Železničar Pančevo vs Radnik Surdulica: match statistics
Železničar Pančevo vs Radnik Surdulica: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Železničar Pančevo played Radnik Surdulica in SuperLiga (Serbia). The match was played on 29 August 2026. Venue: Sportsko-Rekreativni Centar Mladost. Final score: 5:1.
Current form
Železničar Pančevo: 1-2-1, 1.25 points/match. Radnik Surdulica: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Železničar Pančevo scores 1.00 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Radnik Surdulica scores 1.00 and concedes 0.80. League average: 2.34 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Železničar Pančevo 50%, Radnik Surdulica 60%. Over 2.5: Železničar Pančevo 50%, Radnik Surdulica 40%. League level: BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 47%.
xG, shots and style
Radnik Surdulica has higher xG: 1.83 vs 1.38. Železničar Pančevo: 11.5 shots per match, Radnik Surdulica: 16.4.
Match halves
Železničar Pančevo: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.25. Radnik Surdulica: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.60.
Goals by minute
Železničar Pančevo: 0-15 (2 goals). Radnik Surdulica: 46-60 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
SuperLiga: 2.34 goals per match, BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 47%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Železničar Pančevo are clearly in the weaker run of form: they have not won any of their last five matches, scoring 2 goals and conceding 8, while Radnik Surdulica have recorded 2 wins, 2 draws and conceded just 4 goals over the same period. However, the hosts are more difficult to beat at home, where they have yet to lose, concede an average of just 0.5 goals and keep a clean sheet in 50% of their matches. Železničar also create more chances on home soil, averaging 16 shots with an xG of 1.79, compared with Radnik’s 13 shots and xG of 1.37 away from home. Finishing is a problem for both teams: the hosts have failed to score in 50% of their home matches, while the visitors average just 0.5 goals per away game. With both teams recording a 50% draw rate under the current circumstances, a low-scoring draw appears to be the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The stronger signal points to BTTS - No, primarily due to Železničar’s poor current attacking output: they have scored just 2 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.4 per game, with BTTS occurring in only 20% of those fixtures. Radnik are in better form, averaging 1.0 goal and 1.85 xG across their last five appearances, but over the season they score just 0.5 goals per game on average and fail to score in 50% of matches. The hosts concede only 0.67 goals per home game, with opponents recording 1.05 xG, which limits the visitors’ chances of scoring despite their recent improvement. Although Železničar have a high season xG of 2.17 and BTTS has landed in 67% of their matches, their drop to 1.17 xG in the last five games, together with the league BTTS average of just 34%, provides stronger support for a scenario in which at least one team fails to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal is the low goal ceiling: in the teams’ matches to date, at least 4 goals have never been scored, while fewer than 3.5 goals occurred in 100% of each team’s games. Železničar have scored only 2 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.4 per game, while also conceding 1.6 goals per match. Radnik are in better form, with 5 goals in their last 5 appearances, but their season-long average is still just 0.5 goals scored per game. Recent chance-quality indicators suggest 1.17 xG for the hosts and 1.85 xG for the visitors; however, Radnik’s defence allows only 1.28 xG on average, limiting the hosts’ attacking potential. The projected total of 2.10 goals is below the league average of 2.34, giving Under 3.5 goals a clear edge.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Radnik win at full-time, as the visitors were level at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches and did not concede a single goal before half-time during that period. In their last five matches, Železničar averaged just 0.4 goals scored and 1.6 conceded, recording no wins, while Radnik averaged 1.6 points per match and won 2 of their 5 games. The hosts do have excellent season-long home figures, including 2.33 points per match and a 67% rate of leading at the break, but this signal is weakened by their current run of two defeats and two draws. After half-time, Železničar failed to score in their last five appearances and conceded an average of 1.0 goal, while Radnik scored 0.6 goals during that period. The hosts' advantage in chance-creation potential, reflected in an xG of 2.15 versus 1.37, supports significant chances of a draw or home win, but current form and the visitors' greater defensive stability provide stronger support for the X/2 option.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Železničar Pančevo | Radnik Surdulica | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.21 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Radnik Surdulica is 28% better for: last-5 form.
1.25 pts / match - Železničar Pančevo · 1.6 pts / match - Radnik Surdulica
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Radnik Surdulica is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - Železničar Pančevo · 0.8 goals / match - Radnik Surdulica
Železničar Pančevo scores in 50% of matches (2 of 4 matches), while Radnik Surdulica keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 matches).
Radnik Surdulica scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while Železničar Pančevo keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Železničar Pančevo
Over / Under - Radnik Surdulica
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Radnik Surdulica is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / match - Železničar Pančevo · 1.8 pts / match - Radnik Surdulica
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Železničar Pančevo - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Radnik Surdulica - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.50 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.3 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Average goals in match | 1.3 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 75% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 25% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 50% |
| No goal | 50% | 75% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Železničar Pančevo
Radnik Surdulica
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (SuperLiga).
Teams vs league
| Železničar Pančevo | Liga | Radnik Surdulica | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.00 | 2.34 | ▼ 1.80 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 34% | ▲ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 47% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 25% | 38% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 68% | ▼ 40% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 75% | 66% | ▼ 60% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Železničar Pančevo 2 - 1 - 0 Radnik Surdulica. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Železničar Pančevo vs Radnik Surdulica?
The SuperLiga match finished Železničar Pančevo 5:1 Radnik Surdulica. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Železničar Pančevo and Radnik Surdulica?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Železničar Pančevo won 2, Radnik Surdulica won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Železničar Pančevo vs Radnik Surdulica?
Železničar Pančevo score 1.00 goals per game on average and Radnik Surdulica 1.00. The SuperLiga average is 2.34 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Železničar Pančevo's matches and 60% of Radnik Surdulica's.
What form are Železničar Pančevo and Radnik Surdulica in?
Over the last 5 games Železničar Pančevo have a 1-2-1 record (1.25 points per game) and Radnik Surdulica 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Železničar Pančevo vs Radnik Surdulica?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Železničar Pančevo vs Radnik Surdulica: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.