Grasshopper vs Zürich: match statistics
Grasshopper vs Zürich: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Grasshopper played against Zürich in Super League (Switzerland). The game was played on September 5, 2026. Venue: Stadion Letzigrund. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
Grasshopper has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Zürich has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Grasshopper scores 1.40 goals per game and allows 2.40. Zürich scores 1.50 and allows 2.67. Games in this league average 3.83 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 80% of Grasshopper's games and 83% of Zürich's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 100%, compared with league averages of 74% for BTTS and 77% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Grasshopper has the higher season xG average, 1.59 to 1.39 per game. Grasshopper takes 14.6 shots per game, while Zürich takes 12.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Grasshopper leads at halftime in 40% of its games and scores 0.40 goals per game after halftime. Zürich leads at halftime in 33% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Grasshopper's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). For Zürich, it is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Super League games average 3.83 goals. Both teams score in 74% of games, and 77% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 3 away wins. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Zürich head into the derby in clearly better form: they have won 3 of their last 5 matches and averaged 1.6 goals in those games, while Grasshopper managed only 0.8 points per match. The hosts sit bottom of the home table, lost their only home fixture so far and concede as many as 4 goals per game at home, without a single clean sheet. However, their attack is capable of creating chances, with an average home xG of 1.37, and the team has scored in every home match; Zürich’s defensive vulnerability, allowing an xG of 1.53 away from home, gives them a realistic chance of finding the net. The visitors also have slightly better shot efficiency, 13% compared with 9%, and a higher points tally over the last five rounds, which tilts the forecast in their favor. Both teams regularly concede, so the most likely outcome is an away win with goals at both ends.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The signal for both teams to score is very strong: Grasshopper recorded BTTS in 100% of their matches this season, while Zürich did so in 67%, compared with a league average of 78%. In their last five matches, both teams registered BTTS in 80% of games, while Grasshopper averaged 2.0 goals scored and 2.4 conceded, compared with Zürich’s 1.6 goals scored and 2.2 conceded. The hosts have failed to keep a clean sheet in every match, and the same applies to the visitors, while Zürich’s defense allowed an average of 3.0 goals per game. Grasshopper also creates more high-quality chances, with an xG of 1.48 and 5.5 shots on target per match, whereas Zürich, despite a lower xG of 1.16, has scored 7 goals this season. The BTTS scenario is more likely than either side failing to score, as both teams regularly concede goals and their recent matches have been clearly open. Accordingly, BTTS - Yes is the recommended selection.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Grasshopper score an average of 1.50 goals at home, while Zürich concede as many as 3.00 goals per away match, significantly increasing the hosts’ scoring potential. Neither team has kept a clean sheet yet, and all of their matches have ended with at least two goals, exceeding the 2.5 line in 100% of cases. In their last five matches, Grasshopper averaged 2.0 goals scored and 2.4 conceded, while Zürich recorded 1.6 and 2.2 goals respectively, with both teams scoring in 80% of matches for each side. The league is also highly attacking, averaging 4.04 goals per game, with 81% of matches going Over 2.5. Therefore, the safest pick remains Over 1.5 goals, which should be covered even if the match follows a moderately paced pattern.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Grasshopper have started their home matches exceptionally well: they have been leading at half-time in 2 of 2 games, averaging 1.0 goal before the break and conceding none. Zürich have yet to score in the first halves of their away matches, while they were behind at half-time in 2 of 3 games, reinforcing the scenario of the hosts taking the lead from the outset. The home side are also creating more quality chances, recording an xG of 1.48 compared with the opponents’ 1.16, as well as averaging 5.5 shots on target versus Zürich’s 2.67. The visitors’ defense concedes an average of 3.0 goals per away match and has yet to keep a clean sheet, so Grasshopper’s lead has a realistic chance of lasting until full-time. The risk of a turnaround remains noticeable, as Zürich have won 60% of their last five matches, but 1/1 remains the strongest single HT/FT outcome.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Grasshopper | Zürich | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Zürich is 50% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Grasshopper · 1.2 pts / game - Zürich
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Zürich is 7% better for: goals scored per game.
1.4 goals / game - Grasshopper · 1.5 goals / game - Zürich
Grasshopper is 11% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.4 goals / game - Grasshopper · 2.67 goals / game - Zürich
Grasshopper scores in 100% of games (5 of 5 games), while Zürich keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 games).
Zürich scores in 83% of games (5 of 6 games), while Grasshopper keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Grasshopper
Over / Under - Zürich
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Grasshopper is 37% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.6 pts / game - Grasshopper · 1.17 pts / game - Zürich
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Grasshopper - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 20%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Zürich - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 0% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Grasshopper
Zürich
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).
Teams vs league
| Grasshopper | Liga | Zürich | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 3.80 | 3.83 | ▲ 4.17 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 80% | 74% | ▲ 83% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 60% | 77% | ▲ 100% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 20% | 14% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 80% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 91% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Grasshopper's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 3 losses against Zürich. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Grasshopper vs Zürich?
The Super League match finished Grasshopper 2:2 Zürich. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Grasshopper and Zürich?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Grasshopper won 1, Zürich won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Grasshopper vs Zürich?
Grasshopper score 1.40 goals per game on average and Zürich 1.50. The Super League average is 3.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 77% of games. Both teams score in 80% of Grasshopper's matches and 83% of Zürich's.
What form are Grasshopper and Zürich in?
Over the last 5 games Grasshopper have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Zürich 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Grasshopper vs Zürich?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Grasshopper vs Zürich: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


