Auda vs Grobiņa: match statistics
Auda vs Grobiņa: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Auda played against Grobiņa in Virsliga (Latvia). The game was played on September 6, 2026. Venue: Sporta komplekss Ķeizarmežs. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Auda has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Grobiņa has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Auda scores 1.63 goals per game and allows 1.00. Grobiņa scores 0.71 and allows 1.79. Games in this league average 2.99 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 52% of Auda's games and 39% of Grobiņa's. The Over 2.5 rates are 48% and 32%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 56% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Auda has the higher season xG average, 1.66 to 1.23 per game. Auda takes 13.6 shots per game, while Grobiņa takes 10.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Auda leads at halftime in 44% of its games and scores 0.85 goals per game after halftime. Grobiņa leads at halftime in 14% and scores 0.39 after halftime.
When the teams score
Auda's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (11 goals). For Grobiņa, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Virsliga games average 2.99 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 56% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 7 previous meetings were available. The record was 5 home wins, 2 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.71 goals, with both teams scoring in 29% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Auda sit 3rd, while Grobiņa are eighth, and the difference in class is reflected in the season record: 16 home wins compared with just 5 victories for the visitors. At home, Auda average 1.86 goals with an xG of 1.70, whereas Grobiņa score only 0.57 goals per away match and fail to score in 43% of games. The hosts create more chances, averaging 13.64 shots and 5 on target per match, compared with 10.29 and 3.29 respectively for their opponents, while also dominating possession 63% to 45%. Grobiņa’s away defensive record is poor, with the team conceding an average of 2.21 goals and keeping a clean sheet in just 14% of matches; moreover, they have conceded as many as 16 goals in their last five league games. Current form also clearly favors Auda, who have collected 10 points from their last five matches, while Grobiņa have suffered four defeats and picked up just 3 points.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The stronger signal points to BTTS - No, as Auda saw both teams score in only 36% of their matches this season, while Grobiņa recorded this outcome in 43%—well below the league average of 55%. The visitors’ low attacking efficiency is particularly significant: they score just 0.57 goals per match on average and have failed to score in 43% of their appearances. In their last five matches, Auda have allowed opponents only 0.53 xG per game, despite their overall average of 1.36 goals conceded. Grobiņa, meanwhile, concede 2.21 goals per match, rising to 3.2 over their last five, making a scenario with a home goal and at least one team failing to score more likely. The visitors’ 60% BTTS rate in their recent matches increases the chances of BTTS - Yes, but it does not offset Grobiņa’s poor season-long goal production and Auda’s excellent current defensive form.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Auda have clearly improved their attacking output: over their last five matches, they have averaged 1.6 goals scored, with an average xG of 1.53. This is particularly favorable against Grobiņa, who conceded as many as 3.2 goals per game over the same period and allowed opponents 2.34 xG. The visitors have recently averaged just 1.0 goal scored, while Auda allowed their opponents only 0.53 xG across five matches, meaning the main goal-scoring burden should fall on the home side. Over 1.5 goals was recorded in 57% of Auda’s matches and 79% of Grobiņa’s matches this season, while the visitors’ defensive problems further support this projection, making Over 1.5 the strongest pick. At the same time, both teams had 71% of their matches finish below 3.5 goals, which limits confidence in higher lines.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Auda are clearly stronger in terms of current form: they have won 3 of their last 5 matches, scoring an average of 1.6 goals and conceding 1.4, while Grobiņa have lost 4 of their 5 games and allowed opponents to score an average of 3.2 goals. The signal for the home side to lead at the break is strong, as Auda were ahead after 45 minutes in 60% of their recent matches, whereas Grobiņa have not led at half-time once and conceded an average of 1.4 goals in the first half. During this period, the hosts scored 0.8 goals per game before the break while conceding just 0.4, whereas the visitors failed to score in any first half. Across the season, Grobiņa have a weak defensive record, conceding an average of 2.21 goals per match, while Auda also have a better shot-conversion rate, 9% compared with 6%. Although half-time draws occurred in 57% of Auda’s matches over the season, their current form advantage and the visitors’ clear problems primarily point towards an HT/FT scenario of Auda leading at half-time and winning the match.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Auda | Grobiņa | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.21 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Auda is 225% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / game - Auda · 0.8 pts / game - Grobiņa
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Auda is 130% better for: goals scored per game.
1.63 goals / game - Auda · 0.71 goals / game - Grobiņa
Auda is 79% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - Auda · 1.79 goals / game - Grobiņa
Auda scores in 89% of games (24 of 27 games), while Grobiņa keeps a clean sheet in 21% (6 of 28 games).
Grobiņa scores in 54% of games (15 of 28 games), while Auda keeps a clean sheet in 41% (11 of 27 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Auda
Over / Under - Grobiņa
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Auda is 80% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.67 pts / game - Auda · 0.93 pts / game - Grobiņa
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Auda - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 44% of games and wins 59%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Grobiņa - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 18%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -7 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Auda
Grobiņa
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).
Teams vs league
| Auda | Liga | Grobiņa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.63 | 2.99 | ▼ 2.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 52% | 55% | ▼ 39% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 48% | 56% | ▼ 32% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 41% | 24% | ▼ 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 78% | 76% | ▼ 61% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 78% | 83% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Auda's perspective: 5 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses against Grobiņa. Games average 2.71 goals, and both teams scored in 29% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Auda vs Grobiņa?
The Virsliga match finished Auda 1:0 Grobiņa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Auda and Grobiņa?
In the last 7 head-to-head matches Auda won 5, Grobiņa won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.71 goals, with both teams scoring in 29% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Auda vs Grobiņa?
Auda score 1.63 goals per game on average and Grobiņa 0.71. The Virsliga average is 2.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Auda's matches and 39% of Grobiņa's.
What form are Auda and Grobiņa in?
Over the last 5 games Auda have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Grobiņa 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Auda vs Grobiņa?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Auda vs Grobiņa: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


