Slovakia - Super LigaData current as of 13 September 2026

Žilina vs DAC: match statistics

Žilina crest
Žilina
0 : 0half-time 0:0
DAC crest
DAC
135%(2.35)
X30%(3.38)
235%(2.85)

Analysis indicates a very tight rivalry between two top league teams. Žilina shows impressive home form with 70% wins and an average of 2.4 goals per match, yet their last 5 overall games indicate a dip in form (1 point per match). DAC occupies second place in the table with a solid away record (60% wins, 60% clean sheets) and better current momentum (2 points per match in the last 5 games). DAC's possession advantage (55% vs 48%) and lower average goals conceded away (0.8 vs 1.1 for Žilina at home) suggest defensive solidity. Considering the hosts' decline in form alongside the visitors' good disposition and the similar xG values for both sides, the most likely scenario is a balanced duel with a slight edge for either side or a draw.

Žilina vs DAC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Žilina played DAC in Super Liga (Slovakia). The match was played on 28 February 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Žilina: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. DAC: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Žilina scores 2.14 and concedes 1.29 goals per match. DAC scores 1.86 and concedes 0.95. League average: 2.96 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Žilina 62%, DAC 52%. Over 2.5: Žilina 71%, DAC 52%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 57%.

xG, shots and style

DAC has higher xG: 1.99 vs 1.51. Žilina: 12.8 shots per match, DAC: 18.6.

Match halves

Žilina: half-time lead 62%, second-half goals 1.00. DAC: half-time lead 52%, second-half goals 0.86.

Goals by minute

Žilina: 16-30 (10 goals). DAC: 61-75 (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Super Liga: 2.96 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 57%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Analysis indicates a very tight rivalry between two top league teams. Žilina shows impressive home form with 70% wins and an average of 2.4 goals per match, yet their last 5 overall games indicate a dip in form (1 point per match). DAC occupies second place in the table with a solid away record (60% wins, 60% clean sheets) and better current momentum (2 points per match in the last 5 games). DAC's possession advantage (55% vs 48%) and lower average goals conceded away (0.8 vs 1.1 for Žilina at home) suggest defensive solidity. Considering the hosts' decline in form alongside the visitors' good disposition and the similar xG values for both sides, the most likely scenario is a balanced duel with a slight edge for either side or a draw.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
ŽilinaDAC
6Shots16
ŽilinaDAC
2Shots on target3
ŽilinaDAC
0.8xG1.5
ŽilinaDAC
3Corners5
ŽilinaDAC
38Dangerous attacks39
ŽilinaDAC
12Fouls12
ŽilinaDAC
2Cards2
ŽilinaDAC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.14Goals scored / match1.86
ŽilinaDAC
1.29Goals conceded / match0.95
ŽilinaDAC
48%Average possession58%
ŽilinaDAC
5.19Shots on target / match6.19
ŽilinaDAC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.76Shots per match18.62
ŽilinaDAC
5.19Shots on target6.19
ŽilinaDAC
16.8%Shot conversion10%
ŽilinaDAC
48%Possession58%
ŽilinaDAC
1.51xG for1.99
ŽilinaDAC
1.78xG against1.4
ŽilinaDAC

Shooting quality

Žilina: Efficient finishingDAC: Dominant
ŽilinaDAC
Accuracy (shots on target)41%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.410.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

DAC is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Žilina · 2 pts / match - DAC

Žilina
LLWDD
Season result split
52% W29% D19% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-6-4
1.86 pts / match · goal difference +18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-2-1
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.38Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
DAC
WWLDW
Season result split
57% W29% D14% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-6-3
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-3-1
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.98BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Žilina is 15% better for: goals scored per match.

2.14 goals / match - Žilina · 1.86 goals / match - DAC

DAC is 36% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.29 goals / match - Žilina · 0.95 goals / match - DAC

Žilina scoring profile: strong

Žilina scores in 86% of matches (18 of 21 matches), while DAC keeps a clean sheet in 43% (9 of 21 matches).

DAC scoring profile: very strong

DAC scores in 86% of matches (18 of 21 matches), while Žilina keeps a clean sheet in 33% (7 of 21 matches).

45Goals scored (season)39
ŽilinaDAC
27Goals conceded (season)20
ŽilinaDAC
3.43Average goals in match2.81
ŽilinaDAC
6Goals scored (last 5)9
ŽilinaDAC
7Goals conceded (last 5)8
ŽilinaDAC

How often they score at least...

86%1 goal86%
ŽilinaDAC
67%2 goals57%
ŽilinaDAC
43%3 goals33%
ŽilinaDAC
19%4 goals10%
ŽilinaDAC

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal57%
ŽilinaDAC
48%2 goals29%
ŽilinaDAC
14%3 goals10%
ŽilinaDAC
0%4 goals0%
ŽilinaDAC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time14%
ŽilinaDAC
5%BTTS in both halves10%
ŽilinaDAC
43%Scored in both halves38%
ŽilinaDAC

BTTS and goal count

62%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
ŽilinaDAC
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
ŽilinaDAC
60%BTTS - last 560%
ŽilinaDAC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

81%Min. 1 goal before half-time86%
ŽilinaDAC
48%Min. 2 goals before half-time52%
ŽilinaDAC
24%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
ŽilinaDAC

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
ŽilinaDAC
62%Min. 2 goals after half-time48%
ŽilinaDAC
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
ŽilinaDAC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Žilina is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.14 pts / match - Žilina · 1.86 pts / match - DAC

Žilina - half-time state
62% leading29% draw10% trailing
DAC - half-time state
52% leading29% draw19% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.14Points per match (1st half)1.86
ŽilinaDAC
1.14Goals scored (1st half)1
ŽilinaDAC
0.48Goals conceded (1st half)0.43
ŽilinaDAC
1.62Average goals (1st half)1.43
ŽilinaDAC
67%Clean sheet before half-time67%
ŽilinaDAC
24%No goal before half-time33%
ŽilinaDAC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per match (2nd half)1.67
ŽilinaDAC
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.86
ŽilinaDAC
0.81Goals conceded (2nd half)0.52
ŽilinaDAC
1.81Average goals (2nd half)1.38
ŽilinaDAC
43%Clean sheet after half-time62%
ŽilinaDAC
48%No goal after half-time43%
ŽilinaDAC

Žilina - second-half results

38% W24% D38% L
45
Half-time points
24
Half-time goals
+14
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding84%

Leads at half-time in 62% of matches and wins 52%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

DAC - second-half results

43% W38% D19% L
39
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+12
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.86
PPG before half-time
Lead holding110%

Leads at half-time in 52% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Žilina - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.00
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
DAC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.400.40
Goals scored / match1.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.41.2
Average goals in match2.01.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+6-5
Half-time: 80% leading - 0% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 8

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Žilina
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
10
3
16-30
9
4
31-45
9
6
46-60
9
5
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (10 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

DAC
ScoredConceded
9
3
0-15
5
1
16-30
7
5
31-45
2
5
46-60
11
3
61-75
5
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.12
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-4%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
74%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Žilina

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.63
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.49
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
143%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.86
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
7% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
7%

DAC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.59
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
127%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
63%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super Liga).

Teams vs league

ŽilinaLigaDAC
Average goals in match 3.432.96 2.81
Both teams scored 62%56% 52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 71%57% 52%
Clean sheets 33%25% 43%
Goal before half-time 81%75% 86%
Goal after half-time 81%75% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.96
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.50
Home goals / match
1.46
Away goals / match
+3%
Home attack advantage
+3%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. DACYellow cardFilip Blažek
  2. ŽilinaYellow cardFilip Kaša
  3. DACSubstitutionOn: Nino KukovecOff: Pa Assan Corr
  4. DACSubstitutionOn: Alioune SyllaOff: Ammar Ramadan
  5. DACSubstitutionOn: Nathan UdvarosOff: Andreas Gruber
  6. DACYellow cardMatúš Kmeť
  7. ŽilinaYellow cardXavier Rodrigue Adang Mveng
  8. ŽilinaSubstitutionOn: Samuel ĎatkoOff: Timotej Hranica
  9. DACSubstitutionOn: Filip BlažekOff: Matúš Kmeť

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Ivan KružliakMatches officiated: 13
4.69Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 262%Home wins15%Draws23%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Žilina 1 - 0 - 0 DAC. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

DAC 1904 Dunajská Streda
1 : 2
MŠK Žilina

FAQ

What was the result of Žilina vs DAC?

The Super Liga match finished Žilina 0:0 DAC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Žilina vs DAC?

Žilina score 2.14 goals per game on average and DAC 1.86. The Super Liga average is 2.96 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Žilina's matches and 52% of DAC's.

What form are Žilina and DAC in?

Over the last 5 games Žilina have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and DAC 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Žilina vs DAC?

The statistical background for Žilina vs DAC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.