Zhejiang FC vs Tianjin Teda: match statistics
Zhejiang FC vs Tianjin Teda: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Zhejiang FC played Tianjin Teda in Chinese Super League (China). The match was played on 10 May 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Zhejiang FC: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Tianjin Teda: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Zhejiang FC scores 1.10 and concedes 1.40 goals per match. Tianjin Teda scores 1.40 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.93 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Zhejiang FC 40%, Tianjin Teda 60%. Over 2.5: Zhejiang FC 50%, Tianjin Teda 60%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 58%.
xG, shots and style
Zhejiang FC has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.00. Zhejiang FC: 13.8 shots per match, Tianjin Teda: 8.6.
Match halves
Zhejiang FC: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.80. Tianjin Teda: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.80.
Goals by minute
Zhejiang FC: 46-60 (3 goals). Tianjin Teda: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Chinese Super League: 2.93 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 58%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Zhejiang has a clear advantage in chance creation: at home they average 56% possession, 15 shots and 5.6 on target with xG 1.7 per match, whereas Tianjin away averages 36% possession, 8.8 shots, 3.8 on target and xG 1.0. Defensively the hosts are better — Zhejiang concedes only 0.6 goals per home match and records 40% clean sheets, while Tianjin concedes 1.4 goals away and has 20% clean sheets. The visitors, however, can be very efficient: their away conversion rate is 18% and they scored 11 goals in the last 5 matches, compared to Zhejiang’s 4 goals in that period. The gap between xG and actual goals shows Zhejiang creates better chances (xG 1.7 at home) but averages 1.0 goal, while Tianjin has xG 1.0 away yet scores 1.6 goals, which increases outcome uncertainty. Considering the hosts’ control and superior defense, but also the opponents’ high efficiency, I back a Zhejiang win; I assess the probabilities at approximately 57% for the home side, 23% for a draw and 20% for the away side.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal indicators are mixed: Zhejiang has BTTS at 80% versus Tianjin's 40%, while the league average BTTS is 57% with 2.93 goals per game. In the last 5 matches the signal favors both teams scoring — the away side has BTTS 80% and scored 11 goals (2.2 per game), the home side has BTTS 40% and scored 4 goals (0.8 per game), despite their recent xG being 1.43 per game, which indicates chance creation. Both teams’ defenses are vulnerable: Zhejiang concedes 1.6 goals per game on the season, and Tianjin has an xG against of 1.89 (a high value), with both teams having only 20% clean sheets this season. Additionally, the visitors are more efficient in finishing — 3.8 shots on target and an 18% conversion rate versus the hosts’ 2.8 and 14% — which increases the likelihood that both teams will find the net. On this basis I select the BTTS 'Yes' scenario as the stronger signal, with a 65% probability.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model estimates expected goals of 1.44 for Zhejiang and 1.15 for Tianjin, totaling 2.59 xG (based on attack xG 0.99 and 1.00 and xG against 1.89 for the away side and 1.29 for the home side). Both teams have 80% of season matches over 1.5 goals (home 80%, away 80%), therefore I assign 82% probability to Over 1.5. Additionally, the away team scored 11 goals in the last 5 matches (2.2 average), have 3.8 shots on target and 18% conversion, while the home side have 2.8 shots on target and 14% conversion — this increases the likelihood of more goals. The 3.5 line is less likely: seasonally Over 3.5 is 40% for homes and 20% for aways, and the league averages 2.93 goals per match, so I give approximately 30% for Over 3.5. Conclusion: play Over at 1.5 as the strongest signal given the expected combined xG of 2.59.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I back X/2 (draw at Half-Time and away win at Full-Time) because the home side draw at the break in 80% of their home matches and average 0.4 first-half goals versus Tianjin’s 0.8. This season Tianjin have won 40% of their matches while Zhejiang have 0% home wins, which strongly favors the visitors after 90 minutes. The visitors’ attack is more efficient — on average 3.8 shots on target and 18% conversion versus the hosts’ 2.8 and 14% — and both teams’ xG is similar (0.99 vs 1.0), so Tianjin convert chances more readily. Additionally, in their last five matches Tianjin led at the break in 60% of games and averaged 1.2 second-half goals, whereas Zhejiang did not lead at half-time in their last five, confirming the visitors’ advantage after the interval. For these reasons I assign X/2 the highest weight (35%), a full-time draw 22%, an away win from the start (2/2) 14%, and low probabilities to options with a home-side lead.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Zhejiang FC | Tianjin Teda | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.22 | 0.42 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Tianjin Teda is 14% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Zhejiang FC · 1.6 pts / match - Tianjin Teda
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Tianjin Teda is 27% better for: goals scored per match.
1.1 goals / match - Zhejiang FC · 1.4 goals / match - Tianjin Teda
Zhejiang FC is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.4 goals / match - Zhejiang FC · 1.5 goals / match - Tianjin Teda
Zhejiang FC scores in 50% of matches (5 of 10 matches), while Tianjin Teda keeps a clean sheet in 20% (2 of 10 matches).
Tianjin Teda scores in 70% of matches (7 of 10 matches), while Zhejiang FC keeps a clean sheet in 20% (2 of 10 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Zhejiang FC
Over / Under - Tianjin Teda
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Tianjin Teda is 150% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.6 pts / match - Zhejiang FC · 1.5 pts / match - Tianjin Teda
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Zhejiang FC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Tianjin Teda - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.9 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -5 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Zhejiang FC
Tianjin Teda
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).
Teams vs league
| Zhejiang FC | Liga | Tianjin Teda | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.50 | 2.93 | • 2.90 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 59% | • 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 58% | ▲ 60% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 23% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 67% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 80% | 88% | ▼ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Zhejiang FC 1 - 0 - 1 Tianjin Teda. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Zhejiang FC vs Tianjin Teda?
The Chinese Super League match finished Zhejiang FC 1:1 Tianjin Teda. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Zhejiang FC and Tianjin Teda?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Zhejiang FC won 1, Tianjin Teda won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Zhejiang FC vs Tianjin Teda?
Zhejiang FC score 1.10 goals per game on average and Tianjin Teda 1.40. The Chinese Super League average is 2.93 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Zhejiang FC's matches and 60% of Tianjin Teda's.
What form are Zhejiang FC and Tianjin Teda in?
Over the last 5 games Zhejiang FC have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Tianjin Teda 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Zhejiang FC vs Tianjin Teda?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


