Japan - J2 LeagueData current as of 03 November 2026

Yokohama vs Imabari: match statistics

Yokohama crest
Yokohama
2 : 1half-time 1:0
Imabari crest
Imabari

Yokohama vs Imabari: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Yokohama played Imabari in J2 League (Japan). The match was played on 19 September 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Yokohama: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Imabari: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Yokohama scores 1.83 and concedes 1.17 goals per match. Imabari scores 0.83 and concedes 2.17. League average: 2.52 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Yokohama 33%, Imabari 50%. Over 2.5: Yokohama 50%, Imabari 67%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

Yokohama has higher xG: 1.74 vs 1.21. Yokohama: 15.0 shots per match, Imabari: 11.7.

Match halves

Yokohama: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 1.33. Imabari: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Yokohama: 61-75 (3 goals). Imabari: 0-15 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

J2 League: 2.52 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Yokohama have won 3 of their 6 league matches and sit 7th, while Imabari have just 1 win, 4 defeats and are 20th in the standings. The hosts average 3.33 goals per home game, compared with just 0.67 for the visitors away from home, with Imabari failing to score in 33% of such matches. Yokohama average 6.67 shots on target per game compared with Imabari’s 2.67, while their conversion rate stands at 27% versus just 6% for their opponents. The visitors’ defence concedes 2.33 goals per away game and have kept no clean sheets, which, combined with the hosts’ xG of 1.68, creates clear conditions for a Yokohama victory. Recent form also favours the hosts, who have scored 13 goals and collected 10 points in their last five matches, while Imabari have picked up 7.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The case for goals from both sides is strengthened by current form: in their last 5 matches, both Yokohama and Imabari recorded BTTS in 60% of games. During this period, Yokohama averaged 2.6 goals scored and 1.4 conceded, while Imabari scored 1.4 and also conceded 1.4 goals per match. The visitors’ defence looks particularly vulnerable, as Imabari have kept no clean sheets this season and concede an average of 2.33 goals. However, Imabari have a lower attacking efficiency, averaging 0.67 goals this season with just 6% shot conversion, which limits confidence in the pick. Nevertheless, Yokohama allow opponents an average of 1.50 xG, while both teams produce 2.67 shots on target per match. Therefore, BTTS - Yes is the more likely outcome.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, as both teams recorded at least 2 total goals in 67% of Yokohama’s matches and as many as 100% of Imabari’s. In their last five appearances, Yokohama averaged 2.6 goals scored, while Imabari averaged 1.4, with both teams conceding 1.4 goals per match. During this period, the hosts generated an xG of 1.94, clearly above Imabari’s 1.07. However, the visitors have kept no clean sheets all season and concede an average of 2.33 goals. Over 2.5 goals also has a solid basis, having landed in 80% of Yokohama’s and 60% of Imabari’s last five matches, but the 1.5 line offers a significantly greater safety margin. The projected 2.83 goals is driven by the hosts’ strong recent attacking output and the vulnerability of both defenses.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest HT/FT option is Yokohama leading at the break and winning after 90 minutes (1/1), as the hosts have won 3 of their last 5 matches, while Imabari have lost 2 of 5. During this period, Yokohama averaged 2.6 goals per match compared with Imabari’s 1.4, and their advantage is already evident before half-time: they were leading at the break in 60% of matches, compared with 40% for the visitors. The hosts scored an average of 1.2 goals in the first halves, twice as many as Imabari’s 0.6, and they have not been trailing at half-time in any of their last five appearances. After the break, Yokohama continue to offer offensive strength, averaging 1.4 goals scored, while Imabari concede an average of 1.2 goals in that period. In addition, the visitors are still without a win this season and concede an average of 2.33 goals per match, further strengthening the scenario in which the hosts maintain their lead.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
YokohamaImabari
22Shots10
YokohamaImabari
3Shots on target5
YokohamaImabari
2.21xG1.42
YokohamaImabari
5Corners2
YokohamaImabari
88Dangerous attacks60
YokohamaImabari
20Fouls11
YokohamaImabari
2Cards4
YokohamaImabari

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.83Goals scored / match0.83
YokohamaImabari
1.17Goals conceded / match2.17
YokohamaImabari
57%Average possession51%
YokohamaImabari
5.33Shots on target / match2.67
YokohamaImabari

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15Shots per match11.67
YokohamaImabari
5.33Shots on target2.67
YokohamaImabari
12.2%Shot conversion7.1%
YokohamaImabari
57%Possession51%
YokohamaImabari
1.74xG for1.21
YokohamaImabari
1.55xG against1.56
YokohamaImabari

Shooting quality

Yokohama: DominantImabari: Balanced
YokohamaImabari
Accuracy (shots on target)36%23%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.10
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Yokohama is 75% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Yokohama · 0.8 pts / match - Imabari

Yokohama
WLDWL
Season result split
50% W17% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-2
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-0
Last 5 at home
2-1-0
WDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.68Opponent xG: 1.60BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Imabari
LLLDW
Season result split
17% W17% D67% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-4
0.67 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-2
Last 5 away
0-1-2
LLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.18Opponent xG: 1.53BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Yokohama is 120% better for: goals scored per match.

1.83 goals / match - Yokohama · 0.83 goals / match - Imabari

Yokohama is 85% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.17 goals / match - Yokohama · 2.17 goals / match - Imabari

Yokohama scoring profile: very strong

Yokohama scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while Imabari keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).

Imabari scoring profile: strong

Imabari scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while Yokohama keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 matches).

11Goals scored (season)5
YokohamaImabari
7Goals conceded (season)13
YokohamaImabari
3Average goals in match3
YokohamaImabari
10Goals scored (last 5)4
YokohamaImabari
7Goals conceded (last 5)11
YokohamaImabari

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal67%
YokohamaImabari
50%2 goals17%
YokohamaImabari
33%3 goals0%
YokohamaImabari
17%4 goals0%
YokohamaImabari

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal83%
YokohamaImabari
50%2 goals67%
YokohamaImabari
0%3 goals50%
YokohamaImabari
0%4 goals17%
YokohamaImabari

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time17%
YokohamaImabari
17%BTTS in both halves17%
YokohamaImabari
50%Scored in both halves17%
YokohamaImabari

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
YokohamaImabari
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS33%
YokohamaImabari
40%BTTS - last 540%
YokohamaImabari

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
YokohamaImabari
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
YokohamaImabari
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
YokohamaImabari

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
YokohamaImabari
83%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
YokohamaImabari
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
YokohamaImabari

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Yokohama is 67% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.67 pts / match - Yokohama · 1 pts / match - Imabari

Yokohama - half-time state
33% leading67% draw0% trailing
Imabari - half-time state
17% leading50% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.67Points per match (1st half)1
YokohamaImabari
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.33
YokohamaImabari
0.17Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
YokohamaImabari
0.67Average goals (1st half)0.83
YokohamaImabari
83%Clean sheet before half-time67%
YokohamaImabari
50%No goal before half-time67%
YokohamaImabari

After half-time (2nd half)

1.67Points per match (2nd half)0.67
YokohamaImabari
1.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
YokohamaImabari
1Goals conceded (2nd half)1.67
YokohamaImabari
2.33Average goals (2nd half)2.17
YokohamaImabari
33%Clean sheet after half-time17%
YokohamaImabari
33%No goal after half-time50%
YokohamaImabari

Yokohama - second-half results

50% W17% D33% L
10
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.8

Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Imabari - second-half results

17% W17% D67% L
6
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+1.2

Concedes 1.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Yokohama - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.40
Goals scored / match0.61.4
Goals conceded / match0.21.2
Average goals in match0.82.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%100%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Imabari - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.61.6
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1-6
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Yokohama
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
2
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
2
1
46-60
3
1
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Imabari
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
2
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
4
46-60
1
0
61-75
1
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.0 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
119%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
42%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Yokohama

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.47
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
125%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Imabari

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.99
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.38
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.61
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
78%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
149%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J2 League).

Teams vs league

YokohamaLigaImabari
Average goals in match▲ 3.002.52▲ 3.00
Both teams scored▼ 33%43%▲ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 50%44%▲ 67%
Clean sheets• 33%34%▼ 17%
Goal before half-time▼ 50%65%▼ 50%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%78%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.52
Average goals per match
43%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
1.06
Away goals / match
+38%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ImabariYellow cardGabriel Gomes Ferreira
  2. ImabariYellow cardWesley da Silva
  3. YokohamaYellow cardKatsuya Iwatake
  4. ImabariSubstitutionOn: Kota MoriOff: Kengo Furuyama
  5. YokohamaSubstitutionOn: Ryo KubotaOff: Toma Murata
  6. ImabariYellow cardHiroki Abe
  7. YokohamaSubstitutionOn: Makito ItoOff: Kaili Shimbo
  8. ImabariYellow cardYuki Kajiura
  9. YokohamaYellow cardLeo Takae

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Yokohama vs Imabari?

The J2 League match finished Yokohama 2:1 Imabari. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Yokohama vs Imabari?

Yokohama score 1.83 goals per game on average and Imabari 0.83. The J2 League average is 2.52 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Yokohama's matches and 50% of Imabari's.

What form are Yokohama and Imabari in?

Over the last 5 games Yokohama have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Imabari 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Yokohama vs Imabari?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Yokohama vs Imabari: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.