Zira vs Mil Mugan FK: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Zira played Mil Mugan FK in Premyer Liqası (Azerbaijan). The match was played on 20 December 2025. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Zira: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Mil Mugan FK: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Zira scores 1.53 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Mil Mugan FK scores 1.00 and concedes 1.07. League average: 2.52 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Zira 60%, Mil Mugan FK 27%. Over 2.5: Zira 47%, Mil Mugan FK 33%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

Zira has higher xG: 1.42 vs 0.98. Zira: 11.1 shots per match, Mil Mugan FK: 7.9.

Match halves

Zira: half-time lead 53%, second-half goals 0.73. Mil Mugan FK: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

Zira: 31-45+ (9 goals). Mil Mugan FK: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Premyer Liqası: 2.52 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

72Possession (%)28
ZiraMil Mugan FK
14Shots2
ZiraMil Mugan FK
6Shots on target0
ZiraMil Mugan FK
2.33xG0.44
ZiraMil Mugan FK
7Corners1
ZiraMil Mugan FK
141Dangerous attacks42
ZiraMil Mugan FK
10Fouls16
ZiraMil Mugan FK
0Cards1
ZiraMil Mugan FK

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.53Goals scored / match1
ZiraMil Mugan FK
1Goals conceded / match1.07
ZiraMil Mugan FK
59%Average possession41%
ZiraMil Mugan FK
4.47Shots on target / match3.13
ZiraMil Mugan FK

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.13Shots per match7.87
ZiraMil Mugan FK
4.47Shots on target3.13
ZiraMil Mugan FK
13.8%Shot conversion12.7%
ZiraMil Mugan FK
59%Possession41%
ZiraMil Mugan FK
1.42xG for0.98
ZiraMil Mugan FK
1.1xG against1.52
ZiraMil Mugan FK

Shooting quality

Zira: Efficient finishingMil Mugan FK: Counter-attacking
ZiraMil Mugan FK
Accuracy (shots on target)40%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Zira is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Zira · 0.8 pts / match - Mil Mugan FK

Zira
DWWDL
Season result split
47% W40% D13% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-6-2
1.80 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-4-0
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
DWDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.13Opponent xG: 0.89BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Mil Mugan FK
LWLLD
Season result split
33% W27% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-4-6
1.27 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-0-4
Last 5 away
2-0-3
WLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.01Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Zira is 53% better for: goals scored per match.

1.53 goals / match - Zira · 1 goals / match - Mil Mugan FK

Zira is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Zira · 1.07 goals / match - Mil Mugan FK

Zira scoring profile: very strong

Zira scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while Mil Mugan FK keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 matches).

Mil Mugan FK scoring profile: mixed

Mil Mugan FK scores in 53% of matches (8 of 15 matches), while Zira keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 matches).

23Goals scored (season)15
ZiraMil Mugan FK
15Goals conceded (season)16
ZiraMil Mugan FK
2.53Average goals in match2.07
ZiraMil Mugan FK
5Goals scored (last 5)4
ZiraMil Mugan FK
3Goals conceded (last 5)8
ZiraMil Mugan FK

How often they score at least...

87%1 goal53%
ZiraMil Mugan FK
40%2 goals27%
ZiraMil Mugan FK
13%3 goals20%
ZiraMil Mugan FK
7%4 goals0%
ZiraMil Mugan FK

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal67%
ZiraMil Mugan FK
27%2 goals33%
ZiraMil Mugan FK
7%3 goals7%
ZiraMil Mugan FK
0%4 goals0%
ZiraMil Mugan FK

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time13%
ZiraMil Mugan FK
0%BTTS in both halves7%
ZiraMil Mugan FK
13%Scored in both halves20%
ZiraMil Mugan FK

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS13%
ZiraMil Mugan FK
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
ZiraMil Mugan FK
40%BTTS - last 540%
ZiraMil Mugan FK

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

87%Min. 1 goal before half-time47%
ZiraMil Mugan FK
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time13%
ZiraMil Mugan FK
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
ZiraMil Mugan FK

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time87%
ZiraMil Mugan FK
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
ZiraMil Mugan FK
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
ZiraMil Mugan FK

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Zira is 42% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.8 pts / match - Zira · 1.27 pts / match - Mil Mugan FK

Zira - half-time state
53% leading20% draw27% trailing
Mil Mugan FK - half-time state
20% leading67% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.8Points per match (1st half)1.27
ZiraMil Mugan FK
0.8Goals scored (1st half)0.33
ZiraMil Mugan FK
0.47Goals conceded (1st half)0.27
ZiraMil Mugan FK
1.27Average goals (1st half)0.6
ZiraMil Mugan FK
60%Clean sheet before half-time73%
ZiraMil Mugan FK
40%No goal before half-time67%
ZiraMil Mugan FK

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)1.33
ZiraMil Mugan FK
0.73Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
ZiraMil Mugan FK
0.53Goals conceded (2nd half)0.8
ZiraMil Mugan FK
1.27Average goals (2nd half)1.47
ZiraMil Mugan FK
60%Clean sheet after half-time40%
ZiraMil Mugan FK
60%No goal after half-time60%
ZiraMil Mugan FK

Zira - second-half results

33% W33% D33% L
27
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding89%

Leads at half-time in 53% of matches and wins 47%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mil Mugan FK - second-half results

40% W13% D47% L
19
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding165%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Zira - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.20
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.80.8
1 goal60%40%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Mil Mugan FK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.2
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference0-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Zira
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
1
4
16-30
9
3
31-45
1
1
46-60
3
5
61-75
7
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Mil Mugan FK
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
2
0
16-30
1
3
31-45
1
5
46-60
4
0
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.30
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-13%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
46%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Zira

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
120%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Mil Mugan FK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.54
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.47
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
84%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premyer Liqası).

Teams vs league

ZiraLigaMil Mugan FK
Average goals in match 2.532.52 2.07
Both teams scored 60%46% 27%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%47% 33%
Clean sheets 33%31% 33%
Goal before half-time 87%65% 47%
Goal after half-time 67%77% 87%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.52
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.27
Home goals / match
1.24
Away goals / match
+2%
Home attack advantage
+2%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Mil Mugan FKSubstitutionOn: Abbas AğazadəOff: Nikola Karaklajić
  2. ZiraSubstitutionOn: Ceyhun NuriyevOff: Yegor Bogomolskiy

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Zira 0 - 1 - 0 Mil Mugan FK. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Mil Muğan FK
1 : 1
Zira IK

FAQ

What was the result of Zira vs Mil Mugan FK?

The Premyer Liqası match finished Zira 0:0 Mil Mugan FK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Zira vs Mil Mugan FK?

Zira score 1.53 goals per game on average and Mil Mugan FK 1.00. The Premyer Liqası average is 2.52 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Zira's matches and 27% of Mil Mugan FK's.

What form are Zira and Mil Mugan FK in?

Over the last 5 games Zira have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Mil Mugan FK 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Zira vs Mil Mugan FK?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Zira vs Mil Mugan FK: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.