Poland - 3 Liga Group 1Data current as of 23 July 2026

Znicz Biała Piska vs Broń Radom: match statistics

Znicz Biała Piska vs Broń Radom: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Znicz Biała Piska play Broń Radom in 3 Liga Group 1 (Poland). The match date is 11 April 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Znicz Biała Piska: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Broń Radom: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Znicz Biała Piska scores 0.79 and concedes 3.00 goals per match. Broń Radom scores 1.18 and concedes 1.68. League average: 3.33 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Znicz Biała Piska 47%, Broń Radom 53%. Over 2.5: Znicz Biała Piska 74%, Broń Radom 47%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.

xG, shots and style

Broń Radom has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.00. Znicz Biała Piska: 4.1 shots per match, Broń Radom: 9.1.

Match halves

Znicz Biała Piska: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.35. Broń Radom: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.53.

Goals by minute

Znicz Biała Piska: 31-45+ (7 goals). Broń Radom: 46-60 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

3 Liga Group 1: 3.33 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Broń Radom appears to be the favorite: they sit 12th versus Znicz’s 18th and have scored 31 goals this season compared to the hosts’ 18, while their away xG is 1.46 versus Znicz’s home xG of 1.15. The visitors average 10.44 shots and 3.78 on target per away match, compared to Znicz’s 9.5 shots and 3.17 on target at home, so Broń creates more chances despite a lower conversion rate (5% vs 12%). The home defense is a significant liability — Znicz concedes 2.82 goals per home game on average (78 conceded this season), while Broń concedes 2.31 away (45 this season), and in the last 5 matches Znicz has allowed 17 goals vs Broń’s 13. Both teams are in poor form (1 win and 4 losses in the last 5, averaging 0.6 points per match in that period), however Znicz less frequently fails to score at home (only 27% of home games without a goal vs 54% of Broń’s away matches). Considering the higher quality of chances (xG 1.46), greater shot volume and the visitors’ superior league position, I forecast a Broń win: 65% chance for the visitors, 20% for a draw and 15% for the hosts.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
-1Shots-1
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
-1Shots on target-1
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
0xG0
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
-1Corners-1
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
0Dangerous attacks0
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
-1Fouls-1
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
-1Cards-1
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
0.79Goals scored / match1.18
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
3Goals conceded / match1.68
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
25%Average possession37%
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
1.38Shots on target / match3.26
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

4.12Shots per match9.06
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
1.38Shots on target3.26
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
19.3%Shot conversion13%
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
25%Possession37%
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
1xG for1.54
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
2.23xG against1.33
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom

Shooting quality

Znicz Biała Piska: Counter-attackingBroń Radom: Counter-attacking
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
Accuracy (shots on target)33%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.240.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.570.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Broń Radom is 25% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Znicz Biała Piska · 1 pts / match - Broń Radom

Znicz Biała Piska
LDLWL
Season result split
12% W9% R79% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-27
0.44 pts / match · goal difference -75
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-14
Last 5 at home
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 3.2xG: 1.68Opponent xG: 2.32BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Broń Radom
DDLWL
Season result split
26% W26% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-9-16
1.06 pts / match · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-9
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 1.55BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Broń Radom is 49% better for: goals scored per match.

0.79 goals / match - Znicz Biała Piska · 1.18 goals / match - Broń Radom

Broń Radom is 79% better for: goals conceded per match.

3 goals / match - Znicz Biała Piska · 1.68 goals / match - Broń Radom

Znicz Biała Piska scoring profile: strong

Znicz Biała Piska scores in 53% of matches (18 of 34 matches), while Broń Radom keeps a clean sheet in 15% (5 of 34 matches).

Broń Radom scoring profile: very strong

Broń Radom scores in 62% of matches (21 of 34 matches), while Znicz Biała Piska keeps a clean sheet in 9% (3 of 34 matches).

27Goals scored (season)40
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
102Goals conceded (season)57
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
3.79Average goals in match2.85
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
8Goals scored (last 5)6
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
16Goals conceded (last 5)5
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom

How often they score at least...

53%1 goal62%
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
18%2 goals38%
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
9%3 goals12%
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
0%4 goals6%
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom

How often they concede at least...

91%1 goal85%
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
85%2 goals41%
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
56%3 goals18%
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
32%4 goals9%
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

47%
Znicz Biała Piska - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.16 of 34 matches
62%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time26%
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
9%BTTS in both halves6%
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
9%Scored in both halves26%
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
26%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
60%BTTS - last 560%
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
47%Min. 2 goals before half-time41%
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time21%
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time74%
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
65%Min. 2 goals after half-time41%
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
41%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Broń Radom is 39% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.85 pts / match - Znicz Biała Piska · 1.18 pts / match - Broń Radom

Znicz Biała Piska - half-time state
15% leading41% draw44% trailing
Broń Radom - half-time state
26% leading38% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.85Points per match (1st half)1.18
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
0.38Goals scored (1st half)0.65
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
1.06Goals conceded (1st half)0.85
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
1.44Average goals (1st half)1.5
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
38%Clean sheet before half-time41%
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
71%No goal before half-time53%
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom

After half-time (2nd half)

0.5Points per match (2nd half)1.21
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
0.35Goals scored (2nd half)0.53
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
1.68Goals conceded (2nd half)0.82
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
2.03Average goals (2nd half)1.35
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
26%Clean sheet after half-time53%
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom
71%No goal after half-time59%
Znicz Biała PiskaBroń Radom

Znicz Biała Piska - second-half results

6% W32% R62% P
29
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-23
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-45
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.85
PPG before half-time
Lead holding80%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 12%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Broń Radom - second-half results

29% W32% R38% P
40
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Znicz Biała Piska - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.60
Goals scored / match1.00.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.81.0
1 goal60%40%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Broń Radom - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.80.2
Average goals in match1.40.8
1 goal80%40%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Znicz Biała Piska
ScoredConceded
4
22
0-15
4
12
16-30
7
11
31-45
1
14
46-60
6
19
61-75
5
24
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (24). Late-goal balance (76-90): -19 - late phases are a weakness.

Broń Radom
ScoredConceded
9
8
0-15
9
13
16-30
4
8
31-45
10
4
46-60
6
9
61-75
2
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -13 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.32
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 2.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-40%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
33%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
18%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Znicz Biała Piska

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.98
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+8.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.77
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
43%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
199%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.36
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Broń Radom

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.71
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
78%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
92%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
5% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
5%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 1).

Teams vs league

Znicz Biała PiskaLigaBroń Radom
Average goals in match 3.793.33 2.85
Both teams scored 47%62% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 74%66% 47%
Clean sheets 9%20% 15%
Goal before half-time 71%74% 79%
Goal after half-time 76%83% 74%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.33
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / match
1.51
Away goals / match
+21%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
54%
2 goals
28%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Znicz Biała Piska 0 - 0 - 1 Broń Radom. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Broń Radom
2 : 0
Znicz Biała Piska

FAQ

What was the result of Znicz Biała Piska vs Broń Radom?

The 3 Liga Group 1 match finished Znicz Biała Piska 1:0 Broń Radom. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Znicz Biała Piska vs Broń Radom?

Znicz Biała Piska score 0.79 goals per game on average and Broń Radom 1.18. The 3 Liga Group 1 average is 3.33 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Znicz Biała Piska's matches and 53% of Broń Radom's.

What form are Znicz Biała Piska and Broń Radom in?

Over the last 5 games Znicz Biała Piska have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Broń Radom 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Znicz Biała Piska vs Broń Radom?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.