Lithuania - A LygaData current as of October 21, 2026

Hegelmann Litauen vs Panevėžys: match statistics

Hegelmann Litauen vs Panevėžys: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Hegelmann Litauen played against Panevėžys in A Lyga (Lithuania). The game was played on September 7, 2026. Final score: 1:3.

Recent form

Hegelmann Litauen has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.40 points per game. Panevėžys has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Hegelmann Litauen scores 1.07 goals per game and allows 1.63. Panevėžys scores 1.04 and allows 1.56. Games in this league average 2.64 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 67% of Hegelmann Litauen's games and 48% of Panevėžys's. The Over 2.5 rates are 44% and 52%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Panevėžys has the higher season xG average, 1.27 to 1.11 per game. Hegelmann Litauen takes 9.1 shots per game, while Panevėžys takes 10.8.

First-half and second-half trends

Hegelmann Litauen leads at halftime in 22% of its games and scores 0.59 goals per game after halftime. Panevėžys leads at halftime in 41% and scores 0.41 after halftime.

When the teams score

Hegelmann Litauen's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (6 goals). For Panevėžys, it is minutes 31-45+ (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

A Lyga games average 2.64 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 7 previous meetings were available. The record was 4 home wins, 2 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.86 goals, with both teams scoring in 71% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Hegelmann Litauen draw as many as 64% of their home matches, while losing just 21% of games in front of their own supporters, which significantly increases the likelihood of a share of the points. However, the hosts are in poor current form: they have not won any of their last 5 matches, scoring 6 goals and conceding 10. Panevėžys have shown a more stable defense recently, conceding just 4 goals in their previous five appearances, but they lose 77% of their away matches and score only 0.69 goals per game. The visitors have failed to score in 54% of away fixtures, while their average xG stands at 1.13 compared with Hegelmann’s 1.23, making a low-scoring draw the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Hegelmann has a high seasonal BTTS rate of 69%, with both sides scoring in as many as 80% of their last five matches. However, Panevėžys has recorded BTTS in only 31% of its matches this season and 20% of its last five. The visitors average just 0.69 goals per match, have failed to score in 54% of their games, and register 3.08 shots on target per match compared with Hegelmann’s 4.23. Their current defense looks more solid, having conceded only 0.8 goals per match across their last five outings, which could limit the hosts to one goal or none. Hegelmann have recently conceded as many as 2.0 goals per game, but Panevėžys have a low shot conversion rate of 7%, so it is more likely that at least one team will fail to score. Therefore, the stronger pick is BTTS - No: this means that at least one team will not score, and does not automatically imply a 0:0 draw or that neither team will find the net.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Hegelmann average 1.23 goals at home, while Panevėžys concede as many as 2.23 goals away from home, which clearly supports at least one goal for the hosts. At the same time, the visitors score only 0.69 goals per match and failed to score in 54% of their games, so their attacking contribution remains limited. In their last five matches, Panevėžys conceded just 4 goals, and none of those games went Over 2.5 goals. Across the season, Hegelmann recorded Under 3.5 goals in 92% of matches, compared with 62% for Panevėžys, while the league average stands at 2.63 goals. The projected total of 2.40 goals points to value on Under 3.5 goals, as a four-goal or higher scenario would require significantly greater attacking efficiency than the visitors’ current data suggests.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal comes from current first-half form: Panevėžys led at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches, while Hegelmann were trailing at half-time in 4 of 5 games. During this period, the visitors scored an average of 0.8 goals before the break and conceded just 0.2, whereas the hosts scored only 0.2 goals and conceded 1.2. Panevėžys also have a season-long away profile in the first half that supports this scenario, as Hegelmann conceded an average of 0.46 goals before half-time, while the visitors took the lead in 23% of matches. Although Hegelmann’s season results are better, their last five rounds produced 0 wins and an average of 2.0 goals conceded per match, whereas Panevėžys averaged 1.4 points per game and conceded just 0.8 goals. After the break, the hosts improve their attacking output to 1.0 goal over their last five matches, but Panevėžys’ defense allows an average of only 0.6 goals in that period, making the most likely outcome the visitors maintaining their lead until the final whistle.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
1 : 2
Second half

Game stats

43Possession (%)57
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
12Shots7
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
5Shots on target4
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
1.61xG1.25
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
1Corners5
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
69Dangerous attacks71
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
11Fouls9
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
0Cards0
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
1.07Goals scored / game1.04
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
1.63Goals allowed / game1.56
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
43%Average possession46%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
2.96Shots on target / game3.78
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

9.07Shots per game10.78
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
2.96Shots on target3.78
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
11.8%Shot conversion9.6%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
43%Possession46%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
1.11xG for1.27
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
1.52xG against1.65
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys

Shooting quality

Hegelmann Litauen: BalancedPanevėžys: Balanced
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
Accuracy (shots on target)33%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Panevėžys is 350% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / game - Hegelmann Litauen · 1.8 pts / game - Panevėžys

Hegelmann Litauen
LLLDD
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
15% W48% D37% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-13-10
0.93 pts / game · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-9-3
Last 5 at home
0-3-2
DDLLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 0.99Opponent xG: 1.79BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Panevėžys
WLLWW
Season result split
33% W19% D48% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-5-13
1.19 pts / game · goal difference -14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-0-10
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LWLLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.66BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Hegelmann Litauen scoring profile: very strong

Hegelmann Litauen scores in 70% of games (19 of 27 games), while Panevėžys keeps a clean sheet in 22% (6 of 27 games).

Panevėžys scoring profile: very strong

Panevėžys scores in 67% of games (18 of 27 games), while Hegelmann Litauen keeps a clean sheet in 15% (4 of 27 games).

29Goals scored (season)28
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
44Goals conceded (season)42
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
2.7Average goals per game2.59
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
6Goals scored (last 5)7
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
10Goals conceded (last 5)3
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal67%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
26%2 goals30%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
11%3 goals7%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
0%4 goals0%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys

How often they concede at least...

85%1 goal78%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
48%2 goals41%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
15%3 goals26%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
7%4 goals11%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

48%
League average

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time19%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
11%BTTS in both halves7%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
19%Scored in both halves15%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys

BTTS and goal count

37%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS19%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
80%BTTS - last 50%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time81%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time41%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys

2nd half

74%Min. 1 goal after half-time74%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
48%Min. 2 goals after half-time37%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Panevėžys is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.11 pts / game - Hegelmann Litauen · 1.44 pts / game - Panevėžys

Hegelmann Litauen - half-time state
22% leading44% draw33% trailing
Panevėžys - half-time state
41% leading22% draw37% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.11Points per game (1st half)1.44
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
0.48Goals scored (1st half)0.63
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
0.81Goals conceded (1st half)0.78
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
1.3Average goals (1st half)1.41
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
44%Clean sheet before half-time48%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
63%No goal before half-time52%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys

After half-time (2nd half)

1.11Points per game (2nd half)1.04
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
0.59Goals scored (2nd half)0.41
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
0.81Goals conceded (2nd half)0.78
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
1.41Average goals (2nd half)1.19
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
41%Clean sheet after half-time48%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
48%No goal after half-time67%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys

Hegelmann Litauen - second-half results

22% W44% D33% L
30
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding68%

Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 15%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Panevėžys - second-half results

22% W37% D41% L
39
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.44
PPG before half-time
Lead holding80%

Leads at halftime in 41% of games and wins 33%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Hegelmann Litauen - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.201.60
Goals scored / game0.21.0
Goals allowed / game1.20.8
Average goals per game1.41.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet0%40%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-5+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Panevėžys - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.001.60
Goals scored / game0.80.6
Goals allowed / game0.20.4
Average goals per game1.01.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+3+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Hegelmann Litauen
ScoredConceded
3
6
0-15
6
6
16-30
4
10
31-45
6
4
46-60
6
8
61-75
4
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Panevėžys
ScoredConceded
2
9
0-15
6
5
16-30
9
7
31-45
4
6
46-60
0
5
61-75
7
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.65
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+8%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Hegelmann Litauen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.41
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
136%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.53
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Panevėžys

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+7.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.61
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).

Teams vs league

Hegelmann LitauenLigaPanevėžys
Average goals per game• 2.702.64• 2.59
Both teams scored▲ 67%48%• 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 44%53%• 52%
Clean sheets▼ 15%31%▼ 22%
Goal before half-time• 70%70%▲ 81%
Goal after half-time▼ 74%77%▼ 74%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.64
Average goals per game
48%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / game
1.20
Away goals / game
+20%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defensive advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PanevėžysSubstitutionOn: Kwadwo AsamoahOff: Valdas Paulauskas
  2. PanevėžysGoalIsaac AsanteAssist: Rokas Rasimavičius
  3. Hegelmann LitauenSubstitutionOn: Samuel Yves Oum GwetOff: Richard dos Santos Presser
  4. PanevėžysGoalErnestas Burdzilauskas
  5. PanevėžysGoalKwadwo AsamoahAssist: Dovydas Balsys
  6. Hegelmann LitauenGoalAbdoul Samad Harouna
  7. Hegelmann LitauenSubstitutionOn: Andrius KaulinisOff: Wesley Gabriel Freire Arcanjo

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Hegelmann Litauen's perspective: 4 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss against Panevėžys. Games average 2.86 goals, and both teams scored in 71% of them.

Panevėžys
1 : 1
Hegelmann Litauen
Hegelmann Litauen
3 : 2
Panevėžys
Panevėžys
1 : 1
Hegelmann Litauen
FK Panevėžys
0 : 1
FC Hegelmann Litauen Kaunas
FC Hegelmann Litauen Kaunas
3 : 1
FK Panevėžys
FK Panevėžys
3 : 0
FC Hegelmann Litauen Kaunas
FC Hegelmann Litauen Kaunas
2 : 1
FK Panevėžys

FAQ

What was the result of Hegelmann Litauen vs Panevėžys?

The A Lyga match finished Hegelmann Litauen 1:3 Panevėžys. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Hegelmann Litauen and Panevėžys?

In the last 7 head-to-head matches Hegelmann Litauen won 4, Panevėžys won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.86 goals, with both teams scoring in 71% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Hegelmann Litauen vs Panevėžys?

Hegelmann Litauen score 1.07 goals per game on average and Panevėžys 1.04. The A Lyga average is 2.64 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Hegelmann Litauen's matches and 48% of Panevėžys's.

What form are Hegelmann Litauen and Panevėžys in?

Over the last 5 games Hegelmann Litauen have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Panevėžys 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hegelmann Litauen vs Panevėžys?

The statistical background for Hegelmann Litauen vs Panevėžys — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.