Town 41%, Forest Green Rovers 50%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Forest Green Rovers has higher xG: 2.09 vs 1.20. Yeovil Town: 9.7 shots per match, Forest Green Rovers: 17.3.
Match halves
Yeovil Town: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.50. Forest Green Rovers: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 0.91.
Goals by minute
Yeovil Town: 76-90+ (6 goals). Forest Green Rovers: 16-30 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
National League: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Yeovil Town | Forest Green Rovers | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Forest Green Rovers is 57% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Yeovil Town · 2.2 pts / match - Forest Green Rovers
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Forest Green Rovers is 77% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Yeovil Town · 1.77 goals / match - Forest Green Rovers
Forest Green Rovers is 39% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.32 goals / match - Yeovil Town · 0.95 goals / match - Forest Green Rovers
Yeovil Town scores in 55% of matches (12 of 22 matches), while Forest Green Rovers keeps a clean sheet in 32% (7 of 22 matches).
Forest Green Rovers scores in 86% of matches (19 of 22 matches), while Yeovil Town keeps a clean sheet in 27% (6 of 22 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Yeovil Town
Over / Under - Forest Green Rovers
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Forest Green Rovers is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.41 pts / match - Yeovil Town · 1.59 pts / match - Forest Green Rovers
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Yeovil Town - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Forest Green Rovers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 59%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Yeovil Town
Forest Green Rovers
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (National League).
Teams vs league
| Yeovil Town | Liga | Forest Green Rovers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.32 | 2.82 | • 2.73 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 36% | 54% | ▲ 64% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 41% | 54% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 27% | 25% | ▲ 32% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 55% | 70% | ▲ 77% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 81% | ▼ 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Yeovil Town 0 - 0 - 1 Forest Green Rovers. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Yeovil Town vs Forest Green Rovers?
The National League match finished Yeovil Town 0:2 Forest Green Rovers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Yeovil Town vs Forest Green Rovers?
Yeovil Town score 1.00 goals per game on average and Forest Green Rovers 1.77. The National League average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 36% of Yeovil Town's matches and 64% of Forest Green Rovers's.
What form are Yeovil Town and Forest Green Rovers in?
Over the last 5 games Yeovil Town have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Forest Green Rovers 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Yeovil Town vs Forest Green Rovers?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Yeovil Town vs Forest Green Rovers: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.