Zürich vs Grasshopper: match statistics
Zürich vs Grasshopper: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Zürich played against Grasshopper in Super League (Switzerland). The game was played on May 9, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Zürich has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Grasshopper has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Zürich scores 1.34 goals per game and allows 1.94. Grasshopper scores 1.17 and allows 1.97. Games in this league average 3.25 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 69% of Zürich's games and 57% of Grasshopper's. The Over 2.5 rates are 80% and 54%, compared with league averages of 66% for BTTS and 67% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Zürich has the higher season xG average, 1.48 to 1.43 per game. Zürich takes 13.0 shots per game, while Grasshopper takes 12.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Zürich leads at halftime in 26% of its games and scores 0.69 goals per game after halftime. Grasshopper leads at halftime in 26% and scores 0.60 after halftime.
When the teams score
Zürich's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (11 goals). For Grasshopper, it is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Super League games average 3.25 goals. Both teams score in 66% of games, and 67% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back a home win (1). Zürich has 10 wins this season versus Grasshopper’s 6 and has scored 47 goals to their 41, indicating an edge in goal output. At home Zürich averages 1.59 goals, 5.53 shots on target, xG 1.66 and 53% possession, while Grasshopper away averages 1.06 goals, 4.71 shots on target, xG 1.45 and 44% possession — a gap of 0.53 goals, 0.21 xG and 9 percentage points possession in favor of the hosts. Home shot conversion is 11% versus the visitors’ 8%, and the share of matches without scoring is 18% vs 41%, suggesting Zürich is more efficient in converting chances. Both defenses are vulnerable (Zürich concedes 1.94 goals at home vs Grasshopper’s 2.18 conceded away), and in the last 5 matches the hosts have scored 5 goals and average 0.8 points per game versus the visitors’ 3 goals and 0.6 points per game. Therefore I give Zürich a 55% chance to win, 20% for a draw and 25% for a Grasshopper win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Season-long indicators favor a BTTS outcome: Zürich has BTTS at 67%, Grasshopper 47%, and the league overall 66%, indicating a propensity for both teams to score. Both teams concede a lot — Zürich 68 and Grasshopper 69 this season, with averages of 1.78 and 2.18 goals conceded per match — which increases the likelihood both sides find the net. Attacking metrics are comparable: xG 1.40 (Zürich) vs 1.45 (Grasshopper) and on-target shots 4.0 vs 4.71, meaning Grasshopper creates chances and has a real opportunity to score despite lower conversion. There is, however, form risk — in the last 5 matches BTTS is 60% for Zürich and only 20% for Grasshopper, and Grasshopper averaged 0.6 goals in those five games, which reduces my optimism about the visitors scoring. Weighing season-long 67%/66% against the visitors’ poor recent form and low clean sheet rates of 11% and 18%, I tip BTTS - Yes at 63% vs 37% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Total xG is 1.40 (Zürich) + 1.45 (Grasshopper) = 2.85, which under a Poisson distribution yields roughly a 78% probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5). Historically both teams frequently exceed this threshold: hosts have 83% of matches Over 1.5, visitors 71% (average 77%), and in the last 5 matches Zürich scored 5 and conceded 9, while Grasshopper scored 3 and conceded 10, which supports the goal projection. Both sides show a high share of BTTS matches (Zürich 67%, Grasshopper 47%) and similar shot volumes 12.67 vs 12.88 with shots on target 4.0 vs 4.71, reinforcing the tendency for goals. Over 2.5 is only moderately likely (~54%) and Over 3.5 is weaker (~32%), therefore the strongest signal from the available data is a play on Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Seasonal metrics indicate Zürich led at the break in 6 matches (33%) versus 3 matches (18%) for Grasshopper, with average first-half goals of 0.67 for Zürich and 0.47 for the visitors, giving the home side an edge in the first half. Zürich scores on average 1.28 goals per match with an xG of 1.40 and a shot conversion of 10%, while Grasshopper concedes on average 2.18 goals per match with an opponent xG of 1.66 and a conversion rate of 8% — similar xG (1.40 vs 1.45) but clearly weaker away defense favors the hosts. Clean sheets are rare (11% for Zürich, 18% for Grasshopper), and 67% of Zürich’s matches see goals from both sides, so I expect goals and a home advantage. The last 5 matches give mixed signals — Zürich did not lead at the break in those five (0%), while Grasshopper led in 40% — nevertheless I prioritize the seasonal indicators (33% leads for Zürich and better conversion 10% vs 8%), therefore the strongest scenario is Zürich leading at half-time and winning the match (1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Zürich | Grasshopper | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Zürich is 33% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Zürich · 0.6 pts / game - Grasshopper
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Zürich is 15% better for: goals scored per game.
1.34 goals / game - Zürich · 1.17 goals / game - Grasshopper
Zürich scores in 74% of games (26 of 35 meczów), while Grasshopper keeps a clean sheet in 14% (5 of 35 meczów).
Grasshopper scores in 69% of games (24 of 35 meczów), while Zürich keeps a clean sheet in 6% (2 of 35 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Zürich
Over / Under - Grasshopper
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Zürich - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Grasshopper - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 17%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -6 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (24). Late-goal balance (76-90): -16 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Zürich
Grasshopper
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).
Teams vs league
| Zürich | Liga | Grasshopper | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 3.29 | 3.25 | ▼ 3.14 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 69% | 66% | ▼ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 80% | 67% | ▼ 54% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 6% | 19% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 77% | • 77% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 84% | • 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Zürich's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Grasshopper. Games average 2.33 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Zürich vs Grasshopper?
The Super League match finished Zürich 2:1 Grasshopper. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Zürich and Grasshopper?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Zürich won 2, Grasshopper won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Zürich vs Grasshopper?
Zürich score 1.34 goals per game on average and Grasshopper 1.17. The Super League average is 3.25 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 69% of Zürich's matches and 57% of Grasshopper's.
What form are Zürich and Grasshopper in?
Over the last 5 games Zürich have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Grasshopper 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Zürich vs Grasshopper?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Zürich vs Grasshopper: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


