Zira vs Qabala: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Zira played Qabala in Premyer Liqası (Azerbaijan). The match was played on 22 November 2025. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Zira: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Qabala: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Zira scores 1.64 and concedes 1.09 goals per match. Qabala scores 0.73 and concedes 1.45. League average: 2.53 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Zira 64%, Qabala 36%. Over 2.5: Zira 55%, Qabala 36%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

Zira has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.17. Zira: 11.9 shots per match, Qabala: 9.7.

Match halves

Zira: half-time lead 55%, second-half goals 0.82. Qabala: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.36.

Goals by minute

Zira: 31-45+ (7 goals). Qabala: 46-60 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Premyer Liqası: 2.53 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
ZiraQabala
9Shots4
ZiraQabala
2Shots on target1
ZiraQabala
0.99xG0.54
ZiraQabala
2Corners1
ZiraQabala
39Dangerous attacks30
ZiraQabala
22Fouls12
ZiraQabala
3Cards3
ZiraQabala

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.64Goals scored / match0.73
ZiraQabala
1.09Goals conceded / match1.45
ZiraQabala
61%Average possession49%
ZiraQabala
5.09Shots on target / match3.09
ZiraQabala

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.91Shots per match9.73
ZiraQabala
5.09Shots on target3.09
ZiraQabala
13.7%Shot conversion7.5%
ZiraQabala
61%Possession49%
ZiraQabala
1.54xG for1.17
ZiraQabala
1.14xG against1.53
ZiraQabala

Shooting quality

Zira: Efficient finishingQabala: Balanced
ZiraQabala
Accuracy (shots on target)43%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Zira is 700% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Zira · 0.2 pts / match - Qabala

Zira
DLWWD
Season result split
45% W45% D9% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-5-1
1.82 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-3-0
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WWDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 1.12BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Qabala
LDLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
9% W18% D73% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-8
0.45 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-4
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Zira is 125% better for: goals scored per match.

1.64 goals / match - Zira · 0.73 goals / match - Qabala

Zira is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.09 goals / match - Zira · 1.45 goals / match - Qabala

Zira scoring profile: very strong

Zira scores in 82% of matches (9 of 11 matches), while Qabala keeps a clean sheet in 9% (1 of 11 matches).

Qabala scoring profile: mixed

Qabala scores in 45% of matches (5 of 11 matches), while Zira keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 matches).

18Goals scored (season)8
ZiraQabala
12Goals conceded (season)16
ZiraQabala
2.73Average goals in match2.18
ZiraQabala
6Goals scored (last 5)2
ZiraQabala
7Goals conceded (last 5)8
ZiraQabala

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal45%
ZiraQabala
45%2 goals18%
ZiraQabala
18%3 goals9%
ZiraQabala
9%4 goals0%
ZiraQabala

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal91%
ZiraQabala
27%2 goals55%
ZiraQabala
9%3 goals0%
ZiraQabala
0%4 goals0%
ZiraQabala

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

9%BTTS at half-time18%
ZiraQabala
0%BTTS in both halves0%
ZiraQabala
18%Scored in both halves18%
ZiraQabala

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS27%
ZiraQabala
18%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
ZiraQabala
40%BTTS - last 520%
ZiraQabala

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

91%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
ZiraQabala
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time18%
ZiraQabala
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time18%
ZiraQabala

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time64%
ZiraQabala
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
ZiraQabala
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
ZiraQabala

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Zira is 90% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.73 pts / match - Zira · 0.91 pts / match - Qabala

Zira - half-time state
55% leading9% draw36% trailing
Qabala - half-time state
18% leading36% draw45% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.73Points per match (1st half)0.91
ZiraQabala
0.82Goals scored (1st half)0.36
ZiraQabala
0.55Goals conceded (1st half)0.64
ZiraQabala
1.36Average goals (1st half)1
ZiraQabala
55%Clean sheet before half-time55%
ZiraQabala
45%No goal before half-time64%
ZiraQabala

After half-time (2nd half)

1.36Points per match (2nd half)0.73
ZiraQabala
0.82Goals scored (2nd half)0.36
ZiraQabala
0.55Goals conceded (2nd half)0.82
ZiraQabala
1.36Average goals (2nd half)1.18
ZiraQabala
55%Clean sheet after half-time45%
ZiraQabala
55%No goal after half-time73%
ZiraQabala

Zira - second-half results

36% W27% D36% L
19
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.73
PPG before half-time
Lead holding82%

Leads at half-time in 55% of matches and wins 45%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Qabala - second-half results

9% W45% D45% L
10
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.91
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 9%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Zira - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.01.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Qabala - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.40
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.41.2
Average goals in match0.61.4
1 goal60%60%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-1-5
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Zira
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
4
16-30
7
2
31-45
1
0
46-60
2
4
61-75
6
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Qabala
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
3
16-30
2
3
31-45
3
2
46-60
1
2
61-75
0
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.46
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+22%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
37%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Zira

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
128%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
87%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Qabala

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
58%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premyer Liqası).

Teams vs league

ZiraLigaQabala
Average goals in match 2.732.53 2.18
Both teams scored 64%46% 36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 55%47% 36%
Clean sheets 27%31% 9%
Goal before half-time 91%68% 64%
Goal after half-time 73%76% 64%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.53
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.28
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+2%
Home attack advantage
+2%
Home defence advantage
+-3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ZiraYellow cardAlessandro Pinheiro
  2. ZiraYellow cardQismət Alıyev
  3. QabalaSubstitutionOn: Prince OwusuOff: Ibrahim Sangaré
  4. ZiraSubstitutionOn: Elçin ƏlicanovOff: Leroy-Jacques Mickels

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Zira 1 - 0 - 0 Qabala. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FK Qabala
1 : 2
Zira IK

FAQ

What was the result of Zira vs Qabala?

The Premyer Liqası match finished Zira 1:0 Qabala. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Zira vs Qabala?

Zira score 1.64 goals per game on average and Qabala 0.73. The Premyer Liqası average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Zira's matches and 36% of Qabala's.

What form are Zira and Qabala in?

Over the last 5 games Zira have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Qabala 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Zira vs Qabala?

The statistical background for Zira vs Qabala — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.