Azerbaijan - Premyer LiqasıData current as of 12 September 2026

Zira vs Sabah: match statistics

Zira crest
Zira
1 : 3half-time 0:3
Sabah crest
Sabah
125%(2.75)
X25%(2.66)
250%(2.65)

Sabah is the clear favorite for this match, occupying top spot in the table with an impressive record of 12 wins, 4 draws, and only 1 loss. The away side is in excellent form, having won all of their last 5 matches and scoring as many as 14 goals during this period. In away games, Sabah boasts a 75% win rate, averaging 2.25 goals scored while conceding just 0.75 per match. Zira, although solid at home (44% wins in home matches), is going through a poor patch with only 1 victory in their last 5 outings and 3 goals scored. The difference in offensive quality (xG: 1.54 for Zira vs 1.61 for Sabah away) combined with the advantage in form and table position points to a win for the league leaders. Additionally, Sabah has a superior shooting accuracy (18% vs 13%) and a higher average of shots on target per match, further confirming their offensive edge.

Zira vs Sabah: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Zira played Sabah in Premyer Liqası (Azerbaijan). The match was played on 31 January 2026. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

Zira: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Sabah: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Zira scores 1.35 and concedes 0.88 goals per match. Sabah scores 1.94 and concedes 0.59. League average: 2.55 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Zira 53%, Sabah 47%. Over 2.5: Zira 41%, Sabah 53%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 48%.

xG, shots and style

Sabah has higher xG: 1.85 vs 1.46. Zira: 11.1 shots per match, Sabah: 13.8.

Match halves

Zira: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 0.65. Sabah: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 1.12.

Goals by minute

Zira: 31-45+ (9 goals). Sabah: 46-60 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Premyer Liqası: 2.55 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 48%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Sabah is the clear favorite for this match, occupying top spot in the table with an impressive record of 12 wins, 4 draws, and only 1 loss. The away side is in excellent form, having won all of their last 5 matches and scoring as many as 14 goals during this period. In away games, Sabah boasts a 75% win rate, averaging 2.25 goals scored while conceding just 0.75 per match. Zira, although solid at home (44% wins in home matches), is going through a poor patch with only 1 victory in their last 5 outings and 3 goals scored. The difference in offensive quality (xG: 1.54 for Zira vs 1.61 for Sabah away) combined with the advantage in form and table position points to a win for the league leaders. Additionally, Sabah has a superior shooting accuracy (18% vs 13%) and a higher average of shots on target per match, further confirming their offensive edge.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 3
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
ZiraSabah
9Shots10
ZiraSabah
1Shots on target5
ZiraSabah
1.14xG1.46
ZiraSabah
5Corners1
ZiraSabah
69Dangerous attacks66
ZiraSabah
14Fouls11
ZiraSabah
1Cards1
ZiraSabah

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.35Goals scored / match1.94
ZiraSabah
0.88Goals conceded / match0.59
ZiraSabah
59%Average possession57%
ZiraSabah
4.47Shots on target / match5.18
ZiraSabah

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.12Shots per match13.76
ZiraSabah
4.47Shots on target5.18
ZiraSabah
12.2%Shot conversion14.1%
ZiraSabah
59%Possession57%
ZiraSabah
1.46xG for1.85
ZiraSabah
1.08xG against1.12
ZiraSabah

Shooting quality

Zira: BalancedSabah: Efficient finishing
ZiraSabah
Accuracy (shots on target)40%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Sabah is 150% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Zira · 3 pts / match - Sabah

Zira
WDLDD
Season result split
41% W47% D12% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-8-2
1.71 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-5-0
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
WDWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.07BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Sabah
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
71% W24% D6% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-4-1
2.35 pts / match · goal difference +23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-2-0
Last 5 away
4-1-0
DWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 2.00Opponent xG: 1.30BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Sabah is 44% better for: goals scored per match.

1.35 goals / match - Zira · 1.94 goals / match - Sabah

Sabah is 49% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.88 goals / match - Zira · 0.59 goals / match - Sabah

Zira scoring profile: strong

Zira scores in 76% of matches (13 of 17 matches), while Sabah keeps a clean sheet in 47% (8 of 17 matches).

Sabah scoring profile: strong

Sabah scores in 82% of matches (14 of 17 matches), while Zira keeps a clean sheet in 41% (7 of 17 matches).

23Goals scored (season)33
ZiraSabah
15Goals conceded (season)10
ZiraSabah
2.24Average goals in match2.53
ZiraSabah
4Goals scored (last 5)14
ZiraSabah
3Goals conceded (last 5)4
ZiraSabah

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal82%
ZiraSabah
35%2 goals71%
ZiraSabah
12%3 goals35%
ZiraSabah
6%4 goals6%
ZiraSabah

How often they concede at least...

59%1 goal53%
ZiraSabah
24%2 goals6%
ZiraSabah
6%3 goals0%
ZiraSabah
0%4 goals0%
ZiraSabah

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time12%
ZiraSabah
0%BTTS in both halves0%
ZiraSabah
12%Scored in both halves35%
ZiraSabah

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
ZiraSabah
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS12%
ZiraSabah
40%BTTS - last 580%
ZiraSabah

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
ZiraSabah
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
ZiraSabah
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
ZiraSabah

2nd half

59%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
ZiraSabah
35%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
ZiraSabah
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
ZiraSabah

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Sabah is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.71 pts / match - Zira · 1.88 pts / match - Sabah

Zira - half-time state
47% leading29% draw24% trailing
Sabah - half-time state
47% leading47% draw6% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.71Points per match (1st half)1.88
ZiraSabah
0.71Goals scored (1st half)0.82
ZiraSabah
0.41Goals conceded (1st half)0.18
ZiraSabah
1.12Average goals (1st half)1
ZiraSabah
65%Clean sheet before half-time82%
ZiraSabah
47%No goal before half-time47%
ZiraSabah

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per match (2nd half)1.88
ZiraSabah
0.65Goals scored (2nd half)1.12
ZiraSabah
0.47Goals conceded (2nd half)0.41
ZiraSabah
1.12Average goals (2nd half)1.53
ZiraSabah
65%Clean sheet after half-time65%
ZiraSabah
65%No goal after half-time35%
ZiraSabah

Zira - second-half results

29% W41% D29% L
29
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding87%

Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 41%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Sabah - second-half results

47% W47% D6% L
32
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.88
PPG before half-time
Lead holding151%

Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 71%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Zira - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.20
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.60.8
1 goal40%40%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Sabah - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.60
Goals scored / match1.01.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match1.22.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%100%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference+4+6
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Zira
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
1
4
16-30
9
3
31-45
1
1
46-60
3
5
61-75
7
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Sabah
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
6
0
16-30
6
2
31-45
8
2
46-60
4
2
61-75
7
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.38
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+26%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Zira

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
68%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.51
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Sabah

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.73
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.62
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.53
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
149%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
47%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.65
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premyer Liqası).

Teams vs league

ZiraLigaSabah
Average goals in match 2.242.55 2.53
Both teams scored 53%46% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 41%48% 53%
Clean sheets 41%31% 47%
Goal before half-time 76%66% 59%
Goal after half-time 59%76% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.55
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.25
Home goals / match
1.30
Away goals / match
+-4%
Home attack advantage
+-4%
Home defence advantage
+-2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ZiraSubstitutionOn: İsmayıl İbrahimliOff: Brahim Konaté
  2. ZiraSubstitutionOn: Yegor BogomolskiyOff: Rüfət Abdullazadə
  3. ZiraYellow cardQismət Alıyev
  4. ZiraSubstitutionOn: Rovlan MuradovOff: Alessandro Pinheiro
  5. SabahYellow cardIvan Lepinjica
  6. SabahSubstitutionOn: Kaheem Anthony ParrisOff: Veljko Simić

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Kamal UmudluMatches officiated: 10
3.5Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 210%Home wins20%Draws70%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Zira 0 - 0 - 1 Sabah. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Sabah FK
3 : 0
Zira IK

FAQ

What was the result of Zira vs Sabah?

The Premyer Liqası match finished Zira 1:3 Sabah. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Zira vs Sabah?

Zira score 1.35 goals per game on average and Sabah 1.94. The Premyer Liqası average is 2.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Zira's matches and 47% of Sabah's.

What form are Zira and Sabah in?

Over the last 5 games Zira have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Sabah 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Zira vs Sabah?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.