Egypt - Egyptian Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Zamalek vs Ceramica Cleopatra: match statistics

Zamalek crest
Zamalek
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Ceramica Cleopatra crest
Ceramica Cleopatra

Zamalek vs Ceramica Cleopatra: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Zamalek play Ceramica Cleopatra in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match date is 20 May 2026 at 19:00. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Zamalek: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Ceramica Cleopatra: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Zamalek scores 1.50 and concedes 0.65 goals per match. Ceramica Cleopatra scores 1.31 and concedes 0.81. League average: 2.02 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Zamalek 38%, Ceramica Cleopatra 42%. Over 2.5: Zamalek 35%, Ceramica Cleopatra 23%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Zamalek has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.19. Zamalek: 13.3 shots per match, Ceramica Cleopatra: 9.8.

Match halves

Zamalek: half-time lead 54%, second-half goals 0.81. Ceramica Cleopatra: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.77.

Goals by minute

Zamalek: 76-90+ (10 goals). Ceramica Cleopatra: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Egyptian Premier League: 2.02 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Zamalek are favorites: at home they average 60% possession, 15.15 shots and 5.15 on target per match with xG 1.66, while Ceramica away average 56% possession, 8.75 shots and 3.33 on target with xG 1.09. Defensively the hosts outperform — Zamalek concede only 0.46 goals per home match and have 69% clean sheets, whereas the visitors concede 0.67 away and have 50% clean sheets. In the short term the visitors scored 5 goals in their last 5 matches and average 1.2 points over that span, while Zamalek scored 2 goals and average 1.4 points in their last 5, indicating greater efficiency from the hosts despite creating fewer situations. Season-to-date Zamalek have 16 wins and 38 goals for with 17 conceded, Ceramica 12 wins and 34 goals for with 20 conceded; home goal difference is +10 versus +6 for the visitors. Considering the higher xG (1.66 vs 1.09), superiority in shots and a solid home defense, I project a Zamalek win and assess probabilities at 60% for the hosts, 20% for a draw and 20% for Ceramica.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

23Possession (%)77
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
5Shots9
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
3Shots on target5
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
0.72xG1.17
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
1Corners4
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
26Dangerous attacks32
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
10Fouls9
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
5Cards1
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
1.5Goals scored / match1.31
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
0.65Goals conceded / match0.81
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
53%Average possession57%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
4.69Shots on target / match3.81
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.27Shots per match9.81
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
4.69Shots on target3.81
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
11.3%Shot conversion13.3%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
53%Possession57%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
1.47xG for1.19
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
1.1xG against1.24
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra

Shooting quality

Zamalek: BalancedCeramica Cleopatra: Efficient finishing
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
Accuracy (shots on target)35%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Zamalek is 100% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Zamalek · 1 pts / match - Ceramica Cleopatra

Zamalek
WDLWW
Season result split
65% W19% R15% P
Season (W-D-L)
17-5-4
2.15 pts / match · goal difference +22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-4-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%
Ceramica Cleopatra
DWLDL
Season result split
46% W31% R23% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-8-6
1.69 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-4-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LDDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Zamalek is 15% better for: goals scored per match.

1.5 goals / match - Zamalek · 1.31 goals / match - Ceramica Cleopatra

Zamalek is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.65 goals / match - Zamalek · 0.81 goals / match - Ceramica Cleopatra

Zamalek scoring profile: very strong

Zamalek scores in 85% of matches (22 of 26 matches), while Ceramica Cleopatra keeps a clean sheet in 38% (10 of 26 matches).

Ceramica Cleopatra scoring profile: mixed

Ceramica Cleopatra scores in 77% of matches (20 of 26 matches), while Zamalek keeps a clean sheet in 54% (14 of 26 matches).

39Goals scored (season)34
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
17Goals conceded (season)21
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
2.15Average goals in match2.12
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
3Goals scored (last 5)4
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
3Goals conceded (last 5)4
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal77%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
38%2 goals42%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
15%3 goals12%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
8%4 goals0%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra

How often they concede at least...

46%1 goal62%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
15%2 goals15%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
4%3 goals4%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
0%4 goals0%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

42%
Ceramica Cleopatra - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 26 matches
47%
League average

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time15%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
4%BTTS in both halves8%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
27%Scored in both halves23%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra

BTTS and goal count

27%Min. 3 goals and BTTS19%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
0%BTTS - last 540%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time58%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
19%Min. 2 goals before half-time19%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Zamalek is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / match - Zamalek · 1.5 pts / match - Ceramica Cleopatra

Zamalek - half-time state
54% leading38% draw8% trailing
Ceramica Cleopatra - half-time state
35% leading46% draw19% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)1.5
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
0.69Goals scored (1st half)0.54
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
0.23Goals conceded (1st half)0.35
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
0.92Average goals (1st half)0.88
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
81%Clean sheet before half-time69%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
42%No goal before half-time58%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra

After half-time (2nd half)

1.73Points per match (2nd half)1.62
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
0.81Goals scored (2nd half)0.77
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
0.42Goals conceded (2nd half)0.46
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
1.23Average goals (2nd half)1.23
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
65%Clean sheet after half-time58%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra
46%No goal after half-time42%
ZamalekCeramica Cleopatra

Zamalek - second-half results

46% W35% R19% P
52
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+12
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding120%

Leads at half-time in 54% of matches and wins 65%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ceramica Cleopatra - second-half results

42% W35% R23% P
39
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Zamalek - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Ceramica Cleopatra - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.00
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.00.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Zamalek
ScoredConceded
6
1
0-15
5
3
16-30
7
2
31-45
6
2
46-60
5
6
61-75
10
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

Ceramica Cleopatra
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
3
16-30
6
4
31-45
6
3
46-60
5
2
61-75
9
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.13
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-6%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
65%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Zamalek

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
144%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
66%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Ceramica Cleopatra

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
134%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.69
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).

Teams vs league

ZamalekLigaCeramica Cleopatra
Average goals in match 2.152.02 2.12
Both teams scored 38%47% 42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 35%34% 23%
Clean sheets 54%35% 38%
Goal before half-time 65%58% 58%
Goal after half-time 73%70% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.02
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.04
Home goals / match
0.98
Away goals / match
+6%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Zamalek 1 - 0 - 0 Ceramica Cleopatra. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Ceramica Cleopatra
0 : 2
Zamalek

FAQ

What was the result of Zamalek vs Ceramica Cleopatra?

The Egyptian Premier League match finished Zamalek 1:0 Ceramica Cleopatra. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Zamalek vs Ceramica Cleopatra?

Zamalek score 1.50 goals per game on average and Ceramica Cleopatra 1.31. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Zamalek's matches and 42% of Ceramica Cleopatra's.

What form are Zamalek and Ceramica Cleopatra in?

Over the last 5 games Zamalek have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Ceramica Cleopatra 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Zamalek vs Ceramica Cleopatra?

The statistical background for Zamalek vs Ceramica Cleopatra — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.