South Korea - K League 2Data current as of 23 July 2026

Yongin City vs Gimpo Citizen: match statistics

Yongin City crest
Yongin City
1 : 3half-time 1:2
Gimpo Citizen crest
Gimpo Citizen
125%(3.50)
X25%(3.05)
250%(1.92)

Gimpo Citizen showcases decidedly better form and statistics in away matches. The visitors boast a 100% win rate on the road (1 win, 0 draws, 0 losses) and have not conceded an away goal this season, underscoring a solid defense. Yongin City finds itself in a precarious situation, occupying 13th place in the table, winless this season, and with very poor form over their last 5 matches (0.2 points per game). The hosts have drawn 100% of their home games, but their overall form (4 defeats in the last 5 matches) and a negative xG balance (0.73 xG For vs 1.5 xG Against) point to a clear qualitative advantage for the visitors. Gimpo Citizen also holds superior offensive metrics (7 shots on target vs the hosts' 3) and ball possession (62% vs 61%), which, coupled with their stellar away defense, gives them a realistic chance of securing another victory.

Yongin City vs Gimpo Citizen: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Yongin City play Gimpo Citizen in K League 2 (South Korea). The match date is 14 March 2026 at 08:30. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

Yongin City: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Gimpo Citizen: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Yongin City scores 1.18 and concedes 1.53 goals per match. Gimpo Citizen scores 1.18 and concedes 1.12. League average: 2.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Yongin City 65%, Gimpo Citizen 53%. Over 2.5: Yongin City 59%, Gimpo Citizen 35%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Gimpo Citizen has higher xG: 1.52 vs 1.15. Yongin City: 8.6 shots per match, Gimpo Citizen: 12.3.

Match halves

Yongin City: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.71. Gimpo Citizen: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.65.

Goals by minute

Yongin City: 76-90+ (9 goals). Gimpo Citizen: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

Gimpo Citizen showcases decidedly better form and statistics in away matches. The visitors boast a 100% win rate on the road (1 win, 0 draws, 0 losses) and have not conceded an away goal this season, underscoring a solid defense. Yongin City finds itself in a precarious situation, occupying 13th place in the table, winless this season, and with very poor form over their last 5 matches (0.2 points per game). The hosts have drawn 100% of their home games, but their overall form (4 defeats in the last 5 matches) and a negative xG balance (0.73 xG For vs 1.5 xG Against) point to a clear qualitative advantage for the visitors. Gimpo Citizen also holds superior offensive metrics (7 shots on target vs the hosts' 3) and ball possession (62% vs 61%), which, coupled with their stellar away defense, gives them a realistic chance of securing another victory.

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
8Shots15
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
3Shots on target7
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
1.2xG1.84
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
5Corners1
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
65Dangerous attacks55
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
10Fouls16
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
4Cards1
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
1.18Goals scored / match1.18
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
1.53Goals conceded / match1.12
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
49%Average possession50%
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
3.24Shots on target / match4
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.59Shots per match12.29
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
3.24Shots on target4
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
13.7%Shot conversion9.6%
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
49%Possession50%
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
1.15xG for1.52
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
1.47xG against1.27
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen

Shooting quality

Yongin City: Efficient finishingGimpo Citizen: Balanced
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
Accuracy (shots on target)38%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Yongin City is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Yongin City · 1 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen

Yongin City
DDWDL
Season result split
18% W47% R35% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-8-6
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-5-4
Last 5 at home
0-3-2
LDDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.00Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Gimpo Citizen
WDLLD
Season result split
35% W41% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-7-4
1.47 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-5-3
Last 5 away
3-1-1
DWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Gimpo Citizen is 37% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.53 goals / match - Yongin City · 1.12 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen

Yongin City scoring profile: strong

Yongin City scores in 71% of matches (12 of 17 matches), while Gimpo Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).

Gimpo Citizen scoring profile: very strong

Gimpo Citizen scores in 76% of matches (13 of 17 matches), while Yongin City keeps a clean sheet in 18% (3 of 17 matches).

20Goals scored (season)20
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
26Goals conceded (season)19
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
2.71Average goals in match2.29
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
5Goals scored (last 5)5
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
7Goals conceded (last 5)8
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal76%
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
35%2 goals29%
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
6%3 goals12%
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
6%4 goals0%
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen

How often they concede at least...

82%1 goal71%
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
53%2 goals35%
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
18%3 goals6%
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
0%4 goals0%
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time29%
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
6%BTTS in both halves6%
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
29%Scored in both halves24%
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS35%
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
60%BTTS - last 560%
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

59%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time18%
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time12%
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Gimpo Citizen is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.06 pts / match - Yongin City · 1.24 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen

Yongin City - half-time state
18% leading53% draw29% trailing
Gimpo Citizen - half-time state
24% leading53% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.06Points per match (1st half)1.24
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
0.47Goals scored (1st half)0.53
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
1Average goals (1st half)1.06
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
59%Clean sheet before half-time47%
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
65%No goal before half-time59%
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen

After half-time (2nd half)

0.94Points per match (2nd half)1.59
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)0.65
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.59
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
1.71Average goals (2nd half)1.24
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
35%Clean sheet after half-time59%
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen
35%No goal after half-time41%
Yongin CityGimpo Citizen

Yongin City - second-half results

18% W41% R41% P
18
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.06
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 18%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Gimpo Citizen - second-half results

47% W18% R35% P
21
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding146%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Yongin City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.60
Goals scored / match0.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match0.61.8
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal100%20%
Goal difference-3+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Gimpo Citizen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Yongin City
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
1
2
16-30
5
5
31-45
2
7
46-60
1
5
61-75
9
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Gimpo Citizen
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
2
3
16-30
4
2
31-45
0
2
46-60
3
2
61-75
8
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Yongin City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
45% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
45%

Gimpo Citizen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

Yongin CityLigaGimpo Citizen
Average goals in match 2.712.75 2.29
Both teams scored 65%61% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 59%56% 35%
Clean sheets 18%24% 29%
Goal before half-time 59%73% 65%
Goal after half-time 82%76% 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.75
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+4%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Yongin City vs Gimpo Citizen?

The K League 2 match finished Yongin City 1:3 Gimpo Citizen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Yongin City vs Gimpo Citizen?

Yongin City score 1.18 goals per game on average and Gimpo Citizen 1.18. The K League 2 average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Yongin City's matches and 53% of Gimpo Citizen's.

What form are Yongin City and Gimpo Citizen in?

Over the last 5 games Yongin City have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Gimpo Citizen 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Yongin City vs Gimpo Citizen?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.