Egypt - Egyptian Premier LeagueData current as of 22 October 2026

Zamalek vs Abu Qair Semad: match statistics

Zamalek crest
Zamalek
2 : 0half-time 1:0
Abu Qair Semad crest
Abu Qair Semad

Zamalek vs Abu Qair Semad: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Zamalek played Abu Qair Semad in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match was played on 8 September 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Zamalek: 2-1-0, 2.33 points/match. Abu Qair Semad: 1-0-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Zamalek scores 1.67 and concedes 0.33 goals per match. Abu Qair Semad scores 0.33 and concedes 1.33. League average: 2.03 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Zamalek 33%, Abu Qair Semad 0%. Over 2.5: Zamalek 67%, Abu Qair Semad 0%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 32%.

xG, shots and style

Zamalek has higher xG: 1.29 vs 0.75. Zamalek: 11.7 shots per match, Abu Qair Semad: 5.3.

Match halves

Zamalek: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 1.33. Abu Qair Semad: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.33.

Goals by minute

Zamalek: 76-90+ (2 goals). Abu Qair Semad: 46-60 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Egyptian Premier League: 2.03 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 32%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Zamalek are showing clearly superior form: they remain unbeaten in the league (2 wins and 1 draw), while their record in the last five matches stands at 4 wins and 1 draw. During this period, the hosts scored 7 goals and conceded just 1, whereas Abu Qair Semad have lost 2 of their last 5 matches and sit 13th, compared with Zamalek’s 3rd-place position. Away from home, the visitors are yet to score, have lost 100% of their matches, average just 2 shots and 0 shots on target per game, and post an average xG of only 0.32. Zamalek average 56% possession at home and create chances worth 1.29 xG, while their opponents allow 1.62 xG and concede an average of 2 goals away from home. The hosts’ lower attacking efficiency, having failed to score in 50% of their home matches, leaves some room for a draw; however, the quality gap and Abu Qair Semad’s defensive limitations clearly point towards a Zamalek victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal points to BTTS - No, as the seasonal share of matches in which both teams scored is 0% for both Zamalek and Abu Qair Semad, compared with 33% across the league. The visitors have yet to score in the competition, average only 2.0 shots per match and have not recorded a single shot on target, while their average xG is just 0.32. Zamalek have kept a clean sheet in 50% of their matches this season and have conceded only 1 goal in their last five games, averaging 0.2 per match. The hosts are in better form, averaging 1.4 goals scored across their last five appearances, which supports a one-sided scoring outcome but does not significantly increase the chances of the visitors finding the net. Even with Abu Qair Semad improving offensively to an average of 1.0 goal over their last five matches, their 0% BTTS rate during this period still clearly supports a scenario in which at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The match profile clearly points to a low-scoring outcome: both Zamalek’s and Abu Qair Semad’s matches have finished with Under 2.5 goals in 100% of cases so far. In their last five appearances, the hosts averaged 1.4 goals scored and conceded just 0.2, while the visitors scored 1.0 goal, with matches involving both sides producing only 4 goals conceded across five games. Abu Qair Semad have failed to score in their matches so far in this matchup, averaging 2.0 shots and not a single shot on target, which limits the projection for the visitors to 0.57 goals. The league averages just 1.97 goals per match, and only 30% of games go Over 2.5, making Under 3.5 goals the most convincing option.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Zamalek are in clearly better form: over their last five matches, they have averaged 1.4 goals scored, conceded just 0.2, and won 80% of their games, while Abu Qair Semad have lost 40% of theirs. The hosts were leading at the break in 3 of their last 5 appearances and were not behind in any of them after 45 minutes, while the visitors averaged just 0.2 goals before half-time. Zamalek’s advantage is also evident in the quality of chances created: their average xG stands at 0.97 compared with just 0.32 for their opponents, who averaged fewer than one shot on target. Abu Qair Semad nevertheless remain capable of keeping the game open early on, having drawn at half-time in 60% of their recent matches; therefore, the half-time draw/full-time home win option is a strong alternative. The strongest scenario, however, remains Zamalek leading at the break and holding on to secure victory, supported by the hosts keeping a clean sheet in the first half in 100% of their last 5 matches.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
8Shots14
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
5Shots on target5
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
1.16xG1.57
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
4Corners3
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
42Dangerous attacks47
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
14Fouls19
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
1Cards2
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
1.67Goals scored / match0.33
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
0.33Goals conceded / match1.33
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
52%Average possession32%
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
3.67Shots on target / match1.67
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.67Shots per match5.33
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
3.67Shots on target1.67
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
14.3%Shot conversion6.3%
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
52%Possession32%
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
1.29xG for0.75
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
1.68xG against2.13
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad

Shooting quality

Zamalek: Efficient finishingAbu Qair Semad: Balanced
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
Accuracy (shots on target)31%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.460.20

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Zamalek is 133% better for: last-5 form.

2.33 pts / match - Zamalek · 1 pts / match - Abu Qair Semad

Zamalek
DWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
67% W33% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-0
2.33 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-0
2.33 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-0
Last 5 at home
1-1-0
DW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.7Goals conceded: 0.3xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.68BTTS: 33%Over 2.5: 67%
Abu Qair Semad
WLL
Season result split
33% W0% D67% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 away
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.3Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 0.75Opponent xG: 2.13BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Zamalek is 406% better for: goals scored per match.

1.67 goals / match - Zamalek · 0.33 goals / match - Abu Qair Semad

Zamalek is 303% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.33 goals / match - Zamalek · 1.33 goals / match - Abu Qair Semad

Zamalek scoring profile: strong

Zamalek scores in 67% of matches (2 of 3 matches), while Abu Qair Semad keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 matches).

Abu Qair Semad scoring profile: more difficult

Abu Qair Semad scores in 33% of matches (1 of 3 matches), while Zamalek keeps a clean sheet in 67% (2 of 3 matches).

5Goals scored (season)1
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
1Goals conceded (season)4
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
2Average goals in match1.67
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
5Goals scored (last 5)1
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
1Goals conceded (last 5)4
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal33%
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
67%2 goals0%
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
33%3 goals0%
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
0%4 goals0%
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad

How often they concede at least...

33%1 goal67%
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
0%2 goals67%
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
0%3 goals0%
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
0%4 goals0%
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

38%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
0%BTTS in both halves0%
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
33%Scored in both halves0%
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
33%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
33%BTTS - last 50%
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

33%Min. 1 goal before half-time33%
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Zamalek is 149% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.67 pts / match - Zamalek · 0.67 pts / match - Abu Qair Semad

Zamalek - half-time state
33% leading67% draw0% trailing
Abu Qair Semad - half-time state
0% leading67% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.67Points per match (1st half)0.67
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
0Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
0.33Average goals (1st half)0.33
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
100%Clean sheet before half-time67%
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
67%No goal before half-time100%
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad

After half-time (2nd half)

1.67Points per match (2nd half)1
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
1.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.33
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)1
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
1.67Average goals (2nd half)1.33
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
67%Clean sheet after half-time33%
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad
33%No goal after half-time67%
ZamalekAbu Qair Semad

Zamalek - second-half results

33% W67% D0% L
5
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding203%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Abu Qair Semad - second-half results

33% W0% D67% L
2
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.67
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Zamalek - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.671.67
Goals scored / match0.31.3
Goals conceded / match0.00.3
Average goals in match0.31.7
1 goal33%67%
2 goals0%67%
3 goals0%33%
Clean sheet100%67%
No goal67%33%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 33% leading - 67% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 33% won - 67% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Abu Qair Semad - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.671.00
Goals scored / match0.00.3
Goals conceded / match0.31.0
Average goals in match0.31.3
1 goal33%100%
2 goals0%33%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet67%33%
No goal100%67%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 67% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 33% won - 0% draw - 67% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Zamalek
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Abu Qair Semad
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.83
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 0.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
17%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
22%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
22%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Zamalek

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.39
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.73
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.38
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+1.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
178%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
30%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

Abu Qair Semad

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.80
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
30%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
141%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).

Teams vs league

ZamalekLigaAbu Qair Semad
Average goals in match• 2.002.03▼ 1.67
Both teams scored▼ 33%38%▼ 0%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 67%32%▼ 0%
Clean sheets▲ 67%38%▼ 33%
Goal before half-time▼ 33%50%▼ 33%
Goal after half-time▼ 67%76%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.03
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
32%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
0.94
Home goals / match
1.09
Away goals / match
+-14%
Home attack advantage
+-16%
Home defence advantage
+-3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
50%
1 goal
18%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ZamalekYellow cardAhmed Rabia
  2. Abu Qair SemadYellow cardFavour Akem
  3. Abu Qair SemadSubstitutionOn: Mostafa Abdel RahimOff: Favour Akem
  4. Abu Qair SemadSubstitutionOn: Ahmed Thabet DaheshOff: Gaber Kamel
  5. Abu Qair SemadYellow cardSeif El Din Ali Mohamed
  6. Abu Qair SemadSubstitutionOn: Ali HusseinOff: Mahmoud Youssef Abou Gouda
  7. ZamalekSubstitutionOn: Mahmoud GehadOff: Ahmed Rabia
  8. ZamalekSubstitutionOn: Ahmed SherifOff: Hossam Ashraf
  9. ZamalekGoalAhmed SherifAssist: Mahmoud Bentayg
  10. ZamalekSubstitutionOn: Ahmed Abdel RahimOff: Francisco Sacalumbo

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Zamalek vs Abu Qair Semad?

The Egyptian Premier League match finished Zamalek 2:0 Abu Qair Semad. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Zamalek vs Abu Qair Semad?

Zamalek score 1.67 goals per game on average and Abu Qair Semad 0.33. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Zamalek's matches and 0% of Abu Qair Semad's.

What form are Zamalek and Abu Qair Semad in?

Over the last 5 games Zamalek have a 2-1-0 record (2.33 points per game) and Abu Qair Semad 1-0-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Zamalek vs Abu Qair Semad?

The statistical background for Zamalek vs Abu Qair Semad — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.