Zulte-Waregem vs FCV Dender EH: match statistics
Zulte-Waregem vs FCV Dender EH: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Zulte-Waregem played FCV Dender EH in Pro League (Belgium). The match was played on 9 May 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Zulte-Waregem: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. FCV Dender EH: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Zulte-Waregem scores 1.46 and concedes 1.49 goals per match. FCV Dender EH scores 0.86 and concedes 1.71. League average: 2.68 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Zulte-Waregem 60%, FCV Dender EH 60%. Over 2.5: Zulte-Waregem 51%, FCV Dender EH 54%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 49%.
xG, shots and style
Zulte-Waregem has higher xG: 1.44 vs 1.26. Zulte-Waregem: 12.5 shots per match, FCV Dender EH: 10.8.
Match halves
Zulte-Waregem: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.83. FCV Dender EH: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.43.
Goals by minute
Zulte-Waregem: 76-90+ (14 goals). FCV Dender EH: 0-15 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Pro League: 2.68 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 49%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-0. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Zulte-Waregem has a clear advantage in form and attack: in the last 5 matches the home side recorded 4 wins and 1 draw and scored 13 goals, while FCV Dender over their last five games have 2 wins and 3 defeats and 6 goals. At home Zulte-Waregem averages 1.47 goals with 13.71 shots and 4.53 shots on target per match, whereas the visitors away manage 0.82 goals with 10.53 shots and 4.06 on target, and an accuracy of 11% versus 8% favors the hosts. The difference in quality of chances is confirmed by xG: the hosts’ average xG is 1.54 per home match, while Dender have 1.25 xG away, with the visitors conceding 1.81 xG on average away compared to 1.38 xG against Zulte. Defensively Dender underperform — they concede 1.47 goals on average away and have let in 9 goals in the last 5 matches, whereas Zulte at home concede 1.24 and have conceded 5 goals in their last 5. Considering Zulte’s 2.6 points per match in the last 5 versus Dender’s 1.2 and the hosts’ positive goal difference (+4) against the visitors’ negative (-11), the forecast is a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams show high seasonal BTTS rates: Zulte-Waregem 61% and FCV Dender 59%, vs a league average of 55%, indicating a propensity for Goal/Goal matches. In the last 5 games the signal is even stronger for Dender (80% BTTS) vs Zulte (60%), with Zulte scoring 13 goals in 5 matches (2.6 avg) and Dender 6 goals (1.2). Seasonal averages show Zulte concedes 1.94 goals per match and Dender 1.47, while xG_for of 1.28 and 1.25 and xG_against of 1.70 and 1.81 indicate both teams create chances and frequently concede. Additionally, clean sheet expected is low at only 17% and 18%, and shots on target 3.44 vs 4.06 confirm scoring opportunities occur regularly. Considering the 61%/59% seasonal BTTS, 60%/80% in the last 5, and xG ~1.25–1.28 with xG_against ~1.7–1.81, a BTTS - Yes scenario is more likely.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The forecast based on xG and statistics indicates a high-scoring affair: home xG 1.28 and away xG 1.25, while xG against is 1.70 (home) and 1.81 (away), yielding projected ~1.55 goals for Zulte-Waregem and ~1.48 for FCV Dender (total 3.03). Seasonally Over 1.5 occurred for the home side in 67% of matches and for the away side in 76%, and both teams register BTTS in 61% and 59% of games respectively, which increases the probability of at least two goals. In the last 5 matches the home team scored 13 goals (avg. 2.6), the away team 6 goals (1.2), and both teams produced Over 2.5 in 80% of those fixtures, further boosting the expected goals total. Defenses are vulnerable (avg. 1.94 conceded by the home side and 1.47 by the away), so the strongest signal from the data is a bet on Over 1.5, while the 2.5 line also shows an edge (~66% chance).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
At half-time the most likely outcome is a draw: the home side were level at the break in 50% of matches and the visitors in 53%, making a draw the most common state at 45 minutes. In the second half the advantage should lie with Zulte‑Waregem — in their last five matches the hosts have averaged 2.0 goals after the break versus 0.6 for FCV Dender and won 4 of 5 matches (80%) compared with a 40% win rate for the visitors. Additionally, Zulte scored on average 0.61 goals before half-time versus 0.24 for Dender, and the hosts averaged 1.33 points at the break compared to 0.71 for the visitors, which gives them a better position to take the initiative after the break. xG is almost equal (1.28 versus 1.25), so the difference is mainly due to conversion and second-half form in favour of the hosts, hence the recommended scenario: draw at half-time and home win at full-time (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Zulte-Waregem | FCV Dender EH | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Zulte-Waregem is 117% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / match - Zulte-Waregem · 1.2 pts / match - FCV Dender EH
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Zulte-Waregem is 70% better for: goals scored per match.
1.46 goals / match - Zulte-Waregem · 0.86 goals / match - FCV Dender EH
Zulte-Waregem is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.49 goals / match - Zulte-Waregem · 1.71 goals / match - FCV Dender EH
Zulte-Waregem scores in 77% of matches (27 of 35 matches), while FCV Dender EH keeps a clean sheet in 17% (6 of 35 matches).
FCV Dender EH scores in 66% of matches (23 of 35 matches), while Zulte-Waregem keeps a clean sheet in 23% (8 of 35 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Zulte-Waregem
Over / Under - FCV Dender EH
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Zulte-Waregem is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.17 pts / match - Zulte-Waregem · 1.03 pts / match - FCV Dender EH
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Zulte-Waregem - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
FCV Dender EH - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 14%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +7 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Zulte-Waregem
FCV Dender EH
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Pro League).
Teams vs league
| Zulte-Waregem | Liga | FCV Dender EH | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.94 | 2.68 | ▼ 2.57 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 60% | 55% | ▲ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 51% | 49% | ▲ 54% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 23% | 26% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 74% | 70% | ▼ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 76% | ▲ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Zulte-Waregem 2 - 1 - 0 FCV Dender EH. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Zulte-Waregem vs FCV Dender EH?
The Pro League match finished Zulte-Waregem 2:1 FCV Dender EH. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Zulte-Waregem and FCV Dender EH?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Zulte-Waregem won 2, FCV Dender EH won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Zulte-Waregem vs FCV Dender EH?
Zulte-Waregem score 1.46 goals per game on average and FCV Dender EH 0.86. The Pro League average is 2.68 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Zulte-Waregem's matches and 60% of FCV Dender EH's.
What form are Zulte-Waregem and FCV Dender EH in?
Over the last 5 games Zulte-Waregem have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and FCV Dender EH 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Zulte-Waregem vs FCV Dender EH?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


