Slovakia - 2. LigaŠtadión Pod DubňomData current as of 16 October 2026

Žilina II vs Galanta: match statistics

Žilina II crest
Žilina II
2 : 3half-time 1:1
Galanta crest
Galanta

Žilina II vs Galanta: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Žilina II played Galanta in 2. Liga (Slovakia). The match was played on 11 October 2026. Venue: Štadión Pod Dubňom. Final score: 2:3.

Current form

Žilina II: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Galanta: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Žilina II scores 1.27 and concedes 0.91 goals per match. Galanta scores 1.36 and concedes 1.55. League average: 2.84 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Žilina II 45%, Galanta 45%. Over 2.5: Žilina II 45%, Galanta 55%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 57%.

xG, shots and style

Žilina II has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.34. Žilina II: 11.2 shots per match, Galanta: 10.3.

Match halves

Žilina II: half-time lead 55%, second-half goals 0.45. Galanta: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.55.

Goals by minute

Žilina II: 16-30 (5 goals). Galanta: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

2. Liga: 2.84 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 57%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Žilina II have won 3 of their last 5 matches, scoring 9 goals and conceding 4, while Galanta have won 2, scored 11 and conceded as many as 10. At home, the hosts win 67% of their matches and concede an average of 1 goal, whereas Galanta lose 60% of their away fixtures and concede an average of 1.8 goals in those games. Žilina II also hold the edge in chance creation: their home xG stands at 1.82 compared with Galanta’s 1.24 away from home, while they average 6.5 shots on target per match to Galanta’s 3.6. The visitors can still pose a threat, however, having scored 11 goals in their last 5 matches, so a home win is far from guaranteed. Nevertheless, home advantage and a more solid defence make Žilina II the favourites.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The case for BTTS - Yes is driven primarily by Galanta’s recent form: across 5 consecutive matches, they scored an average of 2.2 goals, conceded 2.0, and both teams scored in every match. Žilina II also has the potential to find the net — their average xG is 1.42, while Galanta allows opponents an xG of 1.76. The visitors’ chances of scoring are supported by the fact that Žilina II concedes an average of 1.33 goals per season, although they have reduced that figure to 0.8 over their last 5 matches. Caution is warranted, however, as the season BTTS rate is only 50% for the hosts and 40% for the visitors, while Galanta has failed to score in 40% of its matches. Despite these reservations, their recent scoring form and defensive vulnerability give a moderate edge to the scenario in which both teams score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals: this line has been cleared in 83% of Žilina II’s matches and 80% of Galanta’s. The hosts average 1.33 goals scored, while the visitors concede 1.8; additionally, Žilina II’s xG is 1.42, compared with the 1.76 xG Galanta allow, which favors the hosts finding the net. Galanta average 1.4 goals scored, while Žilina II concede 1.33, so the visitors also have a genuine chance to add a goal. Galanta’s last five matches averaged 4.2 goals, but Žilina II’s five games averaged 2.6, making the 2.5 line a less clear-cut signal. A forecast of around 3.06 goals points to value on Over 1.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is for Žilina II to lead at the break and hold on to that advantage until full time. The hosts have won 50% of their matches, scoring an average of 1.8 goals and conceding 0.8 in their last five; over the same period, Galanta conceded an average of 2.0 goals. Žilina’s prospects of leading at half-time are supported by the available recent-match data, in which they were ahead at the break in 50% of cases, although Galanta also often starts well and averages 1.2 first-half goals. The second half could prove decisive: the hosts have won 50% of second halves, while the visitors have not won any and have averaged just 0.2 goals after the break. A half-time draw followed by a Žilina win therefore remains a strong alternative, but the hosts’ overall advantage provides a slightly stronger signal for the 1/1 HT/FT pick.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
Žilina IIGalanta
17Shots13
Žilina IIGalanta
4Shots on target5
Žilina IIGalanta
1.98xG1.67
Žilina IIGalanta
6Corners4
Žilina IIGalanta
87Dangerous attacks69
Žilina IIGalanta
14Fouls9
Žilina IIGalanta
2Cards2
Žilina IIGalanta

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.27Goals scored / match1.36
Žilina IIGalanta
0.91Goals conceded / match1.55
Žilina IIGalanta
49%Average possession46%
Žilina IIGalanta
5.09Shots on target / match3.73
Žilina IIGalanta

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.18Shots per match10.27
Žilina IIGalanta
5.09Shots on target3.73
Žilina IIGalanta
11.4%Shot conversion13.3%
Žilina IIGalanta
49%Possession46%
Žilina IIGalanta
1.5xG for1.34
Žilina IIGalanta
1.57xG against1.63
Žilina IIGalanta

Shooting quality

Žilina II: BalancedGalanta: Counter-attacking
Žilina IIGalanta
Accuracy (shots on target)46%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Žilina II is 11% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Žilina II · 1.8 pts / match - Galanta

Žilina II
WLWDW
Season result split
55% W18% D27% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-2-3
1.82 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-1
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.73Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Galanta
WLWWL
Season result split
45% W9% D45% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-1-5
1.45 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-3
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LLWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Galanta is 7% better for: goals scored per match.

1.27 goals / match - Žilina II · 1.36 goals / match - Galanta

Žilina II is 70% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.91 goals / match - Žilina II · 1.55 goals / match - Galanta

Žilina II scoring profile: strong

Žilina II scores in 64% of matches (7 of 11 matches), while Galanta keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 matches).

Galanta scoring profile: strong

Galanta scores in 73% of matches (8 of 11 matches), while Žilina II keeps a clean sheet in 36% (4 of 11 matches).

14Goals scored (season)15
Žilina IIGalanta
10Goals conceded (season)17
Žilina IIGalanta
2.18Average goals in match2.91
Žilina IIGalanta
8Goals scored (last 5)11
Žilina IIGalanta
4Goals conceded (last 5)8
Žilina IIGalanta

How often they score at least...

64%1 goal73%
Žilina IIGalanta
45%2 goals45%
Žilina IIGalanta
9%3 goals9%
Žilina IIGalanta
9%4 goals9%
Žilina IIGalanta

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal73%
Žilina IIGalanta
27%2 goals45%
Žilina IIGalanta
0%3 goals36%
Žilina IIGalanta
0%4 goals0%
Žilina IIGalanta

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

9%BTTS at half-time9%
Žilina IIGalanta
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Žilina IIGalanta
36%Scored in both halves18%
Žilina IIGalanta

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
Žilina IIGalanta
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS18%
Žilina IIGalanta
40%BTTS - last 580%
Žilina IIGalanta

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time82%
Žilina IIGalanta
18%Min. 2 goals before half-time27%
Žilina IIGalanta
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time18%
Žilina IIGalanta

2nd half

64%Min. 1 goal after half-time91%
Žilina IIGalanta
45%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
Žilina IIGalanta
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
Žilina IIGalanta

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Žilina II is 47% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / match - Žilina II · 1.36 pts / match - Galanta

Žilina II - half-time state
55% leading36% draw9% trailing
Galanta - half-time state
36% leading27% draw36% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)1.36
Žilina IIGalanta
0.82Goals scored (1st half)0.82
Žilina IIGalanta
0.27Goals conceded (1st half)0.55
Žilina IIGalanta
1.09Average goals (1st half)1.36
Žilina IIGalanta
82%Clean sheet before half-time55%
Žilina IIGalanta
45%No goal before half-time55%
Žilina IIGalanta

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.09
Žilina IIGalanta
0.45Goals scored (2nd half)0.55
Žilina IIGalanta
0.64Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Žilina IIGalanta
1.09Average goals (2nd half)1.55
Žilina IIGalanta
45%Clean sheet after half-time36%
Žilina IIGalanta
55%No goal after half-time55%
Žilina IIGalanta

Žilina II - second-half results

9% W73% D18% L
22
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 55% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Galanta - second-half results

27% W27% D45% L
15
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding125%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Žilina II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.20
Goals scored / match1.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.60.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+40
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6
Galanta - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.00
Goals scored / match1.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.41.2
Average goals in match2.01.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+6-3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 8

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Žilina II
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
5
3
16-30
3
0
31-45
0
2
46-60
1
3
61-75
4
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Galanta
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
3
3
16-30
4
3
31-45
4
4
46-60
1
5
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.54
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
45%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Žilina II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.43
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.66
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
73%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Galanta

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
109%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
7% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
7%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. Liga).

Teams vs league

Žilina IILigaGalanta
Average goals in match▼ 2.182.84• 2.91
Both teams scored▼ 45%55%▼ 45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 45%57%▼ 55%
Clean sheets▲ 36%24%▲ 27%
Goal before half-time▼ 64%78%▲ 82%
Goal after half-time▼ 64%81%▲ 91%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.84
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.58
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+26%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. GalantaYellow cardTomáš Horák
  2. GalantaSubstitutionOn: Kristian MegoOff: Mário Zimáni
  3. Žilina IIYellow cardMarco Bortoli
  4. Žilina IISubstitutionOn: Dominik KmeťOff: Šimon Koribský
  5. Žilina IIYellow cardMichal Pekelský
  6. GalantaYellow cardJakub Jordan Jokel
  7. GalantaSubstitutionOn: Tomas KissOff: Jakub Jordan Jokel
  8. GalantaSubstitutionOn: Miroslav TomekOff: Nentaka Bangs

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Žilina II vs Galanta?

The 2. Liga match finished Žilina II 2:3 Galanta. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Žilina II vs Galanta?

Žilina II score 1.27 goals per game on average and Galanta 1.36. The 2. Liga average is 2.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Žilina II's matches and 45% of Galanta's.

What form are Žilina II and Galanta in?

Over the last 5 games Žilina II have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Galanta 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Žilina II vs Galanta?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.