Latvia - VirsligaZemgales Olimpiskā centraData current as of September 19, 2026

FS Jelgava vs Auda: match statistics

FS Jelgava crest
FS Jelgava
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Auda crest
Auda

FS Jelgava vs Auda: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

FS Jelgava played against Auda in Virsliga (Latvia). The game was played on August 9, 2026. Venue: Zemgales Olimpiskā centra. Final score: 0:1.

Recent form

FS Jelgava has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Auda has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.

Scoring records

FS Jelgava scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 1.72. Auda scores 1.65 and allows 1.13. Games in this league average 2.95 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 44% of FS Jelgava's games and 57% of Auda's. The Over 2.5 rates are 40% and 52%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 55% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Auda has the higher season xG average, 1.63 to 1.30 per game. FS Jelgava takes 10.7 shots per game, while Auda takes 13.1.

First-half and second-half trends

FS Jelgava leads at halftime in 36% of its games and scores 0.44 goals per game after halftime. Auda leads at halftime in 39% and scores 0.87 after halftime.

When the teams score

FS Jelgava's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). For Auda, it is minutes 31-45+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Virsliga games average 2.95 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 55% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 6 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 2 draws and 3 away wins. Those games averaged 2.83 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Auda enter this match as the third-placed team and have won all of their last 5 games, scoring 10 goals and conceding just 3. Jelgava sit seventh and have lost their last 5 matches with a 1:10 goal difference, clearly highlighting their problems both in front of goal and in defensive organization. Away from home, Auda average 1.42 goals with an xG of 1.60, while Jelgava concede 1.69 goals per home match and allow opponents an xG of 1.66. The visitors also create more shots on target, averaging 4.50 compared with the hosts’ 3.54, while keeping a clean sheet in 42% of away matches. Jelgava have failed to score in 46% of their home games, whereas Auda have failed to score in just 8% of their away fixtures, making an away win the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal BTTS indicators are moderately high, standing at 55% for Jelgava and 58% for Auda, but current form clearly shifts the assessment towards at least one team failing to score. Jelgava has scored just 1 goal in its last 5 matches, averaging 0.2 per game, while BTTS occurred in only 20% of its appearances during this period. Auda has conceded just 3 goals in its last five league matches, an average of 0.6 per game, and has kept a clean sheet in 42% of its season matches. At the same time, the visitors are highly effective offensively, averaging 2.0 goals across their last five matches. Therefore, the most likely outcome is Auda to score while Jelgava fails to find the net — BTTS - No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is Under 3.5 goals, as 73% of Jelgava’s matches and 83% of Auda’s matches have finished below this line this season. Jelgava are in very poor form: they have scored just 1 goal in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.2 per game, with an xG of only 1.00. Auda have won their last five matches, scoring 10 goals and conceding just 3, but their solid defense also limits the prospects of a high-scoring game for the hosts; they have kept a clean sheet in 42% of their matches this season. The visitors should create more chances, as their recent xG stands at 1.71, while Jelgava have recently allowed an xG of 2.59. However, the 0.75 to 1.75 forecast still points more towards a scoreline such as 0:2, 1:1 or 1:2 than four goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal points to Auda leading at the break and securing the win after 90 minutes. Jelgava have lost all of their last five matches, scoring an average of just 0.2 goals and conceding 2.0, while Auda have won all five of their matches, averaging 2.0 goals scored and 0.6 conceded. In the first halves of this run, the hosts failed to take the lead on any occasion, were behind at half-time in 100% of their matches, and did not score a single goal. By contrast, Auda led in 60% of their matches and conceded an average of just 0.2 goals before the break. Auda have also had the better defense throughout the season, allowing an average of 1.0 goal and 0.98 xG to opponents, compared with Jelgava’s 1.27 goals and 1.30 xG. The visitors’ advantage remains evident after half-time, as they have averaged 1.2 goals in the second half across their last five appearances, while the hosts have managed just 0.2, further strengthening the 2/2 scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

38Possession (%)62
FS JelgavaAuda
5Shots16
FS JelgavaAuda
1Shots on target4
FS JelgavaAuda
0.72xG1.74
FS JelgavaAuda
6Corners6
FS JelgavaAuda
45Dangerous attacks62
FS JelgavaAuda
21Fouls15
FS JelgavaAuda
2Cards6
FS JelgavaAuda

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1Goals scored / game1.65
FS JelgavaAuda
1.72Goals allowed / game1.13
FS JelgavaAuda
44%Average possession59%
FS JelgavaAuda
3.44Shots on target / game4.65
FS JelgavaAuda

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.68Shots per game13.13
FS JelgavaAuda
3.44Shots on target4.65
FS JelgavaAuda
9.4%Shot conversion12.6%
FS JelgavaAuda
44%Possession59%
FS JelgavaAuda
1.3xG for1.63
FS JelgavaAuda
1.79xG against1.14
FS JelgavaAuda

Shooting quality

FS Jelgava: BalancedAuda: Balanced
FS JelgavaAuda
Accuracy (shots on target)32%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Auda is 167% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / game - FS Jelgava · 1.6 pts / game - Auda

FS Jelgava
WLLLL
Season result split
24% W28% D48% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-7-12
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-7
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LWWLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.18Opponent xG: 2.21BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Auda
WDLDW
Season result split
57% W17% D26% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-4-6
1.87 pts / game · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
7-3-2
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WLWDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.65Opponent xG: 0.94BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Auda is 65% better for: goals scored per game.

1 goals / game - FS Jelgava · 1.65 goals / game - Auda

Auda is 52% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.72 goals / game - FS Jelgava · 1.13 goals / game - Auda

FS Jelgava scoring profile: mixed

FS Jelgava scores in 56% of games (14 of 25 games), while Auda keeps a clean sheet in 35% (8 of 23 games).

Auda scoring profile: very strong

Auda scores in 87% of games (20 of 23 games), while FS Jelgava keeps a clean sheet in 16% (4 of 25 games).

25Goals scored (season)38
FS JelgavaAuda
43Goals conceded (season)26
FS JelgavaAuda
2.72Average goals per game2.78
FS JelgavaAuda
3Goals scored (last 5)4
FS JelgavaAuda
8Goals conceded (last 5)3
FS JelgavaAuda

How often they score at least...

56%1 goal87%
FS JelgavaAuda
24%2 goals48%
FS JelgavaAuda
8%3 goals13%
FS JelgavaAuda
8%4 goals4%
FS JelgavaAuda

How often they concede at least...

84%1 goal65%
FS JelgavaAuda
36%2 goals30%
FS JelgavaAuda
20%3 goals13%
FS JelgavaAuda
12%4 goals4%
FS JelgavaAuda

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time26%
FS JelgavaAuda
0%BTTS in both halves0%
FS JelgavaAuda
16%Scored in both halves35%
FS JelgavaAuda

BTTS and goal count

24%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
FS JelgavaAuda
16%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
FS JelgavaAuda
20%BTTS - last 520%
FS JelgavaAuda

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time78%
FS JelgavaAuda
28%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
FS JelgavaAuda
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
FS JelgavaAuda

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
FS JelgavaAuda
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
FS JelgavaAuda
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
FS JelgavaAuda

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Auda is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.32 pts / game - FS Jelgava · 1.52 pts / game - Auda

FS Jelgava - half-time state
36% leading24% draw40% trailing
Auda - half-time state
39% leading35% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.32Points per game (1st half)1.52
FS JelgavaAuda
0.56Goals scored (1st half)0.78
FS JelgavaAuda
0.68Goals conceded (1st half)0.61
FS JelgavaAuda
1.24Average goals (1st half)1.39
FS JelgavaAuda
48%Clean sheet before half-time57%
FS JelgavaAuda
60%No goal before half-time39%
FS JelgavaAuda

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)1.52
FS JelgavaAuda
0.44Goals scored (2nd half)0.87
FS JelgavaAuda
1.04Goals conceded (2nd half)0.52
FS JelgavaAuda
1.48Average goals (2nd half)1.39
FS JelgavaAuda
40%Clean sheet after half-time57%
FS JelgavaAuda
68%No goal after half-time39%
FS JelgavaAuda

FS Jelgava - second-half results

24% W28% D48% L
33
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 24%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Auda - second-half results

35% W48% D17% L
35
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.52
PPG before half-time
Lead holding146%

Leads at halftime in 39% of games and wins 57%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

FS Jelgava - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.601.20
Goals scored / game0.20.4
Goals allowed / game1.00.6
Average goals per game1.21.0
1 goal100%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-4-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Auda - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.40
Goals scored / game0.20.6
Goals allowed / game0.40.2
Average goals per game0.60.8
1 goal40%40%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

FS Jelgava
ScoredConceded
4
7
0-15
5
7
16-30
5
3
31-45
2
7
46-60
5
6
61-75
4
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

Auda
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
5
5
16-30
10
6
31-45
9
4
46-60
5
3
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.75
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
51%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+3%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

FS Jelgava

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.49
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
60%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
133%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Auda

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.49
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
128%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
68%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

FS JelgavaLigaAuda
Average goals per game 2.722.95 2.78
Both teams scored 44%55% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 40%55% 52%
Clean sheets 16%24% 35%
Goal before half-time 80%75% 78%
Goal after half-time 80%83% 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.95
Average goals per game
55%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.66
Home goals / game
1.29
Away goals / game
+29%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defensive advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FS JelgavaYellow cardGlebs Žaleiko
  2. AudaYellow cardOskars Rubenis
  3. AudaYellow cardRalfs Kragliks
  4. AudaYellow cardMohamoud Fofana
  5. AudaSubstitutionOn: Mohamed FofanaOff: Mohamoud Fofana
  6. AudaYellow cardMohamed Fofana
  7. AudaYellow cardJayen Gerold
  8. FS JelgavaSubstitutionOn: Emīls Kristers ŠmaukstelisOff: Glebs Žaleiko
  9. FS JelgavaYellow cardGļebs Kačanovs
  10. AudaYellow cardBrian Peña Perez-Vico

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from FS Jelgava's perspective: 1 win, 2 draws and 3 losses against Auda. Games average 2.83 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.

Auda
1 : 1
FS Jelgava
FS Jelgava
2 : 3
Auda
FS Jelgava
1 : 1
FK Auda Riga
FK Auda Riga
2 : 0
FS Jelgava
FS Jelgava
3 : 1
FK Auda Riga
FK Auda Riga
2 : 0
FS Jelgava

FAQ

What was the result of FS Jelgava vs Auda?

The Virsliga match finished FS Jelgava 0:1 Auda. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between FS Jelgava and Auda?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches FS Jelgava won 1, Auda won 3 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.83 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before FS Jelgava vs Auda?

FS Jelgava score 1.00 goals per game on average and Auda 1.65. The Virsliga average is 2.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 44% of FS Jelgava's matches and 57% of Auda's.

What form are FS Jelgava and Auda in?

Over the last 5 games FS Jelgava have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Auda 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FS Jelgava vs Auda?

The statistical background for FS Jelgava vs Auda — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.