ABB vs The Strongest: match statistics
ABB vs The Strongest: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
ABB played against The Strongest in LFPB (Bolivia). The game was played on September 15, 2026. Venue: Estadio Municipal El Alto. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
ABB has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. The Strongest has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.
Scoring records
ABB scores 1.58 goals per game and allows 2.26. The Strongest scores 1.95 and allows 1.11. Games in this league average 3.10 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 79% of ABB's games and 68% of The Strongest's. The Over 2.5 rates are 74% and 63%, compared with league averages of 61% for BTTS and 63% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
The Strongest has the higher season xG average, 1.80 to 1.50 per game. ABB takes 14.2 shots per game, while The Strongest takes 17.5.
First-half and second-half trends
ABB leads at halftime in 32% of its games and scores 0.89 goals per game after halftime. The Strongest leads at halftime in 32% and scores 1.05 after halftime.
When the teams score
ABB's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (6 goals). For The Strongest, it is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
LFPB games average 3.10 goals. Both teams score in 61% of games, and 63% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 3 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The Strongest sit in 3rd place, while ABB are 12th, and the visitors’ season record stands at 10 wins and just 2 defeats, compared with the hosts’ 6 wins and 10 losses. Recent form also clearly favors the away side: they have won 4 of their last 5 matches and scored 14 goals in the process, whereas ABB have netted just 5, recording 1 win and 3 defeats. ABB are nevertheless dangerous at home, averaging 2.00 goals with an xG of 1.74 and winning 56% of their matches, so the hosts should create chances of their own. The Strongest’s away defensive record could prove decisive: they concede just 1.00 goal on average and keep a clean sheet in 44% of matches, with only 11% ending in defeat. The visitors also enjoy greater possession, 56% compared with 45%, and combined with their strong finishing in recent weeks, this points towards an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
ABB has a very high seasonal rate of matches in which both teams score, standing at 89%, while The Strongest records 56%, compared with a league average of 63%. The hosts score an average of 2.00 goals but concede 1.33, and only 11% of their matches end with a clean sheet. The Strongest boasts solid attacking potential: they score an average of 1.56 goals, generate 1.68 xG, and register 5.67 shots on target per match, while ABB has conceded 1.80 goals per game over their last five league fixtures. The visitors are also in strong scoring form, with 14 goals and an average of 2.80 goals across their last five matches, although they themselves conceded 1.80 goals per game during this period. The BTTS signal is weakened by ABB’s 40% rate of such outcomes in their last five matches and The Strongest’s 44% clean-sheet rate this season, but the attacking data advantage and the hosts’ defensive weakness still favor a scenario in which both teams find the net.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The match profile points toward goals: ABB averages 2.00 goals at home, while The Strongest scores 1.56 goals away from home. The visitors are also in excellent attacking form, averaging 2.8 goals in their last five matches, although they have conceded 1.8 goals per game during that span. ABB has very limited defensive stability, conceding an average of 1.33 goals and keeping a clean sheet in only 11% of matches, while allowing 9 goals in their last five fixtures. Across the entire season, at least 2 goals were scored in 89% of ABB matches and 67% of The Strongest matches, making Over 1.5 goals the strongest pick. The Over 2.5 line also has merit, but the edge is smaller due to ABB's weaker recent attacking output, with only 5 goals scored in their last five matches.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The Strongest have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring an average of 2.8 goals, while ABB have recorded just 1 victory and averaged 1.0 goal per game. The visitors make a very strong start to matches: in their last five appearances, they held the lead at the break in 60% of cases and scored an average of 1.8 goals before half-time, compared with just 0.6 for ABB over the same period. The Strongest’s advantage is also evident after the interval, as they average 1.0 goal in the second half, while ABB concede as many as 1.8 goals during that period. The hosts do have a better full-season home record, averaging 2.0 goals scored, but their recent form—0.8 points per match compared with the visitors’ 2.4—clearly diminishes the significance of home advantage. The most likely scenario is therefore that The Strongest will take the lead before half-time and maintain it until the final whistle, making the HT/FT prediction 2/2.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| ABB | The Strongest | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
The Strongest is 200% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - ABB · 2.4 pts / game - The Strongest
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
The Strongest is 23% better for: goals scored per game.
1.58 goals / game - ABB · 1.95 goals / game - The Strongest
The Strongest is 104% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.26 goals / game - ABB · 1.11 goals / game - The Strongest
ABB scores in 84% of games (16 of 19 games), while The Strongest keeps a clean sheet in 32% (6 of 19 games).
The Strongest scores in 84% of games (16 of 19 games), while ABB keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 19 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - ABB
Over / Under - The Strongest
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
The Strongest is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.26 pts / game - ABB · 1.42 pts / game - The Strongest
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
ABB - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 32% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
The Strongest - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 32% of games and wins 58%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 2.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -8 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 2.2 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
ABB
The Strongest
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (LFPB).
Teams vs league
| ABB | Liga | The Strongest | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.84 | 3.10 | • 3.05 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 79% | 61% | ▲ 68% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 74% | 63% | • 63% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 5% | 23% | ▲ 32% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 89% | 75% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 87% | ▼ 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from ABB's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses against The Strongest. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of ABB vs The Strongest?
The LFPB match finished ABB 1:2 The Strongest. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between ABB and The Strongest?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches ABB won 0, The Strongest won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before ABB vs The Strongest?
ABB score 1.58 goals per game on average and The Strongest 1.95. The LFPB average is 3.10 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 79% of ABB's matches and 68% of The Strongest's.
What form are ABB and The Strongest in?
Over the last 5 games ABB have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and The Strongest 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for ABB vs The Strongest?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for ABB vs The Strongest: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.