Zhenys vs Ulytau: match statistics
Zhenys vs Ulytau: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Zhenys played Ulytau in Kazakhstan Premier League (Kazakhstan). The match was played on 18 July 2026. Venue: Astana Arena. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Zhenys: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Ulytau: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Zhenys scores 0.82 and concedes 1.12 goals per match. Ulytau scores 0.82 and concedes 0.88. League average: 2.26 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Zhenys 41%, Ulytau 41%. Over 2.5: Zhenys 35%, Ulytau 29%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 42%.
xG, shots and style
Ulytau has higher xG: 1.31 vs 1.27. Zhenys: 10.3 shots per match, Ulytau: 11.2.
Match halves
Zhenys: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.53. Ulytau: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.41.
Goals by minute
Zhenys: 76-90+ (5 goals). Ulytau: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Kazakhstan Premier League: 2.26 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 42%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-1. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Zhenys has a clear defensive edge at home: they concede an average of 0.88 goals per home match and keep a clean sheet in 50% of appearances, while Ulytau scores only 0.50 goals on average away and fail to score in 63% of their away games. In attack, the hosts record home xG of 1.23 per match with 3.25 shots on target and a shot conversion of 8%, whereas the visitors have away xG of 1.20 with 2.63 shots on target and a 5% conversion, indicating both teams create similar chances but the hosts convert them more efficiently. Over the last 5 matches Zhenys have scored 4 goals (1W, 2D, 2L) and conceded 5, while Ulytau have 3 scored and 3 conceded (2W, 1D, 2L), giving the visitors a slightly better points return of 1.4 points per match versus the hosts' 1.0, but that does not offset the visitors' away finishing issues. Considering Zhenys’ 38% home win rate versus only 13% away wins for Ulytau, together with the hosts’ higher number of shots on target and superior conversion, a home victory is more likely. I assess the probability of a Zhenys win at 55%, a draw 30%, and a Ulytau win 15%, because the hosts’ solid defense and 50% share of clean sheets significantly limit the real threat from a visiting side that fails to score in the majority of away fixtures (63%).
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal against BTTS comes from Ulytau: they average only 0.5 goals per match and fail to score in 63% of games, which significantly reduces the likelihood of Goal/Goal. Zhenys keep a clean sheet in 44% of matches and concede just 0.56 goals per game on average; the hosts register more shots on target (4.44 vs 2.63) and have higher conversion (10% vs 5%), so they are more likely to be the sole scorers. Seasonal BTTS rates for both teams are below the league average of 50% (Zhenys 44%, Ulytau 38%), and in the last 5 matches BTTS occurred in 40% for Zhenys and 20% for Ulytau, further supporting No Goal. Although xG shows 1.39 for Zhenys and 1.2 for Ulytau, the gap between Ulytau’s xG 1.2 and their actual 0.5 goals indicates significant inefficiency from the visitors. Based on this I assess BTTS probability at 25% for Yes and 75% for No and recommend a 'No' bet as the strongest signal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG- and form-based model projects a total of approximately 2.74 goals: Zhenys has an attacking xG of 1.39, while Ulytau concedes an average of 1.50 xG away, yielding ~1.45 expected home goals; Ulytau’s attacking xG is 1.20 versus 1.38 xG conceded by Zhenys, yielding ~1.29 expected away goals. Zhenys averages 4.44 shots on target with a 10% conversion rate, while Ulytau manages only 2.63 on-target with a 5% conversion, so the hosts generate materially more chances. Season figures show Over 1.5 in 44% of Zhenys’s home matches and 63% of Ulytau’s away matches, and Zhenys matches had Over 0.5 in 100% of cases and Ulytau in 75%, which supports at least two goals. Using a Poisson distribution with λ=2.74 yields roughly 76% probability for Over 1.5, 52% for Over 2.5 and 29% for Over 3.5, therefore the strongest and least risky signal is Over 1.5. I recommend backing the over at the 1.5 line based on the expected 1.45 home goals and 1.29 away goals (total 2.74).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win (X/1) — I assign it a 28% probability, because a draw at the break occurred in 4 matches (44%), and the home side wins the full match in 67% of cases. Hosts score on average 1.11 goals per game and concede 0.56, while visitors score 0.50 and concede 1.25; the home advantage is also visible in xG 1.39 vs 1.20 and in shots on target 4.44 vs 2.63. In the second half the hosts average 0.67 goals versus 0.13 for the guests and win second halves in 44% of cases (guests only 13%), so a draw at the break often turns into a home victory. The second-strongest signal is the home leading at half-time and winning (1/1) with a 26% probability — the hosts led at the break in 3 matches (33%) and have 2.22 points per match versus 0.75 for opponents. Scenarios involving a turnaround (1/2, 2/1) I assess as unlikely (about 2–6%), given the visitors’ low shot conversion of 5% and the 50% rate of away defeats.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Zhenys | Ulytau | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.21 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Ulytau is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Zhenys · 1.4 pts / match - Ulytau
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ulytau is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.12 goals / match - Zhenys · 0.88 goals / match - Ulytau
Zhenys scores in 65% of matches (11 of 17 matches), while Ulytau keeps a clean sheet in 35% (6 of 17 matches).
Ulytau scores in 65% of matches (11 of 17 matches), while Zhenys keeps a clean sheet in 41% (7 of 17 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Zhenys
Over / Under - Ulytau
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Ulytau is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.06 pts / match - Zhenys · 1.24 pts / match - Ulytau
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Zhenys - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Ulytau - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Zhenys
Ulytau
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kazakhstan Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Zhenys | Liga | Ulytau | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.94 | 2.26 | ▼ 1.71 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 41% | 50% | ▼ 41% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 35% | 42% | ▼ 29% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 41% | 31% | ▲ 35% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 53% | 61% | ▲ 65% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 65% | 69% | ▼ 65% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Zhenys 1 - 1 - 1 Ulytau. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Zhenys vs Ulytau?
The Kazakhstan Premier League match finished Zhenys 1:1 Ulytau. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Zhenys and Ulytau?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Zhenys won 1, Ulytau won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Zhenys vs Ulytau?
Zhenys score 0.82 goals per game on average and Ulytau 0.82. The Kazakhstan Premier League average is 2.26 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Zhenys's matches and 41% of Ulytau's.
What form are Zhenys and Ulytau in?
Over the last 5 games Zhenys have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Ulytau 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Zhenys vs Ulytau?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Zhenys vs Ulytau: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


