Young Apostles vs Vision: match statistics
Young Apostles vs Vision: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Young Apostles play Vision in Ghana Premier League (Ghana). The match date is 6 May 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
Young Apostles: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Vision: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Young Apostles scores 1.06 and concedes 1.09 goals per match. Vision scores 1.12 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.03 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Young Apostles 39%, Vision 32%. Over 2.5: Young Apostles 36%, Vision 44%. League level: BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 34%.
xG, shots and style
Young Apostles has higher xG: 1.38 vs 1.14. Young Apostles: 6.4 shots per match, Vision: 6.0.
Match halves
Young Apostles: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.55. Vision: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.71.
Goals by minute
Young Apostles: 31-45+ (9 goals). Vision: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ghana Premier League: 2.03 goals per match, BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 34%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
Young Apostles have a clear home advantage: they score on average 1.69 goals per home match, while Vision score only 0.6 goals away, a 1.09-goal difference favoring the hosts. The hosts create significantly more chances — on average 16.33 shots and 5.67 on target per home game versus Vision’s 6.5 shots and 2.7 on target away, with xG 1.75 versus 0.98. Defensively Young Apostles concede 1.0 goal per home match and keep a clean sheet in 38% of games, while Vision concede 1.27 goals away and keep a clean sheet in only 27% of matches. In the last 5 matches the hosts scored 5 goals and recorded 2 wins with an average of 1.2 points per game, while the visitors scored 2 goals and won once with an average of 0.8 points per game. Additionally Vision fail to score in 67% of away games versus 23% for Young Apostles at home, therefore I favor a home win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Young Apostles | Vision | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.22 | 0.19 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.56 | 0.45 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Vision is 6% better for: goals scored per match.
1.06 goals / match - Young Apostles · 1.12 goals / match - Vision
Vision is 9% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.09 goals / match - Young Apostles · 1 goals / match - Vision
Young Apostles scores in 61% of matches (20 of 33 matches), while Vision keeps a clean sheet in 44% (15 of 34 matches).
Vision scores in 59% of matches (20 of 34 matches), while Young Apostles keeps a clean sheet in 30% (10 of 33 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Young Apostles
Over / Under — Vision
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Vision is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.21 pts / match - Young Apostles · 1.32 pts / match - Vision
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Young Apostles - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Vision - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +5 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Young Apostles
Vision
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ghana Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Young Apostles | Liga | Vision | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.15 | 2.03 | • 2.12 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 39% | 34% | ▼ 32% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 36% | 34% | ▲ 44% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 30% | 41% | ▲ 44% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 70% | 62% | ▼ 53% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 67% | 59% | ▲ 68% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Young Apostles 0 - 1 - 0 Vision. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Young Apostles vs Vision?
The Ghana Premier League match finished Young Apostles 3:1 Vision. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Young Apostles vs Vision?
Young Apostles score 1.06 goals per game on average and Vision 1.12. The Ghana Premier League average is 2.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 39% of Young Apostles's matches and 32% of Vision's.
What form are Young Apostles and Vision in?
Over the last 5 games Young Apostles have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Vision 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Young Apostles vs Vision?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.