Young Apostles vs Gamba All Blacks: match statistics
Young Apostles vs Gamba All Blacks: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Young Apostles played Gamba All Blacks in Ghana Premier League (Ghana). The match was played on 12 April 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Young Apostles: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Gamba All Blacks: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Young Apostles scores 1.00 and concedes 1.11 goals per match. Gamba All Blacks scores 0.86 and concedes 0.86. League average: 1.87 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Young Apostles 39%, Gamba All Blacks 29%. Over 2.5: Young Apostles 36%, Gamba All Blacks 21%. League level: BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 31%.
xG, shots and style
Young Apostles has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.30. Young Apostles: 5.3 shots per match, Gamba All Blacks: 9.4.
Match halves
Young Apostles: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.61. Gamba All Blacks: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.36.
Goals by minute
Young Apostles: 46-60 (7 goals). Gamba All Blacks: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ghana Premier League: 1.87 goals per match, BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 31%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Young Apostles have a clear home attacking edge: they score 1.75 goals per match at home and generate xG 1.68 at home, while Gamba All Blacks score only 0.69 goals away with xG 1.06. The difference in chance quality is confirmed by shot metrics — the hosts average 15.6 shots and 5.4 on target per home game, whereas the visitors manage just 8.2 shots and 3.1 on target away, with a similar conversion rate (12% vs 11%). Defensively, Young Apostles concede 1.08 goals per home match with xG against 1.23, while Gamba concede 1.31 goals away with xG against 1.53; additionally, the visitors fail to score in 62% of away matches, compared to the hosts who fail to score in only 25% of home games. Form over the last 5 matches is comparable (Young Apostles 2 wins, 1 draw, 2 losses and 7 goals in last 5 vs Gamba 2 wins, 2 draws, 1 loss and 4 goals), with the visitors showing a slightly better points-per-game in the last 5 (1.6 vs 1.4). Considering the home advantage in shots, xG and the low FTS (25% vs 62%), I forecast a Young Apostles victory; I assign 65% probability to the home win, 20% to a draw and 15% to a away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - No: the home side have 60% clean sheets this season, while seasonal BTTS rates are just 27% for Young Apostles and 31% for Gamba All Blacks, both below the league average of 33%. In the last 5 matches the hosts had BTTS in 40% of games and scored 7 goals (1.4 avg), whereas the visitors had BTTS in 20% and scored 4 goals (0.8 avg), indicating hosts more often keep opponents off the scoresheet. Hosts concede 0.47 goals on average this season (0.8 in the last 5), and visitors score only 0.69 goals this season, so the visitors’ realistic ability to break down the hosts’ defense is limited. Although xG shows 1.48 xG for the hosts versus 1.06 xG for the visitors and opponents’ xG against the visitors is 1.53, visitors average just 8.2 shots and 3.1 on target with an 11% conversion, which does not translate into high output. Considering the hosts’ 60% clean sheets, the league’s 85% matches with a clean sheet factor and a low goals-per-game average of 1.87, I assign 70% to 'no' and 30% to 'yes'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
An indirect xG calculation yields expected goals of 1.50 for Young Apostles (xG for = 1.48 vs opponent’s xG conceded = 1.53 → average 1.50) and 1.00 for Gamba All Blacks (xG for = 1.06 vs hosts’ xG conceded = 0.94 → average 1.00), totaling around 2.50 goals. Seasonal percentages of matches over 1.5 goals are 53% for the home side and 54% for the visitors, and in the last 5 games both teams produced xG of 1.32 and 1.29 respectively (combined ~2.55), which increases the probability of at least two goals. On the other hand, rates for matches over 2.5 goals are low: 13% for Young Apostles and 31% for Gamba (avg ~22%), and over 3.5 are 0% and 15%, so exceeding 2.5/3.5 is unlikely. Hosts average 13.21 shots and 3.71 on target per match versus 8.2/3.1 for the visitors, and the high clean sheet rate for the home team (60% vs 15% for the opponent) suggests many matches finish with a single clean sheet, limiting total goals. As a result the best market to play is Over 1.5 (estimated ~66% probability), while Over 2.5 (~36%) and Over 3.5 (~9%) look risky; expected goals: 1.50–1.00 (total 2.50).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely half-time state is a draw — hosts were level at the break in 47% of matches and visitors in 38%, which favors a draw after 45 minutes. In the second half Young Apostles are markedly more active: they average 0.53 goals after the break and have accumulated 26 second-half points (1.73 per match), whereas Gamba All Blacks have only 0.15 goals and 11 points (0.85 per match). Additionally the hosts create more opportunities (13.21 shots and 3.71 on target with an xG of 1.48) versus 8.2 shots and 3.1 on target for the visitors (xG 1.06), and the away side concedes an average xG of 1.53, underscoring their defensive vulnerability. Young Apostles keep a clean sheet in 60% of home games, and the visitors win only 15% of their away matches; therefore the Half-Time/Full-Time scenario of draw at the break and a home turnaround (X/1) appears most justified.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Young Apostles | Gamba All Blacks | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 28% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.26 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.67 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Gamba All Blacks is 14% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Young Apostles · 1.6 pts / match - Gamba All Blacks
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Young Apostles is 16% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Young Apostles · 0.86 goals / match - Gamba All Blacks
Gamba All Blacks is 29% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.11 goals / match - Young Apostles · 0.86 goals / match - Gamba All Blacks
Young Apostles scores in 54% of matches (15 of 28 matches), while Gamba All Blacks keeps a clean sheet in 39% (11 of 28 matches).
Gamba All Blacks scores in 54% of matches (15 of 28 matches), while Young Apostles keeps a clean sheet in 25% (7 of 28 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Young Apostles
Over / Under - Gamba All Blacks
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Gamba All Blacks is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.04 pts / match - Young Apostles · 1.39 pts / match - Gamba All Blacks
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Young Apostles - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Gamba All Blacks - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Young Apostles
Gamba All Blacks
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ghana Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Young Apostles | Liga | Gamba All Blacks | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.11 | 1.87 | ▼ 1.71 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 39% | 33% | ▼ 29% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 36% | 31% | ▼ 21% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 25% | 42% | ▼ 39% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 68% | 60% | • 61% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 71% | 59% | ▲ 61% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Young Apostles 0 - 1 - 0 Gamba All Blacks. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Young Apostles vs Gamba All Blacks?
The Ghana Premier League match finished Young Apostles 1:0 Gamba All Blacks. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Young Apostles vs Gamba All Blacks?
Young Apostles score 1.00 goals per game on average and Gamba All Blacks 0.86. The Ghana Premier League average is 1.87 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 31% of games. Both teams score in 39% of Young Apostles's matches and 29% of Gamba All Blacks's.
What form are Young Apostles and Gamba All Blacks in?
Over the last 5 games Young Apostles have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Gamba All Blacks 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Young Apostles vs Gamba All Blacks?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Young Apostles vs Gamba All Blacks: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


