Match suspended or postponed
The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.
FAS vs Cacahuatique: match statistics
FAS vs Cacahuatique: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
FAS plays Cacahuatique in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.
Recent form
FAS has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Cacahuatique has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
FAS scores 2.15 goals per game and allows 0.96. Cacahuatique scores 1.19 and allows 1.38. Games in this league average 2.68 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 54% of FAS's games and 56% of Cacahuatique's. The Over 2.5 rates are 54% and 56%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
FAS has the higher season xG average, 1.53 to 1.39 per game. FAS takes 10.9 shots per game, while Cacahuatique takes 8.8.
First-half and second-half trends
FAS leads at halftime in 42% of its games and scores 1.19 goals per game after halftime. Cacahuatique leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.54 after halftime.
When the teams score
FAS's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (30 goals). For Cacahuatique, it is minutes 16-30 (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Salvadoran Primera División games average 2.68 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 7 previous meetings were available. The record was 4 home wins, 2 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.14 goals, with both teams scoring in 43% of them.
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| FAS | Cacahuatique | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 46% | 48% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.43 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
FAS is 80% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - FAS · 1 pts / game - Cacahuatique
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FAS is 81% better for: goals scored per game.
2.15 goals / game - FAS · 1.19 goals / game - Cacahuatique
FAS is 44% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.96 goals / game - FAS · 1.38 goals / game - Cacahuatique
FAS scores in 90% of games (43 of 48 games), while Cacahuatique keeps a clean sheet in 29% (14 of 48 games).
Cacahuatique scores in 73% of games (35 of 48 games), while FAS keeps a clean sheet in 38% (18 of 48 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - FAS
Over / Under - Cacahuatique
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
FAS is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.67 pts / game - FAS · 1.46 pts / game - Cacahuatique
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FAS - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 42% of games and wins 63%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Cacahuatique - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 29%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (30 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +20 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
FAS
Cacahuatique
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).
Teams vs league
| FAS | Liga | Cacahuatique | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.10 | 2.68 | ▼ 2.56 |
| Both teams scored | • 54% | 54% | ▲ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 54% | 50% | ▲ 56% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 38% | 27% | ▲ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 68% | ▼ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 85% | 78% | ▲ 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from FAS's perspective: 4 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss against Cacahuatique. Games average 2.14 goals, and both teams scored in 43% of them.