Young Africans vs Namungo: match statistics
Young Africans vs Namungo: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Young Africans played Namungo in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match was played on 25 May 2026. Venue: Benjamin Mkapa National Stadium. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
Young Africans: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Namungo: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Young Africans scores 2.35 and concedes 0.35 goals per match. Namungo scores 0.78 and concedes 1.04. League average: 2.10 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Young Africans 22%, Namungo 43%. Over 2.5: Young Africans 57%, Namungo 17%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 38%.
xG, shots and style
Young Africans has higher xG: 1.84 vs 1.22. Young Africans: 10.7 shots per match, Namungo: 7.4.
Match halves
Young Africans: half-time lead 48%, second-half goals 1.22. Namungo: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.43.
Goals by minute
Young Africans: 76-90+ (14 goals). Namungo: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ligi kuu Bara: 2.10 goals per match, BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 38%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Young Africans are clear favorites: at home they have a 92% win rate, score an average of 3.33 goals per game and concede only 0.17, while keeping 83% clean sheets. Namungo rank 11th away, with only an 8% away win rate, score 0.5 goals per away match and failed to score in 58% of their away games. The quality gap is pronounced — Young Africans average 13 shots with 6.56 on target per match and a 26% conversion, while Namungo average 6.25 shots, 2.33 on target and an 8% conversion. In xG terms the hosts have 1.82 xG per match with 0.92 xG against, whereas the visitors register 1.02 xG per match with 1.13 xG against, confirming the hosts’ superiority in creating and limiting high-quality opportunities. In their last 5 matches Young Africans scored 11 goals and went 3-1-1, while Namungo scored only 1 goal and failed to win any of their last 5; therefore I predict a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I assess BTTS - No as more likely — around 70% vs 30% for BTTS - Yes, because the data strongly favor the visitors’ poor scoring form. Namungo average 0.5 goals per match this season and fail to score in 58% of games; in the last 5 matches they have only 1 goal total (0.2 per match), which severely limits their chance to score. Young Africans average 1.09 goals per match this season and have 11 goals in their last 5 matches (2.2 per match), while keeping a clean sheet in 45% of games and conceding only 0.82 on average, making it easier for them to keep the opponent off the scoresheet. Season-long BTTS are 55% for the home side and only 33% for the away side, and the league has a low BTTS rate of 34% with an average of 2.1 goals per match, which further supports a No Goal scenario. Additionally, the differences in xG and shots (home xG 1.45 vs away 1.02, 9.6 shots vs 6.25 and 3.9 vs 2.33 shots on target) and the fact that the visitors had an xG of 1.34 per match in their last 5 games but only 1 goal in total are the strongest signals in favor of BTTS - No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project 1.21 goals for Young Africans and 0.95 for Namungo (total 2.16) based on a combination of seasonal goals averages and xG. Young Africans have a seasonal goals average of 1.09 and xG_for 1.45, while Namungo average 0.50 goals and xG_for 1.02; juxtaposed with xG_against (Namungo xG_against 1.13, Young Africans xG_against 1.48) this indicates a clear attacking edge for the home side. In the last 5 matches Young Africans scored 11 goals (2.2 per match), whereas Namungo managed just 1 goal (0.2 per match), which further increases the likelihood of home goals. Seasonal indicators show over 1.5 occurs frequently — 64% of Young Africans matches and 50% of Namungo matches — whereas over 2.5 is rare (18%/17%), therefore I estimate the probability of over 1.5 at about 78%, over 2.5 at ~40% and over 3.5 at ~10%. Based on this, I recommend playing the Over on the 1.5 line as the strongest signal: expected total 2.16 and high over0.5 rates (91%/92%) plus historical 64%/50% for over1.5 support a straightforward bet over 1.5 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Young Africans led at the break in 60% of their last 5 matches (3 of 5) and in those five games they scored an average of 1.2 goals by halftime, while Namungo have not won in their last 5 matches (0% wins) and averaged 0.2 goals by halftime. Over the season the home side average 1.09 goals per game versus 0.5 for the visitors, have a higher xG of 1.45 versus 1.02 and more shots on target 3.9 versus 2.33, confirming Young Africans’ advantage in chance creation. Namungo practically do not score after the break in the last five matches (0.0 goals on average), whereas Young Africans have averaged 1.0 goals after halftime and as many as 4 goals in the 61–75 minute window, so decisive strikes more often come after the break. For these reasons the most likely scenario is a Half-Time/Full-Time lead for the hosts and holding the win to full-time (1/1), with draw/home (X/1) and draw/draw (X/X) remaining relevant alternatives due to the high percentage of home draws this season (55%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Young Africans | Namungo | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 46% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.17 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.48 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Young Africans is 233% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Young Africans · 0.6 pts / match - Namungo
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Young Africans is 201% better for: goals scored per match.
2.35 goals / match - Young Africans · 0.78 goals / match - Namungo
Young Africans is 197% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.35 goals / match - Young Africans · 1.04 goals / match - Namungo
Young Africans scores in 83% of matches (19 of 23 matches), while Namungo keeps a clean sheet in 30% (7 of 23 matches).
Namungo scores in 65% of matches (15 of 23 matches), while Young Africans keeps a clean sheet in 78% (18 of 23 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Young Africans
Over / Under - Namungo
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Young Africans is 84% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.91 pts / match - Young Africans · 1.04 pts / match - Namungo
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Young Africans - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 48% of matches and wins 70%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Namungo - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +11 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Young Africans
Namungo
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| Young Africans | Liga | Namungo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.70 | 2.10 | ▼ 1.83 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 22% | 35% | ▲ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 57% | 38% | ▼ 17% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 78% | 40% | ▼ 30% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 61% | 57% | • 57% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 78% | 62% | ▲ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Young AfricansGoalAllan OkelloAssist: Prince Dube
- Young AfricansGoalAllan OkelloAssist: Ally Kibwana Shomari
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Young Africans vs Namungo?
The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Young Africans 3:1 Namungo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Young Africans vs Namungo?
Young Africans score 2.35 goals per game on average and Namungo 0.78. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.10 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 22% of Young Africans's matches and 43% of Namungo's.
What form are Young Africans and Namungo in?
Over the last 5 games Young Africans have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Namungo 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Young Africans vs Namungo?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


