Zhejiang FC vs Beijing Guoan: match statistics
Zhejiang FC vs Beijing Guoan: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Zhejiang FC played Beijing Guoan in Chinese Super League (China). The match was played on 17 April 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Zhejiang FC: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Beijing Guoan: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Zhejiang FC scores 1.40 and concedes 1.20 goals per match. Beijing Guoan scores 1.20 and concedes 1.40. League average: 2.98 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Zhejiang FC 40%, Beijing Guoan 80%. Over 2.5: Zhejiang FC 40%, Beijing Guoan 60%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 53%.
xG, shots and style
Zhejiang FC has higher xG: 1.70 vs 1.36. Zhejiang FC: 14.8 shots per match, Beijing Guoan: 11.4.
Match halves
Zhejiang FC: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.00. Beijing Guoan: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.80.
Goals by minute
Zhejiang FC: 46-60 (2 goals). Beijing Guoan: 46-60 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Chinese Super League: 2.98 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 53%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 4.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Zhejiang FC (9th) holds a home record of 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, scoring 7 and conceding 6, while Beijing Guoan (13th) away record is 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses with a 6–7 goal balance. The hosts create more chances: on average 14.67 shots and 5.33 on target per home match versus 11.67 shots and 3.67 on target for the visitors away, with average xG 1.7 for Zhejiang versus 1.45 for Beijing. Despite that, Zhejiang have lower efficiency — a conversion rate of 7% and on average 1.0 goals per match — while Beijing posts 11% conversion and 1.33 goals on average; additionally the visitors have no blank-score matches (FTS 0%) versus 33% FTS for the hosts. The hosts’ key advantage is defense and form: Zhejiang concede 0.67 goals on average at home versus 1.33 conceded by Beijing away and have higher recent PPG (1.4 vs 0.8), which gives them control and better chances to win. Considering these figures (xG 1.7 vs 1.45, possession 64% vs 60% and advantage in chance creation), I assess the probabilities as 60% home win, 25% draw and 15% away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal indicators strongly support BTTS: Zhejiang has a seasonal BTTS 100% and 0% clean sheets, while Beijing has BTTS 67% and 33% clean sheets, with the league BTTS frequency at 60%. In the last 5 matches Zhejiang has BTTS 40% (averaging 1.4 scored and 1.2 conceded), whereas Beijing has BTTS 80% (averaging 1.2 scored and 1.4 conceded), indicating a greater tendency from the visitors for Goal/Goal games. xG shows both teams create chances: seasonal xG_for 1.22 (Zhejiang) vs 1.45 (Beijing), and seasonal xG_against 1.13 vs 1.27; in the last 5 matches Zhejiang has xG_for 1.7 compared to 1.36 for Beijing. Beijing registers more shots on target (3.67 vs 2.5) and has a higher shot conversion rate (11% vs 9%), and Zhejiang concedes 1.5 goals seasonally, which increases the likelihood that both teams will score. Considering 100% home BTTS, 67% away BTTS, league 60% and last 5 matches 80% for Beijing vs 40% for Zhejiang, I project BTTS - Yes at 72% and No at 28%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project 1.25 goals for Zhejiang and 1.29 for Beijing, totaling 2.54 expected goals; calculation based on xG: Zhejiang xG_for 1.22 vs xG_against_away 1.27, and Beijing xG_for 1.45 vs xG_against_home 1.13. Strong signal for Over 1.5 comes from both teams having a season rate of matches over 1.5 goals equal to 100% (Zhejiang 100%, Beijing 100%), so the probability of under 1.5 is minimal. Over 2.5 has a moderate chance – season Over 2.5 is 50% for Zhejiang and 67% for Beijing, the league has 57% of matches Over 2.5, and the projected 2.54 goals suggests a probability around 55%. Additionally, BTTS occurs frequently (Zhejiang BTTS 100%, Beijing BTTS 67%), and average shots on target 2.5 (home) and 3.67 (away) with conversion rates 9% vs 11% support that both teams can score. Over 3.5 looks unlikely (season Over 3.5 = 0% for both), therefore I recommend the Over 1.5 line as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and an away win (X/2) — I assess it at 30%. At the break both teams score little: the home side averages 0.5 goals by half-time, the visitors 0.33, which increases the chance of a draw after 45 minutes. After the break the advantage lies with Beijing: the visitors have 6 points gained in second halves, average 1.0 goal in the second half and a 67% win rate in second halves, while Zhejiang have 0 points and concede an average of 1.5 goals after the break. Additionally, the visitors’ xG of 1.45 versus the hosts’ 1.22, shots on target 3.67 versus 2.5 and conversion 11% versus 9% suggest that Beijing creates better chances and has a higher probability of a turnaround after half-time; seasonally Zhejiang have a 0% win rate while Beijing have 33%, which confirms X/2 as the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Zhejiang FC | Beijing Guoan | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 28% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Zhejiang FC is 75% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Zhejiang FC · 0.8 pts / match - Beijing Guoan
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Zhejiang FC is 17% better for: goals scored per match.
1.4 goals / match - Zhejiang FC · 1.2 goals / match - Beijing Guoan
Zhejiang FC is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.2 goals / match - Zhejiang FC · 1.4 goals / match - Beijing Guoan
Zhejiang FC scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Beijing Guoan keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).
Beijing Guoan scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while Zhejiang FC keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Zhejiang FC
Over / Under - Beijing Guoan
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Beijing Guoan is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.8 pts / match - Zhejiang FC · 1.6 pts / match - Beijing Guoan
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Zhejiang FC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Beijing Guoan - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Zhejiang FC
Beijing Guoan
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).
Teams vs league
| Zhejiang FC | Liga | Beijing Guoan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.60 | 2.98 | ▼ 2.60 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 58% | ▲ 80% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 53% | ▲ 60% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 23% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 63% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 80% | 88% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Zhejiang FC 0 - 0 - 2 Beijing Guoan. Average goals 4.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Zhejiang FC vs Beijing Guoan?
The Chinese Super League match finished Zhejiang FC 0:0 Beijing Guoan. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Zhejiang FC and Beijing Guoan?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Zhejiang FC won 0, Beijing Guoan won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Zhejiang FC vs Beijing Guoan?
Zhejiang FC score 1.40 goals per game on average and Beijing Guoan 1.20. The Chinese Super League average is 2.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Zhejiang FC's matches and 80% of Beijing Guoan's.
What form are Zhejiang FC and Beijing Guoan in?
Over the last 5 games Zhejiang FC have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Beijing Guoan 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Zhejiang FC vs Beijing Guoan?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.