Žilina II vs Petržalka akadémia: match statistics
Žilina II exhibits significantly better form over their last five matches, securing 2.6 points per game compared to Petržalka akadémia's mere 1.0 point. The hosts boast impressive efficiency at their home stadium with a 56% home win rate, while the visitors win only 11% of their away fixtures. Žilina II's key advantage is their offense – averaging 1.78 goals per home game with a high xG of 2.23, heavily outweighing Petržalka's capabilities (0.89 goals and 1.08 xG on the road). Petržalka akadémia also struggles with a lack of cutting edge, failing to score in 44% of their away games. Even though Žilina II concedes quite a few goals at home (averaging 2 per match), their offensive superiority and excellent recent form (4 wins and 1 draw in their last 5 overall matches) give them a realistic chance of triumph. The goal difference contrast (-2 for the hosts vs -5 for the visitors in their respective splits) further backs the prediction for a Žilina II win.
Žilina II vs Petržalka akadémia: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Žilina II played Petržalka akadémia in 2. Liga (Slovakia). The match was played on 15 March 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Žilina II: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Petržalka akadémia: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Žilina II scores 1.47 and concedes 1.74 goals per match. Petržalka akadémia scores 1.32 and concedes 1.16. League average: 3.01 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Žilina II 58%, Petržalka akadémia 53%. Over 2.5: Žilina II 53%, Petržalka akadémia 42%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Žilina II has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.51. Žilina II: 12.9 shots per match, Petržalka akadémia: 10.4.
Match halves
Žilina II: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.95. Petržalka akadémia: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 0.53.
Goals by minute
Žilina II: 76-90+ (9 goals). Petržalka akadémia: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
2. Liga: 3.01 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Žilina II exhibits significantly better form over their last five matches, securing 2.6 points per game compared to Petržalka akadémia's mere 1.0 point. The hosts boast impressive efficiency at their home stadium with a 56% home win rate, while the visitors win only 11% of their away fixtures. Žilina II's key advantage is their offense – averaging 1.78 goals per home game with a high xG of 2.23, heavily outweighing Petržalka's capabilities (0.89 goals and 1.08 xG on the road). Petržalka akadémia also struggles with a lack of cutting edge, failing to score in 44% of their away games. Even though Žilina II concedes quite a few goals at home (averaging 2 per match), their offensive superiority and excellent recent form (4 wins and 1 draw in their last 5 overall matches) give them a realistic chance of triumph. The goal difference contrast (-2 for the hosts vs -5 for the visitors in their respective splits) further backs the prediction for a Žilina II win.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Žilina II | Petržalka akadémia | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 50% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Žilina II is 160% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / match - Žilina II · 1 pts / match - Petržalka akadémia
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Žilina II is 11% better for: goals scored per match.
1.47 goals / match - Žilina II · 1.32 goals / match - Petržalka akadémia
Petržalka akadémia is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.74 goals / match - Žilina II · 1.16 goals / match - Petržalka akadémia
Žilina II scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while Petržalka akadémia keeps a clean sheet in 32% (6 of 19 matches).
Petržalka akadémia scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while Žilina II keeps a clean sheet in 21% (4 of 19 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Žilina II
Over / Under - Petržalka akadémia
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Petržalka akadémia is 60% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.05 pts / match - Žilina II · 1.68 pts / match - Petržalka akadémia
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Žilina II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Petržalka akadémia - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 37%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Žilina II
Petržalka akadémia
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Žilina II | Liga | Petržalka akadémia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.21 | 3.01 | ▼ 2.47 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 58% | 63% | ▼ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 53% | 56% | ▼ 42% |
| Clean sheets | • 21% | 21% | ▲ 32% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 74% | 78% | ▼ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | • 79% | 79% | ▼ 63% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Žilina II 0 - 1 - 0 Petržalka akadémia. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Žilina II vs Petržalka akadémia?
The 2. Liga match finished Žilina II 1:1 Petržalka akadémia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Žilina II vs Petržalka akadémia?
Žilina II score 1.47 goals per game on average and Petržalka akadémia 1.32. The 2. Liga average is 3.01 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Žilina II's matches and 53% of Petržalka akadémia's.
What form are Žilina II and Petržalka akadémia in?
Over the last 5 games Žilina II have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Petržalka akadémia 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Žilina II vs Petržalka akadémia?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.