Zorya vs Veres: match statistics
Zorya vs Veres: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Zorya play Veres in Ukrainian Premier League (Ukraine). The match date is 27 April 2026 at 14:30. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Zorya: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Veres: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Zorya scores 1.40 and concedes 1.20 goals per match. Veres scores 0.87 and concedes 1.33. League average: 2.57 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Zorya 60%, Veres 30%. Over 2.5: Zorya 53%, Veres 33%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 47%.
xG, shots and style
Zorya has higher xG: 1.42 vs 1.06. Zorya: 12.1 shots per match, Veres: 9.2.
Match halves
Zorya: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.73. Veres: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.60.
Goals by minute
Zorya: 46-60 (11 goals). Veres: 46-60 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ukrainian Premier League: 2.57 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 47%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
Zorya has a clear advantage in chance creation: on average 12.17 shots and 5.0 on target per home match versus 7.75 shots and 3.25 on target for Veres away, and the home side’s average xG is 1.45 compared to 0.98 for the visitors. That translates into a higher goals output — Zorya scores 1.33 goals at home on average and has a home goal difference of +4, while Veres averages 1.0 goal away with an away goal difference of -3. In terms of finishing Veres posts a slightly higher conversion rate (13% vs 11%), but in 50% of their away matches the visitors fail to score, whereas Zorya are goalless at home in only 17% of games. Zorya’s problem is defence in the last 5 matches — the hosts conceded 9 goals in five games (1.8 per match) versus 6 (1.2) for Veres, which weakens their form. Considering Zorya’s superior chance creation and higher home xG and Veres’ high frequency of goalless away games, I predict a home win, although the forecast is moderate due to Zorya’s recent defensive issues.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Zorya | Veres | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Zorya is 450% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - Zorya · 0.4 pts / match - Veres
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Zorya is 61% better for: goals scored per match.
1.4 goals / match - Zorya · 0.87 goals / match - Veres
Zorya is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.2 goals / match - Zorya · 1.33 goals / match - Veres
Zorya scores in 77% of matches (23 of 30 matches), while Veres keeps a clean sheet in 33% (10 of 30 matches).
Veres scores in 47% of matches (14 of 30 matches), while Zorya keeps a clean sheet in 30% (9 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Zorya
Over / Under — Veres
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Zorya is 57% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.37 pts / match - Zorya · 0.87 pts / match - Veres
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Zorya - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Veres - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 100% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Zorya
Veres
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ukrainian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Zorya | Liga | Veres | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.60 | 2.57 | ▼ 2.20 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 60% | 43% | ▼ 30% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 53% | 47% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 30% | 33% | • 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 70% | 68% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 76% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Zorya 0 - 1 - 0 Veres. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Zorya vs Veres?
The Ukrainian Premier League match finished Zorya 2:0 Veres. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Zorya vs Veres?
Zorya score 1.40 goals per game on average and Veres 0.87. The Ukrainian Premier League average is 2.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Zorya's matches and 30% of Veres's.
What form are Zorya and Veres in?
Over the last 5 games Zorya have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Veres 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Zorya vs Veres?
The statistical background for Zorya vs Veres — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.