Switzerland - Super LeagueStadion LetzigrundData current as of October 21, 2026

Grasshopper vs Zürich: match statistics

Grasshopper crest
Grasshopper
2 : 2half-time 0:0
Zürich crest
Zürich

Grasshopper vs Zürich: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Grasshopper played against Zürich in Super League (Switzerland). The game was played on September 5, 2026. Venue: Stadion Letzigrund. Final score: 2:2.

Recent form

Grasshopper has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Zürich has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Grasshopper scores 1.40 goals per game and allows 2.40. Zürich scores 1.50 and allows 2.67. Games in this league average 3.83 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 80% of Grasshopper's games and 83% of Zürich's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 100%, compared with league averages of 74% for BTTS and 77% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Grasshopper has the higher season xG average, 1.59 to 1.39 per game. Grasshopper takes 14.6 shots per game, while Zürich takes 12.2.

First-half and second-half trends

Grasshopper leads at halftime in 40% of its games and scores 0.40 goals per game after halftime. Zürich leads at halftime in 33% and scores 1.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

Grasshopper's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). For Zürich, it is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Super League games average 3.83 goals. Both teams score in 74% of games, and 77% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 3 away wins. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Zürich head into the derby in clearly better form: they have won 3 of their last 5 matches and averaged 1.6 goals in those games, while Grasshopper managed only 0.8 points per match. The hosts sit bottom of the home table, lost their only home fixture so far and concede as many as 4 goals per game at home, without a single clean sheet. However, their attack is capable of creating chances, with an average home xG of 1.37, and the team has scored in every home match; Zürich’s defensive vulnerability, allowing an xG of 1.53 away from home, gives them a realistic chance of finding the net. The visitors also have slightly better shot efficiency, 13% compared with 9%, and a higher points tally over the last five rounds, which tilts the forecast in their favor. Both teams regularly concede, so the most likely outcome is an away win with goals at both ends.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both teams to score is very strong: Grasshopper recorded BTTS in 100% of their matches this season, while Zürich did so in 67%, compared with a league average of 78%. In their last five matches, both teams registered BTTS in 80% of games, while Grasshopper averaged 2.0 goals scored and 2.4 conceded, compared with Zürich’s 1.6 goals scored and 2.2 conceded. The hosts have failed to keep a clean sheet in every match, and the same applies to the visitors, while Zürich’s defense allowed an average of 3.0 goals per game. Grasshopper also creates more high-quality chances, with an xG of 1.48 and 5.5 shots on target per match, whereas Zürich, despite a lower xG of 1.16, has scored 7 goals this season. The BTTS scenario is more likely than either side failing to score, as both teams regularly concede goals and their recent matches have been clearly open. Accordingly, BTTS - Yes is the recommended selection.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Grasshopper score an average of 1.50 goals at home, while Zürich concede as many as 3.00 goals per away match, significantly increasing the hosts’ scoring potential. Neither team has kept a clean sheet yet, and all of their matches have ended with at least two goals, exceeding the 2.5 line in 100% of cases. In their last five matches, Grasshopper averaged 2.0 goals scored and 2.4 conceded, while Zürich recorded 1.6 and 2.2 goals respectively, with both teams scoring in 80% of matches for each side. The league is also highly attacking, averaging 4.04 goals per game, with 81% of matches going Over 2.5. Therefore, the safest pick remains Over 1.5 goals, which should be covered even if the match follows a moderately paced pattern.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Grasshopper have started their home matches exceptionally well: they have been leading at half-time in 2 of 2 games, averaging 1.0 goal before the break and conceding none. Zürich have yet to score in the first halves of their away matches, while they were behind at half-time in 2 of 3 games, reinforcing the scenario of the hosts taking the lead from the outset. The home side are also creating more quality chances, recording an xG of 1.48 compared with the opponents’ 1.16, as well as averaging 5.5 shots on target versus Zürich’s 2.67. The visitors’ defense concedes an average of 3.0 goals per away match and has yet to keep a clean sheet, so Grasshopper’s lead has a realistic chance of lasting until full-time. The risk of a turnaround remains noticeable, as Zürich have won 60% of their last five matches, but 1/1 remains the strongest single HT/FT outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
2 : 2
Second half

Game stats

43Possession (%)57
GrasshopperZürich
20Shots11
GrasshopperZürich
7Shots on target6
GrasshopperZürich
2.23xG1.51
GrasshopperZürich
8Corners4
GrasshopperZürich
66Dangerous attacks54
GrasshopperZürich
11Fouls10
GrasshopperZürich
2Cards6
GrasshopperZürich

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.4Goals scored / game1.5
GrasshopperZürich
2.4Goals allowed / game2.67
GrasshopperZürich
45%Average possession45%
GrasshopperZürich
4.2Shots on target / game4.33
GrasshopperZürich

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

14.6Shots per game12.17
GrasshopperZürich
4.2Shots on target4.33
GrasshopperZürich
9.6%Shot conversion12.3%
GrasshopperZürich
45%Possession45%
GrasshopperZürich
1.59xG for1.39
GrasshopperZürich
1.66xG against1.57
GrasshopperZürich

Shooting quality

Grasshopper: AttackingZürich: Counter-attacking
GrasshopperZürich
Accuracy (shots on target)29%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Zürich is 50% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / game - Grasshopper · 1.2 pts / game - Zürich

Grasshopper
DLLLW
Season result split
20% W20% D60% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 at home
1-0-1
LW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.59Opponent xG: 1.66BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Zürich
WLLWL
Season result split
33% W0% D67% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-4
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-2
Last 5 away
1-0-2
LLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Zürich is 7% better for: goals scored per game.

1.4 goals / game - Grasshopper · 1.5 goals / game - Zürich

Grasshopper is 11% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.4 goals / game - Grasshopper · 2.67 goals / game - Zürich

Grasshopper scoring profile: very strong

Grasshopper scores in 100% of games (5 of 5 games), while Zürich keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 games).

Zürich scoring profile: very strong

Zürich scores in 83% of games (5 of 6 games), while Grasshopper keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 games).

7Goals scored (season)9
GrasshopperZürich
12Goals conceded (season)16
GrasshopperZürich
3.8Average goals per game4.17
GrasshopperZürich
7Goals scored (last 5)8
GrasshopperZürich
12Goals conceded (last 5)14
GrasshopperZürich

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal83%
GrasshopperZürich
40%2 goals50%
GrasshopperZürich
0%3 goals17%
GrasshopperZürich
0%4 goals0%
GrasshopperZürich

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal100%
GrasshopperZürich
60%2 goals83%
GrasshopperZürich
40%3 goals33%
GrasshopperZürich
40%4 goals33%
GrasshopperZürich

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

40%BTTS at half-time17%
GrasshopperZürich
0%BTTS in both halves17%
GrasshopperZürich
20%Scored in both halves33%
GrasshopperZürich

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS83%
GrasshopperZürich
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
GrasshopperZürich
80%BTTS - last 580%
GrasshopperZürich

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
GrasshopperZürich
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
GrasshopperZürich
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
GrasshopperZürich

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
GrasshopperZürich
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
GrasshopperZürich
40%Min. 3 goals after half-time67%
GrasshopperZürich

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Grasshopper is 37% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.6 pts / game - Grasshopper · 1.17 pts / game - Zürich

Grasshopper - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing
Zürich - half-time state
33% leading17% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.6Points per game (1st half)1.17
GrasshopperZürich
1Goals scored (1st half)0.5
GrasshopperZürich
0.8Goals conceded (1st half)0.83
GrasshopperZürich
1.8Average goals (1st half)1.33
GrasshopperZürich
40%Clean sheet before half-time50%
GrasshopperZürich
20%No goal before half-time50%
GrasshopperZürich

After half-time (2nd half)

1.2Points per game (2nd half)0.67
GrasshopperZürich
0.4Goals scored (2nd half)1
GrasshopperZürich
1.6Goals conceded (2nd half)1.83
GrasshopperZürich
2Average goals (2nd half)2.83
GrasshopperZürich
40%Clean sheet after half-time0%
GrasshopperZürich
60%No goal after half-time33%
GrasshopperZürich

Grasshopper - second-half results

40% W0% D60% L
8
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 20%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.8

Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Zürich - second-half results

17% W17% D67% L
7
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+1.0

Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Grasshopper - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.20
Goals scored / game1.00.4
Goals allowed / game0.81.6
Average goals per game1.82.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+1-6
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Zürich - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.200.80
Goals scored / game0.61.0
Goals allowed / game1.01.8
Average goals per game1.62.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-2-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Grasshopper
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
3
2
31-45
0
3
46-60
1
2
61-75
1
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Zürich
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
0
2
16-30
1
3
31-45
3
2
46-60
0
5
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.99
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
2.0 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
82%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-37%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
83%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Grasshopper

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.93
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.74
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
69%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
133%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.6
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Zürich

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.99
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-1.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
132%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).

Teams vs league

GrasshopperLigaZürich
Average goals per game• 3.803.83▲ 4.17
Both teams scored▲ 80%74%▲ 83%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 60%77%▲ 100%
Clean sheets▲ 20%14%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▲ 100%80%▲ 83%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%91%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.83
Average goals per game
74%
Both teams scored
77%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
14%
Clean sheets
2.03
Home goals / game
1.80
Away goals / game
+13%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defensive advantage
+12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
9%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
91%
1 goal
69%
2 goals
43%
3 goals
17%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ZürichYellow cardAlexander Hack
  2. ZürichYellow cardLeandro Schödler
  3. GrasshopperYellow cardSamuele Bengondo
  4. ZürichSubstitutionOn: Nevio Emanuele Di GiustoOff: Alexander Hack
  5. GrasshopperYellow cardÓscar Clemente Mues
  6. GrasshopperGoalSamuel Krasniqi
  7. ZürichYellow cardKevin Spadanuda
  8. ZürichYellow cardNevio Emanuele Di Giusto
  9. ZürichSubstitutionOn: Philippe Paulin KenyOff: Kevin Spadanuda
  10. GrasshopperSubstitutionOn: Allan ArigoniOff: Nico Rissi
  11. GrasshopperSubstitutionOn: Hassane ImouraneOff: Manex Gibelalde Mujika
  12. ZürichYellow cardMiguel Raffael Reichmuth
  13. GrasshopperGoalBujar PllanaAssist: Samuel Krasniqi
  14. ZürichYellow cardDoron Lichtenstein

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Grasshopper's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 3 losses against Zürich. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Grasshopper vs Zürich?

The Super League match finished Grasshopper 2:2 Zürich. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Grasshopper and Zürich?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Grasshopper won 1, Zürich won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Grasshopper vs Zürich?

Grasshopper score 1.40 goals per game on average and Zürich 1.50. The Super League average is 3.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 77% of games. Both teams score in 80% of Grasshopper's matches and 83% of Zürich's.

What form are Grasshopper and Zürich in?

Over the last 5 games Grasshopper have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Zürich 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Grasshopper vs Zürich?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Grasshopper vs Zürich: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.