Hegelmann Litauen vs Panevėžys: match statistics
Hegelmann Litauen vs Panevėžys: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Hegelmann Litauen played against Panevėžys in A Lyga (Lithuania). The game was played on September 7, 2026. Final score: 1:3.
Recent form
Hegelmann Litauen has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.40 points per game. Panevėžys has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Hegelmann Litauen scores 1.07 goals per game and allows 1.63. Panevėžys scores 1.04 and allows 1.56. Games in this league average 2.64 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 67% of Hegelmann Litauen's games and 48% of Panevėžys's. The Over 2.5 rates are 44% and 52%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Panevėžys has the higher season xG average, 1.27 to 1.11 per game. Hegelmann Litauen takes 9.1 shots per game, while Panevėžys takes 10.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Hegelmann Litauen leads at halftime in 22% of its games and scores 0.59 goals per game after halftime. Panevėžys leads at halftime in 41% and scores 0.41 after halftime.
When the teams score
Hegelmann Litauen's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (6 goals). For Panevėžys, it is minutes 31-45+ (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
A Lyga games average 2.64 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 7 previous meetings were available. The record was 4 home wins, 2 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.86 goals, with both teams scoring in 71% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Hegelmann Litauen draw as many as 64% of their home matches, while losing just 21% of games in front of their own supporters, which significantly increases the likelihood of a share of the points. However, the hosts are in poor current form: they have not won any of their last 5 matches, scoring 6 goals and conceding 10. Panevėžys have shown a more stable defense recently, conceding just 4 goals in their previous five appearances, but they lose 77% of their away matches and score only 0.69 goals per game. The visitors have failed to score in 54% of away fixtures, while their average xG stands at 1.13 compared with Hegelmann’s 1.23, making a low-scoring draw the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Hegelmann has a high seasonal BTTS rate of 69%, with both sides scoring in as many as 80% of their last five matches. However, Panevėžys has recorded BTTS in only 31% of its matches this season and 20% of its last five. The visitors average just 0.69 goals per match, have failed to score in 54% of their games, and register 3.08 shots on target per match compared with Hegelmann’s 4.23. Their current defense looks more solid, having conceded only 0.8 goals per match across their last five outings, which could limit the hosts to one goal or none. Hegelmann have recently conceded as many as 2.0 goals per game, but Panevėžys have a low shot conversion rate of 7%, so it is more likely that at least one team will fail to score. Therefore, the stronger pick is BTTS - No: this means that at least one team will not score, and does not automatically imply a 0:0 draw or that neither team will find the net.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Hegelmann average 1.23 goals at home, while Panevėžys concede as many as 2.23 goals away from home, which clearly supports at least one goal for the hosts. At the same time, the visitors score only 0.69 goals per match and failed to score in 54% of their games, so their attacking contribution remains limited. In their last five matches, Panevėžys conceded just 4 goals, and none of those games went Over 2.5 goals. Across the season, Hegelmann recorded Under 3.5 goals in 92% of matches, compared with 62% for Panevėžys, while the league average stands at 2.63 goals. The projected total of 2.40 goals points to value on Under 3.5 goals, as a four-goal or higher scenario would require significantly greater attacking efficiency than the visitors’ current data suggests.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal comes from current first-half form: Panevėžys led at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches, while Hegelmann were trailing at half-time in 4 of 5 games. During this period, the visitors scored an average of 0.8 goals before the break and conceded just 0.2, whereas the hosts scored only 0.2 goals and conceded 1.2. Panevėžys also have a season-long away profile in the first half that supports this scenario, as Hegelmann conceded an average of 0.46 goals before half-time, while the visitors took the lead in 23% of matches. Although Hegelmann’s season results are better, their last five rounds produced 0 wins and an average of 2.0 goals conceded per match, whereas Panevėžys averaged 1.4 points per game and conceded just 0.8 goals. After the break, the hosts improve their attacking output to 1.0 goal over their last five matches, but Panevėžys’ defense allows an average of only 0.6 goals in that period, making the most likely outcome the visitors maintaining their lead until the final whistle.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Hegelmann Litauen | Panevėžys | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Panevėžys is 350% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / game - Hegelmann Litauen · 1.8 pts / game - Panevėžys
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Hegelmann Litauen scores in 70% of games (19 of 27 games), while Panevėžys keeps a clean sheet in 22% (6 of 27 games).
Panevėžys scores in 67% of games (18 of 27 games), while Hegelmann Litauen keeps a clean sheet in 15% (4 of 27 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Hegelmann Litauen
Over / Under - Panevėžys
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Panevėžys is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.11 pts / game - Hegelmann Litauen · 1.44 pts / game - Panevėžys
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Hegelmann Litauen - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 15%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Panevėžys - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 41% of games and wins 33%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -5 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Hegelmann Litauen
Panevėžys
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).
Teams vs league
| Hegelmann Litauen | Liga | Panevėžys | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.70 | 2.64 | • 2.59 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 48% | • 48% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 53% | • 52% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 15% | 31% | ▼ 22% |
| Goal before half-time | • 70% | 70% | ▲ 81% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 74% | 77% | ▼ 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Hegelmann Litauen's perspective: 4 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss against Panevėžys. Games average 2.86 goals, and both teams scored in 71% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Hegelmann Litauen vs Panevėžys?
The A Lyga match finished Hegelmann Litauen 1:3 Panevėžys. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Hegelmann Litauen and Panevėžys?
In the last 7 head-to-head matches Hegelmann Litauen won 4, Panevėžys won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.86 goals, with both teams scoring in 71% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Hegelmann Litauen vs Panevėžys?
Hegelmann Litauen score 1.07 goals per game on average and Panevėžys 1.04. The A Lyga average is 2.64 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Hegelmann Litauen's matches and 48% of Panevėžys's.
What form are Hegelmann Litauen and Panevėžys in?
Over the last 5 games Hegelmann Litauen have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Panevėžys 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hegelmann Litauen vs Panevėžys?
The statistical background for Hegelmann Litauen vs Panevėžys — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


