Belgium - Pro LeagueData current as of 13 September 2026

Zulte-Waregem vs FCV Dender EH: match statistics

Zulte-Waregem crest
Zulte-Waregem
2 : 1half-time 2:1
FCV Dender EH crest
FCV Dender EH

Zulte-Waregem vs FCV Dender EH: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Zulte-Waregem played FCV Dender EH in Pro League (Belgium). The match was played on 9 May 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Zulte-Waregem: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. FCV Dender EH: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Zulte-Waregem scores 1.46 and concedes 1.49 goals per match. FCV Dender EH scores 0.86 and concedes 1.71. League average: 2.68 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Zulte-Waregem 60%, FCV Dender EH 60%. Over 2.5: Zulte-Waregem 51%, FCV Dender EH 54%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

Zulte-Waregem has higher xG: 1.44 vs 1.26. Zulte-Waregem: 12.5 shots per match, FCV Dender EH: 10.8.

Match halves

Zulte-Waregem: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.83. FCV Dender EH: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.43.

Goals by minute

Zulte-Waregem: 76-90+ (14 goals). FCV Dender EH: 0-15 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Pro League: 2.68 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-0. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 67%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Zulte-Waregem has a clear advantage in form and attack: in the last 5 matches the home side recorded 4 wins and 1 draw and scored 13 goals, while FCV Dender over their last five games have 2 wins and 3 defeats and 6 goals. At home Zulte-Waregem averages 1.47 goals with 13.71 shots and 4.53 shots on target per match, whereas the visitors away manage 0.82 goals with 10.53 shots and 4.06 on target, and an accuracy of 11% versus 8% favors the hosts. The difference in quality of chances is confirmed by xG: the hosts’ average xG is 1.54 per home match, while Dender have 1.25 xG away, with the visitors conceding 1.81 xG on average away compared to 1.38 xG against Zulte. Defensively Dender underperform — they concede 1.47 goals on average away and have let in 9 goals in the last 5 matches, whereas Zulte at home concede 1.24 and have conceded 5 goals in their last 5. Considering Zulte’s 2.6 points per match in the last 5 versus Dender’s 1.2 and the hosts’ positive goal difference (+4) against the visitors’ negative (-11), the forecast is a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams show high seasonal BTTS rates: Zulte-Waregem 61% and FCV Dender 59%, vs a league average of 55%, indicating a propensity for Goal/Goal matches. In the last 5 games the signal is even stronger for Dender (80% BTTS) vs Zulte (60%), with Zulte scoring 13 goals in 5 matches (2.6 avg) and Dender 6 goals (1.2). Seasonal averages show Zulte concedes 1.94 goals per match and Dender 1.47, while xG_for of 1.28 and 1.25 and xG_against of 1.70 and 1.81 indicate both teams create chances and frequently concede. Additionally, clean sheet expected is low at only 17% and 18%, and shots on target 3.44 vs 4.06 confirm scoring opportunities occur regularly. Considering the 61%/59% seasonal BTTS, 60%/80% in the last 5, and xG ~1.25–1.28 with xG_against ~1.7–1.81, a BTTS - Yes scenario is more likely.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The forecast based on xG and statistics indicates a high-scoring affair: home xG 1.28 and away xG 1.25, while xG against is 1.70 (home) and 1.81 (away), yielding projected ~1.55 goals for Zulte-Waregem and ~1.48 for FCV Dender (total 3.03). Seasonally Over 1.5 occurred for the home side in 67% of matches and for the away side in 76%, and both teams register BTTS in 61% and 59% of games respectively, which increases the probability of at least two goals. In the last 5 matches the home team scored 13 goals (avg. 2.6), the away team 6 goals (1.2), and both teams produced Over 2.5 in 80% of those fixtures, further boosting the expected goals total. Defenses are vulnerable (avg. 1.94 conceded by the home side and 1.47 by the away), so the strongest signal from the data is a bet on Over 1.5, while the 2.5 line also shows an edge (~66% chance).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

At half-time the most likely outcome is a draw: the home side were level at the break in 50% of matches and the visitors in 53%, making a draw the most common state at 45 minutes. In the second half the advantage should lie with Zulte‑Waregem — in their last five matches the hosts have averaged 2.0 goals after the break versus 0.6 for FCV Dender and won 4 of 5 matches (80%) compared with a 40% win rate for the visitors. Additionally, Zulte scored on average 0.61 goals before half-time versus 0.24 for Dender, and the hosts averaged 1.33 points at the break compared to 0.71 for the visitors, which gives them a better position to take the initiative after the break. xG is almost equal (1.28 versus 1.25), so the difference is mainly due to conversion and second-half form in favour of the hosts, hence the recommended scenario: draw at half-time and home win at full-time (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
19Shots10
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
6Shots on target5
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
1.78xG1.19
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
9Corners2
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
22Dangerous attacks28
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
8Fouls12
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
1Cards5
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
1.46Goals scored / match0.86
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
1.49Goals conceded / match1.71
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
48%Average possession48%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
4.23Shots on target / match3.74
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.49Shots per match10.77
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
4.23Shots on target3.74
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
11.7%Shot conversion8%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
48%Possession48%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
1.44xG for1.26
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
1.49xG against1.75
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH

Shooting quality

Zulte-Waregem: BalancedFCV Dender EH: Balanced
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
Accuracy (shots on target)34%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.23

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Zulte-Waregem is 117% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / match - Zulte-Waregem · 1.2 pts / match - FCV Dender EH

Zulte-Waregem
DWWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
34% W26% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-9-14
1.29 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-4-6
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LLWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
FCV Dender EH
WLLLW
Season result split
14% W29% D57% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-10-20
0.71 pts / match · goal difference -30
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-5-9
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LDLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 2.06BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Zulte-Waregem is 70% better for: goals scored per match.

1.46 goals / match - Zulte-Waregem · 0.86 goals / match - FCV Dender EH

Zulte-Waregem is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.49 goals / match - Zulte-Waregem · 1.71 goals / match - FCV Dender EH

Zulte-Waregem scoring profile: very strong

Zulte-Waregem scores in 77% of matches (27 of 35 matches), while FCV Dender EH keeps a clean sheet in 17% (6 of 35 matches).

FCV Dender EH scoring profile: strong

FCV Dender EH scores in 66% of matches (23 of 35 matches), while Zulte-Waregem keeps a clean sheet in 23% (8 of 35 matches).

51Goals scored (season)30
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
52Goals conceded (season)60
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
2.94Average goals in match2.57
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
13Goals scored (last 5)6
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
5Goals conceded (last 5)9
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal66%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
49%2 goals20%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
14%3 goals0%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
6%4 goals0%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH

How often they concede at least...

77%1 goal83%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
46%2 goals54%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
17%3 goals23%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
9%4 goals9%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time26%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
6%BTTS in both halves3%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
17%Scored in both halves11%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH

BTTS and goal count

49%Min. 3 goals and BTTS51%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
60%BTTS - last 580%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
34%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
46%Min. 2 goals after half-time46%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
26%Min. 3 goals after half-time23%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Zulte-Waregem is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.17 pts / match - Zulte-Waregem · 1.03 pts / match - FCV Dender EH

Zulte-Waregem - half-time state
26% leading40% draw34% trailing
FCV Dender EH - half-time state
17% leading51% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.17Points per match (1st half)1.03
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
0.63Goals scored (1st half)0.43
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
0.69Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
1.31Average goals (1st half)1.06
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
49%Clean sheet before half-time49%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
57%No goal before half-time63%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH

After half-time (2nd half)

1.31Points per match (2nd half)0.8
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
0.83Goals scored (2nd half)0.43
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
0.8Goals conceded (2nd half)1.09
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
1.63Average goals (2nd half)1.51
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
34%Clean sheet after half-time34%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH
49%No goal after half-time60%
Zulte-WaregemFCV Dender EH

Zulte-Waregem - second-half results

34% W29% D37% L
41
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

FCV Dender EH - second-half results

17% W29% D54% L
36
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-23
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.03
PPG before half-time
Lead holding82%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 14%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Zulte-Waregem - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.403.00
Goals scored / match0.62.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.02.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference+1+7
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
FCV Dender EH - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Zulte-Waregem
ScoredConceded
4
8
0-15
10
5
16-30
8
11
31-45
7
8
46-60
8
8
61-75
14
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

FCV Dender EH
ScoredConceded
7
10
0-15
2
6
16-30
6
6
31-45
5
10
46-60
3
14
61-75
7
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.76
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-3%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
51%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Zulte-Waregem

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

FCV Dender EH

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.49
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
67%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
123%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.49
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Pro League).

Teams vs league

Zulte-WaregemLigaFCV Dender EH
Average goals in match 2.942.68 2.57
Both teams scored 60%55% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 51%49% 54%
Clean sheets 23%26% 17%
Goal before half-time 74%70% 63%
Goal after half-time 83%76% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.68
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / match
1.28
Away goals / match
+9%
Home attack advantage
+8%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Zulte-WaregemYellow cardLaurent Lemoine
  2. FCV Dender EHGoalBryan Goncalves
  3. FCV Dender EHYellow cardRoman Květ
  4. Zulte-WaregemGoalMarley AkeAssist: Jelle Vossen
  5. FCV Dender EHYellow cardLuc De Fougerolles
  6. FCV Dender EHGoalBryan Goncalves
  7. FCV Dender EHYellow cardLuc Marijnissen
  8. FCV Dender EHYellow cardKrzysztof Koton
  9. Zulte-WaregemSubstitutionOn: Anosike EmentaOff: Tobias Hedl
  10. Zulte-WaregemSubstitutionOn: Stavros GavrielOff: Jelle Vossen
  11. FCV Dender EHSubstitutionOn: Desmond AcquahOff: Nathan Rodes
  12. Zulte-WaregemSubstitutionOn: Jeppe ErenbjergOff: Joseph Amankwaah Opoku
  13. FCV Dender EHYellow cardDesmond Acquah

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Zulte-Waregem 2 - 1 - 0 FCV Dender EH. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 67% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Zulte-Waregem vs FCV Dender EH?

The Pro League match finished Zulte-Waregem 2:1 FCV Dender EH. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Zulte-Waregem and FCV Dender EH?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Zulte-Waregem won 2, FCV Dender EH won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Zulte-Waregem vs FCV Dender EH?

Zulte-Waregem score 1.46 goals per game on average and FCV Dender EH 0.86. The Pro League average is 2.68 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Zulte-Waregem's matches and 60% of FCV Dender EH's.

What form are Zulte-Waregem and FCV Dender EH in?

Over the last 5 games Zulte-Waregem have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and FCV Dender EH 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Zulte-Waregem vs FCV Dender EH?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.