Zalaegerszegi TE vs MTK: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Zalaegerszegi TE played MTK in NB I (Hungary). The match was played on 20 December 2025. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Zalaegerszegi TE: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. MTK: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Zalaegerszegi TE scores 1.65 and concedes 1.47 goals per match. MTK scores 1.88 and concedes 2.12. League average: 3.11 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Zalaegerszegi TE 59%, MTK 59%. Over 2.5: Zalaegerszegi TE 59%, MTK 76%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 61%.

xG, shots and style

MTK has higher xG: 1.61 vs 1.54. Zalaegerszegi TE: 12.9 shots per match, MTK: 13.8.

Match halves

Zalaegerszegi TE: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 1.12. MTK: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 1.18.

Goals by minute

Zalaegerszegi TE: 76-90+ (9 goals). MTK: 46-60 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NB I: 3.11 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 61%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
17Shots11
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
4Shots on target6
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
1.89xG1.46
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
2Corners5
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
74Dangerous attacks46
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
11Fouls12
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
2Cards4
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
1.65Goals scored / match1.88
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
1.47Goals conceded / match2.12
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
49%Average possession50%
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
5Shots on target / match5.06
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.88Shots per match13.82
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
5Shots on target5.06
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
12.8%Shot conversion13.6%
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
49%Possession50%
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
1.54xG for1.61
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
1.73xG against1.96
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK

Shooting quality

Zalaegerszegi TE: BalancedMTK: Efficient finishing
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
Accuracy (shots on target)39%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Zalaegerszegi TE is 333% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / match - Zalaegerszegi TE · 0.6 pts / match - MTK

Zalaegerszegi TE
WWWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
35% W29% D35% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-5-6
1.35 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-3
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
LWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.89Opponent xG: 1.56BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
MTK
WLLLL
Season result split
35% W12% D53% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-2-9
1.18 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-6
Last 5 away
0-1-4
DLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 2.12BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

MTK is 14% better for: goals scored per match.

1.65 goals / match - Zalaegerszegi TE · 1.88 goals / match - MTK

Zalaegerszegi TE is 44% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.47 goals / match - Zalaegerszegi TE · 2.12 goals / match - MTK

Zalaegerszegi TE scoring profile: very strong

Zalaegerszegi TE scores in 88% of matches (15 of 17 matches), while MTK keeps a clean sheet in 24% (4 of 17 matches).

MTK scoring profile: very strong

MTK scores in 82% of matches (14 of 17 matches), while Zalaegerszegi TE keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).

28Goals scored (season)32
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
25Goals conceded (season)36
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
3.12Average goals in match4
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
9Goals scored (last 5)7
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
3Goals conceded (last 5)14
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal82%
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
47%2 goals47%
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
18%3 goals29%
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
6%4 goals18%
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal76%
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
47%2 goals47%
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
24%3 goals47%
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
6%4 goals24%
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

59%
Zalaegerszegi TE - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 17 matches
60%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time18%
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
12%BTTS in both halves12%
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
24%Scored in both halves35%
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS29%
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
20%BTTS - last 540%
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

59%Min. 1 goal before half-time88%
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
41%Min. 2 goals before half-time47%
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time24%
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time59%
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time41%
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Zalaegerszegi TE is 41% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.24 pts / match - Zalaegerszegi TE · 0.88 pts / match - MTK

Zalaegerszegi TE - half-time state
24% leading53% draw24% trailing
MTK - half-time state
24% leading18% draw59% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.24Points per match (1st half)0.88
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.71
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
0.71Goals conceded (1st half)1.06
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
1.24Average goals (1st half)1.76
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
59%Clean sheet before half-time29%
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
59%No goal before half-time65%
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK

After half-time (2nd half)

1.71Points per match (2nd half)1.76
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
1.12Goals scored (2nd half)1.18
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
0.76Goals conceded (2nd half)1.06
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
1.88Average goals (2nd half)2.24
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
53%Clean sheet after half-time53%
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK
29%No goal after half-time18%
Zalaegerszegi TEMTK

Zalaegerszegi TE - second-half results

53% W12% D35% L
21
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding146%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

MTK - second-half results

59% W0% D41% L
15
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.88
PPG before half-time
Lead holding146%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Zalaegerszegi TE - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.60
Goals scored / match0.41.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal20%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal80%0%
Goal difference0+6
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
MTK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.60
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.82.0
Average goals in match1.42.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1-6
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Zalaegerszegi TE
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
3
3
16-30
5
6
31-45
6
3
46-60
4
3
61-75
9
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

MTK
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
3
9
16-30
6
7
31-45
8
3
46-60
6
5
61-75
6
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.56
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
114%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-72%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
72%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Zalaegerszegi TE

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.37
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

MTK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
125%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
132%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.58
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB I).

Teams vs league

Zalaegerszegi TELigaMTK
Average goals in match 3.123.11 4.00
Both teams scored 59%60% 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 59%61% 76%
Clean sheets 29%22% 24%
Goal before half-time 59%70% 88%
Goal after half-time 100%88% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.11
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.61
Home goals / match
1.50
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+7%
Home defence advantage
+-2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Zalaegerszegi TESubstitutionOn: Balázs BaktiOff: Zsombor Nagy
  2. MTKYellow cardÁdin Molnár
  3. Zalaegerszegi TESubstitutionOn: Daniel Alves de LimaOff: João Victor Vieira Ferreira Sousa
  4. Zalaegerszegi TEYellow cardBalázs Bakti
  5. MTKSubstitutionOn: Artúr HorváthOff: Ádin Molnár
  6. MTKSubstitutionOn: Zalán KerezsiOff: Péter Törőcsik
  7. Zalaegerszegi TESubstitutionOn: Milán Gábor KlauszOff: Bence Kiss
  8. Zalaegerszegi TESubstitutionOn: Csongor PappOff: András Mátyás Csonka
  9. MTKSubstitutionOn: Patrik KovácsOff: Hunor Vajk Németh
  10. MTKYellow cardIlia Beriashvili
  11. MTKSubstitutionOn: Krisztián NémethOff: Róbert Polievka
  12. Zalaegerszegi TEYellow cardCsongor Papp
  13. Zalaegerszegi TEGoalMilán Gábor KlauszAssist: Daniel Alves de Lima
  14. MTKYellow cardKrisztián Németh
  15. MTKYellow cardTamas Fadgyas

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Bence CsonkaMatches officiated: 17
4.82Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 224%Home wins41%Draws35%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Zalaegerszegi TE 0 - 0 - 1 MTK. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

MTK Budapest FC
1 : 0
Zalaegerszegi TE

FAQ

What was the result of Zalaegerszegi TE vs MTK?

The NB I match finished Zalaegerszegi TE 1:1 MTK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Zalaegerszegi TE vs MTK?

Zalaegerszegi TE score 1.65 goals per game on average and MTK 1.88. The NB I average is 3.11 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Zalaegerszegi TE's matches and 59% of MTK's.

What form are Zalaegerszegi TE and MTK in?

Over the last 5 games Zalaegerszegi TE have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and MTK 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Zalaegerszegi TE vs MTK?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Zalaegerszegi TE vs MTK: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.