Switzerland - Super LeagueData current as of 11 September 2026

Zürich vs Grasshopper: match statistics

Zürich crest
Zürich
2 : 1half-time 0:1
Grasshopper crest
Grasshopper

Zürich vs Grasshopper: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Zürich played Grasshopper in Super League (Switzerland). The match was played on 9 May 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Zürich: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Grasshopper: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Zürich scores 1.34 and concedes 1.94 goals per match. Grasshopper scores 1.17 and concedes 1.97. League average: 3.25 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Zürich 69%, Grasshopper 57%. Over 2.5: Zürich 80%, Grasshopper 54%. League level: BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 67%.

xG, shots and style

Zürich has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.43. Zürich: 13.0 shots per match, Grasshopper: 12.8.

Match halves

Zürich: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.69. Grasshopper: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.60.

Goals by minute

Zürich: 61-75 (11 goals). Grasshopper: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Super League: 3.25 goals per match, BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 67%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-1. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 33%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back a home win (1). Zürich has 10 wins this season versus Grasshopper’s 6 and has scored 47 goals to their 41, indicating an edge in goal output. At home Zürich averages 1.59 goals, 5.53 shots on target, xG 1.66 and 53% possession, while Grasshopper away averages 1.06 goals, 4.71 shots on target, xG 1.45 and 44% possession — a gap of 0.53 goals, 0.21 xG and 9 percentage points possession in favour of the hosts. Home shot conversion is 11% versus the visitors’ 8%, and the share of matches without scoring is 18% vs 41%, suggesting Zürich is more efficient in converting chances. Both defenses are vulnerable (Zürich concedes 1.94 goals at home vs Grasshopper’s 2.18 conceded away), and in the last 5 matches the hosts have scored 5 goals and average 0.8 points per game versus the visitors’ 3 goals and 0.6 points per game. Therefore I give Zürich a 55% chance to win, 20% for a draw and 25% for a Grasshopper win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Season-long indicators favor a BTTS outcome: Zürich has BTTS at 67%, Grasshopper 47%, and the league overall 66%, indicating a propensity for both teams to score. Both teams concede a lot — Zürich 68 and Grasshopper 69 this season, with averages of 1.78 and 2.18 goals conceded per match — which increases the likelihood both sides find the net. Attacking metrics are comparable: xG 1.40 (Zürich) vs 1.45 (Grasshopper) and on-target shots 4.0 vs 4.71, meaning Grasshopper creates chances and has a real opportunity to score despite lower conversion. There is, however, form risk — in the last 5 matches BTTS is 60% for Zürich and only 20% for Grasshopper, and Grasshopper averaged 0.6 goals in those five games, which reduces my optimism about the visitors scoring. Weighing season-long 67%/66% against the visitors’ poor recent form and low clean sheet rates of 11% and 18%, I tip BTTS - Yes at 63% vs 37% for No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Total xG is 1.40 (Zürich) + 1.45 (Grasshopper) = 2.85, which under a Poisson distribution yields roughly a 78% probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5). Historically both teams frequently exceed this threshold: hosts have 83% of matches Over 1.5, visitors 71% (average 77%), and in the last 5 matches Zürich scored 5 and conceded 9, while Grasshopper scored 3 and conceded 10, which supports the goal projection. Both sides show a high share of BTTS matches (Zürich 67%, Grasshopper 47%) and similar shot volumes 12.67 vs 12.88 with shots on target 4.0 vs 4.71, reinforcing the tendency for goals. Over 2.5 is only moderately likely (~54%) and Over 3.5 is weaker (~32%), therefore the strongest signal from the available data is a play on Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Seasonal metrics indicate Zürich led at the break in 6 matches (33%) versus 3 matches (18%) for Grasshopper, with average first-half goals of 0.67 for Zürich and 0.47 for the visitors, giving the home side an edge in the first half. Zürich scores on average 1.28 goals per match with an xG of 1.40 and a shot conversion of 10%, while Grasshopper concedes on average 2.18 goals per match with an opponent xG of 1.66 and a conversion rate of 8% — similar xG (1.40 vs 1.45) but clearly weaker away defense favors the hosts. Clean sheets are rare (11% for Zürich, 18% for Grasshopper), and 67% of Zürich’s matches see goals from both sides, so I expect goals and a home advantage. The last 5 matches give mixed signals — Zürich did not lead at the break in those five (0%), while Grasshopper led in 40% — nevertheless I prioritize the seasonal indicators (33% leads for Zürich and better conversion 10% vs 8%), therefore the strongest scenario is Zürich leading at half-time and winning the match (1/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
ZürichGrasshopper
16Shots5
ZürichGrasshopper
7Shots on target3
ZürichGrasshopper
1.93xG0.7
ZürichGrasshopper
6Corners4
ZürichGrasshopper
59Dangerous attacks23
ZürichGrasshopper
12Fouls13
ZürichGrasshopper
2Cards3
ZürichGrasshopper

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.34Goals scored / match1.17
ZürichGrasshopper
1.94Goals conceded / match1.97
ZürichGrasshopper
51%Average possession45%
ZürichGrasshopper
4.74Shots on target / match4.34
ZürichGrasshopper

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.97Shots per match12.77
ZürichGrasshopper
4.74Shots on target4.34
ZürichGrasshopper
10.4%Shot conversion9.2%
ZürichGrasshopper
51%Possession45%
ZürichGrasshopper
1.48xG for1.43
ZürichGrasshopper
1.73xG against1.61
ZürichGrasshopper

Shooting quality

Zürich: BalancedGrasshopper: Balanced
ZürichGrasshopper
Accuracy (shots on target)37%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Zürich is 33% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Zürich · 0.6 pts / match - Grasshopper

Zürich
WLLLD
Season result split
29% W14% D57% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-5-20
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -21
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-1-10
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 1.80BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Grasshopper
LLWLL
Season result split
17% W26% D57% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-9-20
0.77 pts / match · goal difference -28
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-4-10
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.12Opponent xG: 1.72BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Zürich is 15% better for: goals scored per match.

1.34 goals / match - Zürich · 1.17 goals / match - Grasshopper

Zürich scoring profile: very strong

Zürich scores in 74% of matches (26 of 35 matches), while Grasshopper keeps a clean sheet in 14% (5 of 35 matches).

Grasshopper scoring profile: very strong

Grasshopper scores in 69% of matches (24 of 35 matches), while Zürich keeps a clean sheet in 6% (2 of 35 matches).

47Goals scored (season)41
ZürichGrasshopper
68Goals conceded (season)69
ZürichGrasshopper
3.29Average goals in match3.14
ZürichGrasshopper
5Goals scored (last 5)3
ZürichGrasshopper
9Goals conceded (last 5)13
ZürichGrasshopper

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal69%
ZürichGrasshopper
46%2 goals26%
ZürichGrasshopper
14%3 goals14%
ZürichGrasshopper
0%4 goals3%
ZürichGrasshopper

How often they concede at least...

94%1 goal86%
ZürichGrasshopper
60%2 goals51%
ZürichGrasshopper
29%3 goals29%
ZürichGrasshopper
11%4 goals17%
ZürichGrasshopper

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

66%
League average

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time23%
ZürichGrasshopper
6%BTTS in both halves11%
ZürichGrasshopper
23%Scored in both halves23%
ZürichGrasshopper

BTTS and goal count

63%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
ZürichGrasshopper
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
ZürichGrasshopper
60%BTTS - last 520%
ZürichGrasshopper

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
ZürichGrasshopper
49%Min. 2 goals before half-time34%
ZürichGrasshopper
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time23%
ZürichGrasshopper

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
ZürichGrasshopper
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time54%
ZürichGrasshopper
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
ZürichGrasshopper

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Zürich - half-time state
26% leading37% draw37% trailing
Grasshopper - half-time state
26% leading37% draw37% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.14Points per match (1st half)1.14
ZürichGrasshopper
0.66Goals scored (1st half)0.57
ZürichGrasshopper
0.83Goals conceded (1st half)0.89
ZürichGrasshopper
1.49Average goals (1st half)1.46
ZürichGrasshopper
37%Clean sheet before half-time43%
ZürichGrasshopper
51%No goal before half-time57%
ZürichGrasshopper

After half-time (2nd half)

0.97Points per match (2nd half)0.86
ZürichGrasshopper
0.69Goals scored (2nd half)0.6
ZürichGrasshopper
1.11Goals conceded (2nd half)1.09
ZürichGrasshopper
1.8Average goals (2nd half)1.69
ZürichGrasshopper
31%Clean sheet after half-time29%
ZürichGrasshopper
51%No goal after half-time51%
ZürichGrasshopper

Zürich - second-half results

23% W29% D49% L
40
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
-15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding112%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Grasshopper - second-half results

17% W34% D49% L
40
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
-17
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding65%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 17%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Zürich - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match1.20.6
Average goals in match1.81.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 3
Grasshopper - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.60
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match1.21.4
Average goals in match1.61.6
1 goal100%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-4-6
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Zürich
ScoredConceded
5
11
0-15
9
6
16-30
9
12
31-45
5
7
46-60
11
8
61-75
8
24
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (24). Late-goal balance (76-90): -16 - late phases are a weakness.

Grasshopper
ScoredConceded
8
9
0-15
4
11
16-30
8
11
31-45
4
12
46-60
7
18
61-75
10
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.21
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-28%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
51%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Zürich

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
131%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Grasshopper

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.62
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
111%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).

Teams vs league

ZürichLigaGrasshopper
Average goals in match 3.293.25 3.14
Both teams scored 69%66% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 80%67% 54%
Clean sheets 6%19% 14%
Goal before half-time 83%77% 77%
Goal after half-time 86%84% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.25
Average goals per match
66%
Both teams scored
67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
1.77
Home goals / match
1.48
Away goals / match
+20%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
54%
2 goals
30%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ZürichYellow cardCheveyo Tsawa
  2. GrasshopperRed cardFelix Emmanuel Tsimba
  3. GrasshopperSubstitutionOn: Michael FreyOff: Amir Abrashi
  4. ZürichYellow cardSilas Huber
  5. GrasshopperSubstitutionOn: Ismajl BekaOff: Hassane Imourane
  6. GrasshopperYellow cardSamuel Marques

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Lukas FähndrichMatches officiated: 19
4.11Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 226%Home wins16%Draws57%Away wins

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Zürich 2 - 0 - 1 Grasshopper. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 33% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Zürich vs Grasshopper?

The Super League match finished Zürich 2:1 Grasshopper. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Zürich and Grasshopper?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Zürich won 2, Grasshopper won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Zürich vs Grasshopper?

Zürich score 1.34 goals per game on average and Grasshopper 1.17. The Super League average is 3.25 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 69% of Zürich's matches and 57% of Grasshopper's.

What form are Zürich and Grasshopper in?

Over the last 5 games Zürich have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Grasshopper 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Zürich vs Grasshopper?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Zürich vs Grasshopper: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.